The Bold and the Beautiful spoilers: Deacon and Sheila question Luna's death?
Now that Sheila has been told that Luna didn't survive surgery on The Bold and the Beautiful, will she and Deacon accept her loss, or will they start to ask more questions?
If Deacon (Sean Kanan) hadn't persisted with questioning Sheila's (Kimberlin Brown) death (nine toes for the win!), then they never would have discovered that Sugar, Sheila's body double, was keeping Sheila locked up.
We have to think that Sheila will want to see Luna's (Lisa Yamada) body, but if Li (Naomi Matsuda) took Luna away, then there will be no body to be seen. This will likely lead both Sheila and Deacon to start asking questions. And when there are no logical answers to those questions, then Sheila and Deacon will have even more reasons to wonder what's really going on.
For Deacon, not knowing Luna's whereabouts is more of an issue of personal safety. He knows she's dangerous, and he knows that everyone he loves is a target, including Sheila, because Luna already shot Sheila. So what's to stop her from doing it again? Unlike his quest to find Sheila, which was rooted in his love for her, Deacon asking questions will be more about finding out where she really is to keep people safe.
At the moment, Sheila is probably the only person who truly cares about the fate of her granddaughter. Oddly enough, Luna's other grandmother (and also aunt), Li, suddenly sprouted feelings for the young woman and seems to be on a journey to give Luna a fresh start at life by sneaking her out of the hospital. (This is pure speculation, but we have to think Li took Luna somewhere to keep her from going back to jail and used the 'she died in recovery' excuse to cover it up.)
Sheila would be a great accomplice for Li. She's going to need help with Luna's recovery, and Sheila would be willing to step in, so long as Deacon isn't aware of it. It's hard to imagine a world where Li and Sheila would work together, but then again, we never imagined Li having any sympathy for Luna, either.
The Bold and the Beautiful airs weekdays on CBS and the following day on Paramount Plus. Check your local listings to see when it comes on where you are.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
a few seconds ago
- New York Times
Kurt Warner to be lead NFL game analyst for YouTube's Christmas Day Game: Sources
With a little more than a month until its first exclusive NFL regular-season game, YouTube signed Hall of Famer Kurt Warner as its lead game analyst, but is still in search of a play-by-play caller, according to sources briefed on the discussions. YouTube is expected to put its mark on the Sept. 5 game between the Kansas City Chiefs and the Los Angeles Chargers. It will likely have some of its biggest personalities hosting 'Watch Along' type streams, where viewers potentially experience the game with YouTube influencers. Advertisement 'We'll do it in a way that only YouTube can, with an interactive viewing experience and creators right at the center of the experience,' said Mary Ellen Coe, chief business officer of YouTube, in a release for the official game announcement. A YouTube spokesperson declined to comment on Warner's signing. On the traditional broadcast, which will likely garner the most views globally, Warner will provide the commentary. Warner is the lead 'Monday Night Football' analyst for Westwood One Radio, calling the Super Bowl every season, and does about seven games for NFL Network. Play-by-play caller Rich Eisen joins Warner on the NFL Network's games. YouTube is expected to find a play-by-play caller, but its search has been made more difficult because most network-level football announcers have games on opening weekend. The Chiefs and Chargers face off on Friday, Sept. 5, which basically eliminates all college and NFL broadcasters, who have games on Thursday, Saturday and Sunday. Networks have also been more hesitant to help out the streamers, though NBC is handling the production for YouTube for a fee. Last season, ESPN, CBS, Fox and NBC provided broadcasters to Netflix on Christmas Day, but this season, they have been reluctant to loan out their big personalities. CBS, which is handling the production for Netflix, has been willing. The Athletic previously reported that CBS' Nate Burleson and Matt Ryan are in the mix for Netflix's doubleheader, while the non-network affiliated Drew Brees has signed as a game analyst.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Forget The Studio –Seth Rogen's other Apple TV+ show is back next
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. I'm a huge fan of Seth Rogen's work with Apple TV+ – which is to say, I absolutely loved The Studio. I think it's one of the most exciting new shows for years, not least because it captures some of the spirit of Curb Your Enthusiasm with its deliberately awkward cameos and caricatures of celebrities. I'll hold my hands up, though, and admit that I haven't watched the other show Rogen made with Apple TV+, which came out a good while before The Studio. In fact, Platonic is now about to get its second season, starring Rogen opposite the terrific Rose Byrne as their rekindled friendship continues with more hijinks. The show's all about the ruts that we can find ourselves in as adult life takes its toll – it's not very hard to wake up and realise that you haven't actually spoken to someone you used to call one of your best friends for years. The first season saw Rogen and Byrne's characters reconnect and realise that they still had more in common than they might have thought. Now, their friendship might just be going to the next level in a new season. It'll feature the two of them trying to make their relationship less exclusionary to their partners and friends, folding them into activities in an attempt to retain a healthy balance between the various parts of their lives. Image 1 of 5 Image 2 of 5 Image 3 of 5 Image 4 of 5 Image 5 of 5 As glimpsed in the teaser trailer last month, that'll involve going golfing with disastrous consequences, but also Rogen attempting to bond with Byrne's gym-happy fitness enthusiast of a partner, and the start of "couple's dinners" to cement things. It's a balancing act that will clearly leave a lot of room for slapstick, too. So, I know what my job is now – I've added the first season of Platonic to my watchlist on Apple TV+ (which I think is the best streaming service going), and I'll be trying to catch up with it when I have a chance. The new season starts on 6 August, so I'm not sure I'll make that date, but it's nice to know I've got more goodness in store. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Weapons Review: 2025 Has Been Remarkable For Horror Movies, And This Is The Best One Yet
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. There are no 'rules' in storytelling that can't be creatively and successfully broken, and writer/director Zach Cregger wonderfully demonstrated that with his 2022 horror debut Barbarian. Spending 40 minutes setting up one narrative only to pivot to a completely new protagonist with no relation to the previous story seems like a preposterous way to structure a movie, but what might be perceived as its most challenging aspect is actually its greatest strength, as the film successfully blindsides the audience in such a way as to release all expectations and open them to any wild surprise that might be coming next. Weapons Release Date: August 8, 2025Directed By: Zach CreggerWritten By: Zach CreggerStarring: Julia Garner, Josh Brolin, Alden Ehrenreich, Austin Abrams, Benedict Wong, Cary Christopher, June Diane Raphael, Toby Huss, and Amy MadiganRating: R for strong bloody violence and grisly images, language throughout, some sexual content and drug useRuntime: 128 minutes This successful audacity has helped pave the path for Cregger's second genre venture, which is not only even more audacious, but more successful – in that it's not just 'good' or even 'great,' but phenomenal. We may now be only a little more than halfway through the year, but I am wholly confident that Weapons will be remembered as one of the best films of 2025 and regarded as one of its most spectacular big screen experiences. It weaves together in a way as to always keep you in the dark about what is coming next, unfurling a collection of character-centric, overlapping vignettes that each contribute to the epic larger picture. And as it keeps you on the hook, it jabs at you with spikes of terror and horror (along with some laughs) that will have you jumping and yelping. Set in the fictional small town of Maybrook, the movie begins one month into a mystery that has devastated the local community. On a random weekday in the middle of the night, all but one of the children in a single third grade classroom arose from their beds, left their homes, and went running out into the night without leaving a trace. While authorities have some video footage courtesy of doorbell cameras – the kids seen creepily running at full tilt with their arms angled out at their sides – they are baffled by the development, as there is no evidence of any kind of coordination or planned abduction. The parents of the 17 boys and girls are all confused and scared, and a prime target of their angst is Justine Gandy (Julia Garner), their teacher. Justine has a history of misconduct and, unbeknownst to anybody, an unaddressed drinking problem, but she cares about what happened to her students as much as anyone, and when she is put on administrative leave, she doesn't stay at home and do nothing. She instead starts a bit of independent investigating, and shocking discoveries she makes see her story collide with those of Archer, a grieving father (Josh Brolin); Paul, an ex-boyfriend/beat cop (Alden Ehrenreich); James, a meth-addicted thief (Austin Abrams); Marcus, the school principal (Benedict Wong); and Alex, the only kid in Justine's class who didn't disappear (Cary Christopher). As he did with Barbarian, Zach Cregger uses an unorthodox structure to tell a wicked and horrifying tale. Weapons holds on dearly to its secrets and successfully maintains the answer to its core mystery until its closing act full of wild revelation, but the film's brilliance is offering teases and stakes purely through its characters. It starts with Justine, who is a flawed individual, but the love she has for her kids is very real (made particularly palpable by Julia Garner's outstanding performance), and her investment and care becomes ours. She is stubborn and smart, and makes some key discoveries as she follows her instincts. And just as pieces are starting to slot together... Zach Cregger keeps you hungry by switching protagonists and adding whole new dimensions to the puzzle with different insights and clues unearthed by Archer – whose entire life has become background noise as he desperately hunts to figure out what happened to his son. But what makes Weapons so cool and special is that it's not simply a Rashomon-esque collection of perspectives on the same incidents; it can be more accurately described as an anthology film with a single continuity and linked characters. Paul is romantically entangled with Justine (and 'entangled' is definitely the right word to describe their collective messiness), but he isn't assigned to the case with the missing children and has his own disasters that he has to try and deal with. His story is great and compelling in its own right as he desperately tries to mop up conflicts of his own creation… but his narrative also gets sideswiped and caught up in the big picture chaos growing in Maybrook. It's all sewn together with remarkable panache and confidence, as Cregger delights in toying with his audience – perfectly evidenced by the excited gasps that are evoked each time one segment ends and the next one begins. It's layered in a way as to have you constantly asking new questions to yourself and pondering how certain cliffhangers are going to be resolved, keeping you hooked at every second, and each answer it offers is blissfully satisfying. There is a point in the final act where the pacing slows because the movie needs to fill in some vital gaps, but it's in service of keeping an eye on the prize: the unholy and explosive finale is unequivocally one of the most magnificent things I've seen on the big screen in recent years. I hesitate to even describe the complex tone of the finale as to avoid spoiling anything about what audiences are going to experience, but I will tease it by saying that I can't remember the last time I sat in a theater full of adults and witnessed such a wild reaction to a film. Weapons is full of scary and unforgettable terrors. You've probably guessed by this point, but Weapons is not just made with spellbinding story construction; it's also beautifully scary and unnerving. In collaboration with cinematographer Larkin Seiple and editor Joe Murphy (the latter a Barbarian reunion), Zach Cregger demonstrates an adept eye for lingering horrific images and stabbing jump scares that lift you out of your seat but never feel cheap. Unflinching moments of brutality and gore will drop your jaw, but you'll also be stunned by moments of extended stillness and silence. The cast deserves immense credit as well, as the genuine terror felt by the characters becomes our own (Josh Brolin delivers an all-timer 'What the fuck?!' after being on the receiving end of a monstrous jolt), and while the less said, the better in this spoiler-free space, I am compelled to throw a special spotlight on the work of Amy Madigan, who will be REMEMBERED. As a horror fan, I feel as though I am being blissfully spoiled thus far in 2025. From Drew Hancock's Companion, to Osgood Perkins' The Monkey, to Ryan Coogler's Sinners, to James Ashcroft's The Rule Of Jenny Pen, to Zach Lipovsky and Adam Stein's Final Destination: Bloodlines, to Danny and Michael Philippou's Bring Her Back, to Danny Boyle's 28 Years Later, the genre has been the great cinematic highlight of the calendar year, and Weapons is the best new release yet. It's intimate while also being epic, it's scary while expertly utilizing humor as punctuation, and even the most dedicated cinephiles will be rocked by its surprises. It's perfect and a must-see. Solve the daily Crossword
