logo
#

Latest news with #sickpay

UK workers are taking less sick days as figures reveal new average
UK workers are taking less sick days as figures reveal new average

The Independent

time4 days ago

  • Business
  • The Independent

UK workers are taking less sick days as figures reveal new average

The average number of sick days taken by UK workers has fallen, according to new data, as the average amount taken by each worker is revealed. The Office for National Statistics (ONS) estimates that 148.9 million working days were lost due to illness or injury in 2024. This equates to 2 per cent of total working hours – a decrease of 0.3 percentage points from the previous year. Minor illnesses were the most frequent cause of absence, accounting for nearly a third of all cases. Musculoskeletal problems were the next most common reason, responsible for 15.5 per cent of absences. The ONS data indicated that women, older employees, individuals with long-term health issues, part-time workers, and public sector employees had the highest rates of sick leave in 2024. The average time lost per worker in 2024 was 4.4 days. Amanda Walters, director of the Safe Sick Pay campaign, an alliance campaigning for sick pay reform, said: 'The fall in sickness absence may seem a positive development but the figures mask the fact that far too many UK workers regularly go to work when they are too ill. 'We are amongst the least likely to take sick days in Europe as our woeful statutory sick pay system is forcing millions of people to drag themselves into work ill, risking their long term health because they need to pay the bills. This costs the economy billions in lost productivity. 'The Government is fixing one part of the problem by improving sick pay coverage for some lower earners in the employment Bill, but is not doing enough to sort out the sorry state of our sick pay system. 'The weekly rate of sick pay remains just £3 an hour for a full time worker. If we are serious about improving the health of the working age population, the Government needs to stop ignoring the elephant in the room and put statutory sick pay in line with the minimum wage.' Ben Harrison, director of the Work Foundation at Lancaster University, said: 'Enabling people to take time off when they are sick to get better and return to work in good health is critical for a robust and successful labour market. 'Workers feeling unable to take time to recover and recuperate can lead to health issues becoming more serious over time, increasing the risk that they might join the near record number of people who are already out of the labour market due to ill health. 'The UK's statutory sick pay of £118.75 a week is lower than the majority of OECD countries, and our research shows that 47 per cent of UK businesses do not pay above the statutory minimum. 'This can mean those who rely on statutory sick pay can face a choice between making ends meet or looking after their health.'

Can you afford to get sick?
Can you afford to get sick?

Irish Times

time14-05-2025

  • Health
  • Irish Times

Can you afford to get sick?

No one expects to get injured or sick but it happens and it can have a significant impact on your household finances. That's why it pays to know where you stand. If you get sick or injured, you have a statutory entitlement to five days' sick pay a year – about the duration of a flu. And this is an improvement on what was in place – just three days annually up to January last year. A planned increase to seven days was stalled by Government last month amid protests from business. Statutory sick pay is paid at 70 per cent of your normal pay, up to a maximum of €110 a day – the legal minimum your boss must pay. Some employers will have more generous schemes, but employers can't give you less than the statutory amount. You must be an employee in the job for at least 13 weeks and be able to provide a sick cert. READ MORE 'A generous scheme would be anywhere between 21 and 28 days where the employer is paying the sick pay directly,' says employment lawyer Barry Crushell. 'That may be at the statutory rate of €110 a day, or it may be the full rate of pay,' he says. Few employers pay for sick pay from their own coffers after a month, he says. Where this perk is available, the employer is probably paying a third-party insurer to provide the cover. The insurance company pays the sick pay to the employee. 'These policies will cover absences due to illness, typically over a six-month period,' says Crushell. 'After that, in my experience, insurers tend to significantly scrutinise the condition of an employee who is availing of sick pay,' he says. 'Employees can find themselves in a vulnerable position after six months where the insurance company is trying to divest themselves of the liability,' he says. 'After a period of time, the illness of the employee doesn't necessarily become a concern for the employer because it's an insurance company matter. The insurance company can often take a more robust, aggressive and inquisitorial approach to the employee's illness to ensure they are not continuing to pay if they no longer deem it's warranted. 'I have employees coming to me because the employer is saying the matter is out of my hands and the insurance company may be refusing to pay after a particular period of time.' An employer, with the best of intentions, might try to support you for as long as possible, but they are under no legal obligation to do so beyond the five days statutory sick pay or in accordance with their own policy, he says. [ Plans to increase paid sick leave for workers to be stalled under Cabinet proposal Opens in new window ] Where the employee has mostly recovered and wants to return to work on a phased basis, on partial pay for example, things can go awry too, says Crushell. 'There can be a disconnect between the employer and the insurance company about the availability of an employee to work. We have encountered instances where insurance companies are not willing to pay the difference. They say their cover is based on the employee being completely incapacitated for work.' If you are off work sick for more than five days, you should apply for state illness benefit whether your employer pays you or not, says the Department of Social Protection . Illness benefit is a weekly payment of up to €244, depending on your earnings and on any adult or child dependents you may have. It's paid for a maximum of two years to those with sufficient PRSI contributions. Employers keep records on sick leave. Photograph: iStock How to prepare Serious illness is a 'black-swan event' for which you should try to prepare, says Lorraine Cooke of Jigsaw Financial solutions. It's rare and unexpected, but it can have a significant impact. 'In order of priority, I tell people to put aside emergency cash for that unforeseen event; that's a minimum of three months net salary,' says Cooke. The right insurance policy can keep a roof over heads and bills paid. She recommends taking out income protection. 'Your income is your most valuable asset and you need to ensure it's protected,' says Cooke. 'If you get a short-term or long-term illness and your income is not protected, you are going to be financially impacted.' Depending on your policy, income protection can pay up to 75 per cent of salary, less social welfare benefits, up to a maximum age of 70. The payment is treated as income for tax purposes. Some people are unaware they have cover as part of their employment contract. Cooke has seen plenty of examples of this. For those taking out cover themselves, the cost of the premium, fixed at the time you take out cover, depends on a number of factors. 'It's very much determined by your age, your health and the amount of income you are covering, when the policy is going to start to pay out and when the policy will expire,' says Cooke. The good news is that there is tax relief on income protection premiums. And if you are paying 40 per cent tax, relief is paid at this rate. Insurers will do at least a mini medical – recording height, weight and blood pressure, says Cooke. Policyholders decide their own 'deferred period' – the amount of time that must elapse before the policy starts paying out, basically how long you can get by without a salary. 'You might be paid sick leave at work for a period, you might have savings, or a partner may be working and you don't need it to kick in immediately,' says Cooke. 'The default deferred period before a claim can be made is four weeks with the longest being 52 weeks,' says Cooke. 'If you are paid by your employer at six weeks' full pay and six weeks' half-pay, for example, you might opt for a 12-week deferred period – the longer the deferred period, the cheaper the premium.' Shop around and compare quotes is her advice. Critical illness cover Critical illness cover, or specified illness cover, is paid as a tax-free lump sum in the event of a person being diagnosed with an illness specified in the policy. These include things such as heart attack, stroke, loss of limbs or sight, and cancer. If your illness falls outside those listed in the policy, cover will be useless, which is a regular bone of contention. 'The minimum amount of cover that somebody should have is two years of net salary because that's typically the rehabilitation period if someone is going through treatment or surgery,' says Cooke. Insurers can be rigid about illnesses covered and payouts. 'Carcinoma in situ of the breast is a big claim the insurance companies are seeing coming through. That is a woman having a lump in her breast that is not cancerous but it may still need to be removed with possibly chemo, but it's not essentially cancer yet,' says Cooke. 'Insurance companies were getting a lot of claims in and were declining them until they decided to include them as 'partial' payments where they will pay out, say €15,000, where something is classified as carcinoma in situ. If she went on to develop cancer, the balance of her specified illness cover would be paid out,' says Cooke. Data from Irish Life on its critical illness cover claims shows some new trends. While cancer remains the leading cause of claims by women, other health issues such as heart conditions, strokes and other serious illnesses are becoming increasingly common among women, says Martin Duffy, head of underwriting and protection claims, at Irish Life. Men accounted for 59.5 per cent of all specified illness cover claims to Irish Life last year. The top three illnesses men experienced were prostate cancer (malignant), heart attack and stroke. For women claimants, it was breast cancer (malignant), stroke and heart attack. Mental health difficulties are not regarded as a specified illness, says Cooke. They can, however, be covered under income protection policies. 'Since Covid, mental health is now the biggest claim under income protection policies,' says Cooke. 'It was musculoskeletal issues like back and neck, but the majority of claims now are actually for mental health,' she says. Being sick costs Nobody wants to pay another monthly direct debit for an insurance policy but it is worth at least game-planning how your household might manage if an earner, or the person who minds children, gets sick. A 2019 study by the Irish Cancer Society estimated the average cost to someone dealing with cancer was €756 a month, rising to more than €1,000 in some cases. The cost comprised things such as GP and consultant fees, travel, parking and hospital stays, extra heating and lighting costs, additional personal care and clothing costs, childcare costs and the loss of income, according to the survey. The average drop in the income of cancer patients was €1,527 per month, or €18,323 annually. One in three of those diagnosed changed their employment status, one in four changed their approach to work, and 45 per cent of carers' employment was affected, it found. If you are ill from work, make sure you get sick certs and give them to your employer. Photograph: iStock Return to work For those who are sick, dealing with their employer or an insurance company can add to the stress. Be diligent about providing medical certs to your employer, advises Crushell. These may be required on a weekly basis, though generally less often for long-term illness. Sometimes, an employer will take the approach of filling the employee's position with a temporary hire. The sick employee may be kept 'on the books' as an employee while not being paid. 'For employers, the least risky option is to keep the employee on the books for an indefinite duration rather than take any action that might result in a legal claim, like unfair dismissal,' says Crushell. There have been 32 cases in the Workplace Relations Commission under sick leave legislation, he says. An employee who has recovered and wants to return to work can ask for reasonable accommodation, or modification to working terms and conditions. Keep your employer appraised of events, Crushell advises. If you don't tell them how your illness affects your work and what modifications you might need, the employer is under no legal obligation to provide necessary adjustments, he says. Where an employee is no longer able to do the job for which they were hired, and no reasonable accommodation can be met, the employer is within their rights to dismiss the employee on the grounds they no longer have the capability to perform the role for which they were hired.

Workers will skive off if sick pay offered from day one of illness, say Tories
Workers will skive off if sick pay offered from day one of illness, say Tories

Telegraph

time13-05-2025

  • Health
  • Telegraph

Workers will skive off if sick pay offered from day one of illness, say Tories

Labour's plans to introduce sick pay from day one of illness will cause workers to skive, senior Tories have said. Critics of Angela Rayner's Employment Rights Bill claim the proposals will lead to soaring absenteeism. The Bill will end the current situation where new workers are not entitled to Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) for the first three days of a sickness – a so-called three-day waiting period. The Bill will also remove the lower earnings limit to qualify for the payment. Labour argues the existing situation can force people to work when they are unwell, leading to the spread of infection and poorer productivity for businesses. Lord Hunt of Wirral, the Tory business minister, argued the legislation brought with it 'a raft of unintended consequences'. He said: 'Absenteeism is a critical issue for many businesses especially those in hospitality, retail and other service-based industries, where staff shortages can lead to disruption, cancellations and even closures. 'With the removal of waiting days for SSP and the expansion of eligibility it is essential that all of us should understand fully how these changes are going to affect absenteeism patterns across various sectors. 'One of the sectors most concerned with the potential rise in absenteeism that these changes will cause is of course hospitality. 'The concern is that the reforms could result in workers taking sick leave when it may not be strictly necessary as the financial implications of their doing so would be mitigated by the statutory sick pay payment.' He added: 'We believe it is essential that the Government thoroughly evaluates how these statutory sick pay provisions would affect absenteeism. 'When workers can call in sick and expect SSP from day one businesses will inevitably be forced to deal with more absences at short notice.' Baroness Noakes, a fellow Conservative peer, said: 'Extending the days for which payment is made is likely to increase the number of days lost to sickness, as the current incentive to work if the illness is mild will simply disappear. 'The Government say they have no idea what the behavioural impact of the changes will be – whether positive or negative – but I am prepared to bet that there will be far more short-duration absences, which will qualify for statutory sick pay, than there were before.' 'Bad for business' However, Baroness O'Grady of Upper Holloway, the former general secretary of the Trades Union Congress (TUC) and a Labour peer, said: 'The Covid pandemic exposed just how precarious life is for those in insecure, low-paid work, and we do not know how many preventable illnesses were caused by people struggling into work and spreading the virus because they could not afford to stay home. 'But we do know, as we have heard, that forcing people back to work when they are ill is bad for workers and bad for business, puts pressure on the NHS and is costly for the economy.' She argued SSP had failed to keep up with the cost of living or increases in the living wage. Baroness Jones of Whitchurch, the business minister, said the proposed changes to sick pay would cost businesses around an extra £15 per employee, which she described as 'a relatively modest amount'. She said: 'I assure the House that the Government remain committed to monitoring the impact of these SSP measures. 'Our proposals have to be seen in the wider context of the Bill. The Bill is intended to improve the experience of employees at work. 'For us, that is an important challenge that we intend to monitor,' she added.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store