
Trump Budget Cuts Funding for Chronic Disease Prevention
Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the nation's health secretary, has said that tackling a chronic disease 'epidemic' would be a cornerstone of his Make America Healthy Again agenda, often invoking alarming statistics as an urgent reason for reforming public health in this country.
On Friday, President Trump released a proposed budget that called for cutting the funding of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention by almost half. Its chronic disease center was slated for elimination entirely, a proposal that came as a shock to many state and city health officials.
'Most Americans have some sort of ailment that could be considered chronic,' said Dr. Matifadza Hlatshwayo Davis, health director for the city of St. Louis.
Of the proposed cuts, she said, 'How do you reconcile that with trying to make America healthy again?'
The federal health department last month cut 2,400 jobs from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, whose National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion runs on the largest budget within the agency.
Programs on lead poisoning, smoking cessation and reproductive health were jettisoned in a reorganization last month.
Overall, the proposed budget would cut the C.D.C.'s budget to about $4 billion, compared with $9.2 billion in 2024. The budget blueprint makes no mention of the Prevention and Public Health Fund, a $1.2 billion program.
If that figure is taken into account, the cut may be even larger than Mr. Trump's proposal indicates.
The agency would also lose a center focused on preventing injuries, including those caused by firearms, as well as programs for H.I.V. surveillance and prevention, and grants to help states prepare for public health emergencies.
According to the proposed budget, the cuts are needed to eliminate 'duplicative, D.E.I., or simply unnecessary programs.' Congress draws up the U.S. budget, but given the Republican majority and its fealty to Mr. Trump, it is unclear how much the proposal will change.
C.D.C. officials had been told that the functions of the chronic disease center would be moved to a new agency within the health department called the Administration for a Healthy America.
And the proposal released on Friday appears to allocate $500 million to the health secretary in part 'to tackle nutrition, physical activity, healthy lifestyles, overreliance on medication and treatments.'
But at the C.D.C., the chronic disease center's budget was nearly three times as large. And even if part of the chronic disease center is resuscitated in the A.H.A., it's unlikely that its new iteration would involve C.D.C. scientists relocated from Atlanta.
'The actual subject-matter experts, who administer the programs, might not be there at C.D.C. anymore,' said Dr. Scott Harris, state health officer at the Alabama Department of Public Health. 'We certainly don't have the same level of expertise in my state.'
The department of Health and Human Services did not respond to a request for comment.
The C.D.C.'s chronic disease center ran programs aimed at preventing cancer, heart disease, diabetes, epilepsy and Alzheimer's disease.
But the center has also seeded initiatives farther afield, ranging from creating rural and urban hiking trails to ensuring that healthy options like salads are offered in airports. It also promoted wellness programs in marginalized communities.
Dr. Davis, the health director in St. Louis, said her department was already reeling from cuts to programs to curb smoking and reduce lead poisoning and health disparities, as well as the rescinding of more than $11 billion that the C.D.C. had been providing to state health departments.
'I would take back Covid-19 in a heartbeat over what's happening right now,' Dr. Davis said.
In the proposed budget, the administration suggested that the eliminated programs would be better managed by states.
But state health departments already manage most chronic disease programs, and three-quarters of the C.D.C. center's funding goes to support them.
Loss of those funds 'would be devastating for us,' said Dr. Harris, the health officer in Alabama.
The state has one of the highest rates of chronic diseases in the country, and about 84 percent of the public health department's budget comes from the C.D.C., Dr. Harris said. About $6 million goes to chronic disease programs, including blood pressure screening, nutrition education for diabetes and promotion of physical activity.
If those funds are cut, 'I am at a loss right now to tell you where that would come from,' he added. 'It just seems that no one really knows what to expect, and we're not really being asked for any input on that.'
Minnesota's vaunted health department has already laid off 140 employees, and hundreds more may be affected if more C.D.C. funding is lost. Cuts to chronic disease prevention will affect nursing homes, vaccine clinics and public health initiatives for Native Americans in the state.
'The actions of the federal government have left us out on a flimsy limb with no safety net below us,' said Dr. Brooke Cunningham, the state's health commissioner.
Until recently, 'there seemed to be a shared understanding at the local, state and federal level that health was important to invest in,' Dr. Cunningham said.
The chronic disease center's work touches American lives in many unexpected ways.
In Prairie Village, Kan., Stephanie Barr learned about the center 15 years ago when, working as a waitress with no health insurance, she discovered a lump in her breast the size of a lemon.
Through the C.D.C.'s National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program, she was able to get a mammogram and an ultrasound, and staff members helped her enroll in Medicaid for treatment after a biopsy determined the lump was malignant, Ms. Barr said.
'It was caught in the nick of time,' said Ms. Barr, now 45 and cancer free.
Since that program began in 1991, it has provided more than 16.3 million screening exams to more than 6.3 million people with no other affordable access, said Lisa Lacasse, president of the American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network.
The organization is one of 530 health associations that have signed a petition asking lawmakers to reject the proposed H.H.S. budget, which cuts the department's discretionary spending by about one-third. The signatories said the cuts would 'effectively devastate' the nation's research and public health infrastructure.
The budget also proposes dismantling disease registries and surveillance systems. 'If you don't collect the information or keep these surveillance systems going, you don't know what's happening, you don't know what the trends are,' said Dr. Philip Huang, director of Dallas County Health and Human Services.
'You're losing all of that history,' he said.
In a previous position as director of chronic diseases for Texas, Dr. Huang said he worked closely with C.D.C. experts who successfully reduced tobacco use among Americans. 'Eliminating the Office on Smoking and Health is just craziness if you're still wanting to address chronic diseases,' he said.
Smoking is still the leading cause of preventable death in the United States, causing more than 480,000 deaths each year, according to the C.D.C.
More than one in 10 American adults still smoke cigarettes regularly, but rates vary drastically by region, and C.D.C. surveillance helps target cessation programs to areas where they are needed most.
'Smoking rates have come down, but if the federal government takes its foot off the gas, the tobacco companies are ready to pop back up again,' said Erika Sward, assistant vice president for advocacy for the American Lung Association.
She warned that tobacco companies are constantly developing new products like nicotine pouches, whose use by teenagers doubled last year. 'It will take a lot more money to put the genie back in the bottle,' she said.
The C.D.C.'s chronic disease center works with communities and academic centers to promote effective programs, from creating quitting hotlines to reach young Iowans in rural areas to training members of Black churches in Columbia, S.C., to lead exercise and nutrition classes for their congregations.
In rural Missouri, dozens of walking trails have been developed in the 'boot heel' in the southeastern part of the state, an area with high rates of obesity and diabetes, said Ross Brownson, a public health researcher at Washington University in St. Louis who directs the Prevention Research Center in collaboration with the C.D.C.
'There's strong evidence now that if you change the walkability of a community, people will get more physical activity,' Dr. Brownson said. 'There aren't going to be health clubs in rural communities, but there is nature and the ability to have walking trails, and land is relatively cheap.'
With C.D.C. support, in Rochester, N.Y., people who are deaf and hard-of-hearing are being trained to lead exercise and wellness programs for other hearing-impaired people who can't easily participate in other gym classes.
In San Diego, researchers are testing ways to protect farm workers from exposure to ultraviolet rays and heat-related illnesses.
'Once they are up and started, they are community-driven and don't depend on the government,' said Allison Bay, who recently lost her job managing such projects at the C.D.C.
The C.D.C.'s reorganization also eliminated lead poisoning programs. Lead poisoning is also 'one of our greatest public health threats in the city of Cleveland,' said Dr. David Margolius, director of public health for the city.
The C.D.C. does not directly fund Cleveland's lead programs — the funding comes from the state. 'But just having the federal expertise to call on to help lead us toward a lead-free future, I mean, yeah, that has a big impact on us,' he said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Local leaders respond to potential Medicaid cuts
DERBY, Conn. (WTNH) — Leaders of multiple local hospitals came together Monday morning to warn what might happen if Republicans in Congress pass their proposed changes to Medicaid. They worry state and local costs will skyrocket if the federal government makes proposed changes to how the program works. One of the proposed changes involves charging low-income patients a co-pay of as much as $35 for certain medical appointments. Hartford HealthCare introduces 'Empowering New Parents' program 'What this does is act as a barrier,' said Griffin Hospital CEO Patrick Charmel. 'People will see they have an out-of-pocket responsibility and just won't pursue the care that they need.' Eventually, he said, those people will end up in the emergency room, which ends up costing more. The Trump administration contends their changes will lower insurance premiums, but Congresswoman Rosa DeLauro (D-CT3) disagrees. 'Premiums for individual plans sold on Access Health CT will increase by as much as 25% next year,' DeLauro said. DeLauro says proposed cuts threaten access to health care for nearly 14 million people nationwide. A white house spokesman had a different take in an emailed statement. 'President Trump pledged to protect and preserve Medicaid, and that's exactly what The One, Big, Beautiful accomplishes by kicking illegal immigrants off the program, implementing commonsense work requirements, and enforcing basic eligibility verification to combat fraud,' wrote spokesman Kush Desai. Hartford HealthCare and Pfizer partner to tackle workplace migraines For those not on Medicaid, they may wonder why they should care about these cuts. Hospitals have to provide care to everybody who needs it, whether they can pay for it or not. If there is less money from the government coming in to pay for low-income patients, that means hospitals that are already stretched thin financially, could find themselves in serious financial trouble. 'Cuts to programs that support our communities like Medicaid will stress that ecosystem further and bring changes, challenges and collapses to some of our critical infrastructure across the state of Connecticut,' said Dr. Tom Balcezak, EVP & Chief Clinical Officer, Yale New Haven Health System. Which, they say, means fewer people seeing fewer doctors. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
New Study Links Surge in Pediatric Firearm Deaths to Looser State Gun Laws
A major new study published June 9th in JAMA draws a stark line between firearm policy and pediatric deaths in the U.S. — and the findings are sobering and statistically significant. The research examined child and teen firearm mortality trends following the 2010 Supreme Court ruling McDonald v. Chicago, which expanded Second Amendment protections nationwide. While the ruling applied federally, individual states responded differently — some enacting looser gun laws in its wake, others maintaining or tightening restrictions. What followed, researchers say, was a divergence with life-and-death consequences. Here, Jeremy Samuel Faust, M.D., M.S., M.A., FACEP (of the Brigham & Women's Hospital Department of Emergency Medicine) explains the results: 'We found that the increase in pediatric firearm deaths since [McDonald] is large, but essentially isolated to states that expanded firearm access laws in the following years,' the authors wrote. 'In places that did not expand access (NY, CA, CT, etc.), rates have not gone up and in some places are down.' The numbers are stark. Over a 13-year period, there were approximately 7,400 more pediatric firearm deaths in so-called 'permissive' states than expected based on pre-McDonald trends — amounting to 573 additional deaths per year, all concentrated in states that rolled back gun restrictions. By contrast, in states that maintained stricter laws — such as New York, California, and Connecticut — rates of firearm death among youth either remained steady or declined slightly. The gap is most visible in the study's data visualization, below: 'The yellow and blue lines are the most permissive firearm law states,' the study noted. 'The gray line is the strict group of states. As you can see, no change in the strict places compared to pre-McDonald trends, but massive ones in the others.' Among the key findings: Homicides made up the majority of pediatric firearm deaths, but suicides also rose. The average age of victims was 14. In permissive states, Black youth experienced the highest initial rates and the steepest increases in firearm mortality. In strict states, however, Black youth did not see an uptick. States with strict gun laws — while still operating under the Second Amendment — avoided these increases entirely. While not part of this study, previous data underscores the broader context: Firearms are now the leading cause of death for Americans aged 1 to 19. But that risk isn't evenly distributed. In Massachusetts, for example, firearms rank sixth among causes of death in that age group. In Mississippi, they're number one. The bottom line: Gun laws matter — and when it comes to children, the difference in policies can be fatal. The post New Study Links Surge in Pediatric Firearm Deaths to Looser State Gun Laws appeared first on Katie Couric Media.
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
ACI Elevates Health and Hygiene with the launch of Cleaning for Health Initiative
New Cleaning for Health Initiative, underscores the importance of safeguarding health & promoting wellbeing Survey shows Americans recognize the connection between cleaning and health Learn more about the new Levels of Clean Guide WASHINGTON, June 09, 2025--(BUSINESS WIRE)--The American Cleaning Institute launched its new Cleaning for Health initiative, aimed at empowering individuals and communities with the knowledge and tools to put into practice smart, targeted cleaning strategies that not only maintain their health, but create healthier living environments. ACI's latest survey, conducted by Wakefield Research, revealed that 97% of Americans believe cleaning and hygiene are important for public health and the health of our communities. Additionally, three in four people (74%) have changed their cleaning habits to improve health - and the majority recognize the positive impact of cleaning on both physical (91%) and mental (84%) well-being. To kick off the launch of Cleaning for Health, ACI is introducing a new resource guide: "Levels of Clean." This free resource guide, backed by health and safety experts, provides helpful tips and information on the level of cleaning you should employ throughout your home based on factors such as the presence of viruses and sickness or a family member's susceptibility to illness or allergies. "At ACI, we know cleaning plays a critical role in everyday life, but how you approach it often shifts depending on life stage, seasonal routines, and personal health concerns," said Brian Sansoni, ACI Senior Vice President of Communications and Outreach. "Cleaning is more than just a chore; it's one of the most important actions individuals and families can take to prevent the spread of common viruses and illnesses. The Cleaning for Health initiative builds on our commitment to being a trusted source for practical, science-based guidance that helps individuals and families make informed choices about their cleaning routines." "In my practice, I see the consequences of preventable illness every day - missed school, missed work and germs being passed from one family member to another," said Dr. Bayo Curry-Winchell, urgent care physician and health advocate. "I try to emphasize to my patients that small, consistent habits - like handwashing, surface disinfecting, and maintaining a clean home can play a powerful role in keeping individuals and families healthier." To learn more about Levels of Clean and how to stay safe and healthy, visit the new Cleaning for Health webpage at As part of Cleaning for Health, and for the third consecutive year, ACI is partnering with the American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP) to ensure individuals and families are equipped with the most up-to-date guidance on protecting themselves from illness. This collaboration builds on a suite of resources developed jointly by ACI and AAFP offering practical, accessible information for families seeking to use everyday cleaning as a tool to support better health. Topics include: Disinfecting Your Home. A guide on when and how to disinfect household surfaces to help stop the spread of germs. Preparing for Parenthood: Cleaning Your Home. Tips for parents of infants on how to keep a safe, clean environment during the early stages of development to help prevent illness. About the Survey The ACI Spring Cleaning Survey was conducted by Wakefield Research ( among 1,000 nationally representative U.S. adults ages 18+, between February 10th and February 18th, 2025, using an email invitation and an online survey. The data has been weighted to ensure an accurate representation of nationally representative U.S. adults ages 18+. Results of any sample are subject to sampling variation. The magnitude of the variation is measurable and is affected by the number of interviews and the level of the percentages expressing the results. For the interviews conducted in this particular study, the chances are 95 in 100 that a survey result does not vary, plus or minus, by more than 3.1 percentage points from the result that would be obtained if interviews had been conducted with all persons in the universe represented by the sample. About The American Cleaning Institute The American Cleaning Institute® (ACI – is the Home of the U.S. Cleaning Products Industry® and represents the $60 billion U.S. cleaning product supply chain. ACI members include the manufacturers and formulators of soaps, detergents, and general cleaning products used in household, commercial, industrial and institutional settings; companies that supply ingredients and finished packaging for these products; and chemical distributors. ACI serves the growth and innovation of the U.S. cleaning products industry by advancing the health and quality of life of people and protecting our planet. ACI achieves this through a continuous commitment to sound science and being a credible voice for the cleaning products industry. View source version on Contacts Jessica Ek – 202.662.2509 (office) 202.384.6896 (mobile) Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data