Police make multiple arrests at Norwich protest supporting Palestine Action
'These people were all arrested on suspicion of displaying an item in support of a proscribed organisation, contrary to Section 13 of the Terrorism Act 2000,' Norfolk Police said.
'Five of those arrested have been taken to Wymondham police investigation centre for questioning, where they remain.
'The remaining eight people were spoken to by officers and provided their details for further investigation.
'They were therefore de-arrested.
'A 14th person had their sign seized by officers during the protest and provided their details when requested.'
Superintendent Wes Hornigold said: 'We will always work to facilitate peaceful protest and protect the democratic right to assembly, however the actions of this group were unlawful.
'Our officers' role is to prevent disorder, damage and disruption in the local community and they will use their powers to do this.
'Any breaches of the law will be dealt with.'
The arrests came a day after the Metropolitan Police said a further 60 people will be prosecuted for support Palestine Action.
The force said this followed the arrest of more than 700 people since the group was banned on July 5, including 522 in central London last Saturday.
More prosecutions are expected in the coming weeks, and arrangements have been put in place 'that will enable us to investigate and prosecute significant numbers each week if necessary', the Met said.
Last week, the Met confirmed the first three charges in England and Wales for offences under the Terrorism Act relating to Palestine Action.
The three people charged were arrested at a protest in Parliament Square on July 5.
Palestine Action was proscribed in July after the group claimed responsibility for damage to jets at RAF Brize Norton and was also linked to allegations of a serious assault on staff and police officers at a business premises in south Gloucestershire, the force said.
Stephen Parkinson, director of public prosecutions, said: 'The public has a democratic right to protest peacefully in this country, and I understand the depth of feeling around the horrific scenes in Gaza.
'However, Palestine Action is now a proscribed terrorist organisation and those who have chosen to break the law will be subject to criminal proceedings under the Terrorism Act.
'When protest conduct crosses the line from lawful activity into criminality, we have a duty to enforce the law.
'People should be clear about the real-life consequences for anyone choosing to support Palestine Action.
'A terrorism conviction can severely impact your life and career – it can restrict your ability to travel overseas and work in certain professions.
'I urge people to think very carefully about their actions at protests.
'Anyone who chooses to disobey the law will have to face the consequences.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
4 hours ago
- The National
It's interesting to see who the British state views as its enemies
READ MORE: Do not enforce Palestine Action terror ban in Scotland, SNP members urge government By coincidence, a recent obituary to the former head of MI5, Stella Rimington, referred to her first job as an intelligence officer, which was to work on counter-subversion in relation to CND and the National Union of Mineworkers, despite the fact that these two organisations at that time had substantial public support. It is always useful to know who are regarded as the real enemies of the British state. How many are working on counter-subversion in relation to the independence movement? After all, that could really cause problems for the British state. Isobel Lindsay Biggar
Metro
4 hours ago
- Metro
Man arrested at protest after police misread 'Plasticine Action' T-shirt
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Police mistakenly arrested a protester over terrorism offences because they thought his 'Plasticine Action' T-shirt read 'Palestine Action.' Miles Pickering, 59, says senior officers burst out laughing when they realised the blunder before releasing him without charge. He told Metro that he turned up to a protest in Parliament Square on August 9 over the Israel-Hamas war in Gaza wearing the T-shirt. However, when a police officer saw the tee, he arrested the 59-year-old and hauled him to Scotland Yard. This shirt was only a few jumbled letters away from Palestine Action, a group banned under terrorism legislation last month. Section 13 of the Terrorism Act 2000 makes it illegal to wear anything supporting a banned organisation. Instead, the T-shirt was for Plasticine Action, a group of artists who campaign against animation generated by artificial intelligence (AI) Plasticine is a modelling material used to create stop-motion figures, such as the character Morph, who features on Miles' shirt. Miles, from Brighton, told Metro: 'He must have misinterpreted the fact that I was wearing a Plasticine Action T-shirt as me wearing a Palestine Action T-shirt. 'I do not support Palestine Action and was not at the protest to support them. 'But I was definitely there to protest genocide and the government's role, as well as to highlight the plight of animators losing their work in this country.' The protest itself led to 532 arrests on terrorism charges, almost all under section 13 of the Terrorism Act. Miles was also nicked under Section 13 and was taken to two gazebos handling the large queues of arrested people. Protesters cheered Miles and others on, the engineer recalled, saying: ''Well done,' 'You're a hero', 'You're fantastic'.' 'I'm pointing to my T-shirt and going, 'Have a look, Plasticine Action',' Miles said. 'I put my fingers to my lips like, 'shh, don't tell the police'. And everyone's laughing and taking photos. And the crowd can see what's happening.' As he was waiting in line to be booked in, a senior officer asked the arresting officer if Miles could be detained under Section 12, which would bring more serious charges of supporting a proscribed group. Miles said: 'My arresting officer said, 'I can't,' and the senior officer said, 'Why not?' 'And he said, 'Because he hasn't got Palestine Action written on him. He's got Plasticine Action written on him'.' Miles claims that 10 minutes later, two plainclothes police officers approached him and burst out laughing after seeing his shirt. 'They both look at me, and they said, 'Can you just hold your scarf out of the way, please, sir?' So I did that, and they both laughed quite a lot.' Shortly after, Miles was let go. 'The arresting officer says, 'I've got some good news and some bad news. The good news is I'm de-arresting you',' Miles added. 'And I said: 'What's the bad news?' He said, 'It's going to be really embarrassing for me'.' Miles' friend, Cara Brenna, 50, who was not present at the rally, said Miles is a 'lovely guy who stands up for what is right'. 'He's just using humour to show how crazy things are,' the creative artist and charity fundraiser told Metro. 'The fact that he was arrested for wearing a T-shirt saying, 'Plasticine Action'? We need to have a look at what is happening and what common sense is.' The Brighton local added: 'The police's job is to protect the people, but is that being done?' After footage of Miles' arrest went viral online, demand for more copies of the shirt has skyrocketed. Profits go to the charity Medical Aid for Palestinians. According to the product pages at the time of writing, 1,745 white and black Plasticine Action T-shirts have been sold. Miles said: 'What do the police do with people who are walking around with Plasticine Action T-shirts? 'And if another 1,000 people are wearing our T-shirt, or even 500, are they really gonna arrest them as well?' Footage over the weekend from another pro-Palestine protest in Glasgow showed a man, also wearing a Plasticine Action tee, being spoken to by officers. The force confirmed that no arrests were made. Palestine Action was banned after members broke into the RAF Brize Norton in Oxfordshire and sprayed red paint into aircraft engines. The group, which does not call for violence against people and often targets sites operated by Israeli weapons manufacturers, argued that their actions were a response to the 'genocide' happening in Gaza. Peter Leary, deputy director of the Palestine Solidarity Campaign, accused the government of 'wasting public resources' and 'silencing' protesters. 'The disgraceful proscription of Palestine Action comes alongside the use of draconian police powers to impose unprecedented restrictions on marches in solidarity with the Palestinian people,' he told Metro. More Trending The Met Police said in a statement to Metro: 'Shortly after 2pm on Saturday (August 9), officers on duty in Parliament Square arrested a man on suspicion of an offence under Section 12 of the Terrorism Act 2000. 'At the time of his arrest, the man was wearing a scarf that partially obscured the slogan on his T-shirt, which officers believed read Palestine Action. 'He was taken to one of the nearby prisoner processing points where, once officers realised the t-shirt actually read Plasticine Action, he was de-arrested and was free to leave. 'His arrest is not included in the figure of 532 arrests as part of the policing operation that day.' Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page.
The Guardian
4 hours ago
- The Guardian
Changing the narrative about Palestine Action
According to Peter Hain, 'the approach to Palestine Action is contrary to every form of peaceful protest in British history, whether that's the Chartists and suffragettes or anti-apartheid and anti-fascist protesters' (Peter Hain says UK government 'digging itself into hole' over Palestine Action, 13 August). Mr Hain, I'm afraid, needs to return to his history books. Describing those radical and sometimes violent movements as 'peaceful protest' domesticates them and ignores the role that street fighting and property damage (for example) have played in successful protest in the past. From attempted armed uprisings, through bombings of cricket pavilions and churches, to Cable Street and elsewhere, those examples he gives of 'peaceful protest' saw activists exercise violent resistance. Furthermore, the repression of Palestine Action and those protesting against its repression is very much not contrary to approaches to past protest movements. Excessive action through police and courts, and violent repression from the British state, have been common. From transportation (and sometimes execution) of early reformers, through the force-feeding of imprisoned suffrage activists, to the beating to death of Blair Peach by police officers, the state has often responded to serious challenges to its authority in ways that defy reason, and used the criminal justice system to do so. Mr Hain is repeating a longstanding liberal story that seeks to domesticate radicalism. It's the story of a reasonable people interacting with reasonable governments to ensure slow and steady progress. Unfortunately, it is a story that runs contrary to historical (and present) NixonBlackford, Perth and Kinross As a 57-year-old participant in the 9 August Palestine Action protest, I find the tone of slightly surprised celebration of older participants to be rather patronising. There's nothing exceptional about older people's participation in political refusal, and I'm not up for the kind of argument that things must really be bad if old white women are coming out to protest in force. Older people – black, brown and white – have been central to civil disobedience as long as there has been protest. So while of course there will have been many people at the 9 August protest who were facing arrest for the first time, there were also many seasoned activists who were there in solidarity, in leadership and in persistent refusal to accept state curtailment of rights. These solidarity politics, which were beautifully in evidence among those waiting for arrest with their placards, come from feminist, queer and anti-racist histories of organising, solidarity and ethics that older people inaugurated. Today's protests are possible because of the refusal of people to keep quiet about poverty and inequality, racism, sexism, homophobia and transphobia over many years. They are possible because of the risks that organisers have taken that have challenged police brutality and the hierarchies of social justice that prevent a full life – including freedom of expression – for all. People over 50 will continue to show up as long as there is public space to occupy. Clare HemmingsLondon What would happen if people wishing to demonstrate against the outlawing of Palestine Action carried banners emblazoned with the words 'inept escalation' – a description of the government's legislation that happens to be an anagram of the banned organisation's name (Protester arrested over 'Plasticine Action' T-shirt: 'How ridiculous is this?', 18 August)?Philip HoyChurch Enstone, Oxfordshire Have an opinion on anything you've read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.
