India should not engage with Pakistan in any sphere: TMC leader Abhishek Banerjee
In a post on X, the Trinamool Congress Lok Sabha MP said that for decades, Pakistan has exported terror, bled India, causing irreparable loss to Indian lives and families.
"India must not engage with Pakistan in any sphere. The only engagement we should have with Pakistan is on the battlefield, and the only prize worth winning is Pakistan-occupied Jammu & Kashmir", he said in the post.
Banerjee said, "For decades, Pakistan has exported terror, bled our nation by causing irreparable loss to Indian lives and families.
And yet, every now and then, we hear calls to keep politics out of sport. No! This has to stop", he added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
18 minutes ago
- Time of India
An open letter to President Donald J Trump
Dear President Trump, When you assumed office, India felt a surge of hope. A hope that your clarity on partnerships and strategy would lead to a stronger, more principled global leadership. We believed our time-tested ties would deepen, built on parity, not pressure. Yet on August 6, 2025, your administration chose to impose an additional 25% tariff on Indian imports, raising the total to 50%, citing our continued purchase of Russian oil. For two nations that have long claimed a strategic, values-based partnership, this move is deeply disappointing—and strategically incoherent. Today, August 7, marks the anniversary of the Swadeshi Movement—a historic assertion of economic self-reliance. If India were to channel that spirit today and initiate a boycott of U.S. businesses, the impact would be far greater on America than on us on multiple fronts. U.S. firms earn over $80 billion annually from India, with critical stakes in education, tech, finance, and IP. US Aviation deals with India alone were worth $2.45 billion in 2022, and sectors like MRO, navigation, and air traffic systems remain deeply tied to India. Moreover, U.S. exports in manufacturing exceed $42 billion. Meanwhile, India's $200 billion IT industry powers much of America's digital backbone. Over 70% of skilled U.S. visas go to Indians because a third of your AI workforce is of Indian origin, while additionally, Indian students contribute $8 billion annually to your economy. If India looked inward, it wouldn't just signal economic nationalism—it would unearth America's dependence on Indian markets, talent, and momentum. Your own administration's 2025 Annual Threat Assessment identifies China as a systemic rival challenging U.S. interests through conventional and asymmetric tools. And yet, you choose to use the word 'penalty', which is unparliamentary and diplomatically unwelcome. India is not just resilient—we are rising. A 'dead economy' cannot be the world's fourth-largest, soon to be the third, and remain the fastest-growing among major nations. With a 1.4 billion population and a median age under 30, we are dynamic, digital, and determined. Morgan Stanley estimates our middle class alone will drive $5 trillion in consumption by 2031. This is not just India's story—it's the Global South's opportunity for the Global North. It is also telling that your close ally, the European Union, recorded over €67.5 billion in trade with Russia last year, including record LNG imports, even as it calls for others to scale back. What is more surprising is that the United States continues to quietly import uranium hexafluoride for its nuclear industry, palladium for its EV industry, fertilisers, and chemicals from Russia—the same Russia from which you do not want us to buy oil. In fact, your remarks on August 5 this year revealed a startling lack of awareness about this very dependence. And yet, India is singled out for securing energy access in line with its sovereign needs. Should a nation sanction India for trade with Russia when it itself relies on the Kremlin for its domestic interests? Instilling the spirit of Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam, we have stood by the US in the Quad, in counterterrorism, during COVID, and through intelligence sharing post-9/11. Yet, we have also seen trust tested—through military aid to Pakistan, strategic silences, and visa uncertainties. Still, we chose engagement over estrangement. But the future now lies in the hands of those who understand that diplomacy and cooperation are the way forward—not sweeping tariffs. Mr. President, let us choose dialogue over discord, coordination over coercion. Let us shape the future—through respect, resolve, and renewed commitment to a rules-based global order. Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email Disclaimer Views expressed above are the author's own.
Indian Express
18 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Indian Air Force took down 5 fighter jets and 1 large aircraft during Operation Sindoor: Air Marshal AP Singh
In his first official comments over losses inflicted on Pakistan in Operation Sindoor, Indian Air Force Chief Air Marshal AP Singh on Saturday said the Indian Air Force (IAF) took down five fighter jets and one large aircraft during the May 7 operation. Apart from the aircraft, he added, there are a large number of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and drones, some of whose missiles had fallen in the Indian territory. He said India recovered them alongside other wreckage which is being studied, 'so we can make out what they did, where they were launched from, what route they followed, what kind of systems they had, what generation they belonged to, what kind of features they had, etc.' He also showed the before and after images of the damage caused in Pakistani territory at Bahawalpur – the headquarters of the Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM). 'There's hardly any collateral (damage) here… The adjacent buildings are fairly intact… Not only did we have satellite pictures, but also from local media, through which we could get inside pictures,' he said. Singh said Indian Air Defence systems have done a wonderful job. 'The S-400 system, which we had recently bought, has been a game-changer. The range of that system has kept their aircraft away from their weapons, like those long-range glide bombs that they have,' he said, adding that they have not been able to use any of those because they have not been able to penetrate the system. The IAF chief also showed that the Shahbaz Jacobabad airfield was one of the major airfields that were attacked. 'Here, there's an F-16 hangar. One half of the hangar is gone. And I'm sure there were some aircraft inside which got damaged there. We were able to get at least two command and control centres, like Murid and Chaklala,' he said. 'At least six radars, some of them big, some of them small…We have an indication of at least one AEW&C (Airborne Early Warning and Control) in that AEW&C hangar and a few F-16s, which were under maintenance there… ,' he said.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
18 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Trump-Putin Alaska summit to tackle Ukraine war, tariffs and global trade
The world's attention turns to Alaska as US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin prepare to meet on 15 August 2025 for what could be their most significant summit in years. The talks come amid an ongoing war in Ukraine, mounting tariffs, sanctions, and growing diplomatic strains affecting key allies such as India, which shares strategic ties with both the US and Russia. Setting the stage This will be the first face-to-face meeting between the two leaders since 2019. Past high-level talks between Washington and Moscow have often mixed cautious hope with mistrust. The last major encounter, in Helsinki six years ago, produced warm words but few tangible results. Then, as now, Ukraine remained a central point of contention, with both sides accusing the other of bad faith while exploring possible compromises. Ukraine: The summit's core issue The primary focus will be ending Russia's war in Ukraine, now in its third year. Trump has hinted at 'creative solutions,' including possible territorial swaps involving contested regions such as Crimea, Donetsk, Luhansk, Kherson, and Zaporizhian. While aimed at breaking the deadlock, these ideas have been met with caution from Western allies and outright rejection from many in Kyiv, who argue that ceding territory would legitimise aggression and set a dangerous precedent. Trade tensions and tariff diplomacy Diplomatic strains have also grown over trade. The US recently doubled tariffs on Indian imports to 50 per cent, citing New Delhi's continued purchase of discounted Russian oil. The move has raised concerns over US–India relations, particularly given India's strategic role in Indo-Pacific security alliances such as the Quad. Washington has also threatened secondary sanctions on countries, including India and China, that maintain significant energy trade with Moscow. Analysts warn this could push these nations closer to Russia. Russia's position For Putin, the summit offers an opportunity to ease Moscow's diplomatic isolation since the Ukraine invasion. Russia has signalled willingness to discuss a ceasefire, possibly including a pause in air strikes, though Western officials remain sceptical this reflects a genuine policy shift rather than a public relations exercise. Alaska was chosen as the venue partly to avoid complications arising from the International Criminal Court's arrest warrant for Putin, as the US does not recognise ICC jurisdiction. Possible Outcomes Area Likely Developments Ukraine Peace Talks Announcement of a temporary ceasefire or framework for further negotiations. Territorial Proposals Discussion of land swaps involving disputed Ukrainian regions — likely controversial. Tariffs & Sanctions Potential easing for strategic partners if they reduce Russian oil purchases. India's Role Increased diplomatic pressure and potential trade talks alongside the summit. Geopolitical Impact Putin may claim renewed legitimacy; Western unity could face fresh strains. Energy Markets Volatility depending on any deal affecting Russian oil exports. Risks and challenges Experts caution that any outcome perceived as rewarding Moscow's aggression could strain Western alliances, particularly Nato. Conversely, failure to achieve tangible progress risks reducing the summit to a symbolic meeting that provides Putin with a global platform without substantive concessions. For India, the stakes are high: meeting US demands on Russian oil could increase energy costs, while refusal risks harsher trade penalties. What to expect As Trump and Putin meet in Alaska, global attention will focus on both their public remarks and private negotiations, which could influence the future of the Ukraine conflict, global trade relations, and the balance of power from Eastern Europe to the Indo-Pacific.
