Cassidy, Kaine propose new funding trust for Social Security
A June report from the program's Old-Age and Survivors Insurance (OASI) fund would only be able to cover '100 percent of total scheduled benefits until 2033,' while the Disability Insurance (DI) trust fund is estimated to be able to pay '100 percent of total scheduled benefits through at least 2099.'
However, Cassidy and Kaine say trust fund investments should be diversified in order to maintain the available Social Security benefits.
'We propose creating an additional investment fund — in parallel to the trust fund, not replacing it — that would be invested in stocks, bonds and other investments that generate a higher rate of return, helping keep the program from running dry,' Cassidy and Kaine wrote in a Tuesday op-ed for The Washington Post.
The two estimate that it would take a $1.5 trillion up-front investment into the fund to get it going, while suggesting the Treasury fund the accounts for 75 years.
'The Treasury would temporarily shoulder the burden of providing benefits to Social Security beneficiaries — but when the new fund's 75 years are up, it would pay the Treasury back and supplement payroll taxes to help fill the future gap,' the senators said.
Cassidy and Kaine said their program would work, citing the National Railroad Retirement Investment Trust, which was created by Congress in 2001 and successfully provided retirement benefit payouts for railroad workers.
'The trust has remained firmly in the black, with returns even exceeding expectations at some points and with payments consistently remaining reliable and on schedule,' the lawmakers said.
'Our proposal is also consistent with virtually every other pension plan — state and private — currently operating in our country, and it matches the strategy most nations use to fund their retirement programs,' they added.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Adam Back's $2.1B Bitcoin Treasury Play Set to Challenge MARA in BTC Holdings
Bitcoin Standard Treasury Co. (BSTR), a bitcoin (BTC) treasury vehicle led by cryptography pioneer Adam Back, sees itself as a company with a mission to accelerate real-world bitcoin adoption. But it might be setting out on another milestone: becoming one of the biggest corporate bitcoin holders. The company, which is preparing to go public on Nasdaq by merging with Cantor Equity Partners (CEPO), already has 30,021 BTC on its balance sheet, with plans to grow its stack beyond 50,000 coins. This will set it on the path of potentially overtaking MARA Holdings (MARA) as the second-largest corporate holder of BTC behind Strategy. MARA has more than 50,600 BTC, according to Strategy has just under 629,000. Currently, MSTR, MARA, and BSTR collectively hold roughly 710,000 bitcoin, which represents about 3.38% of bitcoin's fixed supply of 21 million. 'Liquidity, security, and scale' Unlike some corporate treasuries that sit on bitcoin passively, BSTR intends to use techniques that include selling puts to accumulate BTC at lower prices, using bitcoin-backed revolvers and placing collateral with regulated tri-party custodians. 'We're not interested in chasing DeFi yield or taking on counterparty risk we can't manage. This is about liquidity, security, and scale," Back said exclusively with CoinDesk. 'Bitcoin was created as sound money and BSTR is being created to bring that same integrity to modern capital markets.' The SPAC deal with Cantor combines, for the first time, traditional Wall Street financing with a bitcoin-denominated private placement of equity (PIPE). In addition to 25,000 BTC contributed by the company's founders, another 5,021 BTC will be raised from the bitcoin community. The company is also raising up to $1.5 billion in fiat financing, the largest PIPE ever announced alongside a bitcoin treasury SPAC merger. $400 million in common equity at $10 per share. Up to $750 million in convertible senior notes (30% conversion premium, $13 per share). Up to $350 million in convertible preferred stock with a 7% dividend and a $13 per share equivalent conversion price. CEPO could add up to $200 million from its trust, subject to redemptions. 'By securing both fiat and bitcoin funding on day one, we are putting unprecedented firepower behind a single mission: maximizing bitcoin ownership per share while accelerating real-world bitcoin adoption,' Back said. A first for bitcoin treasuries The in-kind PIPE allows investors to deliver BTC at closing and potentially capture upside before settlement. Back said the approach was designed to appeal to both crypto-native players and traditional managers seeking exposure without waiting for post-close market buys. The firm's CIO Sean Bill, who previously helped a U.S. pension fund make one of the first institutional allocations to BTC, said the strategy resonated with traditional investors. "We're building the Berkshire Hathaway (BRK) of Bitcoin, an actively managed Treasury that will pursue yield and alpha strategies, and strategic acquisitions within the Bitcoin ecosystem'. 'We're flipping the script on Wall Street as we seek to fuse Bitcoin into Finance and Capital Markets, unlike other Treasury companies we're not coming to Wall Street seeking fiat currency to buy Bitcoin, we're showing up with a 25,000 Bitcoin commitment and more importantly we issued the first ever Bitcoin in kind Equity PIPE in the United States, raising another 5,021 Bitcoins from OG Bitcoiners. We're brining the Bitcoin to Wall Street. We believe that the future of finance runs on Bitcoin',' Bill told CoinDesk exclusively. Bridging bitcoin and Wall Street The leadership team sees BSTR as a bridge between the bitcoin ecosystem and institutional capital markets. 'We're bringing the traders, we're bringing the bitcoiners to Wall Street,' Back said, noting the potential for the U.S. market's liquidity to amplify the success of bitcoin-denominated convertibles that have already gained traction in Europe. The deal is expected to close in the fourth quarter, with the company trading under the reserved ticker BSTR. If the raise is fully subscribed, the launch could set a new scale record for corporate bitcoin treasuries and offer a template for others looking to merge sound money with modern market instruments. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
AT&T Customers Can Receive Up to $7,500 in $177M Data Breach Settlement — Here's How
The data breaches of AT&T customers occurred in March and July of 2024 NEED TO KNOW AT&T customers may be eligible for payouts of up to $7,500 as part of a $177 million settlement tied to data breaches Seventy-three million customers had their data, which included social security numbers, stolen in a March 2024 breach, and in the second breach in July 2024, 'nearly all' of AT&T cellular customers had their phone numbers leaked The deadline to submit a claim is Nov. 18 AT&T customers may be eligible for payouts of up to $7,500 as part of a multimillion-dollar settlement tied to data breaches in 2024. The company said it proposed a $177 million settlement to resolve multiple lawsuits — $149 million for the first class-action lawsuit involving a data breach in March 2024 and $28 million for another breach in July 2024. In March 2024, AT&T said it was investigating a data breach that exposed information, including social security numbers and birth dates, belonging to 73 million customers, whose data had been stored in its systems from 2019 through 2024, according to CNN. The second data breach occurred four months later and leaked the telephone numbers of 'nearly all' of AT&T cellular customers that used the AT&T network between May and October 2022, per the outlet. The company said hackers downloaded call and text logs onto a third-party platform. As part of the settlement, customers affected by the first data breach may be eligible to claim up to $5,000 in compensation for losses that occurred in 2019 or later, according to the settlement website. The amount of cash payment people can receive depends on the information they had leaked. For example, if a person had their social security number leaked, they were able to claim a higher cash payment than someone who only had other information, including their name or phone number, leaked. Those impacted by the second breach could receive up to $2,500 for losses that occurred on or after April 14, 2024. Those who were affected by both breaches, or an 'overlap settlement class member,' could get up to $7,500. For all claims, AT&T customers must show documentation proving that their stolen data was tied to either or both of these two data breaches. The deadline to submit a claim is Nov. 18, according to the settlement website. However, the website said the $177 million settlement is still awaiting approval, and the final approval hearing is scheduled for Dec. 3 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas. 'The amount of money that will be available for Settlement Class Member Cash Payments is unknown at this time,' the settlement website states. An AT&T spokesperson told PEOPLE in a statement, 'While we deny the allegations in these lawsuits that we were responsible for these criminal acts, we have agreed to this settlement to avoid the expense and uncertainty of protracted litigation.' 'We remain committed to protecting our customers' data and ensuring their continued trust in us,' the representative added. Read the original article on People
Los Angeles Times
12 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
Bessent says he's not pushing Fed cuts, just touting models
U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said he isn't calling for a series of interest-rate cuts from the Federal Reserve, just pointing out that models suggest a 'neutral' rate would be about 1.5 percentage points lower. 'I didn't tell the Fed what to do,' Bessent said Thursday in an interview on Fox Business, referring to his comments a day before about how the central bank 'could go into a series of rate cuts here.' Bessent said Thursday that 'what I said was that to get to a neutral rate on interest, that that would be approximately a 150-basis-point cut.' The so-called neutral rate is the level at which policy neither stimulates nor restricts the economy. Fed Chair Jerome Powell said July 30 that there are 'a range of views of what the neutral rate is at this moment for our economy' and that his own estimate was that the current setting was 'modestly restrictive.' 'I believe that there is room, if one believes in the neutral rate,' for a series of rate cuts, Bessent said. 'I'm not calling for one. I didn't call for one. I just said that a model of a neutral rate is approximately 150 basis points lower.' The Fed last month kept its target range for the benchmark rate at 4.25% to 4.5%. The median estimate of the neutral rate among Fed officials over the long run is 3%. Powell and many of his colleagues have for months argued that more time was needed to assess any impact on inflation and inflation expectations from President Donald Trump's tariff hikes. Trump has regularly criticized Powell for holding rates. Bessent, after taking the Treasury's helm, said he would only address past Fed actions, not future ones, but later weighed in on what he thought markets were expecting monetary policymakers to do. This week, he has taken to referring to economic models, and has repeatedly suggested a 50-basis-point rate cut is possible at the Fed's September meeting. 'It's not really the role of the Treasury secretary to opine' on the neutral rate, said Julia Coronado, founder of the research firm MacroPolicy Perspectives and a former Fed economist. 'The fact that the most senior economic official in the administration is saying these things publicly is direct, public pressure on what he wants the Fed to do.' Former Treasury Secretary Lawrence Summers, who served under Democratic President Bill Clinton, said he was 'surprised' to see Bessent's remarks on Wednesday. 'Usually that kind of judgment is not made by administration officials, and I'm not sure it's helpful for the administration to be publicly prescribing on monetary policy,' Summers said on Bloomberg Television's Wall Street Week with David Westin. Summers, a paid contributor to Bloomberg TV, also suggested that a measure of the neutral rate should incorporate the effects of large budget deficits and elevated demand for funds to pay for data centers — along with higher asset prices that reduce the flow of funds into savings. Against that backdrop, 'you wouldn't be prescribing a 175 basis point cut in rates unless we see a recession.' Interest-rate futures as of Thursday morning reflect bets that the Fed will cut rates by less than a cumulative 150 basis points by the end of next year. They also show slightly less confidence in a 25-basis-point reduction at the September meeting. The retreat came after a release on US wholesale inflation showed those prices climbed by the most in three years. Speaking to Bloomberg Television on Wednesday, Bessent said 'if you look at any model' it suggests that 'we should probably be 150, 175 basis points lower' on the Fed's benchmark. He also said that officials might have cut rates if they'd been aware of the revised data on the labor market that came out a couple of days after the latest meeting. 'I suspect we could have had rate cuts in June and July,' Bessent said. 'I don't know what model he's talking about,' said Jim Bianco, president of Bianco Research and a longtime Fed and Treasury watcher. 'There is no model I'm aware of that says it should be that low,' he said of the Fed's benchmark. Other gauges of where the Fed should be, such as the Taylor rule, also aren't arguing that the main rate should be 150 to 175 basis points lower than it is, Bianco said. He added that there have been many instances over the decades of 'cajoling Fed chairs,' and they're 'welcome to offer their opinion,' but it shouldn't change the central bank leader's opinion. Bessent repeated on Thursday that, given the context of the weaker jobs figures and not having cut rates the past couple of months, 'perhaps a 50-basis-point cut in September was warranted.' Two Fed district bank presidents said they're not backing such a move at this point. San Francisco Fed President Mary Daly said in a Wall Street Journal interview Wednesday, 'I just don't see that. I don't see the need to catch up.' St. Louis President Alberto Musalem said on CNBC Thursday, that a 50 basis-point cut would be 'unsupported by the current state of the economy and the outlook for the economy.' Flatley writes for Bloomberg.
