
How Organised Crime Is Carving Up Capital
New Delhi: Delhi's underworld is home to a multitude of notorious gangs — 95, to be specific — as the Centre informed Supreme Court on Thursday. TOI reported about it. The statistics are chilling for a metropolis like Delhi whose gang landscape has evolved over the years, transforming from yesteryear groups like the Kishan Pehalwan and Anoop-Balraj gangs of Najfagarh to newer entities such as the Bishnoi and Sangwan gangs, forming a complex network of organised crime being controlled remotely from foreign countries.
The capital now has a complex underbelly characterised by the presence of various notorious gangs which are engaged in a range of illicit activities that put them at odds with law enforcement and with each other. Resultantly, the city often witnesses turf wars, extortion rackets and murders.
A pertinent question that arises is: Why does Delhi have such a large number of gangs? Investigators who have watched the Delhi's underworld over the years attribute it to a number of factors ranging from Delhi's topography, proximity to states like Haryana and UP and a large migrant population in Jhuggi-Jhopri clusters.
"The organised crime gangs in Delhi often exploit the vulnerabilities of the urban poor, engaging in extortion and other forms of exploitation that further entrench cycles of violence and fear. The fluid nature of gang dynamics, with alliances forming and breaking apart, adds another layer of complexity to the situation," said a retired senior cop.
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Experience three trade fairs with just one ticket
Undo
automatica 2025
Undo
Laser World of Photonics
Undo
World of Quantum
Undo
Visit automatica: June 24-27, Munich
Undo
At first glance, it appears that many gangs initially formed to settle personal scores or gain an edge in college elections. However, the situation quickly escalated, with both sides resorting to violence and eventually engaging in full-fledged criminal activities to sustain their rivalry.
"For example, the Gogi and Tillu Tajpuria gangs which engaged in a deadly gang war in Delhi for years and later ran extortion rackets, originated from a college election at Swami Shraddhanand College. Gogi, a student of the college, took issue with Tillu and his associates interfering with the college elections and allegedly beating Gogi's friend. This incident sparked a decades-long feud, leading to numerous violent encounters and even the deaths of both gang leaders," a senior police officer explained.
Lawrence Bishnoi's foray into crime was also triggered by the rivalry between student organisations in Punjab. For many Delhi gangsters, their journey began with petty crimes, was nurtured during stints in jail, and ultimately found success driven by the aspiration to live a luxurious lifestyle. For instance, gangster Kala Jathedi was first arrested for snatching a mobile phone in 2004. A trip to jail prompted him to form his own gang.
One intriguing aspect of Delhi's gang proliferation is how they gain notoriety. According to sources, while most gangsters in Delhi want to name their gangs after their own names, the cops often inadvertently fuel their reputation by labelling small groups of 3-4 collaborators as a gang, effectively legitimizing their existence in police files.
Each of the gangs have their own distinct identity and sphere of influence. While there are the big names who operate across Delhi, targeting businessmen, bookies, property dealers and builders for extortion, the smaller groups engage in activities like robbery, snatching and land grabbing. A significant number of gangs in Delhi, like the Badhwar gang, are engaged in smuggling and selling illicit liquor in the city and neighbouring states. There are also these "Thak Thak gangs" who originally got their name from police for their modus operandi of knocking on car windows before striking.
The big gangs have 50 to 150 members and have an average six to seven cases against each member. The smaller ones have 5-30 members each. The gangs have access to the best of weapons in Delhi. From copies of foreign-made pistols like Zigana, Taurus, Beretta and Star to the usual 7.65mm pistols manufactured in hubs like Khargone in Madhya Pradesh, Meerut in UP and Munger in Bihar.
The existence of such a large number of gangs is a significant challenge for the authorities, who are tasked with maintaining law and order in a city that is both a political hub and a densely populated urban centre. However, many retired and serving cops said that while tackling the veterans was their job, a comprehensive approach was required to curb the new entrants.
"This involves not only direct action against gang members but also addressing the underlying social and economic issues that fuel gang activity. Strategies might include community outreach programmes, job creation initiatives, and enhanced security measures in vulnerable areas. While law enforcement plays a critical role in controlling gang activity, addressing the root causes socially is equally important," said a senior officer.
Despite these challenges, there have been notable efforts by Delhi Police and other agencies to crack down on gang activity, cops say. Operations targeting specific gangs and their leaders have yielded results, disrupting their operations and, in some cases, leading to significant arrests, they added.
In any case, as Delhi confronts this grim reality, one thing is certain – the city's battle against organised crime is far from over.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hindu
2 hours ago
- The Hindu
Supreme Court orders release of law student from preventive detention under NSA, says ‘wholly untenable'
The Supreme Court has ordered immediate release of a law student in Madhya Pradesh from preventive detention after being booked under the National Security Act (NSA), saying it is "wholly untenable". A Bench of Justices Ujjal Bhuyan and K. Vinod Chandran, which found fault with the July 11, 2024 detention order passed by District Magistrate of Betul in Madhya Pradesh, said it will be passing a detailed reasoned order in the case. Petitioner Annu was booked by police following an altercation at a university campus in Betul, allegedly after he clashed with a professor. An FIR was lodged against him for offences of attempt to murder and other connected offences. While in jail, a detention order under provisions of the NSA was issued against him. This order was later confirmed and extended every three months since then. "After perusal of the first detention order dated July 11, 2024, we find that the appellant has been taken into preventive detention under Section 3(2) of the National Security Act, 1980. However, we are of the view that the reasons for which he has been taken into preventive detention does not satisfy the requirement of Sub Section(2) of Section 3 of the National Security Act, 1980. Preventive detention of the appellant, therefore, becomes wholly untenable," the Supreme Court bench said in its order passed on Friday (June 27, 2025). The Bench said the preventive detention has also become untenable for other grounds as well, such as representation of the appellant (law student) being decided by the District Collector himself, without forwarding it to the State government and also not taken into account the factum of appellant's detention in other criminal cases and as to why he was required to be taken into preventive detention, in spite of being detained in a regular criminal proceeding. "Thus, looking into the facts and circumstances of the case, we direct that the appellant, who is presently lodged in the Central Jail at Bhopal, shall be released forthwith from custody, if not required in any other criminal case. In view of the above, the criminal appeal is disposed of. Reasoned order will follow," the Bench said. It noted that Mr. Annu alias Aniket, who was a law student, was first taken into preventive detention by order dated July 11, 2024, and this detention order has been extended on four occasions and as per the last extension order, his preventive detention is up to July 12, 2025. The Bench said that according to the material brought on record by the State government, the court finds that nine criminal antecedents, including the present criminal case, have been cited against the law student to justify the preventive detention under provisions of the National Security Act, 1980. However, his counsel has submitted that out of the previous eight cases, Mr. Annu has been acquitted in five cases and in one case, he has been convicted, but sentence is only imposition of fine. The court was informed that the remaining two cases are presently pending and the law student was on bail in those matters. The top court also noted that in the present criminal case registered against him last year, he was granted bail on January 28, 2025. "The scenario, which thus emerges, is that the appellant continues to remain in custody only by virtue of the order of preventive detention. It is averred that the appellant is lodged in Central Jail, Bhopal," the Bench noted. On February 25, the Madhya Pradesh High Court dismissed the habeas corpus petition filed by Mr. Annu's father, observing that the petitioner had a long history of criminal cases and was a habitual offender whose presence posed a threat to public peace. The High Court cited the preventive nature of NSA detention and upheld the subjective satisfaction of the district magistrate as sufficient.


Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Arunachal land for defence: SC stays Rs 410 cr recompense; Ref Court fixed compensation for land eight times of mkt rate
NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Friday stayed an order of the Itanagar bench of Gauhati HC asking the Centre to deposit 50% of Rs 418 crore compensation, which the govt alleged was vitiated by forgery, for acquisition of 537 acres of land for defence projects in remote Indo-China border areas of Arunachal Pradesh. Appearing for the Union govt, additional solicitor general S D Sanjay told a bench led by Justice K V Viswanathan that one man forged and fabricated power of attorneys of 102 landowners and approached the Reference court for reassessment of the market value of the land, which the authorities had pegged at Rs 70 crore and paid the landowners. Sanjay said despite the govt pointing out the mischief played by one person, as against the rest of the landowners having recorded their satisfaction in cumulatively receiving Rs 70 crore as compensation, the Reference Court determined the market price of land in the remote areas to be eight times the rate arrived at by authorities. How did the land in the remote Indo-China border areas of Arunachal Pradesh rise from Rs 10-12 lakh per acre to nearly 80 lakh per acre, the ASG asked. The bench said it was the Union govt counsel which had agreed to deposit 10% of Rs 418 crore before the Itanagar bench and hence, it must do the same. The SC directed the Centre to deposit Rs 41.8 crore before the Itanagar Bench registry and ordered suspension of operation of the Reference Court's order. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 2025 Top Trending Local Enterprise Accounting Software [Click Here] Accounting ERP Click Here Undo The Union govt has pointed out that the redetermination of compensation amount was vitiated by 'forgery, fabrication and fraud played by one Dagli Riba, who alone had moved the Reference Court based on forged and fabricated power of attorneys of 102 landowners.' The Centre said the landowners had received compensation at the rate determined earlier and signed the deed of acceptance in November 2023 and did not approach the reference court for enhancement of compensation. It accused Riba of taking advantage of the situation to play fraud with the intention of pocketing the arbitrarily enhanced compensation amount. The defence ministry had on Feb 16, 2023, approved a proposal to acquire 537 acres in the general area of Bame village under Basar Circle, Leparada district in Arunachal Pradesh (border area) for establishment of Corps Ammunition Point. It had fixed the market rate of Rs 12.9 lakh per acre as compensation, totalling Rs 70 crore.


Hindustan Times
3 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
SC orders release of law student from preventive detention under NSA, says wholly untenable
New Delhi, The Supreme Court has ordered immediate release of a law student in Madhya Pradesh from preventive detention after being booked under the National Security Act , saying it is "wholly untenable". SC orders release of law student from preventive detention under NSA, says wholly untenable A bench of Justices Ujjal Bhuyan and K Vinod Chandran, which found fault with the July 11, 2024 detention order passed by District Magistrate of Betul in Madhya Pradesh said it will be passing a detailed reasoned order in the case. Petitioner Annu was booked by police following an altercation at a university campus in Betul, allegedly after he clashed with a professor. An FIR was lodged against him for offences of attempt to murder and other connected offences. While in jail, a detention order under provisions of the NSA was issued against him. This order was later confirmed and extended every three months since then. "After perusal of the first detention order dated July 11, 2024, we find that the appellant has been taken into preventive detention under Section 3 of the National Security Act, 1980. However, we are of the view that the reasons for which he has been taken into preventive detention does not satisfy the requirement of Sub Section of Section 3 of the National Security Act, 1980. Preventive detention of the appellant, therefore, becomes wholly untenable," the Supreme Court bench said in its order passed on Friday. The bench said the preventive detention has also become untenable for other grounds as well, such as representation of the appellant being decided by the district collector himself, without forwarding it to the state government and also not taken into account the factum of appellant's detention in other criminal cases and as to why he was required to be taken into preventive detention, in spite of being detained in a regular criminal proceeding. "Thus, looking into the facts and circumstances of the case, we direct that the appellant, who is presently lodged in the Central Jail at Bhopal, shall be released forthwith from custody, if not required in any other criminal case. In view of the above, the criminal appeal is disposed of. Reasoned order will follow," the bench said. It noted that Annu alias Aniket, who was a law student was first taken into preventive detention by order dated July 11, 2024 and this detention order has been extended on four occasions and as per the last extension order, his preventive detention is up to July 12, 2025. The bench said that according to the material brought on record by the state government, the court finds that nine criminal antecedents, including the present criminal case, have been cited against the law student to justify the preventive detention under provisions of the National Security Act, 1980. However, his counsel has submitted that out of the previous eight cases, Annu has been acquitted in five cases and in one case, he has been convicted, but sentence is only imposition of fine. The court was informed that the remaining two cases are presently pending and the law student was on bail in those matters. The top court also noted that in the present criminal case registered against him last year, he was granted bail on January 28, 2025. "The scenario, which thus emerges, is that the appellant continues to remain in custody only by virtue of the order of preventive detention. It is averred that the appellant is lodged in Central Jail, Bhopal," the bench noted. On February 25, the Madhya Pradesh High Court dismissed the habeas corpus petition filed by Annu's father, observing that the petitioner had a long history of criminal cases and was a habitual offender whose presence posed a threat to public peace. The high court cited the preventive nature of NSA detention and upheld the subjective satisfaction of the district magistrate as sufficient. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.