logo
Opinion - How to avoid Africa's next water war

Opinion - How to avoid Africa's next water war

Yahooa day ago

In 2023, Gen. Michael Langley, commander of U.S. Africa Command, warned that African countries face new destabilizing challenges, including 'climate change [that] is increasing desertification.'
One year earlier, Morocco, a close U.S. ally on the northwestern edge of the Sahara Desert, had already started taking bold steps to get ahead of the negative effects of climate change. In particular, it began building a series of dams to better manage its increasingly precarious water resources.
Scheduled for completion between 2026 and 2029, the dams will lessen the impact of more frequent and more violent floods, and they will allow Morocco to adapt to longer and more acute droughts. However, while the dams proactively mitigate the risks climate change poses to Morocco's domestic stability, they are catalysts for broader regional destabilization.
One of the dams, and its projected 35 billion cubic feet reservoir, is only 19 miles from Morocco's border with Algeria. The watershed filling the reservoir flows southeasterly, not further into Morocco but away from it and across the border into nearby Algeria.
While the dam will safeguard Moroccan communities' water supplies, it will cut off water for more than 300,000 Algerians just on the other side of the border.
Waters from the Oued Guir and the Oued Zousfana Rivers flow east out of Morocco's craggy Atlas Mountains and form the transboundary Oued Saoura watershed. The Saoura watershed is the primary water source for Algeria's Bechar and Tindouf provinces.
Combined, these two semi-arid provinces are bigger than the United Kingdom or Italy. Bechar and Tindouf depend on Saoura water for drinking, agriculture and industry.
Bechar, an Algerian city only 37 miles from the Moroccan border, is not some scrappy Saharan outpost, but a well-developed regional hub.
The eponymous seasonal Oued Bechar flows through town, its banks brimming with palm trees. A brand new university with faculties in medicine, biology, physics, political science and other disciplines caters to 15,000 students. Fountains burble and splash in shaded campus courtyards. There is a state-of-the-art oncology hospital.
Nearly all (98 percent) of Bechar's 35,000 households have running water. They also all have electricity, gas and internet access. Morocco's dams blocking the Saoura watershed threaten all of this.
In April, the University of Bechar hosted a conference on water resource management and equitable usage. Water resource specialists and geopolitical experts from other Algerian universities and around the world presented studies about the calamitous effects that Morocco's dams will have on Algerian communities and case studies of other successfully resolved cross-border water crises.
The burgeoning dam dispute between Morocco and Algeria is hardly unique: Climate change is exacerbating water conflicts around the world.
In many instances, like disputes about water usage on the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers between Turkey and Iraq, or between Ethiopia and Egypt on the Nile, or more recently between India and Pakistan on the Indus River, opposing parties pursue a negotiated solution for equitable cross-border water sharing.
Negotiations are typically protracted, taking years, and they are often fraught, but guided by the United Nations' 1992 Water Convention, which obliges countries with cross-border water resources to 'use transboundary waters in a reasonable and equitable way,' negotiations aim at a mutually acceptable compromise.
Algeria and Morocco are a long way from any compromise.
Morocco is unilaterally pursuing a water resource management strategy that will negatively impact Algeria, accelerate desertification in the Sahara and potentially internally displace hundreds of thousands of Algerians. But because there are no diplomatic ties between Algeria and Morocco, there are no formal channels to negotiate equitable transboundary water usage.
Bechar, however, is not just home to a palm-lined river, a shiny cancer center and a university bustling with students. It is also home to Algeria's 3rd Military Region. The military base stretches for miles on the city's southwestern side, including an airfield, a hospital, barracks, a school and even a playground and a pool.
In May, Algeria's Army chief of staff, the country's highest-ranked uniformed officer, oversaw a live fire military exercise with 3rd Military Region forces, showcasing tanks, drones, mobile rocket systems, fighter jets, attack helicopters, shoulder-launched missiles and a mock ground assault. All within 30 miles of the Moroccan border and 60 miles from Morocco's dams.
With a 2025 defense budget estimated to be $25 billion, Algeria has the largest defense budget in Africa and almost double that of Morocco.
For Algeria, the dams' disruption of the Saoura watershed is a violation of Algeria's sovereignty. Langley, who just visited Morocco in May at the conclusion of the U.S. African Lion joint military exercise, is no doubt correct: Countries need to take steps to counter climate change's destabilizing effects.
But countries also need to ensure that the preventative measures they take accommodate broader contexts so that they do not become drivers of the very instability that they are trying to counter. This is the case of Morocco's dams: They are solving for potential instability in Morocco while simultaneously increasing its likelihood in Algeria.
The U.S. has exceptionally good relations with Morocco. Morocco is a major non-NATO ally, the highest ally status a country can have with the U.S. outside the NATO framework. It is one of only four Arab countries to have a free trade agreement with the U.S. and is a signatory to the Abraham Accords, normalizing relations with Israel.
The U.S. should use its considerable influence with Morocco to encourage it to reach an agreement with Algeria for the cooperative and equitable management of their shared transboundary water resources under the U.N. Water Convention, lest Algeria feels compelled to secure its national interest and its citizens' wellbeing through other means.
Geoff D. Porter, Ph.D., is the president of North Africa Risk Consulting, a nonresident fellow at the Combating Terrorism Center at West Point, and a professor at Fordham University.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Over 30 More Countries Could Be Put on Travel Ban by US—Reports
Over 30 More Countries Could Be Put on Travel Ban by US—Reports

Newsweek

timean hour ago

  • Newsweek

Over 30 More Countries Could Be Put on Travel Ban by US—Reports

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The Trump administration is floating the idea of adding 36 more countries to its travel ban that began earlier this month, according to an internal State Department cable reviewed by The Washington Post and Reuters. A spokesperson for the State Department told Newsweek in a Sunday email: "The Department does not comment on internal deliberations or communications, but we are constantly reevaluating policies to ensure the safety of Americans and that foreign nationals follow our laws." Why It Matters Earlier this month, President Donald Trump issued a proclamation restricting travel by foreigners from 12 countries and partially restricting entry from an additional seven countries. The ban, which Trump said is to "protect the nation from foreign terrorist and other national security and public safety threats," went into effect on June 9. Since his inauguration on January 20, Trump has cracked down on foreign nationals in the United States, mainly through executive orders, and has prioritized immigration enforcement as a key pillar of his agenda. During his first administration, Trump imposed a ban that barred people from seven predominantly Muslim countries from entering the U.S. Critics then and now, have called out the restrictions as xenophobic and racist. What To Know The internal cable, which was signed by U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, "identified 36 countries of concern that might be recommended for full or partial suspension of entry if they do not meet established benchmarks and requirements within 60 days," as reported by Reuters. The weekend memo was first reported by The Washington Post and includes 25 African nations, as well as several Pacific Island nations, Caribbean, and Central Asian. The countries mentioned in the cable that may face a potential partial or full ban are: Angola Antigua and Barbuda Benin Bhutan Burkina Faso Cabo Verde Cambodia Cameroon Cote D'Ivoire Democratic Republic of Congo Djibouti Dominica Ethiopia Egypt Gabon The Gambia Ghana Kyrgyzstan Liberia Malawi Mauritania Niger Nigeria Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Sao Tome and Principe Senegal South Sudan Syria Tanzania Tonga Tuvalu Uganda Vanuatu Zambia Zimbabwe Some of the countries under consideration, such as Egypt, are key U.S. diplomatic partners and receive American military aid. When asked earlier this month why Egypt wasn't on the original list, Trump responded, "Because Egypt has been a country that we deal with very closely. They have things under control." Djibouti hosts Camp Lemonnier, the only permanent U.S. military base in Africa. The countries would be in addition to the 12 fully restricted countries of Afghanistan, Burma, Chad, Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen, and the seven partially restricted, Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela, that Trump already limited. There are, however, some exceptions to the restrictions, including certain visas. The Washington Post identified the benchmarks in the memo as regarding lack of "competent or cooperative central government authority to produce reliable identity documents or other civil documents," or experiencing "widespread government fraud." Immigration also played a role in their potential selection, with some reportedly having large numbers of citizens who overstayed their visas in the U.S. The memo also touched on ideology, reportedly saying, there were accounts of "antisemitic and anti-American activity in the United States" by some people from those countries. Trump announced the first version of the ban earlier this month after citing national security concerns following a recent terror attack in Boulder, Colorado, when Mohamed Sabry Soliman, a 45-year-old Egyptian national, carried out a firebombing attack at a pro-Israel rally, injuring 12 people. Trump has detained several vocal pro-Palestinian voices, most notably Mahmoud Khalil. President Donald Trump speaks during an event in the East Room of the White House on June 12 in Washington, D.C. President Donald Trump speaks during an event in the East Room of the White House on June 12 in Washington, D.C. AP Photo/Alex Brandon What People Are Saying A spokesperson for the State Department told Newsweek in an email Sunday: "The Department of State is committed to protecting our nation and its citizens by upholding the highest standards of national security and public safety through our visa process." Amnesty International's Secretary General Agnès Callamard said in a press release on June 5: "President Trump's new travel ban is discriminatory, racist, and downright cruel. By targeting people based on their race, religion, or nationality, from countries with predominantly Black, Brown and Muslim-majority populations, this blanket ban constitutes racial discrimination under international human rights law. It also spreads hate and disinformation, reinforcing the misleading idea that certain populations are more likely to pose security risks or engage in acts of violence." Senator Adam Schiff, a California Democrat, wrote in a June 4 X, formerly Twitter, post: "This is Trump's reckless first term travel ban all over again. Just like before, Trump's expanded ban on travelers from around the world will not improve our national security and will only further isolate the U.S. from the rest of world. Bigotry is not a national security strategy." What Happens Next? It remains unclear whether the State Department will move forward with the additions or when the countries might face restrictions if they fail to meet certain requirements.

Denmark allocates millions of dollars to attract African students in strategic immigration program
Denmark allocates millions of dollars to attract African students in strategic immigration program

Business Insider

timean hour ago

  • Business Insider

Denmark allocates millions of dollars to attract African students in strategic immigration program

According to LocalDenmark, the Nordic country aims to host 230 African students annually for the next eight years, primarily to foster deeper cultural and diplomatic integrations. As stated by its Foreign Minister, Lars Løkke Rasmussen, " It's clearly in our interest that African countries look towards Europe when considering their future paths. With this new program, we're not just investing in education, but in relationships that build a vital bridge between Denmark and Africa." The program is also expected to strengthen ties between Danish and African universities, promoting knowledge exchange and collaborative research initiatives. Meanwhile, some 430 million Danish kroner ($61 million) has been allocated since 2024 to support this initiative, underscoring Denmark's commitment to its pro-Africa immigration policy and strategy. This move by Denmark is part of a broader European effort to maintain relevance and influence in Africa, amid growing competition from China and Russia, particularly as the US continues to enforce strict immigration policies targeting African migrants. According to Minister for Higher Education and Science Christina Egelund, " Africa has enormous potential, which we can help unlock through education. By 2050, a third of the world's youth will live in Africa, and the continent's geopolitical importance is growing rapidly." In return, Denmark also hopes to see more of its own students pursuing studies and exchange programmes in African institutions. ' There's immense potential in Africa. Education is a two-way bridge, ' Løkke said The scholarship provides comprehensive support, covering tuition fees, living expenses, and potentially including travel assistance. Successful applicants may also be eligible to participate in the EU's Erasmus+ program, offering additional exchange opportunities. Denmark's Africa strategy Denmark is known for having some of the strictest immigration policies in Europe, with conditions growing increasingly rigid since the 1990s. While this tough approach has achieved its intended effects, it has also introduced new challenges. During a visit to Ghana last year, Denmark's Foreign Minister and former Prime Minister, Lars Løkke Rasmussen hinted at a shift in immigration policy. He framed the change as a way to safeguard Denmark's core interests, noting that Europe is shrinking—not just in population, but also in its share of the global economy. This perspective is central to the Danish government's new Africa strategy, unveiled on 26 August 2024. The strategy focuses on deepening ties with African nations through expanded trade, investment, and educational exchanges. One of its key goals is to attract top talent from Africa to pursue education in Denmark, thereby fostering a network with long-term political and economic benefits for the country. For many African students, this initiative offers a gateway to high-quality education in Europe, while also fostering stronger partnerships in areas such as science, technology, innovation, governance, and sustainable development between Africa and Denmark.

African countries' response to the escalating Iran-Israel conflict
African countries' response to the escalating Iran-Israel conflict

Business Insider

time2 hours ago

  • Business Insider

African countries' response to the escalating Iran-Israel conflict

As tensions between Israel and Iran reached dangerous new heights this past week, and continued into the early hours of a new week, African countries are speaking out, reflecting the continent's diverse geopolitical stances yet unified in a call for peace, restraint, and justice in the Middle East. Tensions in the Middle East escalated as Israel launched Operation Rising Lion, targeting Iranian facilities Escalations led to significant damages and casualties on both sides, attracting international concern. African leaders strongly condemned the violence, calling for peace, restraint, and adherence to international law As the Middle East edges toward wider war, African countries add their voices to global calls for de-escalation, recognizing that peace anywhere is peace everywhere, following Israel's massive Operation Rising Lion airstrikes on Iranian nuclear and strategic sites. The latest escalation follows Israel's Operation Rising Lion, a coordinated military campaign involving over 200 fighter jets targeting Iranian nuclear facilities, drone production centers, oil refineries, intelligence bases, and key civilian airports, including Mashhad International Airport. The operation reportedly killed top commanders of Iran's Revolutionary Guard and several civilians. In retaliation, Iran launched Operation True Promise 3 on June 13, firing ballistic and hypersonic missiles, as well as drones, into Israeli cities such as Tel Aviv and Jerusalem. Significant damage was reported, including destruction at the Haifa oil refinery and civilian neighborhoods. According to The Times of India over 200 Israeli fighter jets were involved in the initial offensive, targeting sites deep within Iran, while Iranian retaliation inflicted heavy psychological and physical tolls on Israel's civilian population. In the wake of these developments, a wave of statements from African governments and leaders reflect a continent that remains deeply invested in global peace, committed to international law, yet mindful of its own diverse diplomatic alliances. In light of the escalation, world leaders have spoken to Iranian and Israeli top officials, fearing a possible regional war. Here is what some African countries have said: South Africa: Strong Condemnation of Israeli Strikes: South Africa was one of the first to respond. In a statement issued by the Department of International Relations and Cooperation (DIRCO) on June 13, the government expressed ' deep concern' over Israel's attacks on Iran and extended condolences to the families of all victims of the Iranian people. 'We reiterate our unwavering commitment to the peaceful resolution of disputes, ' the statement read. South Africa urged maximum restraint by all parties and called for the urgent intensification of diplomatic efforts to de-escalate tensions and promote stability in the Middle East. ' We support ongoing bilateral discussions, such as those between the USA and Iran, and reaffirm the critical importance of establishing a Nuclear-Weapon-Free Zone in the Middle East,' it added Kenya: Criticism of Iran, Call for a Functional UN Kenya condemned Iran's retaliatory missile attacks and called for global leadership in defusing the crisis. In a statement on June 13, the country's Foreign Affairs Principal Secretary, Korir Sing'oei, expressed concern over the escalation and referenced Kenya's prior support for a UN resolution for a ceasefire in Gaza. ' We are following with deep concern the escalating situation in the Middle East that has the potential to spiral out of control with grievous implications for regional and global peace and security,' Sing'oei said. He however urged both Israel and Iran to exercise restraint and resolve their differences through peaceful means, consistent with the principles outlined in the Charter of the United Nations. ' The conflict is a clear reason why we need a Security Council that functions and acts in the best interest of all,' he stated. Without naming names, Kenya's statement subtly criticized the inaction of key Security Council members, urging structural reform in global peacekeeping systems. Nigeria: Balanced Call for De-escalation Nigeria's Ministry of Foreign Affairs issued a measured statement urging both sides to pursue diplomatic solutions. The June 13 statement warned that Israel's 'preemptive strike ' had dangerously heightened regional tensions. ' The continued cycle of retaliation not only endangers civilian lives but threatens to plunge the broader Middle East into further instability,' the ministry noted. The country further urged the international community, particularly the United Nations Security Council, to intensify efforts toward immediate de-escalation and to provide a platform for constructive engagement. ' The path to lasting peace lies in diplomacy, mutual respect, and adherence to international law. Nigeria stands ready to support all genuine efforts aimed at de-escalating tensions and promoting peace in the region,' the statement added. Abuja, while taking a neutral stance. reaffirmed its support for dialogue, international law, and constructive engagement over military confrontation. Egypt: A Warning Against Escalation Egypt, a traditional mediator in Middle East crises, condemned Israel's actions as 'a blatant and extremely dangerous regional escalation' and 'a flagrant violation of international law.' 'The arrogance of power will not bring security to any state in the region, including Israel,' Egypt's Foreign Ministry said. ' Genuine security can only be achieved through respect for sovereignty, unity, and the territorial integrity of states,' it further stated. Cairo also reiterated that the resolution of regional crises lies in politics, not warfare. Ghana: Economic Fallout a Growing Concern President John Dramani Mahama warned that Ghana, like many African economies, is not immune to the global economic shocks caused by the conflict. 'Despite the work we have done in stabilizing the economy, Ghana is not immune from the shocks of global events, ' Mahama said. ' The recent exchange of missiles between Israel and Iran has started to escalate crude oil prices dramatically. ' His comments point to the conflict's indirect impact on African livelihoods, especially in energy-importing countries. Tunisia: Full Support for Iran Tunisia, echoing the Arab League, took a strong pro-Iran stance. According to TAP News Agency: 'Tunisia strongly condemns the treacherous Zionist aggression against the Islamic Republic of Iran. It is a flagrant breach of the UN Charter and all international laws and norms, undermining the pillars of security, peace, and stability throughout the entire world.' Namibia: A Global Economic Wake-Up Call Namibia offered a broader perspective, warning of the global ripple effects. Executive Director of International Relations, Penda Naanda, remarked: ' Markets are interconnected, and what happens in one part of the world affects us all, including our commodities and our pockets.' Africa may not be a direct party to the Iran-Israel conflict, but its leaders are asserting the continent's moral and strategic stakes in global affairs.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store