Italian activists face trial for migrant sea rescue in legal first
By
Angelo Amante
, Reuters
Migrants onboard a ship after being rescued in 2018.
Photo:
KENNY KARPOV / MSF/SOS MEDITERRANEE / AFP
A Sicilian judge has ordered six members of an Italian charity ship to stand trial on accusations of aiding illegal immigration, the first time crew members of a rescue vessel have faced such prosecution, the group's lawyer said.
The case centres on a 2020 operation where the Mare Jonio charity ship, operated by the Mediterranea NGO, picked up 27 migrants who had been rescued by a giant tanker in the Mediterranean Sea. The activists then brought them to Italy.
The defendants include a doctor, the Mare Jonio's commander, and Luca Casarini, co-founder of the charity and a prominent left-wing activist. They all deny wrongdoing.
"This is the first indictment of its kind," lawyer Serena Romano told Reuters. "All prior proceedings against NGO crews were shut down at the investigative stage or during preliminary hearings."
The charges come as Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, who took office in 2022, continues her long-running campaign to reduce immigration flows across the Mediterranean.
The six defendants, five men and one woman, are accused of facilitating illegal immigration after they agreed to pick up the group of migrants, who had been stranded aboard the Danish tanker Maersk Etienne for more than a month.
At the time, neither the Maltese, Italian nor Libyan authorities had let the tanker bring the migrants ashore, according to Maersk Tankers, the operator of Maersk Etienne.
The group had been rescued from a sinking wooden dinghy near Malta as they sought to reach Europe. The Mare Jonio took them to Sicily.
According to the Ansa news agency, prosecutors allege the rescue was financially motivated. They cite a €125,000 (NZ$237,742) payment from Maersk to Idra Social Shipping, which owns the Mare Jonio. Mediterranea denies the accusation, calling the payment a "transparent donation" to support rescue efforts.
Casarini, who was a friend of the late Pope Francis, said the trial, ordered by a court in Ragusa, would offer an opportunity to scrutinise official conduct during the incident.
"We will call as witnesses the ministers and authorities who decided to leave 27 human beings adrift in the middle of the sea," he said.
Meloni's government, in power since 2022, has enacted policies aimed at reducing sea arrivals and limiting NGO rescue operations, though the case predates her administration.
Some members of the ruling coalition have accused the judiciary of looking to sink government efforts to prevent migrant crossings, included repeated rulings that have thwarted attempts to detain irregular migrants in Albania.
Earlier this year, several Mediterranea members, including Casarini, were targeted with spyware. The government has denied involvement and called for an inquiry.
- Reuters
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
a day ago
- RNZ News
Alinghi could rejoin as America's Cup challenger, but slams Team NZ for lack of consultation
Team New Zealand chief executive Grant Dalton presents Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni with a scale model of its 2024 boat, Taihoro, at a function in Rome, 27 May, 2025. Photo: Ian Roman / America's Cup/Photosport Alinghi have hinted they could rejoin the America's Cup, but have slated Team New Zealand for celebrating the announcement of Naples as the 2027 host city without agreeing on a protocol with the Challenger of Record. Team NZ have responded saying they had complied with the cup's Deed of Gift' in choosing Naples. The Swiss syndicate announced in April that they would not compete in Naples , citing a lack of accountability and transparency from Team NZ as Defender of the America's Cup over the future of the event. Alinghi had now suggested they could take part in Naples, if Team NZ and the Challenger of Record, Britain's Athena Racing, could agree on a protocol that sets out "an equitable sporting framework" for the event. But the Swiss syndicate called into question Team NZ's consultation with Athena. At a function in Naples on Thursday, Team NZ celebrated the announcement of the Italian city with local and central government officials. That drew an angry riposte from Alinghi, who won the cup in 2003 and 2007. "While we wholeheartedly welcome the choice of Naples as a perfect host venue for the Cup in 2027, our concerns were deepened yesterday when Team New Zealand celebrated the announcement of the host venue at an event in the city,'' Alinghi said in a statement. "They had no right to do so without first having agreed a protocol with the Challenger of Record, Athena Racing, who were not consulted on the host venue arrangements which critically impact all challenging teams with regards to cost and logistics. "In signing a commercial deal with the host city that includes the Challenger Selection Series of races for the Louis Vuitton Cup, Team New Zealand have sold something they do not own the rights to. This is not acceptable." Team NZ race Alinghi in the America's Cup preliminary regatta in Barcelona, 2024. Photo: AFP In response, Team NZ said they did have the right to choose the venue. "The Defender, as per the Deed of Gift has the right and responsibility to choose the venue and the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) signed with the Challenger of Record at the conclusion of the 37th America's Cup also gives that full right and obligation to the Defender," Team NZ said in a statement. "The Defender remains committed to work with the teams to create a partnership for the future America's Cups." The syndicate then added a further clarification. "The MOU with the Challenger of Record also says: "The Venue for the Match and for the preceding CSS will be determined and announced by the AC38 Defender within eight months of the AC37 Final Race. The final dates for the Match and the preceding CSS will be announced within a further two months of the Venue announcement." The Alinghi salvo follows criticism from both Ben Ainslie's Athena Racing and the American Magic syndicate last week about a lack of transparency over the protocol for the next cup. American Magic cast doubt over its participation in Naples, but Team NZ responded saying the claims made were "unreasonable" and they were working closely with all teams to strengthen the future of the event. Alinghi said growing concerns about the cup's governance had led to Société Nautique de Genève raising questions with the Royal New Zealand Yacht Squadron about the administration of the competition. "Like Athena Racing and American Magic, we believe that a successful America's Cup hinges on openness, trust and a shared understanding among all participants. "We remain hopeful that a protocol between the Defender and the Challenger of Record can be agreed that establishes an equitable sporting framework for the racing and a commercially viable event for all America's Cup stakeholders. "If this can be achieved, then Alinghi is ready to explore ways that we can be part of that future, especially in the wonderful city of Naples in 2027, a truly fitting setting for the world's greatest sailing competition." Team NZ chief executive Grant Dalton had been at functions in both Rome and Naples this week, celebrating the announcement of the host city. At the Rome function, he presented Italy's prime minister Giorgia Meloni with a scale model of Taihoro, Team NZ's winning boat in last year's edition of the Cup. In Naples, he referred to Italy's Luna Rossa syndicate as "our dear friends and closest competitors" and said the Italian government had been "amazing to deal with from the very start". Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
2 days ago
- RNZ News
Italian activists face trial for migrant sea rescue in legal first
By Angelo Amante , Reuters Migrants onboard a ship after being rescued in 2018. Photo: KENNY KARPOV / MSF/SOS MEDITERRANEE / AFP A Sicilian judge has ordered six members of an Italian charity ship to stand trial on accusations of aiding illegal immigration, the first time crew members of a rescue vessel have faced such prosecution, the group's lawyer said. The case centres on a 2020 operation where the Mare Jonio charity ship, operated by the Mediterranea NGO, picked up 27 migrants who had been rescued by a giant tanker in the Mediterranean Sea. The activists then brought them to Italy. The defendants include a doctor, the Mare Jonio's commander, and Luca Casarini, co-founder of the charity and a prominent left-wing activist. They all deny wrongdoing. "This is the first indictment of its kind," lawyer Serena Romano told Reuters. "All prior proceedings against NGO crews were shut down at the investigative stage or during preliminary hearings." The charges come as Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, who took office in 2022, continues her long-running campaign to reduce immigration flows across the Mediterranean. The six defendants, five men and one woman, are accused of facilitating illegal immigration after they agreed to pick up the group of migrants, who had been stranded aboard the Danish tanker Maersk Etienne for more than a month. At the time, neither the Maltese, Italian nor Libyan authorities had let the tanker bring the migrants ashore, according to Maersk Tankers, the operator of Maersk Etienne. The group had been rescued from a sinking wooden dinghy near Malta as they sought to reach Europe. The Mare Jonio took them to Sicily. According to the Ansa news agency, prosecutors allege the rescue was financially motivated. They cite a €125,000 (NZ$237,742) payment from Maersk to Idra Social Shipping, which owns the Mare Jonio. Mediterranea denies the accusation, calling the payment a "transparent donation" to support rescue efforts. Casarini, who was a friend of the late Pope Francis, said the trial, ordered by a court in Ragusa, would offer an opportunity to scrutinise official conduct during the incident. "We will call as witnesses the ministers and authorities who decided to leave 27 human beings adrift in the middle of the sea," he said. Meloni's government, in power since 2022, has enacted policies aimed at reducing sea arrivals and limiting NGO rescue operations, though the case predates her administration. Some members of the ruling coalition have accused the judiciary of looking to sink government efforts to prevent migrant crossings, included repeated rulings that have thwarted attempts to detain irregular migrants in Albania. Earlier this year, several Mediterranea members, including Casarini, were targeted with spyware. The government has denied involvement and called for an inquiry. - Reuters Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
The Spinoff
3 days ago
- The Spinoff
Why messing with NZ Super remains political dynamite
Universal super at 65 is increasingly unsustainable, but any attempt to change it will attract fierce political blowback. What's a government to do, wonders Catherine McGregor in today's extract from The Bulletin. No cuts to super – but everything else is on the table Last week's budget delivered a raft of cost-cutting measures, from halving the KiwiSaver member tax credit to tightening access to the Best Start payment. But superannuation was conspicuously untouched – a move that came as no surprise, given NZ First's long-standing defence of the universal pension. High-income earners who can no longer access the KiwiSaver contribution remain fully entitled to super, a benefit projected to cost nearly $25 billion this year and rise to over $45 billion by 2037. Critics have pounced on the apparent double standard, reports RNZ's Susan Edmunds. As economist Shamubeel Eaqub put it: 'It's incoherent … incentives for Kiwis to save for their future [are] means-tested, but New Zealand Super, which is universal welfare for older people, is untouched.' National's slow path to raising the age While ruling out means-testing, both prime minister Christopher Luxon and finance minister Nicola Willis have reiterated National's plan to raise the super age – eventually. The party's policy is to keep the current entitlement age of 65 until 2044, after which it will rise gradually to 67. No one born before 1979 would be affected. In the NZ Herald (paywalled), Fran O'Sullivan argues that such a distant target is little more than political theatre. She contrasts Luxon's timidity on the issue with former National PM Jim Bolger, who methodically raised the age from 60 to 65 over a nine-year period. O'Sullivan notes that Bolger 'managed to convince New Zealanders that a gradual increase … was plain commonsense' at a time when life expectancy was increasing. By contrast, today's leaders seem content to avoid political pain, she writes, even as super becomes an increasingly heavy burden on the budget. One millennial's wail of despair The idea of delaying retirement might make sense on paper – but it's enough to send some younger New Zealanders into an existential tailspin. Writing in The Spinoff this morning, Hayden Donnell delivers a howl of generational frustration: 'Millennials have spent their formative years selling kidneys to pay rent on a draughty villa and getting bullied by gen Z for admittedly being huge losers. They'll spend the next 20 helping fund their parents' generation's Mediterranean cruises. Surely after that they can have a break? I guess not.' Donnell's broader point is that policies like lifting the super age hit those with lower life expectancies and more physically demanding jobs hardest. And while life expectancy has barely moved in recent years – and is even declining in some countries – the financial squeeze on younger generations is intensifying, just as the likelihood of a guaranteed super at 65 starts to fade. Or, in other words: 'Come on man how much shit can people under the age of 40 have shovelled onto them from a great height god damn it christ on a bike argh argh argh no.' 'You can touch anything else. Do not touch my pension' Two of New Zealand's most prominent right-leaning commentators have also weighed in – and their take is not encouraging for National. In his Mike's Minute, Mike Hosking warned that voters' emotional attachment to super far outweighs any argument of fiscal prudence. 'For many, superannuation is untouchable. It's a lifetime's worth of work. 'I paid my taxes' they say, even though that line isn't actually real because we spent your taxes years ago and then borrowed a bit more to keep the lights on.' Hosking's Newstalk ZB colleague Heather du Plessis-Allan was even more emphatic: 'Don't touch my pension. You can touch anything else. Do not touch my pension.' Despite advocating for cuts to almost every other form of welfare, she drew a hard line at super, arguing that she and millions like her had earned it through years of tax contributions. 'So, good luck to Chris Luxon getting this one across the line,' she wrote. With opposition like that from his own ideological camp, Luxon may find that even floating the idea of reform is as far as it goes.
