Trump sets new deadline of 10 or 12 days for Russia to act on Ukraine
Trump has threatened both sanctions on Russia and buyers of its exports unless progress is made. The fresh deadline suggests the US president is prepared to move forward on those threats after previous hesitation to do so.
Speaking in Scotland, where he is holding meetings with European leaders and playing golf, Trump said he was disappointed in Putin and shortening a 50-day deadline he had set on the issue earlier this month.
"I'm going to make a new deadline of about ... 10 or 12 days from today," Trump told reporters during a meeting with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. "There's no reason in waiting... We just don't see any progress being made."
There was no immediate comment from the Kremlin.
In a post on X, former Russian president Dmitry Medvedev, a close ally of Putin, said Trump was playing "a game of ultimatums" that could lead to a war involving the US.
Medvedev wrote: "Each new ultimatum is a threat and a step towards war. Not between Russia and Ukraine, but with (Trump's) own country."
Ukraine welcomed Trump's statement. Andriy Yermak, President Volodymyr Zelenskyy's chief of staff, thanked Trump in a social media post for "standing firm and delivering a clear message of peace through strength."
Trump, who has expressed annoyance also with Zelenskyy, has not always followed tough talk about Putin with action, citing what he deems a good relationship that the two men have had previously.
On Monday, Trump indicated he was not interested in more talks with Putin. He said sanctions and tariffs would be used as penalties for Moscow if it did not meet Trump's demands.
"There's no reason to wait. If you know what the answer is going to be, why wait? And it would be sanctions and maybe tariffs, secondary tariffs," Trump said. "I don't want to do that to Russia. I love the Russian people."
Ukraine had proposed a summit between Putin and Zelenskyy before the end of August, but the Kremlin has said that timeline was unlikely and that a meeting could only happen as a final step to clinch peace.
Russia's foreign ministry said on Saturday that if the West wanted real peace with Ukraine, it would stop supplying Kyiv with weapons.
Trump has repeatedly voiced exasperation with Putin for pursuing attacks on Ukraine despite US efforts to end the war.
He has played up successes in other parts of the world where the United States has helped to broker peace agreements and has been flattered by some leaders who suggest he should be given the Nobel Peace Prize.
"I'm disappointed in President Putin," Trump said on Monday. "I'm going to reduce that 50 days that I gave him to a lesser number because I think I already know the answer what's going to happen."
Trump, who is also struggling to achieve a peace deal in Gaza, has touted his role in ending conflicts between India and Pakistan as well as Rwanda and Congo.
Before returning to the White House in January, Trump campaigned on a promise to end Russia's conflict with Ukraine in a day.
"We thought we had that settled numerous times, and then President Putin goes out and starts launching rockets into some city like Kyiv and kills a lot of people in a nursing home or whatever," Trump said. "And I say that's not the way to do it."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
TECHx
3 hours ago
- TECHx
Hidden Dangers: Supply Chain Cyberattacks in 2025
Home » Editor's pick » Hidden Dangers: Supply Chain Cyberattacks in 2025 Supply chain cyberattacks are rising fast in 2025, exposing enterprises to hidden threats through trusted vendors, weak links, and third-party vulnerabilities. In 2025, it's not the hackers breaching your firewalls that should keep you up at night. It's the vendors you trust the most, the small software firm managing your data sync, the overseas hardware supplier, or even your outsourced payroll provider. Cybercriminals are no longer attacking the front doors of the world's most secure enterprises. They're slipping through the side gates, quietly piggybacking on the digital supply chains that keep global business ticking. Verizon's 2025 Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR) highlights this troubling trend with hard numbers: one in three breaches now involves a third party. The percentage of incidents tied to partners or suppliers has doubled from the previous year, underscoring how deeply embedded these risks have become. What's more, ransomware, often delivered via these indirect attack paths has seen a 37% increase, now factoring into nearly half of all reported breaches. The Hertz-Cleo Fallout Take the Hertz incident earlier this year. The car rental giant itself wasn't hacked. Instead, the Russian-linked ransomware gang Clop infiltrated Cleo Communications, a trusted third-party file transfer provider used by Hertz and gained indirect access to sensitive customer information. By exploiting an unknown vulnerability in Cleo's software, the attackers avoided Hertz's own hardened defenses altogether. This tactic, often called a supply chain attack, isn't new. But what's changed is how quickly it's become the go-to method for sophisticated cybercriminals, including state-backed groups. Why try to breach a billion-dollar enterprise with enterprise-grade security, when you can compromise a smaller supplier with minimal resistance and get the same prize? The damage from these attacks goes far beyond lost data or a ransom paid. They undermine trust in entire ecosystems. If an organization can't vouch for its vendors' security posture, how can it vouch for its own? A Threat Hiding in Plain Sight Supply chains have always been complex. But now it has also become invisible. Many large enterprises now rely on thousands of vendors, software-as-a-service providers, open-source libraries, cloud partners, APIs, and more, creating sprawling digital ecosystems where a single weak link can compromise an entire network. Recent data shows that software supply chain incidents are sharply on the rise. According to Cyble, the average number of such attacks per month increased by 25% from late 2024 to mid-2025. In the last two months alone, this number nearly doubled. Attackers are getting more strategic, more patient, and more effective at exploiting interdependencies between systems that most companies barely map, let alone monitor. Credential abuse remains a leading cause of breaches, with nearly a quarter of attacks stemming from stolen or weak credentials. Vulnerability exploitation is close behind, accounting for 20%. These numbers reflect a sobering reality: as businesses grow more interconnected, the attack surface is no longer within their walls. Sectoral Impact: Healthcare, Manufacturing, and More Certain sectors are feeling the burn more than others. Healthcare, with its sensitive patient data and critical uptime requirements, remains a prime target. The DBIR found 1,710 incidents in the sector this year, with over 1,500 involving confirmed data disclosure. The most compromised data types? Medical and personal. Manufacturing is facing a different but equally insidious threat: espionage. Breaches in the industry nearly doubled this year, and for the first time, 20% were tied to espionage, up from just 3% the year before. Analysts believe this rise is likely linked to state-sponsored actors targeting supply chains to access emerging technologies and industrial secrets. Meanwhile, the financial and education sectors continue to grapple with familiar foes: phishing campaigns, credential stuffing, and basic web application attacks. But the thread tying all of these sectors together is supply chain vulnerability. Regardless of industry, the weakest point isn't the organization, it's often the people and partners just outside of it. Why We're Still Behind Despite years of warnings and a growing pile of headlines, many organizations still don't conduct comprehensive security reviews of their suppliers. Some don't even know how many third-party services are connected to their systems. A recent survey found that fewer than 30% of enterprises require a Software Bill of Materials (SBOM), a basic inventory of components used in applications, from their vendors. The regulatory landscape is beginning to catch up. New compliance mandates in the U.S., EU, and GCC region are placing greater onus on companies to verify vendor security. In the UAE, cybersecurity requirements tied to national digital transformation efforts are already pushing public and private organizations to step up. But policy alone won't solve the problem. Security teams must rethink their architecture from the ground up. The old model, perimeter defense, no longer applies in an age where the perimeter includes thousands of third parties. Strategies like Zero Trust architecture, real-time threat intelligence sharing, and continuous monitoring of third-party behavior are no longer 'nice to haves.' They are essential. A Chain Only as Strong as… The phrase 'a chain is only as strong as its weakest link' is now a cybersecurity cliché. But in 2025, it's painfully accurate. As enterprises double down on digital transformation, AI tools, and cloud-first strategies, their reliance on supply chains will only deepen. That means vigilance can't stop at the firewall, it must extend across every digital handshake. Because in today's cyber era, the breach you didn't notice might just be the one that shuts everything down.
Middle East Eye
3 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
Le Monde publishes new details of campaign against Karim Khan and ICC
French newspaper Le Monde has reported extensive details of an intensifying intimidation campaign targeting the International Criminal Court's chief prosecutor Karim Khan. The campaign has taken place against the backdrop of Khan's efforts to build and pursue a case against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, former Defence Minister Yoav Gallant and other Israeli officials over alleged war crimes. Khan went on leave in mid-May after an attempt to suspend him, prompted by a senior member of his own office, failed. This was amid an ongoing United Nations investigation into sexual misconduct allegations against the prosecutor. In a story published on Friday, the French newspaper quoted British barrister Andrew Cayley, who oversaw the ICC's Palestine investigation, saying Dutch intelligence informed him that he was at risk in The Hague. Cayley said that in December 2024 he was directly threatened: "I was told I was an enemy of Israel and that I should watch my back." New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Cayley told the Observer in June that he left his role earlier this year fearing US sanctions, and that the pressure severely affected his health. Le Monde reported on the role allegedly played in the proceedings by Thomas Lynch, a senior legal adviser at the ICC and longstanding friend and colleague of Khan and his wife. Khan had tasked Lynch, who worked in his office as his special assistant, with liaising with Israel on the Palestine investigation. According to Le Monde, in May 2024 Lynch suggested that Khan organise a dinner in Jerusalem with prominent lawyer Alan Dershowitz. The plan was that Netanyahu himself would join them in the middle of the meal. The newspaper reported that Khan described this as "a remake of Oliver Twist... Netanyahu and I eating roast turkey in front of the hungry Gazans! It's a dangerous idea!" Le Monde reported that an anonymous source in the ICC said Lynch tried to sabotage Khan's pursuit of arrest warrants for Netanyahu and Gallant. The source told Le Monde that Lynch "openly said that for him Palestine is not a state, that Israel is not a party to the Court, and that the office should not investigate it". The source further alleged that Lynch referred sexual harassment allegations against Khan to investigators "to get rid of the prosecutor" and "hijack the process" of applying for arrest warrants. Le Monde reported that a note written by Lynch was the source of press reports about the misconduct allegations against Khan in October 2024. Lynch told Le Monde that the reports in its story were "false and misleading". Cameron's threatening phone call Le Monde also reported that on 23 April 2024, then-British Foreign Secretary David Cameron threatened Khan in a phone call that Britain would withdraw from the ICC if the court issued arrest warrants for Israeli leaders. In June, MEE first revealed details of the call based on information from a number of sources - including former staff in Khan's office familiar with the conversation and who have seen the minutes of the meeting. Cameron told Khan that applying for warrants for Netanyahu and Gallant would be like dropping "a hydrogen bomb", Le Monde reported. He threatened that the UK would "withdraw from the ICC's founding treaty", the Rome Statute, "if Karim Khan followed through with his intentions". Exclusive: David Cameron threatened to withdraw UK from ICC over Israel war crimes probe Read More » In June, Cameron did not respond to MEE's requests for comment and the British foreign office declined to comment. Le Monde also reported on a meeting on 1 May this year between Khan and British-Israeli ICC lawyer Nicholas Kaufman, which was first revealed by MEE last month. Le Monde cited a "report of the meeting" which said Kaufman told Khan that if ICC arrest warrants against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defence Minister Yoav Gallant were not dropped, he and the ICC would be destroyed. Kaufman told Khan he had spoken to Netanyahu's legal adviser Roy Schondorf and offered Khan a way out, Le Monde reported. Khan, Kaufman suggested, should reclassify the arrest warrants as confidential. This would allow Israel to challenge them in private. In response to questions from MEE in July, Kaufman denied threatening Khan. He denied having been authorised to make any proposals on behalf of the Israeli government and said he had shared his personal views with Khan on the Palestine situation. Kaufman told Le Monde he "did not dispute the meeting", but said he was looking to help Khan "get out of his mistakes". Intensifying intimidation campaign The meeting came less than two weeks before allegations of sexual assault against Khan, which he has strenuously denied, were first published, and as he was reportedly preparing to seek arrest warrants for more members of the Israeli government. There is no suggestion of any connection between the Kaufman-Khan meeting and the publication of the allegations. Khan went on indefinite leave shortly afterwards. Exclusive: How Karim Khan's Israel war crimes probe was derailed by threats, leaks and sex claims Read More » Le Monde quoted Cuno Tarfusser, a former ICC judge, who said Khan going on leave was a "coup d'état". Tarfusser described the ongoing UN investigation into misconduct allegations against Khan as an "irregular procedure", "tailor-made" and conducted with a "disregard for confidentiality". On Friday MEE published extraordinary details of the intimidation campaign targeting Khan, which has involved threats and warnings directed at Khan by prominent figures, close colleagues and family friends briefing against him, fears for the prosecutor's safety prompted by a Mossad team in The Hague, and media leaks about sexual assault allegations. MEE reported details of Lynch's role in the process by which Khan was forced on leave. Lynch triggered the initial investigation by the ICC's Internal Oversight Mechanism (IOM) into harassment allegations against Khan in May 2024, after Khan told him to follow the established procedures. On 4 May, just after the investigation was launched, Khan's wife Shyamala Alagendra met up with Lynch. According to the material reviewed by MEE, Lynch privately expressed his own doubts about the allegations and said their timing was 'suspicious'. ICC lawyer linked to Netanyahu advisor warned Khan to drop war crimes probe or be 'destroyed' Read More » But following the publication in May this year of the sexual assault allegations against Khan, Lynch approached the ICC's presidency in a bid to have the prosecutor suspended. Lynch urged the presidency to start a process by which ICC member states could vote to formally suspend Khan. When this attempt failed, Lynch approached the two deputies and urged them to make the same case to the presidency. This followed leaked reports that Khan was preparing to request arrest warrants for more Israeli officials. It was amid this internal turmoil that the decision was made that Khan should step away on leave while the investigation continued. Lynch told MEE: "As you are aware, there is an ongoing confidential investigation into this matter that limits my right to reply." He said questions put to him by MEE were "false and misleading". Sanctions and pressure Since being subjected to sanctions by the US in February, Khan has had his American visa revoked, and his wife and children have been banned from travelling to the country. His bank accounts have also been frozen and his credit cards cancelled in the UK. At present, the progress and future direction of the ICC's investigation into alleged Israeli war crimes rests with Khan's deputies, pending the outcome of the ongoing OIOS investigation. On 27 May, the Wall Street Journal reported that just before he took leave, the prosecutor had been preparing to seek new warrants for Smotrich and Ben Gvir, Netanyahu's key far-right allies in his coalition government, over their roles in expanding illegal settlements in the occupied West Bank. Whether or not those applications have been filed is no longer public knowledge after the court recently ordered that any further warrants cannot be publicised. But the pressure on both the prosecutor's office and the court itself has continued to build, with US sanctions on four ICC judges on 8 June. In a further threat to the court last month, US State Department legal adviser Reed Rubinstein warned that "all options remain on the table" unless all arrest warrants and the investigation into alleged Israeli war crimes are dropped.
Al Etihad
4 hours ago
- Al Etihad
Lebanon president promises justice 5 years after Beirut port blast
4 Aug 2025 12:16 BEIRUT (AFP)Lebanese President Joseph Aoun on Monday vowed that 'justice is coming', five years after a catastrophic explosion at Beirut's port for which nobody has been held to explosion on August 4, 2020 was one of the world's largest non-nuclear explosions, devastating swathes of the Lebanese capital, killing more than 220 people and injuring more than 6, explosion was triggered by a fire in a warehouse where tons of ammonium nitrate fertiliser had been stored haphazardly for years after arriving by ship, despite repeated warnings to senior officials. Aoun said that the Lebanese state 'is committed to uncovering the whole truth, no matter the obstacles or how high the positions' involved. 'The law applies to all, without exception,' Aoun said in a has been declared a day of national mourning, and rallies demanding justice are planned later in the day, converging on the port."The blood of your loved ones will not be in vain," the president told victims' families, adding: "Justice is coming, accountability is coming."After more than a two-year impasse following political and judicial obstruction, investigating judge Tarek Bitar has finished questioning defendants and suspects, a judicial official told AFP on condition of is waiting for some procedures to be completed and for a response to requests last month to several Arab and European countries for 'information on specific incidents', the official added, without judge will then finalise the investigation and refer the file to the public prosecution for his opinion before he issues an indictment decision, the official Aoun said that 'we are working with all available means to ensure the investigations are completed with transparency and integrity.'Prime Minister Nawaf Salam, a former International Court of Justice judge, said on Sunday that knowing the truth and ensuring accountability were national issues, decrying decades of official resumed his inquiry after Aoun and Salam took office this year pledging to uphold judicial Sunday, Culture Minister Ghassan Salame said the port's gutted and partially collapsed wheat silos would be included on a list of historic buildings. Victims' families have long demanded their preservation as a memorial of the catastrophe.
