Chronic Absenteeism's Post-COVID ‘New Normal': Data Shows It Is More Extreme
A new analysis of data from three states — North Carolina, Texas and Virginia — shows that prior to COVID, 17% of students were chronically absent, meaning they missed at least 10% of the school year. By 2023, long after schools had to cope with new variants and hybrid schedules, that figure hit 37%.
'Absences are both more common for everybody, but they are also more extreme,' said Jacob Kirksey, an associate professor of education policy at Texas Tech University.
Additional new research shows that while post-pandemic chronic absenteeism lingers across the board, rates were substantially higher for low-income students. In North Carolina, for example, the chronic absenteeism rate for students in poverty before the pandemic was 9.2 percentage points higher than for non-poor students. By 2023, the gap increased to 14.6 percentage points.
'The income gap really was the main driver that showed up over and over again,' said Morgan Polikoff, an education researcher at the University of Southern California. But it's hard for schools to make a dent in the problem, he said, if they aren't investigating the reasons for chronic absenteeism. 'There's a big difference between the kid [who] has an illness and is chronically sick versus the kid [who] is super disengaged.'
Kirksey and Polikoff were among several researchers who shared their findings Friday at an American Enterprise Institute event focused on facing what Kirksey called the 'under-the-hood dynamics' of chronic absenteeism in the post-COVID era. Since 2022, when the national average peaked at 28%, the rate has dropped to 23% — still much higher than the pre-COVID level of about 15%, according to the conservative think tank's tracker.
'I have a question that keeps me up at night. That question is 'What's the new normal going to be?' ' said Nat Malkus, the deputy director of education policy at AEI. 'We see this rising tide, but I think that it's incumbent on us to say that chronic absenteeism still affects disadvantaged students more.'
The research project began in September with the goal of offering guidance to districts in time for students' return to school this fall. The researchers stressed that those most likely to be chronically absent this school year — low-income, highly mobile and homeless students — are the same ones who will frequently miss school next year.
'Absenteeism should seldom come as a surprise,' said Sam Hollon, an education data analyst at AEI. 'It's hard to justify delaying interventions until absences have accumulated.'
One new finding revealed Friday contradicts a theory that gained traction following the pandemic — that students were more likely to be absent if their teachers were also out. As with students, teacher absenteeism increased during the pandemic and hasn't returned to pre-COVID levels.
The relationship between teacher absences and student absences, however, is 'pretty negligible,' said Arya Ansari, an associate professor of human development and family science at The Ohio State University.
'These absences among teachers don't actually contribute to the post-COVID bump that we've seen in student absences,' he said. 'Targeting teacher absences isn't going to move the needle.'
Related
The researchers discussed how even some well-intentioned responses to the COVID emergency have allowed chronic absenteeism to persist. States, Malkus said, made it easier to graduate despite frequent absences and missing school doesn't necessarily prevent students from turning in their work.
'In my day, you had to get a packet and do the work at home' if you were absent, Polikoff said. In interviews with 40 families after the pandemic, 39 said it was easy to make up work because of Google Classroom and other online platforms. 'How many said, 'Let's make it harder'? Zero.'
In another presentation, Ethan Hutt, an associate education professor at the University of North Carolina, estimated that chronic absenteeism accounts for about 7.5% of overall pandemic learning loss and about 9.2% for Black and low-income students — a 'nontrivial, but modest' impact.
He stressed that missing school also affects student engagement and relationships with teachers. While technology has made it easier for students to keep up, 'there may be other harms that we want to think about and grapple with,' he said.
Related
The new research comes as states are mounting new efforts to more closely track chronic absenteeism data and share it with the public. In 2010, only one state — Maryland — published absenteeism data on its state education agency website. Now, 49 states — all but New Hampshire — report rates on an annual, monthly or even daily basis, according to a new report released Tuesday by Attendance Works, an advocacy and research organization.
The systems allow educators and the public to more quickly identify which students are most affected and when spikes occur. Rhode Island, Connecticut, Massachusetts and Washington D.C. post rates even before the end of the school year. Rhode Island offers real-time data, while Connecticut publishes monthly reports.
The New Hampshire Department of Education doesn't monitor chronic absenteeism, but has a statewide 92.7% attendance rate, a spokesperson said.
The report highlights states that have taken action to reduce chronic absenteeism. In Virginia, bus drivers ensure their routes include students who might be more likely to struggle with transportation. With state funds, Fauquier County, west of Washington, D.C., opened a center for students on short-term suspension to minimize the absences that tend to pile up when a student is removed from the classroom.
Overall chronic absenteeism in the state declined from 19.3% in 2022-23 to 15.7% in 2023-24. To Hedy Chang, executive director of Attendance Works, such improvement proves 'we can still get things done in our country and in education, despite all of the culture wars and binary thinking.'
Some district and school leaders have looked to their peers for ideas on how to get kids back in school. After participating in a six-month program with 16 other districts across the country organized by the nonprofit Digital Promise, Mark Brenneman, an elementary principal in New York's Hudson City Schools, started interviewing families about their challenges.
He learned that Hispanic parents often keep their children home when it rains because they're worried they're going to catch a cold. Several had transportation challenges. His school, Smith Elementary, even contributed to the problem, he said, by holding concerts, award ceremonies or other family events in the morning. Parents would come to celebrate their children's accomplishments, then take them out for lunch and not return.
Related
Hudson, about 40 miles south of Albany, has undergone significant change since the pandemic, added Superintendent Juliette Pennyman. Some families leaving New York City have settled in Hudson, driving up the cost of housing.
'Our families are being priced out of the community,' she said. 'Housing insecurity was … affecting families' and students' ability to focus on school.'
As a result of the intense focus on the issue, Smith, which had a 29% chronic absenteeism rate last year, has seen an about a 15% increase in the number of students with good attendance.
'It's not like we're down to like 10% chronically absent,' Brenneman said. 'But we've hammered away.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Walmart & Target Earnings: Will Performance Disparity Continue?
The 2025 Q2 earnings season continues to slowly wind down, with this week's docket primarily dominated by retail. The period has been resilient, with earnings growth remaining strong and a strong number of companies exceeding quarterly expectations. Notably, expectations for the current period (2025 Q3) have also inched higher over recent months, a key item to keep in mind as we wrap up the Q2 cycle. But before we wrap up anything, two retail heavyweights – Target TGT and Walmart WMT – are headlining the docket for retail companies this week. Walmart's outperformance relative to Target has been notable, outpacing it over the last several years, while Target has struggled in the post-COVID era. This development is illustrated in the chart below. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research Let's take a closer look at how each stacks up heading into their releases. Walmart Outperforms Big Walmart has been firing on all cylinders over the last several years, not only able to see strong growth thanks to its digital efforts but also benefiting from its more 'staply' mix of products. Consumers often trade down to WMT in times of stress, helping insulate it and providing a consistent level of demand. Concerning its success within its digital efforts, Global eCommerce sales grew 22% YoY throughout its latest quarter, continuing the recent momentum nicely. Consumers have increasingly opted to pick up their groceries rather than shop, with its online marketplace also easy to use. Additionally, Walmart US comparable store sales were up a strong 4.5%, a key metric for retailers. For the upcoming release, the Zacks Consensus estimate for US comparable store sales (ex-fuel) stands at 4.2%, alluding to continued momentum. As shown below, WMT has regularly positively surprised on the metric, stringing together six consecutive beats. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research Analysts have primarily been silent concerning their top and bottom line revisions for the quarter, with WMT expected to see 9% EPS growth on 3.7% higher sales. While the company hasn't seen a flurry of upward revisions, the stability of the trends over recent months is a positive takeaway. Below is a chart illustrating the company's sales on a quarterly basis. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research Have TGT Shares Bottomed? Quarterly results from Target have regularly disappointed over recent years, with the company's more 'discretionary' inventory being a major thorn in the side in the post-COVID era. Comparable store sales decreased 3.8% YoY throughout its latest period, with overall sales also down 2.8%. We expect TGT's comparable store sales to decline 2.9% year-over-year, with the company unable to chain together positive beats on the metric over the last six periods. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research While its retail stores may not be seeing growth, its digital efforts certainly can't get overlooked. Digital comparable sales grew 4.7% YoY in its latest period, paired with a 36% increase in same-day delivery through Target Circle 360. As we can see below, the company's sales growth rates exploded during the COVID era, when consumers were spending on more discretionary items, but that trend has since subsided considerably. Target's smaller mix of 'staply' products hasn't been enough to offset the negative effects, also explaining the poor price action over recent years. Please note that the chart below tracks the YoY % change in sales. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research Still, the EPS outlook for the period is constructive and stable, as shown below. Given the several-year-long stretch of poor price action, the worst could be soon 'behind' Target, though that has remained the hope for several periods now. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research Guidance will be the key hurdle for TGT to clear, though it's worth noting that shares are already down more than 50% from their 2021 highs. Any sign of a turnaround concerning its discretionary merchandise would likely be enough to scare the bears away. Bottom Line Both Target TGT and Walmart WMT are titans in the retail space, with performance over recent years heavily skewed in favor of WMT. TGT's more discretionary merchandise mix has been an issue in the post-COVID era, whereas WMT's more 'staply' mix has insulated it nicely, also providing consistent demand. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report Target Corporation (TGT) : Free Stock Analysis Report Walmart Inc. (WMT) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research ( Zacks Investment Research


The Hill
41 minutes ago
- The Hill
Pediatric group bucks RFK Jr. on kids' COVID shots
The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) recommended Tuesday that children between 6 months and 23 months old receive the vaccine to protect them against serious illness caused by the virus. Kids under the age of 2 are especially vulnerable to severe COVID-19, the group said, and should be prioritized for vaccination unless they have an allergy to the jab or its ingredients. In May, Kennedy announced that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) would no longer recommend routine COVID-19 shots for healthy children due to a lack of clinical data justifying the need for annual vaccinations against the virus. But the CDC did not follow Kennedy's guidance to the letter, instead recommending that parents take part in a 'shared decision making' process with health care providers to determine if their child needs the shot. The AAP and HHS have been at odds for months, and tensions reached a head when Kennedy dismissed all the members of the CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) and replaced them with his own handpicked representatives, including some outright vaccine skeptics. Since it was founded in 1930, the AAP has published evidence-based vaccine guidance to support pediatricians. But it has not traditionally differed substantially from federal recommendations. The move to publish COVID recommendations that break from HHS reflects a new effort by medical societies and expert advocacy groups to bypass Kennedy and what they say are his efforts to upend the nation's vaccine system. With vaccine skeptics in charge of U.S. health care, these groups say they want to give Americans — especially parents — as much information as possible to protect children from disease. At the same time AAP's recommendations were released, a group of epidemiologists and infectious diseases experts called the Vaccine Integrity Project held essentially their own version of an ACIP meeting to review evidence on the safety and efficacy for flu, COVID and RSV shots. Members of the initiative said ACIP usually reviews guidelines for respiratory virus vaccines during the summer, but has not appeared to have done it this year. In its absence, the initiative was stepping in. The panel concluded there was no change in safety signals or sudden drop in efficacy on any of the vaccines reviewed. 'There is no scientific evidence to support the changes HHS made to COVID recommendations for pregnant women or for children most at risk for high-risk transmission of severe disease,' said Michael Osterholm, director of the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy at the University of Minnesota, who is leading the initiative.


Boston Globe
an hour ago
- Boston Globe
Defying RFK Jr., pediatric group urges COVID shots for young kids
Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up 'The majority of what we've seen from the secretary has been a pretty clearly orchestrated strategy to sow distrust in vaccines,' said Sean O'Leary, a physician who heads the AAP's infectious-diseases committee. 'We make our recommendations based on what's in the best interest of the health of children.' Advertisement Andrew Nixon, a spokesman for Kennedy, said AAP, which has received funding from vaccine manufacturers, should 'strengthen conflict-of-interest safeguards and keep its publications free from financial influence.' 'By bypassing the CDC's advisory process and freelancing its own recommendations, while smearing those who demand accountability, the AAP is putting commercial interests ahead of public health and politics above America's children,' Nixon said in a statement. Advertisement The country is in the midst of a summer uptick in coronavirus cases, and the future of vaccine access is uncertain. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention did not go as far as Kennedy directed and did not remove coronavirus vaccines from the childhood immunization schedule. Instead, the public health agency softened its recommendation for all children to receive an annual coronavirus shot. It now recommends parents consult a doctor to decide whether to vaccinate their children. The AAP took a similar approach for older children. Its new guide says healthy children ages 2 to 18 can receive a coronavirus vaccine if their parents or guardians want them to have that protection. Few parents do. The CDC estimates that 13 percent of all eligible children are up-to-date on coronavirus vaccines, as well as 4.5 percent of children between the ages of 6 months and 23 months. By issuing a broader coronavirus vaccine recommendation for young children, the AAP is trying to boost uptake and keep the shots free. Between October 2022 and April 2024, a little more than half of children between the ages of 6 months and 23 months admitted to intensive care for COVID had no underlying conditions, a CDC study found. Still, the vast majority of children infected by coronavirus will have mild symptoms, and few will become hospitalized. Health officials say it has become difficult to measure the effectiveness of coronavirus vaccines in young children because the vaccination rates are so low. Limited data show the 2024-2025 coronavirus vaccines provided extra protection against severe illness in children and adults compared with people who did not receive a vaccine, according to CDC data presented in June. Advertisement But pediatric infectious-disease specialists have argued that regularly vaccinating children makes sense as a public health strategy because evidence has shown each year that protection in children is similar to that seen in adults. Federal officials have yet to approve or recommend an updated coronavirus vaccine, which usually debuts in late summer. The Food and Drug Administration has signaled it would not license upcoming coronavirus vaccines for otherwise healthy children. Kennedy recently fired all members of the CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, a group of experts who decide who should receive FDA-approved or authorized vaccines. Four of the seven members Kennedy appointed as replacements have been publicly critical of the broad use of coronavirus vaccines. For the past three decades, the AAP and the CDC have been mostly aligned in their vaccine recommendations — until now. The AAP's schedule 'differs from recent recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices of the CDC, which was overhauled this year and replaced with individuals who have a history of spreading vaccine misinformation,' the organization said in a statement. Under federal law, insurers must cover the cost of ACIP-recommended vaccinations. The AAP and other professional organizations have been holding discussions with insurance companies to continue covering the shots based on guidance from professional associations rather than the federal government. O'Leary said insurers 'are signaling that they are committed to covering our recommendations.' AHIP, the major insurance lobby, has said its members are committed to continue paying for respiratory virus vaccines this season. The new ACIP panel did not make any coronavirus recommendations when it met for the first time in late June. It may not even convene a special meeting to discuss the coronavirus vaccines until mid-September, according to industry employees and CDC officials who spoke on the condition of anonymity to share sensitive information. That timing has become more uncertain after the Aug. 8 shooting at the CDC that severely damaged several buildings and traumatized CDC staff. The ACIP is scheduled to hold a meeting in October. Advertisement The AAP's full vaccine guidance, published Tuesday in the organization's clinical guidebook for infectious-diseases prevention and treatment, represents formal recommendations for immunizations for infants, children, and adolescents against 18 diseases. Its recommendations for flu and respiratory syncytial virus, or RSV, are essentially the same as what federal health officials, including Kennedy, have recommended.