Battery energy storage park near Scottish town approved
Apatura has now secured permission to build a combined total of more than 2.1 gigawatts in electricity storage capacity at sites across central Scotland with the latest news.
The planned development is located on land adjacent to Cochno Road, two miles from Clydebank and eight miles from the city of Glasgow, which had been the focus of protest by community members who raised concerns over safety and the site's placing.
The new site will connect via an underground cable to the Windyhill substation 560 metres away and also the Drumchapel substation two miles away.
Andrew Philpott, chief development Officer at Apatura, said: 'The Whitehall project is in a carefully chosen strategic location that will directly support the UK's energy security strategy. Once commissioned, it will play a key role in providing the resilient infrastructure network needed for a net zero future.'
Mr Philpott added: 'Battery storage plays a major role in Scotland and the wider UK's transition to a low carbon energy system and economy. Projects like Whitehall will directly contribute to stabilising energy prices and reducing bills for households and businesses, and are also integral to the UK's goals of cutting emissions and boosting energy independence and security.
'Apatura is committed to opening up access to affordable clean energy for Scotland and the entire UK. Our BESS projects are an essential part of the wider nationwide effort to upgrade and future-proof the country's energy infrastructure to meet our expanding energy needs in a sustainable way.'
In the decision letter granting consent, Scottish ministers said they 'regard the proposed development as essential infrastructure. Through the provision of energy storage, it adds flexibility and resilience necessary to maintain secure and reliable supplies of energy to all our homes and businesses as our energy transition takes place.'
Golf's female professionals left financially exposed by lack of TV coverage
The Women's Scottish Open gets underway tomorrow with Gemma Dryburgh, Scotland's highest-ranked female player, among a field that includes 15 major winners with 23 championships between them.
If she achieves her dream of winning on home soil in front of family and friends she will take home a top prize worth less than 20% of the $1.57 million earned earlier this month by Chris Gotterup, the victor in the men's Genesis Scottish Open.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scottish Sun
4 minutes ago
- Scottish Sun
Scott McTominay ranked Scotland's most attractive footballer – as Celtic star makes top ten
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) FOOTIE hero Scott McTominay has a new honour to his name... the most attractive Scottish player. The Napoli idol topped a new list of 100 Scots which saw Ipswich Town goalkeeper Cieran Slicker rank second ahead and Luton Town defender Kal Naismith in third. Sign up for the Celtic newsletter Sign up 3 It's been some year for Scott McTominay Credit: Willie Vass 3 Kieran Tierney makes the top 10 Credit: Kenny Ramsay 3 Slicker's caught the eye Credit: Willie Vass Scotland captain and Liverpool legend Andy Robertson was in fourth. Researchers for a betting website came up with the rankings by looking at average searches about the players' love lives and relationship status to their height and the 'golden ratio attractiveness' which calculates facial symmetry. Researchers for gave each player a final score out of 100 from an overall list of over 200 stars eligible to play for the national team. McTominay, who has enjoyed a meteoric rise in fame and fortune since leaving Manchester United for Italy in a £25 million transfer a year ago this month, emerged as number one or 'hottest Scot'. The goalscoring midfielder, who inspired Napoli to Serie A and was judged the most important player in Italy last season, is nicknamed 'McFratm' - from the Neapolitan slang 'fratm,' meaning 'brother' - by his club's famously passionate fans. He came top with an overall score of 87.73 - a combination of his impressive golden ratio score of 77.54, striking 193cm (over 6ft 3in) height and staggering 6498 online searches per month relating to his relationship status, which is the most of any Scots footballer. Making up the top ten hottest Scots footballers are Dinamo Zagreb stopper Scott McKenna, Bologna skipper Lewis Ferguson, Hibs midfielder Josh Campbell, Celtic hero Kieran Tierney, Motherwell starlet Lennon Miller, and FK Haka of Finland's Jordan Houston. Hibs winger Chris Cadden was judged the Scottish footballer with the face closest to perfection. The winger scored the highest marks for facial symmetry, based on the golden ratio analysis, with a score of 79.88, helping him to 13th place overall. Cadden's accolade may cause tension however as his twin brother Nicky - who also stars for Hibs - only scores 74.75. It might also solve a family argument as in a YouTube Q&A posted by Hibernian in December, they both claimed to be the better looking twin. Celtic transfer special as Rodgers lands SEVENTH signing, Hoops eye winger & left-back latest Sturm Graz starlet Max Johnston has the second most attractive face (79.72) according to the research, followed by Falkirk's Brad Spencer (78.85), Celtic defender Dane Murray (78.68) and Hibernian striker Kieron Bowie (78.61). Scotland defender Jack Hendry of Saudi club Al-Ettifaq and Darmstadt 98's Scottish striker Fraser Hornby emerged as the tallest Scottish footballers in the world, measuring 195cm or over 6ft 4in. A spokesperson for said: 'All of these top 100 players we list are scientifically attractive men, either because they have very symmetrical faces - something known to spark attraction in our brains - are taller than average or have something about them that has fans Googling 'Does he have a girlfriend?' 'Out of all the talented players Scotland has produced recently, he generates the highest interest from fans curious about his love life, with nearly 6500 searches every month.' Top 10 hottest Scottish footballers 1- Scott McTominay (Napoli) Score: 87.73 2- Cieran Slicker (Ipswich) Score: 80.48 3- Kai Naismith (Luton) Score: 79.89 4- Andrew Robertson (Liverpool) Score: 79.70 5- Scott McKenna (Dinamo Zagreb) Score: 79.24 6- Lewis Ferguson (Bologna) Score: 78.23 7- Josh Campbell (Hibs) Score: 78.02 8- Kieran Tierney (Celtic) Score: 77.87 9- Lennon Miller (Motherwell) Score: 77.19 10- Jordan Houston (FC Haka) Score: 76.80 Keep up to date with ALL the latest news and transfers at the Scottish Sun football page
Telegraph
4 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Scottish Tories eye Reform electoral pact
Senior Scottish Conservatives have discussed striking an electoral pact with Reform UK for the Holyrood elections next spring. One figure backing a deal told The Telegraph it could help avoid splitting the vote on the Right and kick the SNP out of power in Scotland. The deal, which would not need to be made public, would see the Tories either not stand candidates or go easy in areas where Reform is better placed to win and vice versa. It comes as Nigel Farage 's party sits above the Conservatives in third place in opinion polls for the Scottish Parliament elections next May. A pact does not have the backing of Russell Findlay, the Scottish Tory leader, whose team released a statement ruling out the possibility when approached by The Telegraph. But the fact a deal is being considered at senior levels in the party underscores the scale of Reform's popularity surge north of the border and the concerns it has triggered among Tories. In Scotland, Reform now has 15 councillors, 14 of whom used to be Conservatives. It is in marked contrast to other political parties previously run by Mr Farage, such as the UK Independence Party (Ukip), which struggled to get a foothold north of border. One Tory MSP has privately spoken of a defection 'watch list' in Holyrood of those suspected of switching to Reform. Mr Farage also waved away the idea he would agree to any such pact, telling The Telegraph: 'No chance. The Tories are dying in Scotland and I've got no desire to do a deal with them whatsoever.' The idea of some form of agreement, public or private, between the Conservatives and Reform has become a common discussion point in Westminster. Average UK-wide voting polls have Reform in first place on 30 per cent of the vote, with the Tories in a distant third on 17 per cent. Labour is in second place on 22 per cent. Kemi Badenoch, the Conservative leader, has ruled out a pre-vote deal with Mr Farage, but speculation continues with the next general election not due until 2029. The recent by-election result for the Scottish Parliament seat of Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse underscored the challenges of Right-wing parties splitting the vote. Labour won the seat with 32 per cent of the vote, followed by the SNP on 29 per cent. Reform came third on 26 per cent. Had the Tories, who got 6 per cent, not stood a candidate, it is possible Reform would have beaten Labour and taken the seat, though pollsters often caution against hard conclusions when predicting voter behaviour. Mr Farage has agreed to election pacts before. The Brexit Party, the precursor to Reform which Mr Farage led, had criticism of the Tory handling of the issue of Europe as its heart. Yet he still agreed not to stand candidates against sitting Conservatives at the 2019 general election to help Boris Johnson win and get a Brexit deal through the Commons, securing the UK's departure from the European Union. Despite interest in some quarters of the Scottish Conservative Party, other figures strongly played down the possibility of a pact. One Scottish Tory politician who has spent years in influential positions said: 'Churchill's phrase comes to mind, 'You don't negotiate with a tiger when your head's in its mouth'. We're in competition with Reform – we're not in partnership with them.' The source said Scottish Tory supporters had brought up the prospect of a deal with Reform but that there was little chance it would be adopted by the leadership. Another senior Scottish Tory said: 'Why would Reform do a deal? I can see why we might be interested in it, but why would they?' There have long been suspicions on the Right of coordination between Labour and the Liberal Democrats at general elections to maximise the chances of Tory defeats. The Lib Dems surged from winning 11 MPs at the 2019 general election to 72 MPs at the 2024 general election with almost no increase in overall vote share. The party's strategists have talked about how they ruthlessly focused on a small number of winnable seats rather than competing hard everywhere. Labour was likely to have benefited from the decreased campaigning in non-target seats. But there are reasons why striking some form of deal would be less likely in elections for the Scottish Parliament than the UK-wide Parliament in Westminster. The electoral system for the Scottish Parliament has a proportional element, meaning as well as individual constituency races a party wins some MPs for their overall vote totals. Reform, whose strategists hope to get between 10 and 20 MSPs next spring, is expected to get their victories almost entirely via this way, known as 'the list', rather than winning constituencies. That could provide a disincentive to strike a deal with the Tories, given a lower overall vote total would likely mean fewer MSPs thanks to this proportion element of the election. In polling for next spring's Scottish Parliament elections, Reform is on around 17 per cent, above the Tories on around 12 per cent. The SNP is top, followed by Labour. A year ago, it looked likely that Labour could win power in Scotland but a support slump since Sir Keir Starmer took office last summer means the SNP is now well-placed to remain in office. A Scottish Conservative spokesman said: 'Nigel Farage has said he is content with the SNP winning another five years in power and Reform stood multiple pro-independence candidates in the general election, so no, this won't be happening. 'The Scottish Conservatives want to get the SNP out of power, while Reform will gladly help the nationalists.'
The National
25 minutes ago
- The National
Consent for gigantic wind farm is an ironic act of ecocide
The irony is that Holyrood is contemplating the introduction of an ecocide bill – at the very time the [[Scottish Government]] is complicit in ecocide committed by renewable energy companies on an ever-expanding scale. We note 'SSE Renewables will have to provide a plan to counter any impact the wind farm may have on seabirds', but this is thin gruel, especially as SSE is quoted as admitting in its own environmental impact assessment that more than 31,000 bird collisions are estimated during its lifespan. READ MORE: Scottish crew 'excluded from Spider Man 4 filming' What will its proposed 'mitigation' provide? It is to be hoped it will be something better than the farcically inappropriate plans that Equinor has put in place to construct an inappropriately sited nesting habitat for Arctic Terns hundreds of miles from its proposed massive wind farm extension off the coast of Norfolk. Whatever it is, it is difficult to see how it can provide more than a small sticking plaster for an act of ecocide. The Scottish Government may well have shot itself in the foot here. People who would not normally object to a wind farm are sickened by this decision. The sleeping giant of Joe Public has awakened. Aileen Jackson Scotland Against Spin, Uplawmoor THE story about House of Lords peers warning UK recognition of Palestine may 'breach international law' (Jul 31) is revealing, not just for what it says about Westminster, but for what it exposes about Scotland's position. The peers cite the Montevideo Convention, claiming Palestine doesn't qualify as a state because it lacks a defined territory, unified government and full diplomatic capacity. This argument is flawed because the UK never signed the convention — it's a regional treaty drafted in 1933 by US states, not global law – and even if you accept it as a standard, it backfires spectacularly when applied to Scotland. Let's test the same criteria: Permanent population? Scotland has that; Defined territory? Clearly; Functioning government? We've had one for over 20 years, with its own legal system, civil service, and tax powers. Capacity for foreign relations? Scotland already hosts consulates and conducts international outreach, and could expand that overnight. By any serious standard, Scotland meets the Montevideo criteria more fully than [[Palestine]], Kosovo at the time of recognition, or even Israel in 1948. So why are we still being told we must wait for a Section 30 order from [[Westminster]] to hold an independence referendum — and why are the SNP still building their entire strategy around asking for one? John Swinney says a vote for the [[SNP]] in 2026 will be a vote for independence. But what comes after that? Nothing. Because the leadership still refuses to act without permission. The Supreme Court didn't say independence is illegal – it said [[Holyrood]] doesn't have the power under UK law to legislate for a referendum. That's a political dead end, not a legal one. Recognition doesn't begin with external approval, it begins with internal control. That's how Estonia, Ireland, Kosovo, and countless others did it. They asserted the fact of statehood, governed as such, and forced recognition by acting like a state. That's how international law actually works. The real reason Scotland isn't independent isn't legal, it's psychological. Our leaders won't cross the line. They keep asking Westminster to validate our democracy instead of enforcing it. They quote laws they never intend to test. And they call that strategy. So yes, the peers' letter is cynical and legally thin. But it also hands us a mirror. Because if the UK can consider recognising Palestine under the Montevideo Convention, then the only thing stopping Scotland is the lack of a leadership willing to act on what we already are. James Murphy Bute THE claims by a group of peers in the House of Lords that UK recognition of Palestine could 'breach international law' warrant scrutiny. These assertions are based on a rigid interpretation of the Montevideo Convention and a selective reading of legal principles and risk politicising law rather than defending it. A clear-eyed examination reveals that such recognition remains well within the bounds of international legality and reflects long-standing norms of state practice. The UK is not a signatory to the Montevideo Convention of 1933 and state recognition in international law has always been as much a political act as a legal one. Numerous recognitions have occurred over the years, including Kosovo and South Sudan, despite contested claims to defined territory or unified governance. Recognition of states remains a sovereign prerogative. As confirmed by the International Court of Justice in its 2010 advisory opinion on Kosovo, international law does not prohibit declarations of independence or third-party recognition, even in complex or disputed circumstances. Recognition by the UK would not constitute a breach of international law but rather an exercise of lawful foreign policy discretion. (Image: Jonathan Brady) More than 135 UN member states have recognised Palestine and in 2012 the UN General Assembly granted Palestine non-member observer state status. These actions underscore the fact that recognition of Palestinian statehood is neither novel nor legally exceptional. If such recognition were truly contrary to international law, it would have triggered challenges in international courts – none have materialised. It is time to move beyond legal obfuscation and act in pursuit of a just and lasting peace. Peter Macari Aberdeen
