This Brooklyn landlord says 1 of his tenants owes $60,000 in unpaid rent nightmare — here's what happened
Kemar Lafayette is a Brooklyn landlord who owns a multi-level home in the Bed-Stuy neighborhood. Lafayette has been stuck in the same nightmare since 2021, where an unamed tenant has been giving him the runaround on paying — essentially squatting — racking up $60,000 in unpaid rent.
While Lafayette has tried to get her evicted, he seems to keep running into roadblocks.
"I'm trying to do the right thing, trying to go to the right channel, like within the law. But I'm getting no result," he told News 12 New York.
I'm 49 years old and have nothing saved for retirement — what should I do? Don't panic. Here are 5 of the easiest ways you can catch up (and fast)
Nervous about the stock market in 2025? Find out how you can access this $1B private real estate fund (with as little as $10)
Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how
The situation has generated a lot of stress for Lafayette and his family — expecially his mother, who lives in the ground-floor unit of the building.
'She's just doing the most outrageous things,' Lafayette says, referring to security camera footage showing the tenant smoking indoors, removing posted signs, leaving the front door wide open, and even lifting floorboards — which Lafayette says led to water damage in his mother's apartment.
As the legal process drags on, Lafayette has been forced to cover the mortgage out of pocket, leaving him in financial distress. Although he finally has a court date on the horizon, he's not hopeful.
"My mortgage is crazy. I can't go to the bank and tell the bank I can't pay the mortgage. This for three years? It's rough."
Read more: The US stock market's 'fear gauge' has exploded — but this 1 'shockproof' asset is up 14% and helping American retirees stay calm. Here's how to own it ASAP
In New York City, landlord-tenant law is a technical dance where both parties have tools at their disposal to get the outcome they're looking for — or in the tenant's case, delay eviction.
One of the most common reasons why evictions can take too long or settle on unfavorable terms is because the landlord didn't follow the lease terms and the technicalities of law, according to law firm Blodnick Fazio & Clark.
To avoid this, landlords should:
Start with a strong lease agreement: Include clear terms for late payments, violations, and termination.
Act fast: Don't let a missed payment slide. Send default notices right away and document everything.
Understand the local process: In New York, landlords need a court order from the Division of Housing and Community Renewal (DHCR) to evict a tenant — and the entire process can take months. The same is true in many other states.
It also helps to follow Lafayette's example and install security cameras. If things go sideways, footage can help establish a pattern of behavior and support your case in court.
Lafayette's ordeal has racked up thousands of views on News 12's YouTube channel. One of the the top commenters wrote: "This is insane. I wouldn't even be able to sleep at night knowing I didn't pay rent. The entitlement is crazy."
Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says this 7-step plan 'works every single time' to kill debt, get rich in America — and that 'anyone' can do it
Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — here are the alternative assets they're banking on instead
Here are 5 'must have' items that Americans (almost) always overpay for — and very quickly regret. How many are hurting you?
This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
AMC Theatres announce shocking change that people aren't thrilled about: ‘That's already excessive'
Moviegoers at AMC Theatres are in for a rude awakening starting next month. A few commercials and coming attractions before a movie begins are expected — however, soon enough, AMC Theatres will be delaying the start times of movies even more. On July 1, AMC Theatres — the largest theatre chain in the U.S. and Europe — will be adding one additional commercial on top of the many that they already play after upcoming movie trailers and before the start of a movie. Advertisement Buckle up moviegoers — you're in for a long ride before your movie even begins, starting next month. Christopher Sadowski And people are not happy about this news. The news comes as part of a new deal with American cinema advertising company National CineMedia Inc., according to Bloomberg. Advertisement It's an opportunity for AMC to make some dough — as the movie theater chain will get a cut of the ad sales, as reported on by the outlet. 'While AMC was initially reluctant to bring this to our theaters, our competitors have fully participated for more than five years without any direct impact to their attendance,' AMC said in a statement, according to The Hollywood Reporter. 'This is a strong indication that this NCM pre-show initiative does not negatively influence moviegoing habits.' Advertisement The deal is a win-win for both AMC and NCM, as it serves as an opportunity for each company to earn back some of the revenue they lost during the pandemic, when all theatres were shut down. 'For the past five years, AMC has sought out crucial revenue that is not reliant on the increase of base ticket prices,' said an AMC rep in a statement to Deadline. 'We've done this through more and better moviegoing enhancements like our significant expansion of PLFs, a greater selection of food and beverage offerings, and the introduction of movie-going merchandise like popcorn buckets and other collectible concession vessels,' the statement explained. Although this news isn't the end of the world — and frankly, could be worse — people on X (formerly Twitter) are acting like it is. Advertisement 'I show up to every movie 30 minutes after the 'start time', and it is always exactly as the movie is starting. That's already excessive,' said one person. 'How could they possibly run more?' a grumpy X user wrote. 'Gee, great! So, more people will arrive 30 minutes after 'start' time and climb over people in the dark, at the beginning of a film, to avoid the trailers and additional ads! This is why I treasure my aisle seat. I will be arriving much later now,' quipped someone else. 'Glad my area only has Regals,' commented another unhappy person.
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
What's the matter with Ohio? Trump tariffs are a loser even in Red states.
Donald Trump largely got a second chance at the presidency due to a deep dissatisfaction with the economy. It turns out his tariff policy has not eased fears and in fact may be fueling deeper anxieties among voters. It is one of the few issues where a significant number of Republican voters are willing to break with the president. Notably, independent voters are also spooked by tariff uncertainty. While public opinion polling in the aggregate has illustrated these trends, few polls have probed how Red State voters are reacting to Trump's tariff policies. Once a prized bellwether state, Ohio has now voted solidly Republican in the last three elections, including a double-digit margin of victory for Trump in 2024. Yet, our poll of Buckeye voters finds Trump is currently underwater and the tariffs are a major reason why. A majority of Ohio voters (51 percent) believe the Trump tariff policies will personally hurt them and just 1 in 4 think his tariff policies will benefit them. About half think the tariffs will hurt the United States (49 percent), while 38 percent think the country will benefit from them. This is somewhat vexing as Trump had long indicated he would engage in an aggressive tariff policy in his second term. Perhaps the uneven rollout and increased media attention to the potential effects of tariffs on the American consumer could be driving the discontent. Although Trump enjoys almost universal support among Republicans in our poll on most issues, there is some melt when it comes to the tariffs. Just 47 percent of Republicans think the tariffs will personally help them, and less than 1 in 5 think the tariffs will personally hurt them. Independents also provide some caution, as a majority (53 percent) think they will personally be hurt by Trump's tariff policies. The poll finds some rare bipartisan agreement in who respondents think will benefit most from the tariff policies. Respondents overwhelmingly think the tariffs will benefit the wealthy (66 percent) and large corporations (60 percent). Majorities of both Democrats (75 percent) and Republicans (56 percent) believe the wealthy will benefit from the tariff policies. Seventy-two percent of independents also believe the wealthy will benefit. When it comes to large corporations, however, it is Republicans who are most likely to agree that these entities would likely benefit from the Trump tariff policies, with 67 percent in agreement, compared to 55 percent of Democrats and 51 percent of Independents. Large majorities of all respondents believe that small businesses (59 percent), the middle class (58 percent), the working class (58 percent), labor unions (58 percent) and the United States automobile industry (54 percent) do not stand to benefit from the tariffs. Although Trump has claimed that his tariff policies would benefit these groups, thus far, most people appear to be skeptical. This is a message Democrats will likely amplify leading up to next year's midterm elections. As might be expected, the largest amount of agreement among all respondents is that foreign governments would not benefit from the tariffs (75 percent). Overall, we find Trump's approval in Ohio is underwater with 47 percent approving and 48 percent disapproving of his job in office. Keep in mind that this poll is of voters who indicated they supported Trump by a 10-point margin, largely reflecting the actual outcome of the 2024 election in the state. Moreover, this is a 7-point slide in favorability from when we polled Ohio voters in February of this year. Nationally, Trump's approval is at minus 4, with 46 percent approval and 50 percent disapproval. The frenzied pace of the first few months of the second Trump presidency has created some unease among many voters as well. Not surprisingly, nearly 9 in 10 Democrats feel more anxious (86 percent). More broadly, majorities of non-whites (59 percent), those 18-44 (53 percent) and women (50 percent), personally feel more anxious with Trump as president. While 24 percent of independents are less anxious with Trump as president, 43 percent are more anxious with him as president. Notably, Trump has changed course on the implementation of his tariffs on several occasions already, likely fueling more uncertainty among voters. Citizens across the country and in red states in particular have conveyed a strong distrust in government and an impulse for change. The advantages Republicans have in the House and Senate may be in jeopardy, given that the president's party has an average midterm loss of 28 seats in the House and 4 seats in the Senate from 1934-2018. In 2022, Republicans gained just 8 seats in the House and lost one seat in the Senate. If public opinion continues in this direction, especially in red states, some Republicans will be faced with difficult choices on how closely they align themselves with Trump and his tariff agenda. Robert Alexander is a professor of political science at Bowling Green State University.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Sen. Cory Booker says he won't accept campaign donations from Elon Musk
Sen. Cory Booker on Sunday said he would not accept campaign donations from tech mogul Elon Musk but urged the former Trump adviser to 'get involved right now in a more substantive way' in Democrats' push against the sweeping GOP-backed spending bill. 'This bill is disastrous for our long-term economy,' Booker told NBC News' 'Meet the Press.' 'This is an American issue, and I welcome Elon Musk not to my campaign. I welcome him right now, not to sit back and just fire off tweets, get involved right now in a more substantive way in putting pressure on Congress people and senators to not do this.' Asked directly whether he would ever accept campaign funding from Musk, Booker said, 'I would not accept money from Elon Musk for my campaign, but I would be supportive of anybody, including Elon Musk, putting resources forward right now to let more Americans know' about the bill. Booker's remarks come as other Democrats, like Rep. Ro Khanna of California, have floated welcoming Musk into the Democratic Party after a feud between President Donald Trump and the Tesla and SpaceX CEO exploded into public view last week. 'We should ultimately be trying to convince him that the Democratic Party has more of the values that he agrees with,' Khanna told Politico last week after Musk and Trump fired off a series of social media posts criticizing each other. The falling out started after Musk called the budget bill a 'disgusting abomination' in a post on X. In subsequent posts on Truth Social, the president accused Musk of 'wearing thin' and said 'he just went crazy.' Musk later accused Trump of 'ingratitude' in another post on X after he spent $250 million boosting Trump's campaign in 2024 and accused Trump of links to deceased sex offender Jeffrey Epstein in a now-deleted post. On Saturday, in a phone call with NBC News, Trump said he has no desire to repair his relationship with Musk after their public spat. The president also responded to a direct question about what might happen if Musk decided to financially support Democrats in the 2026 midterm elections, days after Musk wrote in a post on X, 'In November next year, we fire all politicians who betrayed the American people,' appearing to refer to Republicans who voted for the GOP-backed spending bill in the House. 'If he does, he'll have to pay the consequences for that,' Trump told NBC News, adding that there could be 'serious consequences.' In May, House Republicans passed a sweeping domestic policy bill called the 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act' that would extend tax cuts passed in the first Trump administration, increase funding for border security and eliminate federal taxes on tips and overtime pay. The bill has also drawn scrutiny from Democrats for slashing funding for Medicaid and some food stamps while adding work requirements for Medicaid, which provides health care for low-income Americans. Musk and some Senate Republicans have blasted the bill for estimated effects it could have on the federal debt and deficit, though Trump and House Republicans have downplayed those concerns. 'More Americans have to understand that if this bill passes, average Americans are going to see their costs skyrocket as this president again pushes legislation that is indicative of his chaos, corruption and cruelty towards Americans,' Booker said on Sunday. This article was originally published on
