Battin had legal advice that Pesutto loan could breach Liberal Party constitution
Lawyers for aggrieved members of the party's administrative committee made the assertion in a statement of claim on Monday, in a case seeking to have the loan thrown out.
The 19-member committee last month supported the loan to ensure that Pesutto could pay his party room colleague Moira Deeming 's legal fees, sparing him bankruptcy and a byelection in his marginal seat of Hawthorn.
Pesutto was ordered to pay her legal costs after the Federal Court found he repeatedly defamed her by falsely implying she associated with neo-Nazis.
The party loan requires Pesutto to repay the money at a market-based interest rate.
Committee members Colleen Harkin, Erin Hunt, Anthony Schneider, Ian Pugh and Marcus Li have argued in the Supreme Court the loan would constitute a 'benefit' in breach of the Liberal Party's constitution.
Her statement of claim said Battin had sought his own legal advice, which said as much, but that this advice was not provided to the committee.
'On or around 13 June 2025, in response to a request from the seventh defendant, Brad Battin MP (Battin), the Leader of the Opposition in Victoria and the state member for Berwick, a legal opinion was provided by Stuart Wood KC and Paul Jeffreys of Counsel on whether a proposed loan to Mr Pesutto would comply with clause 18.8 of the constitution,' the claim states.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Perth Now
7 hours ago
- Perth Now
A premier, a former MP and a case of blackmail
The secret blackmailing of premier-in-waiting Peter Malinauskas has been revealed in an Adelaide court. But the perpetrator - herself a former MP - was never sentenced after the charges were dropped in a deal with prosecutors. Annabel Digance is now suing Mr Malinauskas and the state of South Australia for $2.3 million for allegedly instigating what she claims was a malicious prosecution mounted to damage her reputation. In April 2023, prosecutors elected not to proceed with blackmail charges against Mrs Digance and her husband Greg, after they agreed to a ban on contacting Mr Malinauskas and his family. That decision was made in a closed District Courtroom, and the details emerged for the first time during separate proceedings for Mrs Digance's lawsuit in the South Australian Supreme Court on Wednesday. Mr Malinauskas' counsel Michael Abbott KC said when the judge in the blackmail case entered court, he thought he was undertaking a directions hearing but was then invited to proceed as a sentencing judge. "Orders were made ... and the sentencing jurisdiction of the judge was then brought to an end by the director of public prosecutions," Mr Abbott said. An order - known in legal circles as a nolle prosequi - was imposed "so that the sentencing judge was deprived of going any further by imposing a sentence of imprisonment, fine or bond". Associate Justice Graham Dart on Wednesday said that "whatever else might be said, the prosecution bore fruit because Mr and Mrs Digance agreed or consented to orders being made against them". "The orders are expressed to be for the benefit of Mr Malinauskas' protection, and then they consent to the orders." The blackmail charges stemmed from a meeting between Mr Digance and then opposition leader Mr Malinauskas in February 2020, which was recorded by Mr Malinauskas and handed to police. Defence documents filed by the state government say at that meeting, Mr Digance demanded Mrs Digance "be secured an upper or lower house seat in the SA parliament, and that a failure to do so would result in Mr Malinauskas' career being deliberately damaged". In her statement of claim, Mrs Digance states Mr Malinauskas reported the meeting to police in March 2020, "claiming he was a victim of blackmail". In her lawsuit, Mrs Digance also alleges trespass, wrongful arrest and false imprisonment by SA Police. On Wednesday, Mr Abbott asked the court to order that the government hand over files from SA Police and the office of the Director of Public Prosecutions that explain the agreement reached for the Digances to avoid sentencing. Associate Justice Dart said "much turns on" any agreement between the DPP and the Digances in the prior criminal proceedings. Mr Abbott and Todd Golding, for the state government and SA police, indicated they planned to lodge applications for the lawsuit to be dismissed. The matter returns to court on September 4.
ABC News
8 hours ago
- ABC News
Pokies giant Mounties taken to civil court over anti-money laundering laws
The company that owns the most profitable pokie machine club in New South Wales is being taken to the Federal Court by the agency that investigates financial crime. The Australian Transaction Reports and Analysis Centre (AUSTRAC) alleges the Mount Pritchard District and Community Club group seriously and systemically violated the country's anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financial laws. Mounties, as it is commonly known, owns 10 venues — including eight that operate approximately 1,400 pokie machines, mostly across Greater Sydney and the Central Coast. Amongst them is the club with the most lucrative pokies machines in NSW, also known as Mounties, in Sydney's south-west, according to quarterly data the club supplied to the state's regulator. AUSTRAC alleges in a civil suit that Mounties failed to comply with rules designed to stop criminals from exploiting its gaming machines. It is also alleged in the civil suit that the group failed to monitor customers presenting money laundering risks in "a number of specific instances". "This is a big company with an even bigger responsibility to ensure its clubs are managing the risks that criminals can run dirty money through its gaming machines," AUSTRAC chief executive Brendan Thomas said. "Customer due diligence and transaction monitoring in a club that processes hundreds of millions of dollars a year through its poker machines, a significant amount of which is cash, is going to require a robust approach when it comes to verifying a customer's source of funds." Mounties outsources parts of its compliance program to a third party, Betsafe, which is also used by other clubs. But Mr Thomas said: "It can't outsource its anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financial obligations." He invoked findings from the NSW Crime Commission's Project Islington, an inquiry that found billions of dollars were laundered through the state's pokies machines at clubs and hotels in the financial year ending in 2021. The NSW government introduced a cashless gaming trial in response, though it had few active participants, and it wasn't rolled out more widely. Mounties have been contacted for comment. The matter is set to be heard by the Federal Court.
AU Financial Review
8 hours ago
- AU Financial Review
NSW Police seek court order to block pro-Palestine protest
NSW Police will apply to stop a pro-Palestine protest planned for the Sydney Harbour Bridge on Sunday. Police said on Wednesday they would ask the Supreme Court to deem the protest unauthorised, which would open attendees to criminal liability for offences including blocking roadways or disobeying move-on orders.
