Shroud of Turin mystery deepens as burial cloth was NEVER laid on Jesus' body but a sculpture, scientists claim
The Shroud of Turin, a length of linen believed to have been used to wrap Jesus after his death on the cross, draws thousands of faithful visitors every year.
4
4
4
The cloth bears the image of a man after Crucifixion, leading believers to claim it was the very shroud that bore Christ's body.
Yet it has been the centre of controversy and debate for centuries.
Sceptics suggest the shroud is nothing more than a hoax dating to the Middle Ages.
But a new study published in the journal Archaeometry seems to have put the debate to rest.
Brazilian 3D digital designer Cicero Moraes used digital modelling software to reach his final conclusion.
He believes the shroud was never wrapped around Jesus' body, based on a study using 3D imaging tech.
"The Shroud's image is more consistent with an artistic low-relief representation than with the direct imprint of a real human body," he wrote.
Moraes argues that the imprints on the linen could only have been made by a sculpture, not an actual person's body.
For his research, Moraes compared two different digital 3D bodies.
One was that of a human body, and the other was a low-relief sculpture.
He then used 3D simulation tools to digitally drape a shroud over each of them.
Moraes compared both to pictures of the Shroud of Turin.
He found that the low-relief sculpture was a worthy match for the centuries-old relic, while the one based on a human was more distorted.
This is down to a phenomenon called the Agammemnon Mask Effect - named after a wide death mask found in Greece.
The effect sets out that if someone pressed their face against a paper towel, it would be wide and distorted - and would not accurately reflect the individual's features.
Moraes told Live Science: "The image on the Shroud of Turin is more consistent with a low-relief matrix.
"Such a matrix could have been made of wood, stone or metal and pigmented - or even heated - only in the areas of contact, producing the observed pattern."
Accusations that the Turin Shroud is a fake have been around since its first recorded mentions in the 14th century.
More recently, carbon dating analysis has placed its likely time of creation somewhere between 1260 and 1390 AD.
Moraes thinks it is likely the shroud was made in a funerary context, and is a "masterpiece of Christian art".
He wrote that it is "plausible to consider that artists or sculptors with sufficient knowledge could have created such a piece, either through painting or low relief".
However, it's unlikely that Moraes' work will being an end to speculation over the shroud's veracity.
University of Padua professor Giulio Fanti has claimed in a study that the blood stain patterns offer evidence that the shroud is the real deal, according to the New York Post.
4
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scottish Sun
12 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Shroud of Turin mystery deepens as burial cloth was NEVER laid on Jesus' body but a sculpture, scientists claim
The shroud has been the centre of controversy and debate for centuries SACRED RELIC Shroud of Turin mystery deepens as burial cloth was NEVER laid on Jesus' body but a sculpture, scientists claim Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) THE mystery surrounding one of the world's most famous religious relics may finally be solved, according to new research. The Shroud of Turin, a length of linen believed to have been used to wrap Jesus after his death on the cross, draws thousands of faithful visitors every year. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 5 The shroud is believed to have been used to wrap Jesus after his death on the cross Credit: Alamy 5 Cicero Moraes used digital modelling software to study the shroud Credit: Credit: Cicero Moraes/Pen News 5 For his research, Moraes compared two different digital 3D bodies Credit: Credit: Cicero Moraes/Pen News The cloth bears the image of a man after Crucifixion, leading believers to claim it was the very shroud that bore Christ's body. Yet it has been the centre of controversy and debate for centuries. Sceptics suggest the shroud is nothing more than a hoax dating to the Middle Ages. But a new study published in the journal Archaeometry seems to have put the debate to rest. Brazilian 3D digital designer Cicero Moraes used digital modelling software to reach his final conclusion. He believes the shroud was never wrapped around Jesus' body, based on a study using 3D imaging tech. "The Shroud's image is more consistent with an artistic low-relief representation than with the direct imprint of a real human body," he wrote. Moraes argues that the imprints on the linen could only have been made by a sculpture, not an actual person's body. For his research, Moraes compared two different digital 3D bodies. One was that of a human body, and the other was a low-relief sculpture. Watch monstrous black hole GOBBLE up a star before Earth-shattering explosion in incredible new Nasa clip He then used 3D simulation tools to digitally drape a shroud over each of them. Moraes compared both to pictures of the Shroud of Turin. He found that the low-relief sculpture was a worthy match for the centuries-old relic, while the one based on a human was more distorted. This is down to a phenomenon called the Agammemnon Mask Effect - named after a wide death mask found in Greece. The effect sets out that if someone pressed their face against a paper towel, it would be wide and distorted - and would not accurately reflect the individual's features. Moraes told Live Science: "The image on the Shroud of Turin is more consistent with a low-relief matrix. "Such a matrix could have been made of wood, stone or metal and pigmented - or even heated - only in the areas of contact, producing the observed pattern." Accusations that the Turin Shroud is a fake have been around since its first recorded mentions in the 14th century. More recently, carbon dating analysis has placed its likely time of creation somewhere between 1260 and 1390 AD. Moraes thinks it is likely the shroud was made in a funerary context, and is a "masterpiece of Christian art". He wrote that it is "plausible to consider that artists or sculptors with sufficient knowledge could have created such a piece, either through painting or low relief". However, it's unlikely that Moraes' work will being an end to speculation over the shroud's veracity. University of Padua professor Giulio Fanti has claimed in a study that the blood stain patterns offer evidence that the shroud is the real deal, according to the New York Post. 5 Carbon dating analysis has placed its likely time of creation somewhere between 1260 and 1390 AD Credit: Reuters
Telegraph
14 hours ago
- Telegraph
We must lead AI revolution or be damned, says Muslim leader
Muslims must take charge of artificial intelligence or 'be damned' as a marginalised community, the head of the Muslim Council of Britain (MCB) has said in a leaked video. Dr Wajid Akhter, the general secretary of the MCB, said Muslims and their children risked missing the AI revolution in the same way as they had been left behind in the computer and social media revolutions. He added that while Muslims had historically been at the forefront of civilisation and were credited with some of the greatest scientific advances, they had ended up as the butt' of jokes in the modern world after failing to play a part in the latest technological revolutions. 'We already missed the industrial revolution. We missed the computer revolution. We missed the social media revolution. We will be damned and our children will damn us if we miss the AI revolution. We must take a lead,' said Dr Akther. Speaking at the MCB's AI and the Muslim Community conference on July 19, he added: 'AI needs Islam, it needs Muslims to step up.' Scientists 'made fun of' faith at computer launch Dr Akther recalled how at the launch of one of the world's earliest computers, the Mark II , US scientists brought out a prayer mat aligned towards Mecca. 'They were making fun of all religions because they felt that they had now achieved the age of reason and science and technology and we don't need that superstition any more,' he said. 'And so to show that they had achieved mastery over religion, they decided to make fun and they chose our faith. 'How did we go from a people who gave the world the most beautiful buildings, science, technology, medicine, arts to being a joke? 'I'll tell you one thing – the next time that the world is going through a revolution, the next time they go to flip that switch, they will also pull out a prayer mat and they will also line it towards the Qibla [the direction towards Mecca] and they will also pray, but this time, not to make fun of us, they will do so because they are us.' Government eases stance on MCB Dr Akther also told his audience: 'We lost each other. And ever since we lost each other, we've been falling. We've been falling ever since. We are people now who are forced, we are forced by Allah to watch the genocide of our brothers and sisters in Gaza. 'This is a punishment for us if we know it. We are people who are forced to beg the ones who are doing the killing to stop it. We are people who are two billion strong but cannot even get one bottle of water into Gaza.' Dr Akhter said Gaza had 'woken' Muslims up and showed they needed to unite. 'We will continue to fall until the day we realise that only when we are united will we be able to reverse this. Until the day we realise that we need to sacrifice for this unity,' he added. British governments have maintained a policy of 'non-engagement' with the MCB since 2009 based on claims, disputed by the council, that some of its officials have previously made extremist comments. However, Angela Rayner, the Deputy Prime Minister, is drawing up a new official definition of Islamophobia, and last week it emerged the consultation has been thrown open to all groups including the MCB. Earlier this year, Sir Stephen Timms, a minister in the Department for Work and Pensions, was one of four Labour MPs to attend an MCB event.
The Sun
15 hours ago
- The Sun
Shroud of Turin mystery deepens as burial cloth was NEVER laid on Jesus' body but a sculpture, scientists claim
THE mystery surrounding one of the world's most famous religious relics may finally be solved, according to new research. The Shroud of Turin, a length of linen believed to have been used to wrap Jesus after his death on the cross, draws thousands of faithful visitors every year. 4 4 4 The cloth bears the image of a man after Crucifixion, leading believers to claim it was the very shroud that bore Christ's body. Yet it has been the centre of controversy and debate for centuries. Sceptics suggest the shroud is nothing more than a hoax dating to the Middle Ages. But a new study published in the journal Archaeometry seems to have put the debate to rest. Brazilian 3D digital designer Cicero Moraes used digital modelling software to reach his final conclusion. He believes the shroud was never wrapped around Jesus' body, based on a study using 3D imaging tech. "The Shroud's image is more consistent with an artistic low-relief representation than with the direct imprint of a real human body," he wrote. Moraes argues that the imprints on the linen could only have been made by a sculpture, not an actual person's body. For his research, Moraes compared two different digital 3D bodies. One was that of a human body, and the other was a low-relief sculpture. He then used 3D simulation tools to digitally drape a shroud over each of them. Moraes compared both to pictures of the Shroud of Turin. He found that the low-relief sculpture was a worthy match for the centuries-old relic, while the one based on a human was more distorted. This is down to a phenomenon called the Agammemnon Mask Effect - named after a wide death mask found in Greece. The effect sets out that if someone pressed their face against a paper towel, it would be wide and distorted - and would not accurately reflect the individual's features. Moraes told Live Science: "The image on the Shroud of Turin is more consistent with a low-relief matrix. "Such a matrix could have been made of wood, stone or metal and pigmented - or even heated - only in the areas of contact, producing the observed pattern." Accusations that the Turin Shroud is a fake have been around since its first recorded mentions in the 14th century. More recently, carbon dating analysis has placed its likely time of creation somewhere between 1260 and 1390 AD. Moraes thinks it is likely the shroud was made in a funerary context, and is a "masterpiece of Christian art". He wrote that it is "plausible to consider that artists or sculptors with sufficient knowledge could have created such a piece, either through painting or low relief". However, it's unlikely that Moraes' work will being an end to speculation over the shroud's veracity. University of Padua professor Giulio Fanti has claimed in a study that the blood stain patterns offer evidence that the shroud is the real deal, according to the New York Post. 4
