logo
Private sector DEI programs still legal despite Trump's executive order, Maryland AG says

Private sector DEI programs still legal despite Trump's executive order, Maryland AG says

CBS News14-02-2025
Maryland Attorney General Anthony Brown is one of 16 state attorneys general joining together to issue guidance on how organizations should approach Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility (DEIA) programs in the workplace.
In the letter, the AGs emphasize that DEI programs are still legal, despite an executive order issued by President Trump halting federal DEI programs nationwide.
Following the order, Maryland leaders shared their support for DEI programs, and the City of Baltimore responded with a lawsuit alleging that the order would stifle programs the city relies on for essential functions.
What is DEI and DEIA?
DEI and DEIA refer to principles of diversity, equity, inclusion and accessibility.
While the push gained momentum after the 2020 murder of George Floyd, DEI has much earlier roots.
The concept dates back to the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which banned employment discrimination based on race, color, sex, religion, and other criteria. Since then, other policies seeking to eliminate hiring bias, promote fairness in the workplace, and provide equal opportunities to people of color, women, and individuals with disabilities have arisen. DEI has also expanded to include sexual orientation and gender identity.
Are workplace DEI and DEIA programs legal?
Mr. Trump's executive order calls for an end to "discriminatory programs," including "'diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility' (DEIA) mandates, policies, programs, preferences, and activities in the Federal Government, under whatever name they appear."
It also instructs the U.S. attorney general to create a plan that would deter the private sector from continuing DEI programs.
According to the Bureau of Justice Assistance, "Executive Orders (EOs) are official documents … through which the President of the United States manages the operations of the Federal Government."
But the memo from the 16 state attorneys general says Mr. Trump's executive action does not have the authority to mandate an end to DEI and DEIA programs within the private sector.
"Diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility best practices are not illegal, and the federal government does not have the legal authority to issue an executive order that prohibits otherwise lawful activities in the private sector or mandates the wholesale removal of these policies and practices within private organizations, including those that receive federal contracts and grants," the memo reads.
AGs say DEI prevents workplace discrimination
The attorneys general argue that DEI employment practices are not only lawful but exist to prevent workplace discrimination — protecting companies from the risk of lawsuits.
"Employment policies incorporating diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility best practices are not only compliant with state and federal civil rights laws, but they also help to reduce litigation risk by affirmatively protecting against discriminatory conduct that violates the law."
According to the 16 attorneys general, more than 285,000 discrimination complaints have been filed with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission by employees in their states alone.
In the letter, the attorneys general said Mr. Trump's executive order is misleading and suggests that DEI policies are discriminatory practices.
"The Executive Order states what is already the law—that discrimination is illegal—but then conflates unlawful preferences in hiring and promotion with sound and lawful best practices for promoting diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility in the workforce," the coalition of attorneys general wrote. "This conflation is inaccurate and misleading. Policies and practices that promote diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility are not the same as preferences in individual hiring and promotion decisions that have been found to be unlawful. The Executive Order cannot and does not prohibit these otherwise lawful practices and policies."
How should organizations implement DEI policies?
The attorneys general encouraged organizations to prioritize wide-scale recruitment efforts to attract diverse applicant pools, while using panel interviews to ensure multiple perspectives in hiring and promotion decisions.
The AGs said companies should also establish standardized evaluation criteria focused on skills and experience to maintain objective, merit-based hiring processes.
Companies are also encouraged to maintain accessible recruitment practices and provide reasonable accommodations throughout the hiring process.
In the letter, the attorneys general also told companies to ensure that employees have equal access to professional development, training, and mentorship programs to minimize turnover rates and strengthen organizational culture.
They also recommended employee resource groups, or ERGs, which are spaces where employees of common backgrounds can feel recognized and supported.
In addition, the AGs encouraged organizations to conduct training on unconscious bias, inclusive leadership, and disability awareness.
How do DEI programs impact the workplace?
DEI experts told CBS News that DEI is often misperceived as being solely focused on race. Policies giving working parents flexible work hours or establishing professional groups based on shared identities, such as sexual orientation, could also be classified as DEI programs.
Proponents of DEI argue that it improves the quality of the workforce and its employees, while opponents argue DEI programs work against the principle of merit-based hiring and promotions or even promote discrimination themselves.
According to Mr. Trump's executive order, DEI policies have led to "illegal, pernicious discrimination that has prioritized how people were born instead of what they were capable of doing."
In a statement Thursday, Attorney General Brown said companies in the top quartile for diversity are 35% more likely to have financial gains above their respective industry counterparts, citing a study by the consulting firm McKinsey & Company.
"Diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility initiatives are not only legal, they are essential for creating fair, thriving workplaces. They help businesses comply with the law, prevent discrimination, and ensure equal opportunities for all employees," Brown said. "DEIA policies are critical for expanding talent pools, addressing bias, and fostering employee success. Far from being illegal, they are vital for business growth, retention, and engagement."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

India to maintain Russian oil imports despite Trump threats, government sources say
India to maintain Russian oil imports despite Trump threats, government sources say

CNBC

time34 minutes ago

  • CNBC

India to maintain Russian oil imports despite Trump threats, government sources say

India will keep purchasing oil from Russia despite U.S. President Donald Trump's threats of penalties, two Indian government sources told Reuters on Saturday, not wishing to be identified due to the sensitivity of the matter. On top of a new 25% tariff on India's exports to the U.S., Trump indicated in a Truth Social post last month that India would face additional penalties for purchases of Russian arms and oil. On Friday, Trump told reporters he had heard that India would no longer be buying oil from Russia. But the sources said there would be no immediate changes. "These are long-term oil contracts," one of the sources said. "It is not so simple to just stop buying overnight." Justifying India's oil purchases from Russia, a second source said India's imports of Russian grades had helped avoid a global surge in oil prices, which have remained subdued despite Western curbs on the Russian oil sector. Unlike Iranian and Venezuelan oil, Russian crude is not subject to direct sanctions, and India is buying it below the current price cap fixed by the European Union, the source said. The New York Times also quoted two unnamed senior Indian officials on Saturday as saying there had been no change in Indian government policy. Indian government authorities did not respond to Reuters' request for official comment on its oil purchasing intentions. However, during a regular press briefing on Friday, foreign ministry spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said India has a "steady and time-tested partnership" with Russia. "On our energy sourcing requirements ... we look at what is there available in the markets, what is there on offer, and also what is the prevailing global situation or circumstances," he said. The White House did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Trump, who has made ending Russia's war in Ukraine a priority of his administration since returning to office this year, has expressed growing impatience with Russian President Vladimir Putin in recent weeks. He has threatened 100% tariffs on U.S. imports from countries that buy Russian oil unless Moscow reaches a major peace deal with Ukraine. Russia is the leading supplier to India, the world's third-largest oil importer and consumer, accounting for about 35% of its overall supplies. India imported about 1.75 million barrels per day of Russian oil from January to June this year, up 1% from a year ago, according to data provided to Reuters by sources. But while the Indian government may not be deterred by Trump's threats, sources told Reuters this week that Indian state refiners stopped buying Russian oil after July discounts narrowed to their lowest since 2022 - when sanctions were first imposed on Moscow - due to lower Russian exports and steady demand. Indian Oil Corp, Hindustan Petroleum Corp, Bharat Petroleum Corp and Mangalore Refinery Petrochemical Ltd have not sought Russian crude in the past week or so, four sources told Reuters. Nayara Energy - a refinery majority-owned by Russian entities, including oil major Rosneft, and major buyer of Russian oil - was recently sanctioned by the EU. Nayara's chief executive resigned following the sanctions, and three vessels laden with oil products from Nayara Energy have yet to discharge their cargoes, hindered by the new EU sanctions, Reuters reported last week.

Senate confirms former Fox News host Pirro as top federal prosecutor for the nation's capital

timean hour ago

Senate confirms former Fox News host Pirro as top federal prosecutor for the nation's capital

WASHINGTON -- The Senate has confirmed former Fox News host Jeanine Pirro as the top federal prosecutor for the nation's capital, filling the post after President Donald Trump withdrew his controversial first pick, conservative activist Ed Martin Jr. Pirro, a former county prosecutor and elected judge, was confirmed 50-45. Before becoming the acting U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia in May, she co-hosted the Fox News show 'The Five' on weekday evenings, where she frequently interviewed Trump. Trump yanked Martin's nomination after a key Republican senator said he could not support him due to Martin's outspoken support for rioters who stormed the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. Martin now serves as the Justice Department's pardon attorney. In 2021, voting technology company Smartmatic USA sued Fox News, Pirro and others for spreading false claims that the company helped 'steal' the 2020 presidential election from Trump. The company's libel suit, filed in a New York state court, sought $2.7 billion from the defendants. Last month, Republican members of the Senate Judiciary Committee voted unanimously to send Pirro's nomination to the Senate floor after Democrats walked out to protest Emil Bove's nomination to become a federal appeals court judge. Pirro, a 1975 graduate of Albany Law School, has significantly more courtroom experience than Martin, who had never served as a prosecutor or tried a case before taking office in January. She was elected as a judge in New York's Westchester County Court in 1990 before serving three terms as the county's elected district attorney. In the final minutes of his first term as president, Trump issued a pardon to Pirro's ex-husband, Albert Pirro, who was convicted in 2000 on conspiracy and tax evasion charges.

Durham Council staff 'wanting to leave or retire' after Reform UK threats about jobs
Durham Council staff 'wanting to leave or retire' after Reform UK threats about jobs

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Durham Council staff 'wanting to leave or retire' after Reform UK threats about jobs

Council staff have considered leaving their roles or retiring early after comments from Reform UK leaders, a councillor has claimed. Liberal Democrat Mark Wilkes suggested that comments made by the party nationally and locally have jeopardised officers' roles. It comes after Nigel Farage previously said council staff working on diversity or climate change initiatives should be 'seeking alternative careers' after Reform UK took control of Durham council. Cllr Wilkes also criticised the party's messaging around its recent decision to remove diversity training for all councillors after members refused participation. He told a Durham County Council scrutiny committee: 'If you're a sane person, would you feel comfortable at all working for an organisation where the political leadership might appear to be anti-staff? Even if they're not, that might be what it appears to be. 'If you are somebody with a protected characteristic - perhaps a disability or from a minority background- would you want to come and work at Durham County Council right now when you see that kind of narrative in the press? 'I have heard of staff already wanting to leave or retire early.' Reform said councillors were not legally required to take diversity, equality and inclusion training, and dismissed Cllr Wilkes' concerns as "utter nonsense". Recommended reading: Thousands of vulnerable residents face impact of proposed council tax changes Bishop Auckland STACK venue to progress after funding lifeline Speeding concerns on County Durham road are 'ignored' by council, MPs say In May, Mr Farage warned council staff working on diversity or climate change initiatives to seek 'alternative careers' after the party took control of the local authority. The local authority is believed to have just 1.8 full-time-equivalent diversity roles, which are connected to duties required by law. Durham County Council was urged to maintain its roll of 'quality' workers across several council departments to help deliver cost-effective services. Cllr Wilkes said: 'You can't have a well-functioning council, and you can't make savings, if you don't have quality staff.' The opposition councillor's plea was supported by Reform's John Cook, chair of the corporate overview and scrutiny management board, who said: 'I agree. This should be a great place to work and our community should be a great place to live.' Meanwhile, the party's deputy leader, Darren Grimes, added: 'He claims, without a shred of evidence, that staff are 'wanting to leave'. This is pure political scaremongering. 'Let me be clear: there is no statistically significant change. The mass exodus he imagines exists only in his alarmist fantasies.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store