logo
Atomic Ambitions: Geopolitical Impact Of India's Nuclear Energy Reforms

Atomic Ambitions: Geopolitical Impact Of India's Nuclear Energy Reforms

News1828-07-2025
India's move to open up nuclear power sector to private companies represents a notable shift in its energy strategy and a potential opportunity for private players
Embracing adaptability in policymaking is crucial for navigating the complexities of a constantly changing world and ensuring that policies remain relevant, effective, and responsive to the needs of society. India is taking steps to open its nuclear power sector to private companies—a significant shift from its historically state-controlled approach. While the Atomic Energy Act of 1962 had restricted nuclear power generation to government-owned entities, recent policy changes and budget announcements indicate a push toward private sector involvement and global outreach.
Union Minister Jitendra Singh, who oversees the Department of Atomic Energy, recently said that India will be able to address the apprehensions of the private sector globally about investments in the civil nuclear sector, which was opened up to achieve the ambitious target of producing 100 GW of atomic power by 2047. He also stressed that changes in relevant rules and legislation will have to be made to facilitate the entry of the private sector in the field of nuclear energy, which is currently under the tight control of the government.
This policy shift is driven by the need to attract private capital, potentially increasing India's nuclear capacity and reducing reliance on fossil fuels. It is a move that would require amendments to existing laws, and India is considering changes to the Atomic Energy Act of 1962 and the Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage Act of 2010 to allow private companies to build, own, and operate nuclear power plants.
It may be recalled that in February this year, Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman, introducing the Union Budget for 2025, announced the creation of a new Nuclear Energy Mission for 'Viksit Bharat' and indicated amending laws that are limiting nuclear industry growth. Viksit Bharat 2047 represents the government's vision to transform India into a developed entity by its 100th Independence anniversary in 2047.
The Finance Minister said that generating at least 100 GW of nuclear energy by 2047 is 'essential for our energy transition efforts." She added: 'For an active partnership with the private sector towards this goal, amendments to the Atomic Energy Act and the Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage Act will be made." She also said that a Nuclear Energy Mission for research & development into Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) will be set up with an investment of Rupees 20,000 crores ($2.3 billion). At least five indigenously developed SMRs will be operational by 2033, she said.
Many countries allow private sector participation in nuclear power generation, though the extent of this involvement varies significantly. The United States is a prime example, with large private sector participation in its civil nuclear industry. Some countries like Finland and the UK have also seen varying degrees of privatization in their nuclear sectors. Others, like China, Japan, and the United Arab Emirates, are also exploring or implementing public-private partnerships for nuclear power projects. Thus, it is a positive development that India is also taking the necessary steps to gradually open up to private investment in nuclear power by announcing plans to invite private companies to invest in nuclear electricity projects.
Currently, the Nuclear Power Corporation of India Ltd (NPCIL) is the sole operator of nuclear power plants in India. The Atomic Energy Act of 1962 prohibits private sector control of nuclear power generation. The government is actively working to ease restrictions and attract private investment to expand India's nuclear capacity, and private investment is seen as crucial to achieving this goal. Amendments to existing laws are needed to allow private players to participate.
The government is believed to be engaging with private firms like Reliance Industries, Tata Power, Adani Power, and Vedanta Ltd. to potentially invest in new nuclear power plants. Under this proposed model, private companies could acquire land and water resources, invest in plant development, and undertake construction activities in areas outside the reactor complex. However, the Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited (NPCIL) would still retain the rights to build and operate the plants and manage fuel. Private companies are expected to earn revenue from electricity sales, while NPCIL would operate the projects for a fee.
India is also opening its nuclear power sector to foreign investment, allowing up to 49 per cent foreign direct investment, perhaps starting with a 26 per cent cap and increasing it in phases. It is estimated that the opening up of the nuclear sector could create a $100 billion market, attracting global players. Some companies (like Holtec International of the US) are seeking to transfer Small Modular Reactor (SMR) technology to India. India is also looking to diversify its uranium fuel sources and expand its vendor base for specialised nuclear equipment.
India's decision to open up its nuclear power sector to private and foreign investment has been met with a mix of positive reactions and cautious optimism globally. While some see it as a crucial step toward bolstering India's energy security and achieving its ambitious climate goals, others express concerns about potential risks and regulatory hurdles. Concerns remain about the Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage Act of 2010, which is considered by some to have been a barrier to foreign investment in the past due to its potential for high operator liability in case of accidents.
The Indian Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage Act of 2010 is a law establishing a framework for civil liability in the event of a nuclear incident. It aims to provide prompt compensation to victims and facilitate India's participation in international agreements regarding nuclear damage. The operator of a nuclear installation is held liable for damages, regardless of fault, in a nuclear incident.
The government is looking to address concerns around liability and safety regulations to encourage private investment. The Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage Act imposes significant liability on operators, which may need to be addressed to encourage private investment.
The history of nuclear regulation demonstrates a progression toward tighter controls and greater public and environmental protection, driven by lessons learned from past incidents like Chernobyl and Fukushima. The current regulatory framework and ongoing advancements in safety protocols aim to ensure that nuclear power remains a safe and reliable energy source. In the United States, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) plays a key role in ensuring safety when private companies operate nuclear facilities.
Thus, ensuring robust safety protocols and regulatory oversight is crucial when private companies operate nuclear facilities. The Indian Nuclear Insurance Pool (NIP) was established in 2015 to address liability concerns, creating a more secure environment for foreign investors. The Pool provides capacity for insurance coverage to operators and suppliers for any nuclear liability toward third parties under the Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage Act.
India's nuclear energy ambitions could have broader geopolitical implications, particularly in its relationship with countries like the US. The US has expressed intentions to remove barriers to civil nuclear cooperation with India, recognizing its potential for growth in the sector. In March 2025, the US Department of Energy approved the proposal from Holtec International to share Small Modular Reactor (SMR) technology with India, removing a key hurdle that had delayed the deal. French and US companies have also expressed interest in partnering with Indian companies on SMR projects. The Russian nuclear company Rosatom has also offered its expertise in building SMRs in India.
India has signed agreements with many countries for collaboration on nuclear energy, including the development of advanced reactors. Russia continues to be a key partner, involved in projects like Kudankulam and exploring areas like floating nuclear power plants and Small Modular Reactors (SMRs).
As regards the US, the 2008 Civil Nuclear Agreement and more recent regulatory clearances, like the one granted to Holtec International for SMR technology transfer to Indian firms, are facilitating deeper engagement.
France is collaborating in the proposed Jaitapur Nuclear Power Project located in Maharashtra and exploring collaboration in SMRs and research reactors. The Jaitapur plant will have six reactors, each with a capacity of 1,650 MW and involves technical cooperation with Electricité de France.
With Canada, India has a uranium supply agreement and potential for collaboration in CANDU reactor technology and related services. CANDU is a type of nuclear reactor known for its use of heavy water (deuterium oxide) as a moderator and coolant, and natural uranium as fuel. CANDU reactors are a significant part of Canada's energy production, with some reactors also operating in other countries including Argentina, China, South Korea, Romania, India, and Pakistan.
With South Korea, India has signed an intergovernmental agreement for civil nuclear cooperation, potentially opening avenues for South Korean companies to participate.
top videos
View all
Summing up, the Indian government's move to open up the nuclear power sector to private companies represents a notable shift in its energy strategy and a potential opportunity for private players to contribute to the nation's nuclear power growth. This policy shift, alongside legislative amendments, aims to boost nuclear power generation and facilitate private sector participation, including international collaborations. The move is expected to attract foreign capital and technology, potentially transforming India's nuclear energy landscape. Addressing public concerns about nuclear safety and waste management is essential. While challenges remain, the government is taking the right steps to address concerns about liability, safety, and regulations to attract private investment and achieve its ambitious nuclear energy goals. Adapting to changing needs is indeed a cornerstone of effective policymaking.
The writer is a retired Indian diplomat and had previously served as Consul General in New York. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect News18's views.
view comments
Location :
New Delhi, India, India
First Published:
July 28, 2025, 13:58 IST
News opinion Opinion | Atomic Ambitions: Geopolitical Impact Of India's Nuclear Energy Reforms
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Juveniles, age of consent and justice: Explaining the wide conviction gap
Juveniles, age of consent and justice: Explaining the wide conviction gap

Hindustan Times

time9 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Juveniles, age of consent and justice: Explaining the wide conviction gap

An analysis of government data in the Supreme Court reveals a stark disparity between the number of juveniles and young adults charged under rape and child sexual abuse laws and the relatively small proportion who are eventually convicted, throwing sharp focus on the ongoing debate over the age of consent and its unintended consequences. According to the Union government's latest submission to the Supreme Court, between 2018 and 2022, only 468 juveniles aged 16-18 were convicted under Section 376 (rape) of the Indian Penal Code, despite more than 4,900 being booked across the country in the same period , a conviction rate of just 9.55%. For charges under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (Pocso) Act, just 855 convictions were recorded out of 6,892 cases during the same period , a rate of only 12.4%. The corresponding numbers for young adults aged 18-22 tell a similar story. While 52,471 were arrested under these stringent laws during this period, only 6,093 were convicted under Pocso, a conviction rate of just 11.61%. Of 24,306 arrested between 2018 and 2022 for rape, only 2,585 young adults were convicted under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code, amounting to just 10.63% . The statistics form part of the Centre's written submissions opposing any move to lower the age of consent under the Pocso Act or introduce exceptions for adolescent relationships, telling the top court that such dilution, 'even in the name of reform or adolescent autonomy,' would dismantle the statutory shield meant to safeguard minors and risk opening the door to child abuse. However, the wide gap between the registration of cases and convictions suggests that while these laws aim to safeguard children from sexual exploitation, they may also be pulling large numbers of adolescents and young people (mostly men) into the criminal justice system, often in cases involving consensual relationships that turn adversarial due to family or societal pressure. Convictions and sentencing For juveniles (16-18 years), Pocso convictions rose modestly from 144 in 2018 to 213 in 2022 even as the number of detentions rose from 844 to 1,757, which implies a conviction rate of just 12.12% in 2022. The majority received prison terms of up to 10 years. Life imprisonment was awarded in only 31 cases across five years, and there was no death penalty. For the same group, rape convictions remained flat, ranging from 83 to 110 per year, with over 85% receiving sentences of up to 10 years. Only eight juveniles, tried as adults under the pertinent legal provisions, received life terms during this period. Among young adults in the 18-22 years age group, convictions under Pocso grew from 1,213 in 2018 to 1,312 in 2022. However, even this increase is modest considering the scale of bookings under the Act. While 8,740 persons were apprehended in 2018, 13,068 were arrested in 2022. That translates to conviction rates of 13.88% in 2018 and 10.04% in 2022 under Pocso. Additionally, rape convictions dropped from 620 in 2018 to 476 in 2022, reflecting a 23.23% decline despite higher arrest figures. Life imprisonment was more common in this age group. 773 individuals received life terms for Pocso offences, while 238 did so for rape. A total of 22 young adults were awarded the death penalty over the five years, compared to just one juvenile. These statistics emerge at a time when the Supreme Court is hearing a public interest litigation examining whether the blanket criminalisation of all sexual activity below the age of 18 under the Pocso Act requires re-examination. The law, enacted in 2012, sets the age of consent at 18 and makes even consensual acts between teenagers prosecutable. Senior advocates Indira Jaising and Sidharth Luthra, appearing as amici curiae in the 2012 public interest litigation (PIL) filed by lawyer Nipun Saxena, have argued that the mandatory reporting requirement and lack of a close-in-age exception is leading to over-criminalisation, infringing on the autonomy, privacy, and health rights of adolescents, particularly girls. But the Union government has pushed back, telling the court that 'any dilution of the age of consent, even in the name of reform or adolescent autonomy, would irrevocably dilute the statutory presumption of vulnerability that lies at the heart of child protection law.' In a recently filed affidavit, It has urged the court to uphold the 'bright-line' age of 18 to deter abuse and exploitation. Numbers suggest a need for nuance Data suggests that many of those convicted are themselves just a few years older than the complainants. The tables submitted by the government highlight that young men aged 18–22 are the most prosecuted group under Pocso, raising concerns that the protective intent of the law is being applied to penalise consensual relationships. For example, in 2022, 213 juveniles (16-18) were convicted under Pocso whereas 1,312 young adults (18-22) were convicted under the same Act -- over six times higher. Rape convictions for 18-22-year-olds (476) were also significantly higher than for juveniles (92). The sentencing trends further bolster the case for a more differentiated approach. A vast majority of both juveniles and young adults received sentences below 10 years, suggesting courts may be exercising discretion when faced with such cases, but only after the accused have undergone lengthy trials and detention. A legal and social dilemma The Centre's firm position against creating a 'close-in-age' exception, such as exempting consensual acts between teens aged 16-18, comes amid growing calls for a calibrated rethink. Several high courts, and even Supreme Court benches in bail and quashing proceedings, have flagged the problem of criminalising teenage love. Yet, the government has maintained that 'loosening age-based protections could open avenues for abuse under the guise of consensual activity,' and that the law must 'act as a strong deterrent… in a society where children, especially girls, are vulnerable to manipulation, coercion and abuse.' At the heart of the debate lies the challenge of balancing protection with autonomy, ensuring minors are not exploited, while also preventing a legal system from punishing consensual and developmental relationships among peers. In her written submissions countering the Centre's stance, Jaising said the age of consent was static at 16 years for 80 years and that increasing it to 18 years through the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013. 'No rational reason has been indicated for the increase, nor is there any data to suggest that the age of consent required any increase,' stated her submissions, adding the increase in the age of consent violated the right to autonomy of children between the ages of 16 and 18 who have the ability to give mature consent to sexual activity, having regard to the fact that they have attained puberty giving rise to sexual awareness. 'Scientific research indicates that adolescents are attaining puberty sooner than they did several years ago and puberty as we know, is the age of awakening of sexual awareness. It is the age during which there is a natural attraction between the sexes and the development of sexual relationships of choice. Hence, to criminalise such an activity rather than addressing the issue of sex education, is arbitrary, unconstitutional and against the best interests of children as defined in law,' the submissions contended. Increasing the age of consent has led to branding hundreds of children in the 16-18 age group as criminals. 'Data also indicates that most complaints to police are filed by parents of the girl, often against her own wishes and for extraneous reasons such as inter-religious or inter-caste relationships,' she said. 'The only solution lies in declaring that sex between consenting adolescents between the age of 16, an almost universal age of sexual maturity, and 18 is not a form of 'abuse',' Jaising's submissions added. The senior counsel urged the Supreme Court to read into the impugned legal provisions a 'close-in-age exception', applicable when both parties to the sexual act are adolescents between the ages of 16 and 18 and the sexual act is consensual. 'Such an exception would preserve the protective intent of the statute while preventing its misuse against adolescent relationships that are not exploitative in nature,' she said. As the Supreme Court resumes hearing the matter next month, the numbers paint a sobering picture : thousands of adolescents and young adults are caught in the legal net each year, but only a fraction are ultimately held guilty, often after years of litigation. Whether this calls for legislative reform or judicial steps may now be for the court to decide but the data offers compelling reason to confront the unintended consequences of the current regime.

Of controversies and incomplete tenures
Of controversies and incomplete tenures

Time of India

time2 hours ago

  • Time of India

Of controversies and incomplete tenures

1 2 Ranchi: The political life of eminent tribal leader and key architect of the formation of Jharkhand state, Shibu Soren, has been plagued by controversies. The 'Dishom Guru' struggled to complete his tenure in the Union govt as well as in the state. Soren served as the chief minister three times, but he held office cumulatively for only 308 days. His shortest tenure lasted just 10 days, from March 2 to March 12, 2005. In 2009, while he was still serving as the chief minister, Shibu was defeated in the Tamar by-election by Raja Peter. He was appointed as the Union coal minister in former Prime Minister Manmohan Singh's cabinet, following the alliance between JMM and UPA for the Lok Sabha polls in 2004. However, a three-decade-old Chirudih massacre case returned to haunt him. Facing potential arrest, Shibu went underground for several days before resigning from the Union govt on July 24, 2004. In November of that year, after securing bail, Shibu was reappointed as coal minister in Manmohan's cabinet. However, he was removed again in March 2005 due to a murder case in 1994, involving his secretary, Sashinath Jha, who was allegedly attempting to blackmail him in a "cash for vote scam" that was aimed at saving former PM Narasimha Rao's govt in 1993. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like This Bond Accounts offers a 6%+ yield on your investment 6% Yield Bond Account Learn More Undo In January 2006, Shibu returned as a Union minister but was forced to resign in November after Delhi's Tis Hazari court found him guilty of Jha's murder. Shibu was allegedly accused of abducting Jha from Delhi on May 22, 1994, and having him killed in Ranchi. The CBI's charge-sheet claimed that Jha was aware of a monetary arrangement between Congress and JMM to avert a no-confidence motion against the Narasimha Rao govt in 1993 and was "blackmailing" Shibu for money, allegedly resulting in the murder. In the end, Shibu was acquitted in all the cases -- Kudko, Chirudih, Shashinath Jha murder and vote-for-cash scam.

Government meetings spark buzz of J&K statehood
Government meetings spark buzz of J&K statehood

Hindustan Times

time2 hours ago

  • Hindustan Times

Government meetings spark buzz of J&K statehood

High-level meetings on the eve of the sixth anniversary of the reorganisation of Jammu and Kashmir that led to the bifurcation of the erstwhile state into two Union territories set off speculation on Monday that the Centre may start the process of restoring the region's statehood. Adding fuel to this was a meeting of NDA members of Parliament called for Tuesday morning and the separate Sunday meetings between President Droupadi Murmu and Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Union home minister Amit Shah. (PTI) Adding fuel to this was a meeting of NDA members of Parliament called for Tuesday morning and the separate Sunday meetings between President Droupadi Murmu and Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Union home minister Amit Shah. Government officials and ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) functionaries remained tight-lipped about the bunch of meetings, including the one Union home minister Amit Shah held with national security advisor Ajit Doval, Intelligence Bureau chief Tapan Kumar Deka, and home secretary Govind Mohan on Monday. No details of this meeting, which was held in Parliament precincts, were shared. The speculation even prompted J&K chief minister Omar Abdullah to take to X and post: 'I've heard every possible permutation & combination about what to expect in J&K tomorrow so let me stick my neck out and say nothing will happen tomorrow - fortunately nothing bad will happen but unfortunately nothing positive will happen either. ' J&K was bifurcated into two UTs of J&K and Ladakh after Parliament on August 5, 2019 passed the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Bill and read down Article 370 and 35 (A) that gave the erstwhile state special powers to determine issues of domicile. Since the formation of the National Conference-led government in J&K almost 10 months ago, there has been a clamour to restore statehood in J&K. To be sure, both the Prime Minister and the home minister have stated that the region's statehood would be restored at the appropriate time. A senior BJP leader, while refusing to comment on the speculation said: 'This is a promise that the government has already made…and it will be done when the time is right.' This person, who asked not to be named, attributed the speculation of 'a big ticket announcement' to the two major events that took place on August 5. The first was the Bill for Abrogation of Article 370 in 2019 and a year later, on the foundation ceremony of the Ram temple in Ayodhya. Modi and Shah separately calling on President Murmu at Rashtrapati Bhavan prompted rumours that the Centre may have a crucial bill on its agenda for the ongoing monsoon session that will end on August 21. To be sure, officials and party functionaries said the two leaders calling on the President was not unusual. 'The PM briefs the President on his foreign visits, the HM too meets her as required…' a second BJP functionary said. The meetings come in the backdrop of the impending vice presidential election that has been necessitated by the sudden resignation of Jagdeep Dhankhar who announced his exit on July 21, citing ill health. The election to pick the new VP has been scheduled for September 9, with August 21 being the last date for filing nominations. The second party functionary said the process of shortlisting candidates and reaching out to the allies including the Telugu Desam Party and the Janata Dal (United) to elicit their support will be initiated by the BJP leadership. 'So far, all the names being mentioned in the media are speculative,' the second functionary said. Some party leaders however indicated that the candidate is unlikely to be a sitting Lok Sabha MP or someone who holds a gubernatorial position. A meeting of the NDA parliamentary party has also been scheduled for Tuesday, which is likely to be addressed by the PM. Although such meetings used to be routinely held during Parliament sessions, their frequency has dropped after 2024. The last such meeting of NDA lawmakers was held on July 2, 2024. All eyes are also on the announcement for the election of the BJP's new party president. The term of the incumbent JP Nadda was extended till June 2024, but the election process has been the party president is elected unopposed. While the constitutional requirements for the election have been met, elections to pick new state presidents in at least 50% of the states are over, but there has been no word on the reason for the delay in announcing the date for the election of the new party president. A few party leaders said the process may get underway after the election of the VP is over, while some others indicated that the incumbent may continue till state polls are held in Bihar later this year. But right now, everyone is holding their breath for August 5.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store