'He Was Juvenile In 1988': Man, Now 53, Gets 3 Years' Punishment For Rape
Thirty-seven years after he raped an 11-year-old girl, a 53-year-old man has been referred to the Juvenile Justice Board after the Supreme Court found he was a juvenile at the time of the incident. The Board can send the man to a special home for a maximum of three years.
A bench of Chief Justice of India BR Gavai and Justice Augustine George Masih was hearing the man's challenge to his conviction by the trial court and the Rajasthan High Court. The lower court had convicted him under Section 342 (wrongful confinement) and Section 376 (rape) and sentenced him to a three-year jail term. The high court upheld this.
The counsel for the accused told the Supreme Court, for the first time in the case, that the accused was a juvenile at the time of the incident, which occurred in the Ajmer district on November 17, 1988.
The court noted that the prosecution's case is not just based on the survivor's testimony, but "amply supported by the statements of other witnesses and corroborating medical evidence, all of which collectively establish the case of the prosecution". The court said the findings about the conviction "stand duly established beyond doubt," and the earlier judgments cannot be faulted.
The court said the convict's claim that he was a juvenile at the time of the incident was found to be correct. While the Rajasthan government counsel objected to the convict seeking relief as a juvenile after so many years, the top court noted that earlier judgments have "categorically held that the plea of juvenility can be raised before any court and has to be recognised at any stage, even after disposal of the case". "Consequently, the sentence as imposed by the Trial Court and upheld by the High Court will have to be set aside, as the same cannot sustain," the court said.
The bench referred the matter to the Juvenile Justice Board for appropriate orders. The board can send the 53-year-old man to a special home for a maximum of three years.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
3 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Raigad police bust huge cyber fraud racket, arrest 11, seize 6,175 SIM cards
NAVI MUMBAI: In a significant breakthrough, the Raigad cyber police have dismantled a cyber fraud operation with nationwide and international links. Eleven individuals have been arrested for their involvement in the racket, which targeted elderly citizens by using fake identities of central government and law enforcement officials. Raigad police bust huge cyber fraud racket, arrest 11, seize 6,175 SIM cards The gang operated using telecom-grade SIP (Session Initiation Protocol) infrastructure to impersonate officials from agencies such as the CBI, Supreme Court and cyber police. The case came to light after a Raigad resident filed a complaint on May 23, stating that he had been defrauded of ₹66 lakh. 'He received multiple WhatsApp and voice calls from fraudsters posing as central government officials, who accused him of money laundering and threatened to arrest him unless he paid a hefty fine,' said the investigating officer. 'Under psychological pressure, the victim transferred the money to several accounts over a span of several days.' The investigation led the police to a Central Bank account held by Abdus Salam Barbhuyan, through which the stolen funds had been routed. 'Further digital tracking pointed to a company named Nivi Cloud Pvt Ltd, hosted at the Yotta Data Centre in Panvel,' said superintendent of police Anchal Dalal. 'The listed director, Vineet Duva, was discovered to be a fake identity.' The police arrested Nadeem Ahmed, Laraib Khan, Shadan Khan and Mohd Faisal Khan, four men from Shahganj, Jaunpur (UP), who were allegedly manufacturing fake KYC documents. The documents were reportedly made with the help of two Jio sales managers, Vinay Kumar Rao and Gangadhar Muttan. 'The duo procured SIP lines in the names of shell companies. These lines were then used to make fraudulent calls across India,' said the officer. At the centre of the racket was Abhay Santprakash Mishra, a BTech graduate from Hardoi, Uttar Pradesh. He worked as an aggregator, setting up multiple servers to operate both domestic and international SIP lines. 'Mishra's network was found to have ties to Pakistan, Canada, Nepal, China, and Bangladesh. He was also found attempting to secure fake documents for Nepalese citizenship,' said Dalal. The investigation revealed that one of the servers operated by Mishra had made over 6.2 million calls in just 28 days, including 87,000 to target victims in Maharashtra. Upon his arrest, the authorities recovered 35 mobile phones, laptops, tablets, VPN equipment and documents related to 112 bank accounts. The police have also seized cryptocurrency worth ₹85 lakh as well as real estate assets, including a flat in Noida, two shops in Hardoi and a bungalow in Nepal. In a related arrest, Mohsin Mia Khan was apprehended in Delhi with 6,175 SIM cards from providers such as Jio, Airtel, VI and several foreign telecom companies. He had 26 mobile phones and admitted to supplying SIM cards for use in cyber fraud activities. The police have also arrested Shams Tahir Khan, an MBA from Rajasthan, who helped market and sell illegal SIP connections.
Indian Express
3 hours ago
- Indian Express
Chhattisgarh conversion row and violence on Pune family: Rule of the mob
Two incidents, a day apart, show the police in two states, Chhattisgarh and Maharashtra, in poor light. They failed to uphold a basic precept of modern governance — only law enforcement agencies have the power to detain and question suspects and investigate crime, and they must also do so only according to due process. Last week, policemen in these two states appear to have acted at the behest of the mob. On July 25, the Chhattisgarh police arrested three people, including two nuns, on charges of forced conversion and human trafficking. Reports in this paper have raised questions about the neutrality of the law enforcers in a situation rife with tension. Instead of calming tempers and probing the charges, the Chhattisgarh police drew up their FIR almost entirely on the basis of statements of Bajrang Dal members. One of the women at the centre of the row later admitted she was coerced by a member of a right-wing outfit to give a statement against the accused. A day after the Chhattisgarh arrests, a group of around 60-70 people, several of them allegedly belonging to the Bajrang Dal, barged into the house of a Kargil War veteran's relative in Pune, demanded identity proofs from the family, and called them Bangladeshis. The police personnel present at the site participated in the humiliation of the family by taking them to a police station in the dead of the night. The Supreme Court has, on several occasions, underlined the dangers of mob vigilantism. But whether in cow protection cases or in matters related to religious conversion, or now in the increasingly contentious issue of illegal migration, law enforcement agencies show a disturbing tendency to let self-proclaimed community leaders take over. The Pune incident reportedly occurred after a 'tip-off' about Bangladeshis in the city. The role of the Bajrang Dal in this episode — as well as in the conversion-related arrests in Chhattisgarh — points to the same worrying tendency of the state law enforcement apparatus ceding vital space to vigilantes. On more than one occasion, including in December last year, Prime Minister Narendra Modi has underlined the contributions of the Catholic community in social welfare. Instances such as the episode in Chhattisgarh pose question marks on that outreach. It's also a cruel irony that at a time when members of all political parties are applauding the valour of the armed forces in Operation Sindoor, a war veteran's relatives were targeted with impunity. The police in Chhattisgarh and Maharashtra have much to answer for.
Hindustan Times
4 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
SC to first test maintainability for reopening 2022 PMLA verdict
New Delhi The Supreme Court on Thursday said it will first examine whether the review petitions filed against its 2022 judgment in the Vijay Madanlal Choudhary case, which upheld the Enforcement Directorate's sweeping powers under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), are legally maintainable before proceeding to consider the substantive issues raised by the petitioners. The bench posted the matter for hearing on August 6, making it clear that the preliminary objections raised by ED must be addressed first. (ANI PHOTO) A three-judge bench led by Justice Surya Kant emphasised that the scope of a review jurisdiction hinges on certain fixed parameters and therefore, the petitioners demanding a reconsideration of the 2022 judgment must cross the first hurdle of maintainability. 'Since the proposed issues are arising in the review proceedings, we propose to first hear the parties on the issue of maintainability of the review petitions followed by a hearing on the questions proposed to be raised on behalf of the review petitioners. Eventually, the questions that would finally arise for consideration will also be determined by us if we hold that the review petitions are maintainable,' noted the bench, also comprising justices Ujjal Bhuyan and N Kotiswar Singh, hearing a bunch of petitions seeking a complete review of the impugned judgment. The bench posted the matter for hearing on August 6, making it clear that the preliminary objections raised by ED must be addressed first. 'Review has limitations…You will (petitioners) proceed on the premise as if the entire matter has been reopened... but they (ED) are justified in raising preliminary issues… first what we will suggest is you address preliminary issues,' the bench told senior advocates Kapil Sibal, Abhishek Manu Singhvi and Vikram Chaudhri, leading counsel for the petitioners in the matter. The court's observation came during a brief hearing on the clutch of review petitions filed against the Vijay Madanlal Choudhary ruling, a decision that has since become a constitutional flashpoint for its endorsement of the ED's broad powers related to arrest, search, seizure and the attachment of property. ED, represented by Additional Solicitor General SV Raju, argued that the review jurisdiction of the court is narrow and cannot be used as a backdoor to file an appeal. Raising three preliminary objections, the ASG contended that the review petitions must be dismissed unless they clearly demonstrate an 'error apparent on the face of the record' in the 2022 verdict. He read out the three objections framed by the agency -- Whether the review petitions meet the threshold of an 'error apparent on the face of the record; whether the petitions amount to an appeal in disguise and whether the review can be confined only to two issues, as mandated by the court's August 25, 2022 order. By the August 2022 order, the top court had agreed to take a re-look at only two issues -- the supply of the Enforcement Case Information Report (ECIR) to the accused and the constitutionality of the reverse burden of proof under Section 24 of the PMLA. The 2022 order issuing notice in the review petition, filed by Congress lawmaker Karti Chidambaram, had noted that these two issues required reconsideration. During the hearing, Sibal contested the ED's claim that the review was limited to two issues, pointing out that no such restriction was recorded in the August 2022 order. He also urged the bench to tag a separate but related batch of cases, where the correctness of the Vijay Madanlal verdict had been raised, with the current review proceedings. That batch had remained dormant following the retirement of Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul in December 2023. In this batch of petitions, sections 50 and 63 of the PMLA have been assailed, besides a reconsideration of the entire 2022 judgment. These sections relate to the Enforcement Directorate's (ED) powers to summon witnesses, extract confessions and prosecute for providing false information. Responding, Justice Kant advised Sibal to mention the matter before the Chief Justice of India to seek listing of that batch. The petitioners, in their list of 13 issues submitted to the court, have sought reconsideration of key aspects of its 2022 ruling, arguing that the judgment diluted the offence of money laundering by misreading a pertinent provision, retrospectively applied the law in violation of fundamental rights, and wrongly upheld the ED's powers to compel statements under Section 50, undermining protections against self-incrimination. They have also challenged the court's classification of ED officers as non-police personnel, non-supply of the ECIR to the accused, constitutional validity of the reverse burden of proof for securing bail, which, they claim, strips accused persons of basic due process safeguards.
