Columbus mayoral candidate, former city manager Isaiah Hugley: ‘We got to get rid of crazy and get back on track'
Hugley, now a mayoral candidate, spoke at a Muscogee County Democratic Committee campaign event at the Public Library. Hugley spoke for a half hour, a little more time than Jason Esteves, democratic candidate for Georgia Governor, received.
He did not directly address his firing or the EEOC complaint he recently filed against the city, which claimed discrimination. Inside, the room belonged to Hugley – and this is as close as he got to addressing the controversy swirling around him.
'And we have allowed crazy to occur in Columbus, Georgia,' Hugley said. 'We got to get rid of crazy and get back on track. And we are going to do it. Unity through reconciliation can get us there.'
Outside, there were a couple of protestors outside with a large sign that read, 'Make Columbus Great Again. Anybody but Isaiah Hugley.'
Hugley spent most of his time talking about his background, coming out of poverty and public housing, to a 41-year career with the city, the last 20 as city manager.
'I am not just going to dwell on the past,' he said. 'I want to talk about when I become mayor of Columbus, Georgia. And I can assure you when I become mayor, we are going to provide leadership, we are going to manage with the same bold vision during my tenure as city manager.'
District 7 Councilor Joanne Cogle was one of the seven votes to terminate Hugley on May 27, despite the fact that he announced he was retiring at the end of the year. Cogle has announced her intention to run for mayor.
Hugley – through his attorney — had threatened legal action against six councilors, including Cogle. That came more than a month before he was fired. The EEOC complaint alleging discrimination could be the precursor to a suit against the city.
On the advice of two lawyers representing councilors, Cogle chose her words carefully Tuesday when asked about Hugley.
'There's still a personnel issue.,' Cogle said. 'There's still potential for litigation. And so, again, I'm focused on moving Columbus forward and focused on my campaign and only my campaign.'
Other candidates in the race don't have the same legal constraints.
Mark LaJoye: 'The former city manager even said he was for unity he was going to bring the community together. How do you do that when you due the city council members. That's not unity, bringing it together.'
Steven Kelly: 'What concerns me about him running for mayor is he actually does have a complaint in and is suing the city. And what I find funny is the fact that he's actually getting paid until he retires in December. Even though he was fired.'
Kia Legette: 'Let me answer your question from a place of the Pledge of Allegiance. The Pledge of Allegiance, if you look at the bottom of the sentence, it says liberty for all and justice for all. Apparently, Hugley is seeking justice for something.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
3 days ago
- Boston Globe
‘A climate of fear': How the Trump administration's attacks on Harvard could upend hiring practices across the country
Advertisement Regardless of whether the Trump administration is successful in extracting changes at Harvard — both are negotiating over a deal that would resolve several investigations of the university and restore its research funding — its targeting of the university's hiring practices could have a nationwide chilling effect, observers said. Employers may feel the need to abandon any efforts, even initiatives currently permitted under state and federal laws, that focus on recruiting and retaining diverse 'Clearly, what the administration is doing with Harvard and Advertisement The Civil Rights Act of 1964 outlawed employment discrimination on the basis of 'race, color, religion, sex, or national origin,' and created the EEOC to enforce the prohibition. For decades, the EEOC has encouraged employers to pursue diversity efforts if they are 'designed to open up opportunities to everyone,' according to its In April, EEOC Acting Chair Andrea Lucas brought a While a spokesperson for the EEOC said the agency could not 'confirm nor deny the existence of any charge,' Harvard spokesperson Jonathan Swain said in a statement that the 'university has responded initially' to the EEOC charge 'and will continue to engage around questions from the agency.' The EEOC charge covers several topics surrounding Harvard. One part of the document alleges that certain student fellowship and internship programs might be discriminatory because they focus on specific groups of people, such as underrepresented minorities. The thrust of the EEOC's case against Harvard discusses the university's hiring more generally — though it doesn't describe exactly how the agency believes Harvard discriminated against certain employees and applicants. The charge largely hinges on practices Harvard — like all federal contractors — was legally bound to follow under an executive order issued by President Lyndon B. Johnson nearly 60 years ago. That order required affected employers to measure the demographics of their employees against the overall workforce to see whether any groups were being underrepresented. Advertisement President Trump rescinded Johnson's order on his second day in office. 'This is a benchmarking to assess whether you're fully utilizing the talent available in your workforce and whether there are barriers that are artificially excluding qualified people,' said Jenny Yang, a former EEOC commissioner and Department of Labor official. 'That's all it's asking to do. Nobody's saying you need to meet that target.' The EEOC charge cited charts — once available on Harvard's website but now removed — depicting how the percentage of women, people of color, and LGBTQ staff among Harvard's faculty has increased over time. That data, Commissioner Lucas said, may show Harvard illegally discriminated against other employees. Under the executive order that Trump rescinded, Harvard had been required to compile demographic data since 1965. Now, those very same documents are being used against the university. 'It's somewhat of a nonsensical argument,' said David Cohen, founder and president of DCI Consulting, which advises companies on employment matters. He added that the availability of Black and Hispanic professors has gone up over the past decade, and so one would expect to see percentage increases. 'If you are selecting and hiring in a neutral way, then you would see an increase in representation of these groups,' Cohen said. Employment law experts also scrutinized the legal concepts used by the EEOC. Put simply, 'disparate treatment' happens when there is intentional discrimination, whereas 'disparate impact' is unintentional discrimination. The EEOC charge — that Harvard engaged in disparate treatment against white, Asian, male, or straight employees and applicants — under the law requires proof of intentional discrimination. But because the charge backs this up almost exclusively by showing a demographic shift, and not how that shift occurred, lawyers who spoke to the Globe said the commissioner is effectively relying on a different legal theory known as disparate impact. Advertisement Trump signed an executive order in April that prohibited federal agencies from using the theory, arguing that it is unconstitutional. 'There is real irony in the fact that this commissioner's charge relies on statistical trends to allege discrimination,' said Mickey Silberman, founder of Silberman Law PC who represents companies, universities, and other organizations on employment matters. It's ironic because that is a disparate impact argument, which he added the executive order 'was designed to address and prevent.' Experts said while the commissioner might have a better case arguing the other half of the charge — that certain student internship and fellowship programs are discriminatory — they cautioned that more information is needed to determine how the programs were structured, and whether participants would be employees under the law. While civil rights laws have not changed, Trump's about-face on nearly six decades of employment law represents an aggressive shift intended to stamp out diversity, equity, and inclusion policies and push what it says are 'merit-based' practices. The Trump administration has also used the EEOC to Those who side with the administration's broad approach view its actions as a return to the true meaning of anti-discrimination law — meaning that no one should be advantaged or disadvantaged based on their demographic details. 'Our goal is to end unlawful discrimination in America,' said Leigh Ann O'Neill, a senior attorney at the legal advocacy group America First Policy Institute, which is engaged in litigation on employment in higher education and was co-founded by two current Trump officials. 'There is a high focus on the universities right now, but that by no means is our narrow focus.' Advertisement Already, the government has struck a deal with Columbia University that includes requirements that all but factor race out of the hiring process. Employment law experts said that concession goes beyond existing laws that have long prohibited race-based hiring decisions, but have allowed employers to take some steps to promote diversity — for instance, by recruiting candidates from underrepresented groups to expand hiring pools. The Columbia deal also included a separate settlement of EEOC charges alleging civil rights violations against Jewish faculty. While the status of the EEOC investigation is unclear, targeting university hiring practices remains a top priority for the Trump administration. And even if other organizations determine that parts of their employment process related to diversity are legal, the threat of a costly EEOC investigation may lead them to abandon decades of hiring practices. 'It appears that there's not a lot of facts or evidence to support these actions, but the administration is working to create a climate of fear to intimidate employers into abandoning fully lawful efforts to advance equal opportunity,' said Yang, the former EEOC commissioner. Mike Damiano of the Globe staff contributed to this report. Aidan Ryan can be reached at
Yahoo
7 days ago
- Yahoo
School district asks court to reel in EEOC charge it called a ‘fishing expedition'
This story was originally published on HR Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily HR Dive newsletter. Dive Brief: A 2024 U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission discrimination charge constituted an overly broad and vague 'fishing expedition' that should be blocked by a federal judge, the board of education for New Mexico's Gallup-McKinley County Public Schools district alleged in a lawsuit filed Aug. 8. Per the complaint, then-Commissioner Andrea Lucas submitted a charge alleging that the district discriminated on the basis of race in its hiring practices. The district claimed that EEOC refused a request for information about the charge's basis, violating its due process rights. It further claimed that EEOC's request for information was so overbroad as to exceed its investigative authority. The plaintiffs also alleged procedural errors on EEOC's part, claiming the agency failed to allow sufficient time for a local fair employment practice agency with jurisdiction over the case the opportunity to process the charge instead of EEOC. The commission did not respond to a request for comment. Dive Insight: The board of education claimed that EEOC violated Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, the Administrative Procedure Act and the Fifth Amendment guarantee of due process. A portion of the complaint alleged that EEOC's request that the district produce five years' worth of confidential employee and applicant information did not properly consider the privacy interests of affected parties. Noting that the vast majority of the district's students and employees are Native American, the complaint said Lucas had asserted "broad and vague claims without any factual support of systemic discrimination toward Native Americans." 'If the EEOC's investigation is allowed to proceed, sensitive personal information of employees and applicants may be disclosed to the government despite the government's complete lack of authority to obtain it,' the plaintiffs wrote. 'Each of these individuals and entities will be irreparably harmed.' The complaint also noted that EEOC currently lacks a quorum, and the plaintiffs alleged that 'all actions by the EEOC, thus far, are contrary to law and outside of Defendants' authority and outside a quorum of the Commission.' EEOC requests for information have been of particular concern this year due to the agency's public commitment to cracking down on diversity, equity and inclusion programs. One attorney previously told HR Dive that employers may want to consider taking a number of steps before responding to an EEOC letter or information request, such as negotiating the scope of such requests and providing a position statement. Recommended Reading EEOC: Recruiter's sex discrimination, retaliation charge ends in $90K settlement
Yahoo
13-08-2025
- Yahoo
Columbus mayoral candidate, former city manager Isaiah Hugley: ‘We got to get rid of crazy and get back on track'
COLUMBUS, Ga. () — For the first time since the Columbus council terminated him on May 27th, former city manager Isaiah Hugley spoke publicly Tuesday night. Hugley, now a mayoral candidate, spoke at a Muscogee County Democratic Committee campaign event at the Public Library. Hugley spoke for a half hour, a little more time than Jason Esteves, democratic candidate for Georgia Governor, received. He did not directly address his firing or the EEOC complaint he recently filed against the city, which claimed discrimination. Inside, the room belonged to Hugley – and this is as close as he got to addressing the controversy swirling around him. 'And we have allowed crazy to occur in Columbus, Georgia,' Hugley said. 'We got to get rid of crazy and get back on track. And we are going to do it. Unity through reconciliation can get us there.' Outside, there were a couple of protestors outside with a large sign that read, 'Make Columbus Great Again. Anybody but Isaiah Hugley.' Hugley spent most of his time talking about his background, coming out of poverty and public housing, to a 41-year career with the city, the last 20 as city manager. 'I am not just going to dwell on the past,' he said. 'I want to talk about when I become mayor of Columbus, Georgia. And I can assure you when I become mayor, we are going to provide leadership, we are going to manage with the same bold vision during my tenure as city manager.' District 7 Councilor Joanne Cogle was one of the seven votes to terminate Hugley on May 27, despite the fact that he announced he was retiring at the end of the year. Cogle has announced her intention to run for mayor. Hugley – through his attorney — had threatened legal action against six councilors, including Cogle. That came more than a month before he was fired. The EEOC complaint alleging discrimination could be the precursor to a suit against the city. On the advice of two lawyers representing councilors, Cogle chose her words carefully Tuesday when asked about Hugley. 'There's still a personnel issue.,' Cogle said. 'There's still potential for litigation. And so, again, I'm focused on moving Columbus forward and focused on my campaign and only my campaign.' Other candidates in the race don't have the same legal constraints. Mark LaJoye: 'The former city manager even said he was for unity he was going to bring the community together. How do you do that when you due the city council members. That's not unity, bringing it together.' Steven Kelly: 'What concerns me about him running for mayor is he actually does have a complaint in and is suing the city. And what I find funny is the fact that he's actually getting paid until he retires in December. Even though he was fired.' Kia Legette: 'Let me answer your question from a place of the Pledge of Allegiance. The Pledge of Allegiance, if you look at the bottom of the sentence, it says liberty for all and justice for all. Apparently, Hugley is seeking justice for something.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword
