Couples who share this quality are happier and more satisfied with their lives, new study says
A recent study gets us closer to an answer: Research from McGill University, published in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, shows that couples who hold a shared worldview (being on the same page about their understanding of the world) experienced less uncertainty and found more meaning in their lives.
Researchers conducted five studies of nearly 1,300 adults in the U.S. and Canada, pooling data from lab-based tasks, online surveys, and experiments. They were testing the hypothesis that experiencing a sense of shared reality with a close partner reduces uncertainty about one's environment, which in turn boosts meaning in work and life. For instance, they found that front-line healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic and Black Americans during the Black Lives Matter demonstrations reported feeling less uncertainty and more meaning when their partner's understanding of the world matched their own.
'Our approach was different from earlier work on how relationships promote meaning, which tended to focus on aspects like belonging or support,' said lead author and psychologist M. Catalina Enestrom in a press release. 'We set out to explore whether sharing thoughts, ideas and concerns about the world with a romantic partner could enhance meaning by reducing uncertainty about one's environment.'
Having that shared perception of reality with your partner, according to the study, helps make your reality seem true while validating your perspective. Over time, the more experiences you share with your partner, the closer you can become to sharing a worldview.
'As couples accumulate shared experiences, shared feelings, goals, and memories, they develop a generalized shared reality,' senior author John Lydon, psychology professor at McGill University, said in the press release. 'This is different from simply feeling close or supported. It's not just 'my partner gets me,' it's 'we get it.''
Enestrom pointed out that shared reality can emerge from both aligned experiences and interpretations.
'Shared reality can form, for instance, when a couple watches a horror movie together and one or both partners perceive that they both find it scary,' she said. 'But shared reality doesn't necessarily require shared experiences. One partner can describe a stressful event they experienced, and if the other partner sees it the same way, this too can foster shared reality.'
The more shared reality experiences you accumulate together, the more likely you are to build a shared understanding of the world in general, she explained. As couples become closer through a shared reality, researchers also observed a greater sense of meaning in life, where individuals have a strong feeling of purpose, which research indicates can lead to better coping, greater happiness, and improved health outcomes.
For more on relationships:
5 things most Americans say are true about love and successful relationships
Marriage has a surprising link to dementia risk, new study finds
Couples most likely to divorce share a common economic trait, research shows
This story was originally featured on Fortune.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
6 hours ago
- The Hill
Fewer kindergarteners are being vaccinated, CDC data show
Vaccinations among kindergarteners declined during the 2024-25 school year compared to the year before, according to new data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Rates dipped to 92.1 percent for the diphtheria, tetanus, and acellular pertussis vaccine (DTaP) and to 92.5 percent for the measles, mumps and rubella vaccine (MMR) and polio vaccine, the data show. The drop in vaccination coverage comes as the U.S. grapples with rising cases of the measles—one of the most contagious diseases in the world. There have been 29 outbreaks of the virus this year, resulting in more than 1,330 confirmed measles cases across 40 states, according to the latest CDC numbers. Herd immunity against measles requires roughly 95 percent of the population to be vaccinated against the disease, according to the World Health Organization. Vaccine coverage decreased in more than half of states during the last school year compared to the year before, with about 286,000 kindergartners attending school without documentation showing they completed the MMR vaccine series. Vaccine exemptions for one or more vaccines have also gone up, with a total of 138,000 kindergarteners exempt from a vaccine in the last school year. The number of exemptions rose to 3.6 percent during the 2024-25 school year from 3.3 percent the year before. Exemptions increased in 36 states and Washington D.C. with 17 states now reporting an exemption rate of more than 5 percent, the data show. The Trump administration has shaken up the country's federal vaccine policy, sparking concerns among the medical community about the future of vaccine access. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, who has a long history of vaccine skepticism, has changed the process for vaccine recommendations as well as who is eligible for COVID-19 vaccines. 'The decision to vaccinate is a personal one,' a spokesperson for the Department of Health and Human Services told The Hill. 'Parents should consult their health care providers on options for their families.' The spokesperson added that vaccination remains the most effective way to protect children from serious diseases like measles and whooping cough which can lead to hospitalization and death.
Chicago Tribune
7 hours ago
- Chicago Tribune
Vaccination rates of children in US fall again
U.S. kindergarten vaccination rates inched down again last year and the share of children with exemptions rose to an all-time high, according to federal data posted Thursday. The fraction of kids exempted from vaccine requirements rose to 4.1%, up from 3.7% the year before. It's the third record-breaking year in a row for the exemption rate, and the vast majority are parents withholding shots for nonmedical reasons. Meanwhile, 92.5% of 2024-25 kindergartners got their required measles-mumps-rubella shots, down slightly from the previous year. Before the COVID-19 pandemic, the vaccination rate was 95% — the level that makes it unlikely that a single infection will spark a disease cluster or outbreak. The vaccination numbers were posted as the U.S. experiences its worst year for measles spread in more than three decades, with more than 1,300 cases so far. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention traditionally releases the vaccination coverage data in its flagship publication, the Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. CDC officials usually speak to the trends and possible explanations, and stress the importance of vaccinations. This year, the agency quietly posted the data online and — when asked about it — emailed a statement. 'The decision to vaccinate is a personal one. Parents should consult their health care providers on options for their families,' the statement said, adding; 'Vaccination remains the most effective way to protect children from serious diseases like measles and whooping cough, which can lead to hospitalization and long-term health complications.' Public health officials focus on vaccination rates for kindergartners because schools can be cauldrons for germs and launching pads for community outbreaks. For years, those rates were high, thanks largely to school attendance mandates that required key vaccinations. All U.S. states and territories require that children attending child care centers and schools be vaccinated against a number of diseases, including, measles, mumps, polio, tetanus, whooping cough and chickenpox. All states allow exemptions for children with medical conditions that prevent them from receiving certain vaccines. And most also permit exemptions for religious or other nonmedical reasons. In the last decade, the percentage of kindergartners with medical exemptions has held steady, at about 0.2%. But the percentage with nonmedical exemptions has risen. The rates can be influenced by policies that make it harder or easier to obtain exemptions, and by local attitudes among families and doctors about the need to get children vaccinated. Online misinformation and the political divide that emerged around COVID-19 vaccines have led more parents to question routine childhood vaccinations, experts say. According to the CDC data, 15.4% of kindergartners had an exemption to one or more vaccines in Idaho in the last school year. But fewer than 0.5% did in Connecticut.
8 hours ago
Members of CDC vaccine panel ousted by RFK Jr. say committee has 'lost credibility'
The members of a federal vaccine advisory committee, who were removed by Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., are suggesting alternatives to vaccine policy in the U.S. because the panel has "lost credibility." In early June, Kennedy dismissed all 17 sitting members of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), which advises the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) on vaccine recommendations. Kennedy replaced the group with his own, hand-selected members, many of whom had expressed skeptical views on vaccines. Since then, the committee has recommended against flu vaccines containing thimerosal -- a preservative that has been falsely linked to autism -- has said the childhood immunization schedule will be studied and has cast doubt on whether newborns need the hepatitis B vaccine. The members also expressed skepticism around the safety and efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccine, which Kennedy announced earlier this year will no longer be recommended for healthy children and healthy pregnant women. In a , the former members wrote that the rigorous process for recommending vaccines is "rapidly eroding." Dr. Noel Brewer, a former ACIP member removed by Kennedy and a professor in the department of health behavior at the University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, told ABC News that since the upheaval of the ACIP, vaccination has changed in the U.S. in a "fundamental" way and that the committee has "lost credibility." "We no longer have a single authority that's trustworthy to tell us who should get vaccinated at what age," he said. "This is a change in vaccine policy that is unprecedented, and we felt it important to start thinking about what a future should look like, or what a future will look like." "There is no good alternative to ACIP; the most that we could do is try to limit the damage," Brewer continued. He said ACIP has lost credibility with health care providers, especially with the decision to cut COVID-19 vaccine recommendations, and that the recent ACIP meeting was disappointing to witness. In the commentary, the first recommended step is to have professional organizations work together to "harmonize vaccine recommendations." Brewer said this is already happening, with professional societies meeting and establishing vaccination schedules. The American Academy of Pediatrics will recommend pediatricians and parents follow its own immunization schedule, which it has published for decades. The American Academy of Family Physicians and the American College of Physicians will publish recommendations for adults and the Infectious Diseases Society of America will set a schedule for people who are immunocompromised. Brewer said that while the recommendations will clarify what good health care is, it doesn't ensure that private insurers or the federal Vaccines for Children program will cover those vaccines. The second recommendation is for an external auditor of the new ACIP recommendations. "It's unclear how exactly that would play out, but some organizations would listen in on the ACIP meetings and, once they've concluded, look at the data and look at the decisions and see if they're reasonable," Brewer said. "Former ACIP members have taken on some of this role and will be commenting on the recent meeting." The third recommendation is to have a parallel system that follows past ACIP practices, which Brewer said would consist of people with credentials in fields such as immunology, virology and vaccinology who would meet once a quarter or every four months to review data and generate recommendations. Brewer said this system would be unlikely to succeed, however, due to the amount of funding it would cost and whether the CDC would be willing to share data before it's publicly available. However, he said this does not solve the current problem that the committee is missing members who have expertise in child primary care and vaccine implementation. "Those gaps were quite apparent at the last meeting," Brewer said. "They need to fill those gaps that will help credibility, but will not fully take care of the problem that the committee has tilted from being pro-vaccine to anti-vaccine, and that change complicates their roles as a recommending body." In a statement to ABC News, an HHS spokesperson said the former panelists "have it wrong, just like their rubber-stamped decisions on COVID vaccines." "Secretary Kennedy has restored public trust through his reconstitution of ACIP with highly credentialed medical doctors and public health experts committed to evidence-based medicine, gold standard science, and common sense," the statement said. "By replacing vaccine groupthink with a diversity of perspectives, Secretary Kennedy is strengthening the integrity of the advisory process guiding immunization policy in this country. Additionally, you can't claim them as anti-vaccine when they recommended them at their first meeting."
