What RFK Jr. actually believes about his father's assassination — and how it's torn the Kennedy family apart
Robert Kennedy Jr. has long maintained that Sirhan Sirhan, who has spent nearly 60 years in prison for killing his father, is innocent of the crime — and that a second gunman was involved in the assassination of Sen. Robert Kennedy in 1968.
That belief has fueled division between him and the majority of his siblings as well as their mother, Ethel, when she was alive. And it's sure to heat up again as Sirhan, 81, could be eligible for parole again next year.
'I believe Cesar killed my father,' Kennedy Jr. wrote in a 2021 San Francisco Chronicle op-ed of security guard Thane Eugene Cesar, who died in 2019 and was never charged. 'Sirhan,' Kennedy Jr. wrote, 'is not my father's killer.'
Advertisement
It was revealed Wednesday that Kennedy Jr., the current US Health and Human Services Secretary, sent a letter to then US Attorney General Eric Holder in 2012 requesting a new investigation into his father's death and the two-gunman theory. The letter to Holder, who served under Barack Obama, came to light in documents on the assassination declassified by the Trump administration.
10 Health and Human Services Secretary Robert Kennedy Jr. has long believed that Sirhan Sirhan did not fire the shot that killed his father in 1968.
Getty Images
When Kennedy Jr., 71, recommended to the California Board of Parole Hearings that Sirhan be given parole in 2021 — the 16th time he faced the board — six of his siblings, led by their mother, Ethel, slammed the move.
Advertisement
10 Robert F. Kennedy's nine surviving children are split in their beliefs about his father's convicted killer, Sirhan Sirhan — with two arguing for their parole. RFK Jr. has said he believes a second gunman shot his father.
Michael Guillen/NY Post
'Our family and our country suffered an unspeakable loss due to the inhumanity of one man,' said Ethel in a Sept. 7, 2021, post on her daughter Kerry Kennedy's X account — adding: 'He should not have the opportunity to terrorize again.'
Ethel passed away Oct. 10, 2024, at age 96.
Her children Joe, Courtney, Kerry, Chris, Max and Rory have opposed Sirhan's parole. Son Douglas, like Kennedy Jr., is in favor.
Advertisement
10 Robert Kennedy confidant Paul Schrade spent much of his life trying to convince authorities to reopen the investigation into the assassination of the Democratic presidential candidate.
The Washington Post via Getty Images
Daughter Kathleen Kennedy Townsend told the Washington Post in 2018 that Kennedy Jr. 'makes a compelling case' about Sirhan not acting alone, but has not commented on the matter since.
Kennedy Jr.'s 2012 letter to Holder included a three-page 'Summary of Evidence for the New Investigation' compiled by Paul Schrade. A former labor leader and confidant of RFK, Schrade was among five people wounded in the fusillade of bullets that resulted in Kennedy's death at Los Angeles's Ambassador Hotel following his Democratic presidential primary victory in California.
Schrade, who was shot in the head by Sirhan during the melee, spent years trying to prove his theory that there were two gunmen involved in the assassination.
Advertisement
10 Paul Schrade was among one of the victims of the shooting at the Ambassador Hotel that killed Robert Kennedy in 1968. He was shot in the head by Sirhan Sirhan.
AP
'Paul and his team of nationally prominent attorneys including former US Attorney Rob Bonner strongly believe this new evidence is conclusive and requires a new investigation,' Kennedy Jr. wrote in his letter to Holder. 'I agree and support his request for a new investigation.'
The request was based on 'new forensic tests on a journalist's audiotape recorded during this crime and found in the FBI's files,' said Schrade in his own letter to Holder dated July 29, 2012.
10 Robert Kennedy was shot in the kitchen of the Ambassador Hotel in Los Angeles moments after his victory speech in the California Democratic presidential primary.
Bettmann Archive
10 An acoustics expert has maintained that 13 shots were fired in the shooting of Robert F. Kennedy in 1968. Sirhan fired all eight shots from his .22 caliber Ivar Johnson revolver and did not reload, said Schrade in his letter to Holder.
Bettmann Archive
An acoustics expert who examined the recording maintained that 13 shots were fired. Sirhan fired all eight shots from his .22 caliber Ivar Johnson revolver and did not reload, said Schrade in his letter to Holder.
Schrade, who died in 2022 at age 97, also pointed to the autopsy report that showed that RFK was shot from behind. Eyewitnesses said that Sirhan had stood in front of the candidate.
'I have been a strong advocate for the release of Mr. Sirhan B. Sirhan since I learned of evidence that was not presented to the court during his trial,' said Kennedy Jr. in an August 27, 2021, letter to the Board of Parole Hearings. 'After years of careful investigation, I arrived at the conviction that the story of my father's murder was not as cut and dried as portrayed at trial.
Advertisement
10 Sirhan Sirhan was convicted of the assassination of Robert Kennedy. He claims to have no memory of the event,
10 Sirhan Sirhan, now 81, has been denied parole multiple times. He could be up for parole again in 2026.
AP
'While Sirhan clearly fired shots at my father, overwhelming evidence suggests that these were not the shots that took his life.'
Cesar, hired as a security guard for the night 'was in the exact position to fire the shots as described in the autopsy. Three witnesses saw him draw his gun — which he later admitted — and one said she saw him fire it,' Kennedy Jr. wrote in 2021. 'The Los Angeles police never bothered to examine the gun. Cesar, who was moonlighting that night from his high-security clearance job at the Lockheed plant, acknowledged a loathing for the Kennedys and their race-mixing sympathizers.'
Advertisement
Sirhan has consistently maintained that he does not recall the events that took place on the day of the assassination.
10 Douglas Kennedy, a younger brother of Robert Kennedy Jr., also wants a new investigation into the assassination of his father, and supports parole for Sirhan Sirhan
Douglas Healey
Other recently released files on the assassination released by director of national intelligence Tulsi Gabbard revealed numerous menacing handwritten notes in Sirhan's bedroom in the Pasadena, Calif., home he shared with his mother and three siblings.
'My determination to remove RFK is becoming more the more of an unshakeable obsession,' read one of the scribbled notes included in the file.
Advertisement
When Sirhan was up for parole in 2021, the Kennedy family fight over his impending release led to one side 'double-crossing' the other, insider sources told The Post at the time.
10 'While Sirhan clearly fired shots at my father, overwhelming evidence suggests that these were not the shots that took his life,' RFK Jr. wrote in 2021. Here, Robert F. Kennedy and wife Ethel tour northwest Washington, which was devastated by fires in the wake of Martin Luther King's 1968 assassination.
Bettmann Archive
The family members against Sirhan's release had promised that they would not make a statement to the parole board, sources told The Post.
'The night before the hearing I got a letter from the parole board via the LAPD,' Sirhan's lawyer Angela Berry told The Post in 2021. 'It read, 'On behalf of the Kennedy family, we oppose the release of Sirhan.' [Kennedy Jr.] had been staying out of it specifically on the assumption that his family was going to stay out of it … I got ahold of him right away letting him know what happened.'
Advertisement
In response, Kennedy Jr. stayed up late writing a letter in favor of Sirhan's release that barely made it into the hearing, sources said.
'The parole hearing started at 8:30 a.m. and Robert's letter streamed in at 10:30 a.m.,' Berry said. 'It read in part, 'I have to assure you that the letter you got is not on behalf of the whole Kennedy family.' That was the very last thing the hearing officer read into the record.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
14 minutes ago
- Axios
Legal pressure mounts against Gov. Polis over ICE data disclosure
Legal pressure is mounting against Democratic Gov. Jared Polis after revelations that he ordered state officials to comply with an ICE subpoena and hand over personal data of undocumented children in Colorado to federal immigration agents. The latest: Colorado WINS — the union representing more than 27,000 state workers— civil rights group Towards Justice and labor organization Colorado AFL-CIOannounced Monday they're joining as plaintiffs on a whistleblower lawsuit filed last week by Scott Moss, a senior labor official in Polis' administration. The groups accuse the governor of "colluding" with ICE agents and violating multiple state laws that restrict cooperation with federal immigration enforcement in non-criminal matters. The intrigue: Polis has agreed not to act on the subpoena until after the judge rules on a request for a temporary restraining order and injunction, according to his attorney's court filing last week. The big picture: The backlash highlights growing fractures in Polis' support among labor leaders, civil rights advocates and Latino Democrats — many of whom viewed him as an ally. Just weeks ago, Polis signed a bill prohibiting state and local officials from collecting or sharing information about immigration status unless it directly involves a criminal investigation. What they're saying:"The actions that Gov. Polis has taken are undermining public trust in our state government," Colorado WINS president Diane Byrne said at a news briefing on the steps of Denver City Hall on Monday. "This action by the governor represents a betrayal to the immigrant community of our state," the Colorado Democratic Latino Caucus said in a statement Monday, adding that Polis has turned "his back on some of the most vulnerable residents." Catch up quick: On April 24, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security subpoenaed the state labor department for detailed records — including wage data, leave filings and home addresses — for 35 people sponsoring unaccompanied migrant children. According to the records, Polis initially resisted but later reversed, ordering staff to comply or face termination. The other side: The governor's office defends its action, saying it was a criminal matter. "We are committed to partnering on criminal investigations ... including to protect against human trafficking and child exploitation," Polis' spokesperson Eric Maruyama told us. Reality check: The subpoena reviewed by Axios Denver makes no mention of any open criminal investigation, nor is it court-ordered. Instead, the administrative request references broad "investigative activities" to ensure children released to sponsors were safe — citing general risks of trafficking or exploitation. Crucially, a checkbox on the subpoena that would formally classify the request as involving child exploitation was left blank. The bottom line: Polis' office appears to be casting a civil immigration enforcement request as a criminal matter — sidestepping state law to justify a politically risky decision of turning over immigrant data to ICE.
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump says it would 'great' to arrest Newsom. Their relationship and politics at play
President Donald Trump and California Gov. Gavin Newsom are sharply at odds as protests against Immigration and Customs Enforcement continue in Los Angeles -- and both are framing their confrontation as not only about the protests but also in terms of politics, some of which are appearing in ways they've dealt with before. On Monday, the president said it would be a "great thing" if border czar Tom Homan arrested Newsom; in response, the California governor fired back that the comment is an "unmistakable step toward authoritarianism." Asked on Monday afternoon by ABC News what crime Newsom has committed to warrant his arrest, Trump said the governor's "primary crime is running for governor because he's done such a bad job." Newsom responded on X, "Donald Trump admits he will arrest a sitting governor simply because he ran for office." MORE: War of words between Trump and Newsom over LA protests escalates with arrest threat With the protests, Trump, who has characterized them as "violent, insurrectionist mobs" and "Gavin Newscum inspired Riots," has deployed National Guard members to Los Angeles. Newsom has asked the administration to rescind the deployment and said Monday that he is suing the Trump administration, claiming Trump illegally federalized the National Guard. But Trump is not only criticizing the protestors -- he has also criticized the leaders of the state and the city, framing their political leadership as failures. "The very incompetent 'Governor,' Gavin Newscum, and 'Mayor,' Karen Bass, should be saying, 'THANK YOU, PRESIDENT TRUMP, YOU ARE SO WONDERFUL. WE WOULD BE NOTHING WITHOUT YOU, SIR,'" Trump wrote on his social media platform on Monday. "Instead, they choose to lie to the People of California and America by saying that we weren't needed, and that these are 'peaceful protests.'" Trump has also long been critical of the leadership in most Democratic-run states, often focusing his ire on California. MORE: Johnson: Trump did 'exactly what he needed to do' in sending National Guard to LA The situation, separately, gives Trump the chance to take high-profile action on immigration enforcement -- a key issue for the president during his 2024 campaign and one that has remained a priority during the first few months of his administration. A recent poll from Marquette Law School taken in early to mid-May found that Trump had positive or around even job approval on border security and immigration. Newsom, on his end, has explicitly accused the White House of exacerbating the situation for political gain. "They want a spectacle. They want the violence," he said in an email to supporters sent through his political action committee on Sunday night. "They think this is good for them politically." ABC News has asked the White House for comment on Newsom's claim. MORE: What's in Trump's 'big' tax and immigration bill House Republicans are struggling to pass Newsom and Trump have long been at odds, although the two had a brief detente in their relationship in the past few months. In the aftermath of wildfires in January that devastated the Los Angeles region, Trump visited the city toward the end of the month and was greeted on the tarmac by Newsom with several handshakes and an embrace; Newsom also met with Trump in Washington in early February, and told CNN afterwards, "I have just all the confidence in the world that it's going to be a strong partnership moving forward." But Newsom, around that time, also approved $50 million for funds that could be used in legal battles against the federal government. And Newsom grew more critical of Trump in the months afterward -- attacking the president's tariff policy in an ad that aired on Fox News where he said the "tariffs punish families." The Trump administration has appeared to direct punishment at California as well. Earlier this month, Trump vowed to impose "large scale fines" on California after a transgender teen competed in a California state final competition in track and field. Last week, the Trump administration signaled that it would cut federal funding for a high-speed rail project in the state. Newsom, separately, has begun to build a national profile amid speculation that he could run for president in 2028, which included stoking more speculation through a buzzy podcast launch in March. Newsom is term-limited and cannot run for governor in 2026. While the Los Angeles situation is tied to Newsom's current work as governor and not to any current or future campaign, it puts him back in the national spotlight and at the center of one of the nation's highest-profile political issues. Newsom referenced what he framed as the national stakes in his response to Trump's comments on his potential arrest: "This is a day I hoped I would never see in America… this is a line we cannot cross as a nation." ABC News' Molly Nagle and Michelle Stoddart contributed to this report.
Boston Globe
36 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Shoppers are wary of digital shelf labels, but a study found they don't lead to price surges
Social media is filled with warnings that grocers will use the technology to charge more for ice cream if it's hot outside, hike the price of umbrellas if it's raining or to gather information about customers. Advertisement Democratic US Senators Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts and Bob Casey of Pennsylvania fired off a letter to Kroger last fall demanding to know whether it would use its electronic labels as part of a dynamic pricing strategy. Lawmakers in Rhode Island and Maine have introduced bills to limit the use of digital labels. In Arizona, Democratic state Representative Cesar Aguilar recently introduced a bill that would ban them altogether. A study published in late May found 'virtually no surge pricing' before or after electronic shelf labels were adopted. The study was authored by Ioannis Stamatopoulos of the University of Texas, Austin, Robert Evan Sanders of the University of California, San Diego and Robert Bray of Northwestern University The researchers looked at prices between 2019 and 2024 at an unnamed grocery chain that began using digital labels in October 2022. They found that temporary price increases affected 0.005 percent of products on any given day before electronic shelf labels were introduced, a share that increased by only 0.0006 percentage points after digital labels were installed. Advertisement The study also determined that discounts were slightly more common after digital labels were introduced. Economists have long wondered why grocery prices don't change more often, according to Stamatopoulos. If bananas are about to expire, for example, it makes sense to lower the price on them. He said the cost of having workers change prices by hand could be one issue. But there's another reason: Shoppers watch grocery prices closely, and stores don't want to risk angering them. 'Selling groceries is not selling a couch. It's not a one-time transaction and you will never see them again,' Stamatopoulos said. 'You want them coming to the store every week.' Electronic price labels aren't new. They've been in use for more than a decade at groceries in Europe and some US retailers, like Kohl's. But they've been slow to migrate to US grocery stores. Only around 5 percent to 10 percent of US supermarkets now have electronic labels, compared to 80 percent in Europe, said Amanda Oren, vice president of industry strategy for North American grocery at Relex Solutions, a technology company that helps retailers forecast demand. Oren said cost is one issue that has slowed the US rollout. The tiny screens cost between $5 and $20, Oren said, but every product a store sells needs one, and the average supermarket has 100,000 or more individual products. Advertisement Still, the US industry is charging ahead. Walmart, the nation's largest grocer and retailer, hopes to have digital price labels at 2,300 US stores by 2026. Kroger is expanding the use of digital labels this year after testing them at 20 stores. Whole Foods is testing the labels in nearly 50 stores. Companies say electronic price labels have tremendous advantages. Walmart says it used to take employees two days to change paper price labels on the 120,000 items it has in a typical store. With digital tags, it takes a few minutes. The labels can also be useful. Some have codes shoppers can scan to see recipes or nutrition information. Instacart has a system in thousands of US stores, including Aldi and Schnucks, that flashes a light on the digital tag when Instacart shoppers are nearby to help them find products. Ahold Delhaize's Albert Heijn supermarket chain in the Netherlands and Belgium has been testing an artificial intelligence-enabled tool since 2022 that marks down prices on its digital labels every 15 minutes for products nearing expiration. The system has reduced more than 250 tons of food waste annually, the company said. But Warren and Casey are skeptical. In their letter to Kroger, the US senators noted a partnership with Microsoft that planned to put cameras in grocery aisles and offer personalized deals to shoppers depending on their gender and age. In its response, Kroger said the prices shown on its digital labels were not connected to any sort of facial recognition technology. It also denied surging prices during periods of peak demand. 'Kroger's business model is built on a foundation of lowering prices to attract more customers,' the company said. Advertisement
