Raigad police bust huge cyber fraud racket, arrest 11, seize 6,175 SIM cards
The gang operated using telecom-grade SIP (Session Initiation Protocol) infrastructure to impersonate officials from agencies such as the CBI, Supreme Court and cyber police.
The case came to light after a Raigad resident filed a complaint on May 23, stating that he had been defrauded of ₹66 lakh. 'He received multiple WhatsApp and voice calls from fraudsters posing as central government officials, who accused him of money laundering and threatened to arrest him unless he paid a hefty fine,' said the investigating officer. 'Under psychological pressure, the victim transferred the money to several accounts over a span of several days.'
The investigation led the police to a Central Bank account held by Abdus Salam Barbhuyan, through which the stolen funds had been routed. 'Further digital tracking pointed to a company named Nivi Cloud Pvt Ltd, hosted at the Yotta Data Centre in Panvel,' said superintendent of police Anchal Dalal. 'The listed director, Vineet Duva, was discovered to be a fake identity.'
The police arrested Nadeem Ahmed, Laraib Khan, Shadan Khan and Mohd Faisal Khan, four men from Shahganj, Jaunpur (UP), who were allegedly manufacturing fake KYC documents. The documents were reportedly made with the help of two Jio sales managers, Vinay Kumar Rao and Gangadhar Muttan. 'The duo procured SIP lines in the names of shell companies. These lines were then used to make fraudulent calls across India,' said the officer.
At the centre of the racket was Abhay Santprakash Mishra, a BTech graduate from Hardoi, Uttar Pradesh. He worked as an aggregator, setting up multiple servers to operate both domestic and international SIP lines. 'Mishra's network was found to have ties to Pakistan, Canada, Nepal, China, and Bangladesh. He was also found attempting to secure fake documents for Nepalese citizenship,' said Dalal.
The investigation revealed that one of the servers operated by Mishra had made over 6.2 million calls in just 28 days, including 87,000 to target victims in Maharashtra. Upon his arrest, the authorities recovered 35 mobile phones, laptops, tablets, VPN equipment and documents related to 112 bank accounts. The police have also seized cryptocurrency worth ₹85 lakh as well as real estate assets, including a flat in Noida, two shops in Hardoi and a bungalow in Nepal.
In a related arrest, Mohsin Mia Khan was apprehended in Delhi with 6,175 SIM cards from providers such as Jio, Airtel, VI and several foreign telecom companies. He had 26 mobile phones and admitted to supplying SIM cards for use in cyber fraud activities. The police have also arrested Shams Tahir Khan, an MBA from Rajasthan, who helped market and sell illegal SIP connections.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
37 minutes ago
- Time of India
FIR finally registered against unidentified policemen in Somnath Suryawanshi custodial death case
Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar: Three days after the Supreme Court upheld the directive of the Aurangabad bench of the Bombay high court — to register an FIR in the Somnath Suryawanshi custodial death case — the Parbhani police finally registered an FIR late on Friday under BNS Section 103 (1) for punishment for murder against unidentified policemen of the New Mondha police station. The FIR follows eight months and several rounds of hearings in the Bombay high court and Supreme Court after the alleged custodial death of 35-year-old law student Suryawanshi. His mother, 60-year-old Vijayabai Suryawanshi, is the complainant in the case. In her complaint, Vijayabai said on the morning of Dec 15, 2024, she received a phone call informing her that Somnath had died of a heart attack, and she was told to go to Parbhani to collect the body. When she was near Parbhani, she was informed that the body had been shifted to the Aurangabad Govt Medical College and Hospital (GMCH). On the way, Vijayabai alleged that she was stopped by the Parbhani police and taken to the SP's office, where a senior officer told her, "We did not kill your son. He died of a heart attack. We will help you. We can offer police training to one of your sons. Take the body and go." Vijayabai said in her complaint that she refused the offer and proceeded to Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar, where a postmortem was conducted on her son's body. Social activists present at the hospital informed her that the report indicated that Somnath had died of injuries caused by the police assault. In the FIR, she alleged that her son was subjected to three days of continuous assault in the lockup at New Mondha police station, and this lead to his death. She alleged that the officers and constables of the New Mondha police station were responsible for her son's death. The Supreme Court's division bench, comprising Justice M M Sundresh and Justice Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh, in its order dated July 30, clarified that the Bombay HC's direction to register an FIR in the matter should be construed as a mandate to investigate the crime, not necessarily to name any specific officer unless their role is established. State govt on July 10 moved the Supreme Court against the HC order of July 4, but after three adjournments, the apex court upheld the HC's order to register an FIR. During this entire appeal period, there was no stay on the high court order that required the Parbhani police to register the FIR within a week, by July 11. On Dec 11, 2024, protests and a riot broke out in Parbhani over reports of an alleged desecration of a replica of the Indian Constitution. Somnath, a law student residing with his family in Pune and pursuing his studies at a college in Parbhani, was among the people arrested by the police in connection with the rioting case. After his initial custody remand, he was sent to jail in magisterial custody but succumbed on Dec 15, to injuries sustained in alleged police brutalities. His mother, Vijayabai Suryawanshi, filed a petition in the HC seeking registration of an FIR against the policemen responsible for the alleged brutality. On July 4, the high court, while observing in an interim order that there was "prima facie material" indicating "custodial brutality and violation of constitutional rights," directed the FIR to be registered at Mondha police station in Parbhani district within a week, by July 11. The FIR is based on a complaint application of Dec 18, 2024, by Vijayabai. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Friendship Day wishes , messages and quotes !
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
SC sets aside HC order granting anticipatory bail on condition to resume conjugal life
New Delhi: The Supreme Court has set aside an order of the Jharkhand High Court which granted anticipatory bail to a man on a condition that he would resume conjugal life with his wife and maintain her with dignity and honour. A bench of Justices Dipankar Datta and Augustine George Masih noted that the man was an accused in a case registered under various sections of the erstwhile Indian Penal Code and under the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961. "While considering the application for pre-arrest bail of the appellant, the court ought to have assessed whether the discretionary relief sought by the appellant for pre-arrest bail deserved to be granted within the settled parameters… but a condition such as the one impugned before us ought not to have been imposed in view of several decisions of this court," the bench said in its July 29 order. It said the high court should have considered the prayer for pre-arrest bail entirely on its own merit instead of imposing a condition, which is not traceable to section 438(2) of the erstwhile Code of Criminal Procedure. The apex court passed the order on a plea challenging a February 2025 order of the high court which had granted the prayer for pre-arrest bail on condition that the man resumes conjugal life with his wife and maintains her with dignity and honour as his lawful wife. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Cardiologists: Teaspoon On an Empty Stomach Slims Waist from 36 To 22 Health Wellness Journal Learn more Undo During the hearing before the top court, the counsel appearing for the woman said the man, together with her, had jointly submitted before the high court that he was willing to resume his conjugal life. The lawyer contended that the man cannot now turn around and take a different stand. The bench said the counsel was partly right in the sense that the man had indeed agreed to resume conjugal life. "However, the respondent no.2 (woman) insisted for imposition of a further condition to which we do not find the appellant (man) to have agreed. The spouses seemingly, at one point of time, had drifted apart and resided separately for some time. Imposing a condition that the appellant would maintain the respondent no.2 with dignity and honour is beset with risk in that it can generate further litigation," the bench said. It said an application for cancellation of bail on the ground that such condition has not been complied with, if filed later, is bound to meet opposition from the man and could place the high court in further difficulty. "The impugned judgment and order, accordingly, stands set aside. The appeal is allowed," the bench said. It restored the anticipatory bail application on the file of the high court and asked it to decide it afresh on its own merits, as early as possible. The bench said till such time the matter is decided finally by the high court, the interim protection granted to the man by the top court earlier would continue. In its interim direction passed earlier, the top court had said the man be not arrested in connection with the case subject to his joining investigation as and when called upon to do so by the investigating officer. PTI Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Friendship Day wishes , messages and quotes !
The Print
2 hours ago
- The Print
NEET-UG 2024 leak ‘mastermind' Sanjeev Mukhiya gets bail as CBI fails to file chargesheet in 90 days
Mukhiya was taken into custody by the agency in April this year, days after the Bihar Police Economic Offences Unit arrested him for his alleged role in the paper leak. He will continue to remain lodged in Beur jail as he faces charges in at least three other cases—Teacher Recruitment Examination conducted by Bihar Public Service Commission in early 2024, Bihar Police Constable Recruitment examination of 2023, and CGL examination of Jharkhand. According to sources aware of the development, the chargesheet against him has been delayed as there are 'doubts' about his involvement in the organised syndicate that allegedly compromised the examination last year. New Delhi: Sanjeev Kumar Singh alias 'Mukhiya', the alleged kingpin behind the leak of the NEET-UG 2024 examination, has secured default bail as the Central Bureau of Investigation did not file a chargesheet in the stipulated time of 90 days, ThePrint has learnt. The NEET-UG case was first probed by Patna Police, which intercepted a car carrying some members of an organised gang involved in the leak of question papers of a competitive exam. As the probe developed and the angle of an organised racket emerged, the Bihar government handed over the probe to EOU. The case subsequently went to the CBI, which had registered a case on 23 June last year, following a recommendation by the Ministry of Education amid protests and claims that the question paper of the NEET examination held on 5 May had been leaked. Over the course of the investigation, the agency filed five chargesheets against 45 accused till November 2024. Mukhiya was the only named suspect, who didn't get arrested by the agency until May this year. The CBI invoked Sections 120B (criminal conspiracy), 109 (abetment), 409 (criminal Breach of Trust), 420 (cheating), 380 (theft), 201 (causing disappearance of evidence), and 411 (dishonestly receiving stolen property) of the Indian Penal Code, and Section 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(a) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (as amended in 2018) against all accused persons. As the agency did not file a chargesheet against him within 90 days, Mukhiya moved an application for default bail before a Special CBI court in Patna, and Special Judge Sunil Kumar granted him bail Thursday. ThePrint has previously reported how Mukhiya's name surfaced in the leakage of question papers of other examinations in Bihar and Jharkhand, even before the NEET-UG paper leak. His son Shiv Kumar, who has an MBBS degree from Patna Medical College and Hospital, was also arrested by Bihar Police in the 2024 Bihar Public Service Commission Teacher Recruitment Exam case, besides a 2017 leak of the NEET-UG question paper. (Edited by Mannat Chugh) Also Read: MCOCA, 'confessions' & a bomb bike with no owner: How NIA cast doubt on ATS's Malegaon blast probe
