&w=3840&q=100)
‘Killed 2,800 dogs, buried them under trees: The row over Karnataka politician's shocking remarks
Bhojegowda's remarks come days after the Supreme Court ordered the removal of all stray dogs from neighbourhoods in Delhi-NCR. PTI/File Photo
A controversy has erupted over comments by SL Bhojegowda, JD(S) member of the Karnataka Legislative Council, who said he had supervised the killing of 2,800 dogs while heading the Chikkamagaluru municipal council.
He said on Wednesday that he was willing to go to jail if it meant protecting children from stray dogs.
ALSO READ | 'When Paris removed stray dogs': What happened in the French capital in the 1880s?
Bhojegowda's remarks come just days after the Supreme Court of India ordered the removal of all stray dogs from neighbourhoods in Delhi NCR.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
So, what exactly did he say, and what is the entire controversy?
Let's take a look:
The row over JD(S) lawmaker's remarks
SL Bhojegowda has sparked a major controversy after saying he had poisoned at least 2,800 dogs to tackle the problem of strays on the streets.
Speaking in the Legislative Council, the Janata Dal (Secular) leader said that a 'petition be filed in the Supreme Court… let Karnataka be the first in India to ask the Supreme Court to act against dogs".
He claimed that while serving as chairperson of the Chikkamagaluru municipal council, he had killed 2,800 dogs and buried them under trees to act as natural compost.
'During my tenure as the chairperson of the City Municipality Council, we killed 2,800 dogs and buried them under trees to serve as natural compost," Bhojegowda said during a discussion. He said the animals were fed poisoned meat.
Bengaluru, Karnataka: JD(S) Karnataka Legislative Council member S.L. Bhojegowda says, "Please file a petition in the Supreme Court. The Karnataka government has filed a petition against this decision; this will go down in history. Only we know the suffering children go through.… pic.twitter.com/6k38QjVCm1 — IANS (@ians_india) August 13, 2025
Bhojegowda argued that the stray dog problem mostly affects children from poor families.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
'Children of judges, ministers and legislators, who travel by cars and other vehicles, may not be affected. But children from poor families, who walk to school, face the danger of being attacked by stray dogs. The menace is prevalent even in Bengaluru's Cubbon Park," he said.
The matter was raised in the Karnataka assembly after two college students in Bengaluru were attacked. The MSc students from Bengaluru's Ambedkar School of Economics University were hospitalised.
His statement has drawn strong criticism from animal rights groups and the public.
Responding to Bhojegowda's question, the Karnataka government referred to petitions and animal lovers. After this, MLCs suggested that 10 dogs should be sent to live in every animal lover's home.
'We are witnessing dog bite cases daily, and victims are being hospitalised. If someone opposesthe removal of stray dogs from the streets, let the government leave a few dogs in their compounds to make them understand the reality,' Bhojegowda said. 'What will they do if a stray bites their children?' he added.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
His comments come as the Supreme Court has directed civic bodies in Delhi and the National Capital Region to immediately catch, sterilise, and permanently relocate stray dogs to shelters, warning of strict action against anyone obstructing the work.
The top court instructed officials to ensure that all dogs are taken off the streets 'at the earliest'. PTI/File Photo
Supreme Court's 'remove strays' order
While hearing a suo motu case on the rise in dog-bite incidents in the national capital region, the Supreme Court on Monday issued strict directions to the Delhi civic body to capture stray dogs, sterilise them, and move them permanently to shelters.
The court said the order must be enforced without delay to make New Delhi and the surrounding NCR safe.
ALSO READ | With nearly 10 lakh stray dogs, how will Delhi implement the Supreme Court order?
Describing the stray dog problem as 'extremely grim', the court instructed officials to ensure that all dogs are taken off the streets 'at the earliest' and warned that anyone blocking the drive would face strict action.
The order has faced backlash from animal rights activists and many pet lovers, who argue that there are not enough shelters to house the animals. People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) said, 'displacement and jailing of dogs is not scientific and has never worked.'
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Former BJP MP and former Union Minister Maneka Gandhi, who is also a well-known animal rights advocate, said the order would put civic bodies under immense pressure and make it more difficult to prevent dog bites while also safeguarding the animals.
In response to the backlash, the Supreme Court has listed the matter for hearing before a larger three-judge bench on Thursday. 'The judges who passed the order are not part of the bench,' the court said.
With inputs from agencies

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Economic Times
23 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Opposition PDP, PC trash Omar Abdullah's proposed signature campaign for restoration of statehood of Jammu and Kashmir
Jammu and Kashmir's opposition parties have criticized Chief Minister Omar Abdullah's proposed signature campaign. The campaign aims to restore statehood. Opposition leaders call it a betrayal of public trust. They accuse Abdullah of normalizing the 2019 decisions. These decisions revoked Article 370. Sajad Lone suggests a resolution in the assembly. Waheed Para demands an apology from Abdullah. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Opposition parties in Jammu and Kashmir stated that the signature campaign in support of statehood proposed by chief minister Omar Abdullah is mockery and betrayal of the trust and mandate of the people reposed in the National Conference in the last assembly opposition People's Democratic Party and People's Conference legislators accused Abdullah of normalizing the decisions of August 5, 2019, when the BJP led government in New Delhi, abrogated Article 370 and 35 (A) and downgraded the erstwhile state of J&K into the two Union Territories of J&K and during his speech on August 15, here in Srinagar had said that he will no longer be silent on the issue of restoration of statehood and instead hit the streets and reach out to people in all 90 assembly constituencies across J&K. He said that his government will get their signatures in support of restoration of statehood which will be submitted before the BJP leader government in New Delhi and the Supreme Court. The SC while hearing the petition on restoration of statehood on August 14, gave eight weeks time to the central government to submit their response.'We will support any movement towards statehood. But please don't make a mockery of statehood. Let us approach the Supreme Court as a constitutional entity not as another 'Tom Dick and Harry. Signature campaigns have no legal or constitutional sanctity,' said Sajad Lone of People's Conference. He suggested that the NC led government should pass a strong resolution in the J&K assembly. 'Our resolutions are not binding on the Supreme Court, but inherent in them will be constitutional dignity and reflect will of people…Political or signature campaigns have no legal or constitutional sanctity,' said Lone asking, 'Name one event empirically in India or in the rest of the world where signature campaigns have altered legal interpretations. They are not even admissible.'The PC chief also referred to the 2007 signature campaign 'Safr-e-Azadi' of the jailed Jammu and Kashmir Liberation Front leader Yasin Malik. 'The signature campaign for independence was carried out by Yasin Malik also. How far did that campaign go,' Lone asked. He accused Abdullah of showing, 'disregard, disdain and contempt for the assembly that has made him the CM.''I beg you. Please stop this childish and immature attitude. We will support any campaign unconditionally. But please ensure that a resolution from the state assembly is also passed and sent to the Supreme Court,' said Lone, adding, 'Don't set the stage for denial of statehood. Act like a leader. Don't throw tantrums…This is a real ideological battle. This is not a video game.'The PC legislator from Handwara, who served as a minister in the last PDP-BJP government, asked Abdullah to explain 'whether he was shielding and protecting the state BJP and giving them the luxury of not taking a position on statehood, by not passing a resolution on statehood?'The PDP legislator from Pulwama, Waheed Para said that Abdullah owes an apology not a signature campaign for normalising 5th August. 'With 50 MLAs behind him, he has reduced the fight for J&K's statehood to token gestures, after seeking votes door-to-door on the promise of restoring pre–5th August status,' said Para, adding, 'This is not just retreat, it is betrayal.' The PDP leader said that the people of J&K gave Abdullah a historic mandate to fight for Article 370 and statehood, not to stage political theatre. 'If he has already surrendered, he must admit it and apologise to every citizen of J&K for selling promises he never intended to keep,' said Para.


New Indian Express
an hour ago
- New Indian Express
In Independence Day speech, CM Revanth Reddy urges Centre to clear BC quota bills
HYDERABAD: Chief Minister A Revanth Reddy on Friday urged the Centre to approve Telangana's landmark bills providing 42% reservation for Backward Classes (BCs) in local bodies, education and employment. The CM was addressing the gathering after hoisting the national flag during the 79th Independence Day celebrations held at Golconda Fort. Citing figures from the socio-economic survey conducted by the state government, covering 1.12 crore families, Revanth said the findings revealed that BCs constitute 56.33% of the state's population. 'Based on this data, our government has introduced 42% reservation for BCs. The bills passed by the state legislature have been sent to the Centre for approval. On this historic occasion, I urge the Union government to clear the bills,' he said. Revanth underscored his government's commitment to social justice, highlighting that Telangana is the first state in the country to implement Scheduled Caste (SC) sub-categorisation following a Supreme Court verdict, classifying 59 sub-castes into three distinct groups. The chief minister also painted a stark picture of the state's fiscal health, revealing that the Congress government had inherited a staggering debt burden of Rs 8,21,652 crore. This included Rs 6,71,757 crore in borrowings, Rs 40,154 crore in pending employee dues and scheme liabilities, and Rs 1,09,740 crore in obligations under the SC/ST sub-plan, Singareni Collieries, and the power sector, he said. Despite these constraints, the government has serviced Rs 2,20,676 crore in debt — Rs 1,32,498 crore in principal and Rs 88,178 crore in interest — while continuing welfare initiatives, he added. 'Mahalakshmi scheme benefitted women, RTC' Revanth, meanwhile, said that the Mahalakshmi scheme, which provides free bus travel for women, was a success. 'Launched within 48 hours of the government taking charge, the initiative has issued over 200 crore zero-fare tickets, saving women passengers an estimated Rs 6,790 crore collectively,' he highlighted. 'This is not just about free travel — it is about financial independence, educational access, and social mobility for women,' he said, adding that the scheme revitalised the state's transport corporation.


New Indian Express
an hour ago
- New Indian Express
CJI BR Gavai says Supreme Court not superior or inferior to HC
NEW DELHI: CJI BR Gavai said on Friday that the Supreme Court collegium cannot dictate a high court collegium to recommend a particular name for judgeship, emphasising that both are constitutional courts and neither is superior to the other. The CJI was speaking at a function organised by the Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) to celebrate the country's 79th Independence Day on Friday, where SCBA president Vikas Singh urged the Supreme Court collegium to also consider lawyers practising in the apex court for high court judgeships, irrespective of whether they have practised there. 'Ultimately, even the Supreme Court Collegium can't dictate the high court collegium to recommend the names... the SC is not a superior court to the HC,' CJI Gavai those who sacrificed their lives for the country's independence, he added, 'On this Independence Day, let us not only salute the flag, but also the spirit it represents — of liberty that refuses to be silenced, of equality that admits no hierarchy, of fraternity that knows no walls.'