Supreme Court to examine POCSO clause requiring mandatory reporting of sexual activity
The Supreme Court on Thursday (April 24, 2025) agreed to hear concerns flagged by senior advocate Indira Jaising that mandatory reporting of sexual activity, even if a voluntary one, under Section 19 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) is leading to the criminalisation of the young and poses a threat to the fundamental right to health of adolescent girls.
Appearing before a Bench of Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta, Ms. Jaising, who is amicus curiae in the case along with senior advocate Siddharth Luthra, said the age of consent was raised from 16 years to 18 in 2012 with the enactment of the POCSO. This has led to a situation when knowledge of even voluntary sexual activity between juveniles is required to be reported to the police.
Also read | Why has the Supreme Court clarified POCSO provisions?
'Counselling and not criminalisation is required in such cases. We do not need to create an army of criminals,' Ms. Jaising submitted.
The senior advocate said parents, guardians, and even doctors are being penalised on the ground that they had knowledge but did not report to the police about the sexual activity.
'A doctor to whom a juvenile approaches for medical care has to report the sexual activity to the police even if she says it was voluntary. In such a situation, juveniles would turn to quacks and endanger their health,' Ms. Jaising argued.
The court said Ms. Jaising has raised a 'serious and relevant' issue. It scheduled a detailed hearing on May 8.
The Bench suggested taking the aid of Additional Solicitor General Aishwarya Bhati, and, if required, the Attorney General of India on the issue.
The Legislature had intended the requirement for mandatorily reporting sexual activity under Section 19 of the POCSO to prioritise timely intervention and protection of children.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


United News of India
17 minutes ago
- United News of India
Calcutta High Court reserves verdict on petition against state's aid to dismissed non-teaching staff
Kolkata, June 9 (UNI): The Calcutta High Court on Monday reserved its judgment on a petition challenging the West Bengal government's recently introduced scheme that offers monetary assistance to non-teaching staff dismissed following a Supreme Court verdict. Justice Amrita Sinha reserved her decision on the petition, which opposes the state's plan to pay ex-gratia amounts of Rs 25,000 to Group C and Rs 20,000 to Group D employees. During the case hearing, Justice Singh questioned the state as to why the decision to grant the allowance was taken so hastily, without any discussion or scrutiny, following the Supreme Court's verdict. Justice Sinha also raised questions about the allowance amount. Addressing the state, she asked, "Why were the amounts set at Rs 15,000 and Rs 20,000? On what basis were these figures determined?" The West Bengal government had launched the scheme to provide temporary financial relief and social security on humanitarian grounds to families affected by the dismissals. The scheme applies to Group C and D non-teaching staff who were recruited through the 2016 selection process conducted by the West Bengal School Service Commission (WBSSC) and have lost their jobs because of Supreme Court order. Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee, announcing the ex-gratia payments had said that the aid was a one-time measure aimed at supporting those left jobless after the Supreme Court's decision earlier this month in connection with the cash-for-jobs scam. The crisis began on April 3 when a Supreme Court bench led by then Chief Justice of India Sanjiv Khanna and Justice Sanjay Kumar upheld a Calcutta High Court order dismissing 25,753 teaching and non-teaching staff from state-run and aided schools. The apex court concluded that the entire 2016 recruitment process had been tainted by large-scale fraud and manipulation. While the court later allowed secondary school teachers (Classes IX–XII) to return to classrooms temporarily, it made no such concession for Group C and D employees. It also ordered the state to complete a fresh recruitment process by December 31. Meanwhile, the state has filed a review petition against the Supreme Court's ruling. 'Since a review petition has been filed in the Supreme Court, how long will the allowance continue to be paid?,' Justice Sinha asked. She also asked the state whether Group C and Group D employees would keep receiving the allowance without doing any work. UNI XC SSP


The Hindu
21 minutes ago
- The Hindu
2 days after rape and murder of minor girl, accused still at large
Two days after the rape and murder of a nine-year-old girl in north-east Delhi's Nehru Vihar, the search for the accused, who allegedly sexually assaulted the girl and killed her before stuffing her body in a suitcase, continues to remain under way. 'The hunt for the accused is on. Multiple teams of the Special Cell, Crime Branch, and district police unit are conducting raids to nab him,' said a senior police officer. The accused, who ran a food stall in the area, is suspected to have fled the scene immediately after committing the crime. During the preliminary investigation, the police found that the accused had been residing in that area for the past nearly nine months. 'Argument with wife' 'A few days back, during an argument with his wife he threw stones at her, after which she did not come back to him,' said Shakeela, a neighbour. On Sunday, a case was registered under relevant sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, which deals with aggravated penetrative sexual assault. The incident has sparked widespread protests by residents, who have demanded strict punishment for the accused. Oppn. criticises BJP Meanwhile, the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) and the Congress criticised the BJP governments in Delhi and the Centre over the 'collapse of law and order'. Delhi Police reports to the Union Home Ministry. Leader of the Opposition in the Delhi Assembly and AAP leader Atishi wrote to Delhi Police Commissioner Sanjay Arora demanding swift action. Meanwhile, Deputy Speaker Mohan Singh Bisht met the victim's family members. He later told mediapersons that 'such criminals should be dealt with thorough encounters'.


Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Manesar land scam: Court to rule on charges against 3 more accused
Panchkula: In a significant development in the Manesar land scam, a special CBI court has opted to first decide on framing charges against three more people before consolidating the chargesheet against former Haryana chief minister Bhupinder Singh Hooda and 30 others. Special CBI Judge Rajiv Goyal made the ruling last Friday, following the Punjab and Haryana high court's vacation of a stay on proceedings. The three individuals facing potential charges are former IAS officer D R Dhingra and private persons Dhare Singh and Kulwant Singh Lamba. The court has scheduled July 10 for resumed arguments regarding the chargesheet against this trio. The extensive case implicates former CM Hooda, his three ex-principal secretaries – Murari Lal Tayal (also facing another trial), S S Dhillon, and Chhattar Singh – as well as various companies and their office bearers involved in the controversial land transactions. The Supreme Court has stayed proceedings against another accused bureaucrat, Rajiv Arora, who was named in the initial chargesheet. The scam revolves around 914 acres of land in Manesar, Gurugram district, originally slated for acquisition to develop an Industrial Model Township (IMT). Following the Aug 2004 notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, a rush to acquire land at low prices ensued. Builders and land mafia reportedly capitalised on residents' panic, acquiring plots at "throwaway rates". Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch CFD với công nghệ và tốc độ tốt hơn IC Markets Đăng ký Undo In 2007, the industrial department released the land from the acquisition process. Allegations of political patronage in the builder-official-land mafia nexus led aggrieved parties to court. Ultimately, the Supreme Court directed the CBI to probe the matter, leading to the chargesheet naming former CM Hooda. MSID:: 121731795 413 |