Reforming law enforcement in South Africa: a path to safety
During the dark days of colonial and apartheid rule, the lives of Black communities were subjected to the most brutal forms of violence unleashed by the state, including forced removals, assassinations, torture, detention and state sponsored vigilante attacks.
Image: Armand Hough/Independent Media
Whilst a White Genocide is fake news spurred by race baiters on social media, crime is a real problem for all South Africans, in particular African and Coloured working-class communities, and especially women.
South Africa is a nation that has struggled with high levels of crime for decades. During the dark days of colonial and apartheid rule, the lives of Black communities were subjected to the most brutal forms of violence unleashed by the state, including forced removals, assassinations, torture, detention and state sponsored vigilante attacks. During this time, the role of the police was to subject not protect communities.
Much has been done since the advent of democracy by government led by the African National Congress to deracialise and transform the police into a police service focused on protecting our communities, in particular the most vulnerable. Whilst strides have been made on many fronts, including the recently announced reductions in murders, cash in transit heists and other serious crimes, we nonetheless remain a society battling this pandemic.
Whilst the cause of some types of crime, in particular petty crimes, are unemployment and poverty, others remain the domain of depraved individuals and well resourced and sophisticated criminal syndicates and gangs.
What is to be done as Lenin asked? Yes, we must spur the economy, create decent jobs and slash poverty but equally we must ensure our law enforcement have the weapons they need to win this war.
Whilst government has doubled the size of the SAPS since 1994, it has not kept pace with population growth, let alone rising crime levels or the internationally recommended ratio of police to society. We welcome the recent shift in this regard to begin recruiting new police officers.
The SAPS is our most important weapon in this war, yet we fail to continuously invest in the skills and training of our officers, to provide them with working vehicles, adequate protective gear, modern police stations or the latest forensic, communications or other equipment. Our police need to be paid a decent and living not a poverty wage if we are to ensure that none are tempted by the allure of well-resourced syndicates and gangs.
The National Prosecuting Authority too has not been spared the costs of austerity budget cuts. The NPA has struggled with a shortage of prosecutors, though we hope the recent announcement of funding for an additional 250 marks a step in the right direction. Again, if you want to attract the best, the state needs to offer attractive salaries.
The courts need to be invested in and modernised. The endless delays in trials and the archaic paper-based systems deter many from pursuing justice.
More must be done to turn our Correctional Services from resting centres for criminals who continue their violent activities inside their cells and pose a serious threat to the safety and lives of our prison staff. Inmates must be required to pursue skills development and further education to help them find work and leave the life of crime upon their release. Parole programmes must be expanded to reduce the high levels of recidivism amongst former prisoners.
Home Affairs must be roped in to help the SAPS build a comprehensive DNA and biometric database of all persons within South Africa.
The South African Revenue Service must be given the resources it needs to tackle customs fraud and in particular illicit trade in tobacco and alcohol as well as to conduct comprehensive lifestyle audits of those with unexplained wealth.
Treasury and Parliament must treat our law enforcement institutions as assets and their allocations as investments. And yes, whilst there is a cost to fund them today, we will reap the rewards in a society that is safe and an economy that attracts the investments and retains the skills needed to spur growth and create jobs.
Parliament must tighten the Criminal Procedures Act to prohibit bail under any circumstances for any person charged with attacking law enforcement personnel. Similarly, life sentences must be required for all convicted of killing our law enforcement officers and life must mean life not release after 20 years or less.
We as ordinary citizens too must play our part and adopt a zero-tolerance approach to all forms of criminality in our communities and workplaces. This includes the most basic of offences such as littering and public intoxication to domestic violence and corruption. All crimes have witnesses, and we must expose these crimes.
Witnesses and whistleblowers must be protected and the memory of those who have died exposing corruption and other criminal activities, honoured.
The private sector too must play its part, from creating jobs and paying a living wage to supporting locally produced goods and not supporting a culture of corruption in pursuit of tenders. It must work with and actively support and sponsor the SAPS and Community Policing Forums and Neighbourhood, Community and Farm Watch Programmes.
South Africa requires the support and cooperation of international partners, from Mozambique to Zimbabwe in dealing with illegal migration, car theft and drug smuggling, to Lesotho on stock theft. Similarly, the support of other nations further afield in tackling criminal syndicates and drug cartels is urgently needed, in particular Brazil, Tanzania, Nigeria and Afghanistan.
International partners in the industrialised economies need to be engaged to provide support to the SAPS particularly with regards to resources, training and live intelligence. Criminal syndicates operate across borders. Their defeat requires similar international collaboration.
We will not be able to grow our economy, create decent jobs, reduce poverty and inequality, unless we resource our law enforcement, ramp up the war against crime and treat it as the national priority it is.
This is a war that requires government, business, labour, the media, and ordinary citizens to work together.
It requires us to anchor society upon a culture of zero tolerance, morality and rule of law. We cannot afford to continue to normalise the levels of crime that have become prevalent across our communities.
Solly Phetoe is the General Secretary of Cosatu.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Maverick
21 minutes ago
- Daily Maverick
Trophy hunting in the greater Kruger area — what the study overlooks
Trevor Oertel is an Executive Committee member of the Sustainable Use Coalition of Southern Africa (SUCo-SA) and has represented SUCo-SA at CITES meetings both in Panama and Geneva. He has served under various ministers of Environmental Affairs on the Minister's Wildlife Forum. A recent study published in Biological Conservation Vol 309, September 2025, and amplified by Adam Cruise in Daily Maverick claims that communities near Kruger National Park reject trophy hunting and that alternative livelihood options should be explored ('Communities near Kruger Park reject trophy hunting, embrace ethical alternatives — study', 28 July 2025). Yet the very same study simultaneously acknowledges the conservation and economic benefits that trophy hunting has delivered in southern Africa for decades. advertisement Don't want to see this? Remove ads This contradiction is at the heart of the problem: the study does not confront the source of public opposition to hunting, nor does it critically assess how representative the voices quoted actually are of the broader land use reality in the region. The paper states that 'public pressure could end trophy hunting of wildlife, potentially negatively affecting species conservation and the human communities that depend upon the revenue hunting generates'. This is not an insignificant point. In fact, it is perhaps the most important finding in the study, though the authors treat it as a side note. But who is driving that public pressure? Animal rights ideology It is not coming from the rural African communities who live alongside wildlife and bear the costs of its presence. It is driven largely by foreign NGOs and urban-based lobby groups rooted in animal rights ideology, not conservation science or socioeconomic realities. These groups wield emotive campaigns across digital media, often misrepresenting facts and vilifying hunting without engaging the voices of landowners, conservation professionals or rural custodians. The resulting 'public pressure' is thus manufactured by narrative, and not grounded in local truth. The paper correctly identifies that banning hunting could harm both people and wildlife, yet it fails to interrogate why public opinion is being manipulated against a practice that has demonstrably conserved habitats, maintained viable populations of wild animals and their habitats, and generated revenue for landholders and communities. A prominent example of this group is World Animal Protection (WAP), a multimillion-pound UK-based animal rights group that has consistently lobbied against all forms of hunting, including regulated and sustainable hunting. Besides the study that Cruise cites being funded by WAP, it fails to clearly disclose up front that at least three of its authors are either employed by or have formerly been employed by WAP, calling into question the neutrality of the research and its conclusions (the authors' biographies are disclosed in hyperlinks, not in an up-front disclaimer). When those crafting the questions, framing the data and interpreting the findings are aligned with an organisation vocally opposed to hunting in any form, one must ask: Is this research or advocacy under the banner of science? The Daily Maverick article and the study it draws from focus on communities bordering Kruger National Park in the north-eastern Lowveld of South Africa. However, it is also worth asking: 'How much actual trophy hunting happens in this area?' The answer is very little, particularly on communal lands in the immediate vicinity of the park. Hunting in this region is constrained by land tenure, regulation and land-use policies. This means most households surveyed in the study have had minimal, if any, direct experience of benefits from hunting in general, and specifically from trophy hunting. advertisement Don't want to see this? Remove ads It is therefore not surprising that many interviewees do not see hunting as a livelihood opportunity — they have not been given the opportunity to benefit from it in the first place. Deeper issue This raises a deeper issue — is this study truly about assessing trophy hunting, or is it part of an agenda to explore alternatives in an area where hunting hasn't really been implemented or tested as a sustainable revenue model? The study proposes alternatives like vegetable farming, sewing or craft-making — all worthy initiatives, but hardly equivalent in income potential, ecological compatibility or explaining how they would incentivise conservation in any way. Hunting alongside photographic tourism aligns livelihoods with managing wildlife and its habitats. Generating income from vegetables, sewing or crafts moves communities away from wildlife and disincentivises conservation. For instance, vegetable farming in buffer zones around protected areas risks increasing human-wildlife conflict. Water access, crop raiding by elephants or baboons, fencing costs and soil degradation are real constraints. Yet the paper glosses over these very practical concerns. In contrast, hunting incentivises keeping wild land wild, placing value on intact ecosystems and large, free-ranging species. It doesn't require land clearance or conflict with the ecosystem — it works with it. advertisement Don't want to see this? Remove ads Instead of using communities' limited exposure to hunting as proof of rejection, the study could have investigated: Why opportunities from hunting have not reached these communities. How to expand access and equity in hunting revenue, including governance reforms. How existing conservation success in neighbouring areas like APNR (Associated Private Nature Reserves) or KwaZulu-Natal community hunting initiatives could serve as models. The Daily Maverick article is penned by Adam Cruise, who is well known for his opposition to trophy hunting. In this instance, Cruise's tone borders on celebratory. However, as a journalist Cruise would do well to temper his personal biases and acknowledge the full scope of the study's findings, including its clear warnings that banning hunting could harm both conservation and local livelihoods. The study paradoxically confirms that ending trophy hunting could harm both conservation and communities, yet it aligns itself with a movement that is pressuring governments to do just that, without addressing the source of that pressure or the sociopolitical power imbalance behind it. Real conservation solutions must be led by local needs, backed by science and sound conservation management, and shielded from ideological interference. advertisement Don't want to see this? Remove ads Disregarding proven conservation industries like hunting simply because of foreign sentiment, often divorced from African realities, risks sacrificing both people and wildlife for the sake of fashionable morality. The debate about trophy hunting should not be about emotion or optics. It should be about what actually works for conservation and for the people who live with wildlife every day. DM

IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
Singh's Mysterious Death Casts Shadow Over R150 Million Bank Fraud Case
Singh died in custody in October 2024 while awaiting trial for her alleged role in a R150 million fraud case involving forged Stanbic Bank Ghana guarantees. Image: Pexels The sudden death of 51-year-old Nishani Singh, initially attributed to health complications, is now at the centre of mounting suspicions in one of South Africa's most high-profile financial crime investigations. Singh died in custody in October 2024 while awaiting trial for her alleged role in a R150 million fraud case involving forged Stanbic Bank Ghana guarantees. These documents were used to obtain large credit facilities from Investec Bank between 2017 and 2022. While once seen as a key accused, Singh was reportedly preparing to turn State witness, a move insiders believe could have implicated senior figures within South Africa's financial sector. 'She could not have orchestrated this alone,' said a source close to the investigation. 'The forgeries were too precise. This required someone with deep internal knowledge.'That testimony, however, will now never be heard. This week, the prosecution's case suffered a major blow during proceedings at the Palm Ridge Specialised Commercial Crimes Court. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ Under cross-examination, the State's lead witness conceded that the affidavits used to charge Singh and her brother, Rushil, did not establish intent to defraud.'These documents show a prima facie case,' the witness admitted. 'But they do not prove the accused acted with criminal intent.'Further damaging the State's position, the witness also confirmed that several of the emails used as evidence were genuine, and that at the time, it was reasonable to assume the Ghanaian guarantees were backed by actual funds.' This may reflect reckless financial behaviour,' he added, 'but not necessarily criminal fraud.'The defence has seized on these revelations to argue that the Singhs may have engaged in questionable financial dealings but were far from the masterminds they have been portrayed as. Attention has now shifted to the circumstances of Singh's death. She had appeared visibly ill during earlier court appearances and was allegedly denied adequate medical care while in custody.

IOL News
2 hours ago
- IOL News
Duduzile Zuma-Sambudla's trial date for July 2021 unrest matter set
Duduzile Zuma-Sambudla having a word with her attorney, Advocate Dali Mpofu SC before the start of the pre-trial hearing on Thursday. Image: Doctor Ngcobo/Independent Media Umkhonto weSizwe Party (MKP) member of Parliament, Duduzile Zuma-Sambudla is no longer intending to petition the National Director of Public Prosecution (NDPP), Advocate Shamila Batohi, to withdraw charges against her but said she is ready for trial. This was revealed by her attorney Advocate Dali Mpofu SC at the pre-trial hearing held in the Durban High Court yesterday. Both the State and the defence said they were ready for the trial and the court dates were set down for November 10 to 21. Sambudla-Zuma was arrested and charged in January. The state alleged that she was instrumental in fomenting deadly violence that left many people dead and paralysed the economy, particularly in KwaZulu-Natal in July 2021. She faced three counts emanating from her social media posts during the civil unrest. Count one is incitement to commit the offence of terrorism, with the state alleging that between June and July 2021, at various places within the country, the accused unlawfully and intentionally incited others to commit terrorism by engaging in terrorist activities. On count two, which was incitement to commit violence, the state alleged that the accused incited, instigated, commanded or procured other persons unlawfully, who assembled with common intent to forcibly disturb the public peace or tranquility or to invade the rights of other persons. On count three, the state also accused her of violating Section 17 of the Riotous Assemblies Act, 17 of 1956 which dealt with the illegal assembling of persons with the intention to cause a riot. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading Wearing a black T-shirt with the words 'Modern Day Terrorism Charges', Zuma-Sambudla looked relaxed and smiled. Speaking after the postponement inside the court, Zuma-Sambudla said she still maintained that the charges against her were politically motivated, however, she was ready for trial. "I still maintain that this case is politically motivated. I am in high spirits and ready for the trial. My party comrades and I are in and out of court because the system wants to punish us for supporting ubaba (Jacob Zuma), said Sambudla-Zuma. At her last appearance in March, she indicated that she would fight for the dropping of the charges. During the pre-trial hearing, Mpofu read her admission that between June and July she had tweeted using her X account, which had more than 100,000 followers, during her father's arrest. However, she denied having incited anyone to cause violence. Her argument was that people who may have caused violence and looted did so out of their own anger over her father's arrest in July 2021, not because they were incited by her tweets.