logo
Florida Schools Consider Expanding Phone Ban

Florida Schools Consider Expanding Phone Ban

Newsweek12-05-2025

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Members of the Palm Beach County School Board in Florida are considering expanding a ban on cellphone use in schools.
Newsweek has contacted the school board for comment via email.
Why It Matters
Florida became the first state to crack down on phones on school in 2023 with a law that requires all public schools to ban student cellphone use during class time. Some states have followed suit—while many others have policies that restrict students' use of cellphones in schools.
Supporters say limiting use of cellphones will improve student learning and mental health. But others have noted that the bans could impact safety and not allow students to communicate on their phones in an emergency, such as during a school shooting.
A stock photo shows students using cellphones.
A stock photo shows students using cellphones.
iStock
What To Know
Lawmakers in Florida have approved legislation that would go further than the law already in effect and ban elementary and middle school students from using cellphones during the school day.
HB 1105 would also establish a pilot program for six school districts, which have yet to be named, to ban cellphone use for high school students "from bell to bell," according to The Palm Beach Post. It is expected to be signed into law by Florida Governor Ron DeSantis.
At a meeting last week, several members of the Palm Beach County School Board supported the idea of extending the "bell-to-bell" ban to high school students in the district.
Board member Edwin Ferguson said he is in favor of creating a policy for high school students because cellphones are "a huge distraction."
He noted that another district, Orange County Public Schools, had already banned phones for the entire school day.
Another member, Matthew Jay Lane, said he supported the idea, pointing to studies that have shown it will "increase academic achievement, enhance interpersonal communication, limit distractions and reduce bullying."
Another board member, Gloria Branch, said she supported students not being able to use their phones during the school day, but opposed spending money on pouches to keep phones locked in.
Board chair Karen Brill noted that parents who oppose the ban want to ensure their children have access to their phones in an emergency.
She said: "They don't want their phones collected because they're worried that if there was that emergency and they had to go into a safe room, that they would not have the phones on them."
Other board members argued that the district should focus on implementing the bell-to-bell ban on elementary and middle school students.
Marcia Andrews said she believes cellphones are "dangerous to our children," but that students "need the phones for emergencies."
She added: "We're going to have to follow the law, but I think we don't need to jump out there and begin to overdo this thing. I think high schools do a great job with taking care of the cellphones."
Erica Whitfield, another board member, agreed, saying that she is "always cautious when we talk about doing something huge to the school system."
What People Are Saying
Isabella Mirisola, the board's student representative, said during the meeting that she agrees students "shouldn't be on their phones during the school day."
But she said she believes students should be allowed to keep their phones on them "considering that, if there's an emergency in a school, I don't think that the teachers or administration are going to jump at emailing parents or calling parents. I think they're going to try getting rid of the situation first."
What's Next
The school board will hold a workshop on May 28 to discuss how to implement HB 1105.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

GOP Senator Flummoxed By Trump Adviser's Response To Tariff Question
GOP Senator Flummoxed By Trump Adviser's Response To Tariff Question

Newsweek

time21 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

GOP Senator Flummoxed By Trump Adviser's Response To Tariff Question

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A Republican senator was stumped on Wednesday when Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick said the U.S. would not lift tariffs on another country even if that country agreed to a reciprocal trade deal with the U.S. Why It Matters Lutnick's response appeared to fly in the face of President Donald Trump's claim that the U.S. is seeking trade "reciprocity" with its partners around the world. Trump has repeatedly accused other countries, including some of the U.S.'s closest trading partners, of taking advantage of the U.S. and in April levied steep tariffs against almost every country around the world in an effort to renegotiate more balanced trading relationships. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, left, speaks, as President Donald Trump, right, and Vice President JD Vance, center, listening as a trade deal with United Kingdom in announced in the Oval Office of the White House,... Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, left, speaks, as President Donald Trump, right, and Vice President JD Vance, center, listening as a trade deal with United Kingdom in announced in the Oval Office of the White House, Thursday, May 8, 2025, in Washington. More Evan Vucci/AP What To Know Lutnick got into a back-and-forth with Republican Senator John Kennedy of Louisiana on Wednesday while testifying on Capitol Hill. Kennedy asked Lutnick if the U.S. would accept a zero-to-zero trade deal with Vietnam, saying, "If Vietnam, for example, came to you tomorrow and said, 'Okay, Mr. Secretary, you win, we're going to remove all tariffs and all trade barriers.' Would the United States please do the same? Would you accept that deal?" "Absolutely not," Lutnick said while smirking. "Absolutely not. That would be the silliest thing we could do." "Why is that?" Kennedy asked. "Vietnam has $125 billion of exports to us and imports from us $12.5 million ... Where do they get it from? They buy 90 billion [dollars worth] from China, then they mark it up and send it to us. It's just a pathway of China to us," Lutnick said. "So you wouldn't accept that deal?" Kennedy pressed. "It's a terrible deal," Lutnick replied. "We're the ones with money, we're the one with the stores. Of course, they want us to take it down." "What's the purpose of reciprocity then?" Kennedy shot back. "Is reciprocity not one of your goals? Are you telling the president that we shouldn't seek reciprocity? If that's what you're telling him, why are you trying to do these trade deals?" Lutnick began to say the U.S. wants to "encourage" Vietnam to produce more, but Kennedy cut him off, saying, "I want to get back to reciprocity." "You just said you don't ... accept reciprocity as a goal. What are you negotiating in these trade deals?" Lutnick pushed back: "Why would we open our bank account—" "But why are you negotiating trade deals?" Kennedy said, speaking over him. "You're trying to get other countries to lower their tariffs and trade barriers in return for us lowering ours. That's called reciprocity." "Of course," Lutnick said. "So are you or are you not seeking reciprocity in these trade deals?" Kennedy pressed. "We are absolutely seeking reciprocity with respect to things that can be reciprocal, but when you're importing from China and sending it to us, they're not—" Lutnick said, before Kennedy again cut him off. "But you just said that if a country came to you and offered you the ultimate reciprocity—no tariffs, no trade barriers, in return for us doing the same—you would reject that?" the Louisiana Republican said. "Of course, because they buy from China and send it to us," Lutnick said. Kennedy asked him how the U.S. would respond if a trade partner pledged that they wouldn't buy products from China and resell them to the U.S., to which Lutnick replied, "Now we're talking." "Would you accept that deal?" Kennedy said. "We would consider it," Lutnick said. This story is developing and will be updated as more information becomes available. Update 06/04/25 2:40 p.m. ET: This article has been updated with additional information.

Bernie Sanders Agrees With Elon Musk
Bernie Sanders Agrees With Elon Musk

Newsweek

time31 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Bernie Sanders Agrees With Elon Musk

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Progressive Senator Bernie Sanders, who has held rallies for months as part of his "Fighting Oligarchy" tour, echoed billionaire Elon Musk on President Donald Trump's spending proposal, saying on social media the so-called "big, beautiful bill" is a "disgusting abomination." Newsweek has reached out to Sanders' press team and X's press team on behalf of Musk via email for comment on Wednesday. Newsweek has also reached out to Speaker Mike Johnson and Senate Majority Leader John Thune via email on Wednesday. Why It Matters Sanders, a Vermont independent who caucuses with the Democrats, has been outspoken against billionaires like Musk and their political influence, calling it a "shadow government," thus the convergence between Sanders and Musk is notable. Although Sanders has been actively campaigning against the influence of billionaires in American politics, he has at times sided with Musk on a handful of topics, including reducing Pentagon funding. The Trump-backed reconciliation package passed the House last month following weeks of negotiations in which House Speaker Mike Johnson wrangled votes from the ultraconservative and more centrist factions of the GOP. While Trump praised the measure in its current form, Senate Republicans have made it clear that they plan to make significant changes to it before it passes the upper chamber. What To Know On Tuesday, Sanders shared Musk's X, formerly Twitter, post, adding: "Musk is right: this bill IS a 'disgusting abomination.'" His post continued: "We shouldn't give $664 billion in tax breaks to the 1%. We shouldn't throw 13.7 million people off of Medicaid. We shouldn't cut $290 billion from programs to feed the hungry. Let's defeat this disgusting abomination." The bill, which is the centerpiece of Trump's domestic agenda, including wide-ranging tax cuts and extra money for the military and border security, has been labeled by Musk as a "massive, outrageous, pork-filled," and a "disgusting abomination." Musk served as one of Trump's top advisors, previously leading the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) cost-cutting task force. On Tuesday, he took to his social media outlet X to denounce the spending bill in a series of posts. (L):Elon Musk attends news conference with President Donald Trump in the Oval Office of the White House, Friday, May 30, 2025, in Washington. (R): Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., is seen during the Senate Health, Education,... (L):Elon Musk attends news conference with President Donald Trump in the Oval Office of the White House, Friday, May 30, 2025, in Washington. (R): Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., is seen during the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee hearing titled "FY2026 Department of Health and Human Services Budget," in Dirksen building on Wednesday, May 14, 2025. More AP Photo/Evan VucciTom Williams/CQ Roll Call via AP Images He said the bill undermines DOGE's efforts to cut federal spending and warned that it leaves "American taxpayers saddled with crushingly unsustainable debt." The bill is expected to add $2.4 trillion to the U.S. federal debt, according to analysis published by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) on Wednesday. Musk previously estimated DOGE would save $2 trillion in federal spending. It has achieved $160 billion in cuts and eliminated 20,000 federal jobs—roughly 1 percent of the workforce. In another post on his social media account, Sanders voiced his agreement with Musk's stance, touching on its social and programmatic implications, saying: "When Mr. Musk, the wealthiest man alive & major campaign contributor, expresses strong distaste for Trump's Big Beautiful Bill, Republicans will listen & obey. That means more cuts to Medicaid, nutrition & education. The oligarchs want it ALL. We're not going to let that happen." Other lawmakers have offered partial support to Musk's stance on the bill, such as Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, a Georgia Republican and staunch supporter of President Trump. She did vote for the bill but said later that had she known about a section that "strips states of the right to make laws or regulate AI for 10 years...I would have voted NO..." What People Are Saying White House Press Secretary Karolina Leavitt said during a Tuesday briefing when asked about Musk's response: "Look, the president already knows where Elon Musk stood on this bill. It doesn't change the president's opinion. This is one big, beautiful bill, and he's sticking to it." Bernie Sanders in a Wednesday X post: "If Musk & his pals are so concerned about increasing the national debt in Trump's Big Beautiful Bill, why don't they cut the $664 billion in tax breaks for the 1%; the $420 billion in tax breaks for large profitable corporations; & the $150 billion in increased military spending?" Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene told reporters on Tuesday: "Well, you know, I have to agree with him [Musk] on one hand. I always love it when Americans are angry at the federal government and express it. I think that should've been happening for years now. I mean, we're $36 trillion in debt for a reason." Senate Majority Leader John Thune told reporters on Tuesday: "We obviously respect everything that Elon did with DOGE. On this particular issue, we have a difference of opinion ... he's entitled to that opinion. We're going to proceed full speed ahead." Representative Thomas Massie, a Kentucky Republican, in a tweet this afternoon in reference to Musk's comments: "He's right." What Happens Next Trump recently gave Senate Republicans a July 4 deadline to pass the bill and get it to his desk.

DeSantis deputy chief of staff tapped as Florida's next education commissioner
DeSantis deputy chief of staff tapped as Florida's next education commissioner

CBS News

time40 minutes ago

  • CBS News

DeSantis deputy chief of staff tapped as Florida's next education commissioner

The Florida Board of Education has tapped a top aide of Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis to be the state's next education commissioner, a choice meant to influence K-12 and higher education policy in the state while bolstering a conservative legacy that could long outlast the governor's time in office. The board voted unanimously Wednesday to appoint Anastasios Kamoutsas, a deputy chief of staff to the governor. The job opened up after Commissioner of Education Manny Diaz, a former Republican state lawmaker, was named interim president of the University of West Florida. Kamoutsas' appointment is contingent on Diaz being named the permanent president of UWF. "Student safety and achievement will be my top priorities," Kamoutsas said. "Parents will continue to be empowered. And teachers, you have my word that I stand in support of you." Kamoutsas previously served as general counsel and chief staff at the state's Education Department, before moving to the governor's office. "Stasi Kamoutsas has delivered on important issues like parental rights, school choice, and fighting back against radical ideologies in education," DeSantis said in a statement. "I am confident that he will continue to serve our state well as the next Commissioner of Education." Kamoutsas to carry out conservative agenda Kamoutsas is expected to help carry out DeSantis' conservative education agenda, from banning public funds for diversity, equity and inclusion efforts, to restricting how schools teach about race and history, and dramatically expanding the state's school voucher system, which provides billions in public funds for scholarships to private and religious schools. Among those who lauded Kamoutsas at Wednesday's meeting was former Commissioner of Education Richard Corcoran, who has overseen what critics describe as the "hostile takeover" of New College of Florida. He's among the slate of Republican former state lawmakers who are now helming state colleges and universities. "Every single major decision, I don't care if it was elimination of DEI, critical race theory, opening schools, demasking students, changing higher education, Stasi has been in that room, every single time," Corcoran said. "And not just as a participant. He's been in the room as a leader." ___ Kate Payne is a corps member for The Associated Press/Report for America Statehouse News Initiative. Report for America is a nonprofit national service program that places journalists in local newsrooms to report on undercovered issues.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store