Your investment, retirement, and insurance questions answered
Image: Freepik
With industries and trends changing rapidly, I often feel tempted to change my investment strategy (specifically the portion of shares that I've invested in). Can you advise me on how to navigate these "hypes" and remain committed to my financial plan? Alexi Coutsoudis, Wealth Adviser, PSG Wealth, Umhlanga Ridge
In today's fast-paced, always-connected world, the sheer volume of investment news and social media commentary can be overwhelming. This constant stream of information and success stories often fuels the urge to adjust investment strategies in response to the latest winners. However, staying focused is essential to preserving your long-term financial plan, as yesterday's winners can become tomorrow's losers.
Warren Buffett put it best: 'To invest successfully over a lifetime does not require a stratospheric IQ, unusual business insights, or inside information. What's needed is a sound intellectual framework for making decisions and the ability to keep emotions from corroding that framework.'
One of the most effective ways to manage the pressure of 'investment FOMO' is to recognise a key truth: individual stock selection has far less impact on long-term portfolio performance than your overall asset allocation does. In other words, how much you invest in equities matters far more to long-term performance than which specific shares you pick.
Even with a few standout stocks, consistently outperforming the market is rare. What's more damaging to long-term returns is being underexposed to equities altogether. That's why your focus should be on aligning your portfolio with your risk tolerance and long-term goals, rather than being tempted to chase the next big thing.
Finally, one of the most powerful defences against emotional decision-making is getting caught up in the hype is working with a Certified Financial Planner®. A trusted adviser offers objective guidance, helping you filter out noise and stay committed to your strategy — even when headlines suggest otherwise.
Market trends come and go, but a disciplined, well-structured plan is what builds lasting wealth.
I am currently working full-time and would like to use a portion of my salary to invest in starting my own business, but I also need to keep paying rent and other living expenses. Do you have advice for how I can achieve this and remain financially stable? Dulcie Weyks, Financial Adviser, PSG Wealth, Waterkloof
Starting your own business while working full-time is a smart way to lower financial risk, but it takes planning to stay on track. Begin by understanding your monthly budget. Make sure your essential expenses — rent, groceries, transport, and debt repayments are covered. Then calculate how much of your remaining income you can safely set aside for your business without affecting your day-to-day living.
Open a separate account for your business savings and contribute to it regularly. Even a small monthly amount can grow over time and give you a solid starting base. A study by the Kauffman Foundation found that nearly 65% of successful entrepreneurs launched their businesses while still employed, proving that steady progress can pay off.
Start small. Choose a business idea with low upfront costs — like a service or online offering — that you can manage in your spare time. This approach keeps your risk low and allows you to test your idea before investing more.
It's also wise to build an emergency fund with at least three months' worth of living expenses. This safety net gives you breathing room if the unexpected happens or income is tight for a while.
Use your evenings and weekends to build your business gradually. As it grows, you can reinvest profits rather than taking on debt.
With a steady income, a clear plan, and the discipline to build step by step, it's entirely possible to start a business without putting your financial stability at risk.
I've just started a new job and I'm finally able to start putting additional money away towards my retirement. What do I need to be aware of to maximise my strategy? Kim Wheeler, Wealth Manager, PSG Wealth, Northcliff
Only around 6% of South Africans can afford to retire when they hit retirement age. Think of it this way: for every R4,500 to R5,000 per month of income (after tax) you will need for your retirement, you are going to have to have invested R1 million, and then still hope you do not outlive your funds. This is why it is always good to start working on making your retirement secure early in your career. The earlier you start, the better. After all, the 8th wonder of the world is the power of compound interest!
But it is never too late. In South Africa, there are several advantages to contributing to a retirement fund: A deduction of up to 27.5% of your taxable income (capped to a maximum of R350,000 per annum) in respect of your contributions is allowed, which reduces your taxable income – so this earns you tax relief.
The growth in the investment is not taxed.
On retirement, the first R550,000 of all cash lump sums you take is tax-free.
Retirement funds fall outside of your estate, so when you die, your heirs can benefit without the burdens of estate duty and executors' fees.
Remember that if your retirement fund is your only source of retirement income, you will need to take into consideration that you will pay tax on your income at your marginal tax rate. So, it is always advisable to have some 'discretionary' money set aside to top up your income or to meet unforeseen expenses.
A qualified financial adviser can help you draw up a retirement plan tailored to your needs.
I haven't started saving for my long-term goals. What's the best strategy for a 10-year investment? Kobie Kritzinger, Wealth Adviser, PSG Wealth, Menlyn
Congratulations on taking the first step to start saving towards your long-term goals. Given that you have not started saving yet, you might have to play catch-up and allocate a bigger portion of your budget towards your investment. This means you may have to make some lifestyle sacrifices. The other commitment you have to make is an emotional commitment.
Investors underestimate the risk posed by inflation on investments over the long term. There is a perceived sense of safety in having your money in a bank account earning interest. Interest is a wolf in sheep's clothing, because it is taxed and cannot beat inflation over the long term.
Growth assets such as local and international equities are the only assets that can beat inflation over the long term. I like to refer to equities as the 'hard-working' money. Your behaviour during the different market cycles will determine the success of your investment, meaning that if you make emotional decisions, it could affect your investment. A qualified and experienced financial adviser can craft an investment plan tailor-made to your unique circumstances and help you stay the course and achieve success.
I recently heard about the concept of 'duty of care' regarding car insurance. In the context of car keys, which we often hand over to multiple people in our normal daily interactions, how does this work? Ryno de Kock, Head: Distribution, PSG Insure
Duty of care is a legal obligation that all insured parties must take reasonable care to protect their insured assets. There are many situations where you may unknowingly neglect your 'duty of care' requirement when it comes to safeguarding car keys as many of us may find ourselves in situations where we hand over our keys to third parties. While in most cases, it might be handed over to trusted parties, we need to exercise caution in certain situations. Some examples include:
The car wash
A quick trip to the car wash includes handing keys over without knowing where they are being stored, leaving your vehicle vulnerable to theft. Keep in mind that criminals may attempt to claim your keys without your knowledge by pretending to work for the carwash you are leaving your vehicle at. It is your responsibility to prioritise the safety of your vehicle. It's always best to choose a reputable car wash with clear security measures and protocols in place.
Airport parking
Leaving your car at the airport for a long period is convenient, but if your arrangement involves handing over the keys for valet or repositioning services, there's a risk of damage or even theft. Before you travel, speak to your adviser to make sure you're covered for any unexpected incidents.
Ultimately, ensure you have comprehensive cover in place. Reach out to one of our qualified advisers for more information.
PERSONAL FINANCE
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
9 hours ago
- IOL News
How proposed amendments to South Africa's family law could affect property rights despite antenuptial agreements
Amendments to family law will impact the division of property when a marriage dissolves or upon one spouse's death. Image: Freepik The way one's property - and other assets - are divided in the event of divorce or death, even if there is an antenuptial agreement in place, could be impacted by the proposed amendments to South Africa's family law. 'This is one of the most substantial adjustments we've seen in matrimonial property law in some time,' says Grant Smee, CEO of Only Realty Property Group. 'The goal is to promote fairer outcomes, particularly for spouses who've made meaningful non-financial contributions to the marriage.' According to Statistics South Africa, 130 806 civil marriages were registered in 2023, while in decline, Smee says that marriage remains a commonplace institution in South Africa with significant legal implications for property ownership. Justice and Constitutional Development Minister Mmamoloko Kubayi plans to table the General Laws (Family Matters) Amendment Bill in Parliament this year. Smee explains, 'This Bill follows the 2023 Constitutional Court ruling that called for greater equity in divorce and estate matters. The amendment aims to protect spouses who could be left financially vulnerable after death or divorce by granting courts broader discretion in terms of fair asset redistribution.' The proposed amendments will affect the Divorce Act, Matrimonial Property Act, and Mediation in Certain Divorce Matters Act, with the most notable proposed reforms including: Pre-1984 marriages (before the accrual system): Courts may now redistribute assets upon death or divorce. Post-1984 marriages without accrual: Even with an antenuptial contract excluding accrual, courts may intervene to redistribute assets if deemed just. 'This departs from the current norm, where a spouse typically walks away only with what's legally theirs, regardless of their broader contributions to the marriage,' explains Smee. 'Couples who are married or planning to marry should take note of how these legal updates could affect property ownership and estate planning.' Under this amendment, courts will consider non-financial contributions, such as homemaking, raising children or supporting a spouse's career or business when it comes time to divide assets. 'Interestingly, this isn't about defaulting to a 50/50 split; it's about assessing whether one spouse enabled the other to grow wealth or acquire property before deciding what a fair outcome looks like.' Smee says the reforms mean that spouses in no-accrual marriages will be able to apply to the divorce court for a redistribution of assets. 'The court can then decide to transfer a portion of the spouse's assets to the applicant if it finds she or he contributed towards the increase of the spouse's estate – directly or indirectly.' Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Factors that will determine asset distribution include the duration of the marriage, the couple's arrangements and the extent of the applicant's contribution. Based on this, assets that may be subject to redistribution include: Primary or investment properties. Real estate-linked business interests. Property within a deceased spouse's estate. Under the current law, surviving spouses in non-accrual marriages often have no claim to property unless specified in a will. The proposed changes would allow for court-ordered redistribution from the deceased's estate, offering greater financial protection for the surviving spouse. 'This aims to prevent situations where an individual is left with nothing when a spouse dies, despite years of matrimonial support,' Smee says. For married or engaged couples, especially those with shared property or long-term investments, Only Realty Property Group recommends seeking legal advice regarding the upcoming adjustments to the marital law. Smee shares his top tips as follows: Review or update your antenuptial contract: Antenuptial contracts remain valid, but courts may override them if they result in an unfair outcome. 'Here, we strongly suggest drafting contracts with contingency clauses to account for future contributions and asset division scenarios, and it's strongly advised that you work with a legal team to make these adjustments.' Explore postnuptial adjustments: Married couples can apply for a change in their matrimonial property regime under Section 21 of the Matrimonial Property Act. 'This helps to align existing agreements to the new legal framework - particularly when it comes to property investments.' Consider Detailed Contract Planning: 'If you're going into a marriage and there are significant property assets involved, more consideration will need to be applied to ensure an equitable distribution.' He suggests couples consider the following: Clearly defining asset exclusions. Assessing whether the chosen regime still suits their needs. Ensuring estate plans and wills reflect the potential for court-ordered redistribution. Accounting for dependents to avoid unintended asset shifts. According to Smee, these changes reflect a more modern understanding of marriage dynamics: 'It's important to remember that contributions aren't always financial. The law takes cognisance of the reality that sacrifices, including non-financial sacrifices, made for the household deserve recognition. These reforms aim to create a more balanced approach to property and asset distribution.' Bertus Preller, a family and divorce law attorney and mediator at Maurice Phillips Wisenberg, said the central change is that the courts will be empowered to redistribute assets in certain marriages out of the community of property without accrual. Currently, this marital regime leaves some spouses with no legal claim to assets, despite their non-financial contributions to the marriage. Independent Media Property
IOL News
2 days ago
- IOL News
Taxpayers owe SARS over R500 billion, warns Deputy Commissioner Johnstone Makhubu
The South African Revenue Service says taxpayers now owe the government just over R513 billion in unpaid taxes. Image: Freepik The South African Revenue Service (SARS) says taxpayers now owe the government just over R513 billion in unpaid taxes. The figure was revealed by Deputy Commissioner Johnstone Makhubu, who was speaking at the 12th annual Tax Indaba on Monday. Makhubu also warned that the ballooning tax debt poses a major concern for the fiscus but also presents opportunities for improved recovery and enforcement. "I think the growing tax debt we are sitting with around, as at the end of the financial year last year, we are sitting at around R513 billion of monies that are owed to the fiscus by taxpayers,' Makhubu said. 'And again, if you are sitting with a balance sheet like that, any shareholder will ask you: what are you doing to leverage that balance sheet? And how much of that balance sheet should you be writing off?' IOL previously reported that the revenue service announced its intention to use artificial intelligence (AI) and data analytics to help achieve the revised revenue target of R1.986 trillion in taxes for the 2025/26 financial year set by Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana earlier this year. Godongwana allocated R7.5 billion over the next three years to enhance SARS's revenue collection capabilities and modernise its systems. Makhubu added that the revenue service has not had substantial write-offs of tax debt in the past, but acknowledged that some level of write-offs may be necessary. "SARS has, over the years, not had substantial write-offs of its debt book. However, I think even if we allowed for some substantial write-offs of the debt book, we are of the view that there is still an opportunity in there, like our colleagues are telling us globally, that we can be able to leverage that". He also addressed challenges related to the rapid growth of e-commerce, adding that SARS began charging VAT on low-value goods imported through e-commerce platforms last year.
IOL News
6 days ago
- IOL News
Understanding the Fair Pay Bill: A step towards salary equity in South Africa
While the Fair Pay Bill has been described as a step towards ending unequal pay, experts also highlight that it might pose some challenges for AI and technology companies, including start-ups and scale-ups that rely on flexible compensation structures. Image: Freepik The Fair Pay Bill, recently tabled in Parliament, has been described as setting the groundwork for creating a more equitable starting point for salary negotiations and career advancement by eliminating the consideration of past remuneration in hiring decisions, experts say. The Bill was tabled in Parliament as an amendment to the Employment Equity Act 55 of 1998 (EEA). It aims to transform recruitment and remuneration practices to promote fairness, transparency, and equal opportunity in the workplace. However, there are concerns that a critical limitation remains in that the fair pay protections are still embedded within the Employment Equity Act's unfair discrimination framework, which means that, unlike jurisdictions with standalone equal pay legislation, employees must still prove unfair discrimination to successfully claim equal pay violations, rather than having direct equal pay rights. Dr Louis Koen, senior lecturer and Moot Court coordinator at the University of Johannesburg's Faculty of Law, said historically underpaid individuals, many of whom are black women or youths entering the labour market, will no longer be constrained by prior low earnings when applying for new positions. 'The requirement for employers to disclose the remuneration or remuneration range when advertising a position or recruiting candidates would increase transparency and reduce opportunities for subjective or biased wage-setting. It could empower job applicants to negotiate from an informed position and also create greater parity among employees performing similar work. 'The Bill, if passed, will provide employees with a better understanding of what other employees performing the same role can expect to pay. This may ease the burden of proving discrimination in pay,' Koen said. Compliance with the Fair Pay Bill is likely to be demanding, especially for small and medium-sized enterprises, which may not have formal job grading or remuneration systems in place, he said. 'These businesses will need to develop internal frameworks to determine and document remuneration ranges, train HR personnel to navigate the new restrictions on pay discussions, and adjust recruitment practices accordingly. One potential unintended consequence is that, to avoid scrutiny or legal risk, some employers may default to offering standardised mid-range pay within bands, thereby limiting flexibility in responding to market signals or recognising merit,' Koen said. He highlighted that several types of disputes may arise from the implementation of the Bill, where employees or applicants may allege that an employer failed to disclose an appropriate remuneration range or that the disclosed range was misleading. Others may claim that their past pay was improperly solicited or factored into a hiring decision, in contravention of Section 6B of the Bill. Professor Marius van Staden, associate professor at the Wits School of Law, said the Bill will significantly affect multinational tech and AI companies operating in South Africa through two key mechanisms. 'Firstly, the new Section 6A requires employers to disclose remuneration ranges when advertising positions and during recruitment, promotion, or transfer processes. This means companies with global pay scales will need to transparently communicate their South African compensation bands, potentially revealing disparities between local and international compensation levels. 'Second, Section 6B prohibits employers from enquiring into candidates' past remuneration information during recruitment. This prevents the common practice of using previous salaries to determine offers, which could be particularly challenging for companies accustomed to benchmarking against international compensation histories when relocating talent,' Van Staden said. He added that companies in the AI and technology sectors face unique challenges given the rapid evolution of roles and skillsets. 'The Bill's amendment to the definition of 'employment policy or practice' now explicitly includes 'determining the remuneration or remuneration range for a position' during job classification and grading. 'To ensure compliance with 'equal pay for equal work' or 'work of equal value' principles, companies should establish systematic job evaluation frameworks that focus on objective criteria such as required skills, qualifications, experience levels, and job responsibilities rather than subjective assessments. The Bill references the International Labour Organisation Convention No. 100 concerning Equal Remuneration, which emphasises work of equal value rather than just identical work,' Van Staden said. He stated that for emerging AI roles, companies should develop clear competency frameworks and regularly review job classifications as roles evolve, ensuring that remuneration ranges reflect genuine differences in skill requirements and responsibilities rather than historical biases or arbitrary distinctions. Several unintended consequences could impact the sector's growth and innovation. The mandatory disclosure of remuneration ranges may reduce companies' salary negotiation flexibility and could lead to wage inflation as employees benchmark against disclosed ranges. This might particularly affect start-ups and scale-ups that rely on flexible compensation structures, Van Staden said. He added that the prohibition on enquiring into past remuneration could make it more difficult for companies to assess appropriate compensation levels for candidates with unique or highly specialised AI skillsets, potentially leading to either over-compensation or difficulty attracting top talent. 'Most significantly, the continued embedding of fair pay rights within the discrimination framework may create legal uncertainty and compliance costs that disproportionately burden smaller tech companies without extensive HR and legal resources. There's also a risk that companies may become overly conservative in their hiring and promotion practices to avoid potential discrimination claims, which could slow innovation and talent development,' he said. How can digital law experts and legal advisors assist in ensuring compliance? Van Staden said digital law experts can assist with developing compliant recruitment processes that avoid prohibited enquiries into past remuneration whilst maintaining competitive hiring practices. This includes crafting job advertisements that include appropriate remuneration range disclosures and training hiring managers on permissible discussion topics. 'Legal experts can also help design remuneration transparency policies that comply with the new Section 6A requirements whilst protecting legitimate business interests. Additionally, they can develop internal audit mechanisms to identify potential equal pay violations before they become discrimination claims. 'Importantly, legal advisors can help companies understand that the fair pay provisions remain part of the unfair discrimination framework, meaning robust documentation of objective job evaluation and remuneration-setting processes will be essential for defending against discrimination claims,' Van Staden said. He added that while the transparency requirements align with trends in jurisdictions like California, New York, and the EU, South Africa's approach of maintaining fair pay within the discrimination framework (EEA) is increasingly outdated. Van Staden noted that South Africa's requirement to prove unfair discrimination for equal pay claims creates a higher burden of proof than in many developed jurisdictions, where equal pay violations can be established through statistical analysis without requiring proof of discriminatory intent. 'The Bill's prohibition on salary history enquiries does align with progressive practices, suggesting South Africa is adopting some best practices while maintaining a more conservative overall framework,' he said. Roger Solomons, spokesperson for Build One South Africa (BOSA), stated that mandatory disclosure will prevent lowballing, as employers will be required to provide a realistic and justifiable pay range, benchmark salaries to industry norms, and comply with non-discrimination provisions in the EEA. If a company consistently posts abnormally low ranges, it opens itself to reputational risk, public scrutiny, and intervention by the Department of Employment and Labour. More importantly, job seekers will be empowered to walk away from exploitative offers, which they cannot do when pay is hidden, Solomons said.
