Sick pay changes could benefit UK firms by up to £2bn, TUC says
The Trades Union Congress (TUC), which is pushing for the government to stick with its plans for workers' rights, said modelling showed businesses would gain benefits of £2.4bn thanks to productivity boosts, while facing direct costs of £425m to pay for extra sick days.
Sick employees in the UK are currently entitled to statutory sick pay only from their fourth day of illness, including weekends and days on which people do not usually work. The government's employment rights bill, which is being debated in the House of Lords, proposes to abolish the wait, putting the UK in line with countries such as Germany and Sweden.
Statutory sick pay, paid by employers for up to 28 weeks, is worth £118.75 a week – or £3 an hour – for people too ill to work. People paid less than £125 a week are not eligible at all, meaning as many as 1.3 million people who work do not have any entitlement. The lower limit would be abolished under the proposed changes.
Business lobby groups have argued vociferously against the employment rights bill, which is closely associated with the deputy prime minister, Angela Rayner, and which includes measures such as protection against unfair dismissal from the first day of employment, a ban on fire-and-rehire practices, and a right to flexible working where practical.
The Federation of Small Businesses has said the changes to statutory sick pay 'will make employers think twice about their hiring plans'. It is concerned that employees will be quicker to take sick leave, increasing the costs for businesses.
The TUC's analysis, carried out by the consultancy WPI Economics, indicates that improved sick pay could provide benefits for businesses. It argues, citing a 2018 US study, that easier access to sick pay may, counterintuitively, lead to lower overall sickness absence, because workers would be less likely to spread infectious diseases such as colds and influenza.
It also suggests that earlier sick pay could prevent sick workers from dragging down colleagues' productivity, improve overall morale and employee retention, and reduce longer absences. However, those proposed benefits have not been subject to large-scale tests in the UK.
Paul Nowak, the TUC's general secretary, said: 'Nobody should be plunged into hardship when they become ill. The government's sick pay reforms will stop millions from facing a financial cliff edge if they get sick.
Sign up to Business Today
Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning
after newsletter promotion
'With sick pay rights from the first day of sickness, workers will know they can take the time they need to recover without needing to rush back to work. That's good for business and the wider economy too. A healthier, happier workforce is a more productive workforce.'
The UK's rate of sick pay is far below that of more generous countries such as Sweden, which mandates 80% of salary. The TUC said the UK's overall rate should also be increased.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
23 minutes ago
- The Independent
Why Diane Abbott told Jeremy Corbyn not to set up new party
Diane Abbott advised Jeremy Corbyn against establishing a new political party, citing the difficulties new parties face under Britain's first-past-the-post electoral system. Despite her advice, Ms Abbott believes Mr Corbyn's unnamed new party, launched last month with Zarah Sultana, will exceed expectations due to widespread public dissatisfaction with current politics. Ms Abbott, a Labour MP for over 40 years, indicated she would not be joining Mr Corbyn's new venture, despite expressing disappointment with the current Labour government 's policies. She criticised the government's decision to proscribe Palestine Action, labelling it a "complete disgrace" and an attempt to suppress protest. Ms Abbott expressed anger at not being called by Commons Speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle to speak after racist comments by Conservative donor Frank Hester, suggesting political motives from both the Conservatives and Labour.
The Independent
23 minutes ago
- The Independent
Manufacturers given 18 months to cut sugar and salt in baby food products
Baby food manufacturers have been given 18 months to cut sugar and salt in their products, to address concerns that infants' development is being harmed by poor diets. Accompanying new guidelines to clarify labelling on baby food will help parents make informed choices about what they feed their children, the Department of Health and Social Care said. Manufacturers will be challenged to change the recipes for their products to reduce levels of salt and sugar, without the use of sweeteners, which are not permitted for use in commercial baby food. For example, baby desserts and breakfasts such as rice pudding, custard and ready-to-eat fruity porridge should contain less than 10g of total sugar per 100g, while baby meals should have no more than 60mg of salt per 100 calories or 100mg per 100 calories if cheese is included in the recipe. The guidelines will also tackle misleading labelling that often conflicts with official feeding advice. For example, some products labelled as snacks for babies from seven months on directly contradict government recommendations that children aged between six and 12 months do not need snacks between meals, only milk. Manufacturers will also be told to stop using misleading marketing claims that make products appear healthier than they are, for example products with labels such as 'contains no nasties' when they may be high in sugar. The move comes as data from the National Diet and Nutrition Survey, published in June, shows that more than two thirds of children aged 18 months to three years are eating too much sugar, while more than a fifth of children aged four to five years are overweight or living with obesity in England. High sugar intake in children's diets is a significant factor contributing to high rates of childhood obesity in the UK, which is among the highest in western Europe. Obesity rates have doubled since the 1990s, including among children. Obesity costs the NHS £11.4 billion a year and is one of the root causes of diabetes, heart disease and cancer. Public health minister Ashley Dalton said: 'Every child deserves a healthy, happy start to life. But babies' development is being harmed by poor diets and unhealthy food, holding them back and piling up pressure on the NHS. 'Too often, parents are bombarded with confusing labels, disguising unhealthy foods packed with hidden sugars and salt. 'Our plan for change will tackle this, giving parents the information they need and providing children with good nutritious food. 'I'm determined to make it far easier for parents to keep their children healthy. 'From working with influencers to get children exercising, to banning junk food ads near schools, our 10-year health plan will help kids today be part of the healthiest generation of children ever.' Katharine Jenner, director of the Obesity Health Alliance, said: 'For too long, commercial baby foods have been promoting high-sugar products disguised as 'healthy options', using misleading packaging. 'These new guidelines put the industry on notice: this practice must end. 'Making it easier for parents to buy healthier products is a baby step in the right direction – but what's really needed is a giant leap. 'It should not even be possible to sell baby food that goes against official feeding guidance, and the public agrees, with three in four people supporting a ban on high-sugar baby foods. 'If the industry fails to act quickly, the Government must step in with mandatory rules to set children up for a lifetime of good health.' Dr Kawther Hashem, head of research and impact at Action on Sugar, said: 'Our research has consistently shown excessive levels of sugars in commercial baby foods. 'These long-overdue voluntary guidelines are a step in the right direction, but they must not be the final word. 'Consuming too much sugar on a regular basis means children are taking in excess calories that, if not used for energy, are stored as fat. 'This increases the risk of weight gain and, if it starts early, that excess weight is often carried into adolescence and adulthood, raising the risk of overweight, obesity and agonising tooth decay. 'If we're serious about protecting our youngest children, these guidelines must be made mandatory. 'We urge the Government to closely monitor progress and act swiftly if companies fail to change.' Professor Simon Kenny, NHS England's national clinical director for children and young people, said: 'I can't overstate just how important good nutrition is during these formative months for babies' health in the long term, and you can't beat fresh foods. 'Reducing the salt and sugar levels in shop-bought baby food is a really important step, and these new guidelines alongside clearer labelling will help empower busy parents to make nutritious choices that give their children the best possible start in life.' Dr Hannah Brisden, head of policy and advocacy at the Food Foundation, said: 'Giving every child the best start in life begins with good nutrition. 'Today's announcement on commercial baby foods highlights the need to protect families from aggressive marketing and end misleading claims on sugary products. 'Our research found up to 43 claims on a single baby snack, despite many being high in sugar. 'The industry has been warned to clean up their act with voluntary guidelines, but to truly protect children, mandatory standards are needed. 'We urge the Government to monitor progress closely and be ready to step in if companies don't act.'
The Independent
23 minutes ago
- The Independent
Consumer confidence reaches highest point of year despite ‘clouds on horizon'
Consumer confidence has reached its highest point this year amid 'clouds on the horizon' in the form of inflation and rising unemployment, according to a long-running survey. GfK's Consumer Confidence Index increased by two points to minus 17 in August, driven by improved personal finances likely thanks to the latest cut to interest rates. Earlier this month, the Bank of England voted to cut its base interest rate from 4.25% to 4%. Confidence in personal finances over both the last year and the coming 12 months rose three points, to minus four and positive five respectively. The measure for the general economic situation of the country during the last 12 months is up two points to minus 42 – seven points worse than a year ago – while the expectations for the next 12 months fell one point to minus 30 – 15 points worse than last August. The major purchase index – a measure of confidence in buying big ticket items – is up two points to minus 13. Neil Bellamy, consumer insights director at GfK, said: 'The biggest changes in August are in confidence in personal finances, with the scores looking back and ahead a year each up by three points. 'This is likely due to the Bank of England's August 7 cut in interest rates, delivering the lowest cost of borrowing for more than two years. 'The improved sentiment on personal finances is welcome, but there are many clouds on the horizon in the form of inflation – the highest since January 2024 – and rising unemployment. 'There's no shortage of speculation, too, about what the autumn budget will bring in terms of tax rises.' He added: 'While August's overall index score of minus 17 is the best this year, consumer confidence continues to move in a very narrow band, and there's no sense that it is about to break out into fresher, more optimistic territory. 'The UK's consumers are still in wait-and-see mode, and any surprises could result in sudden and sharp changes in sentiment.'
