logo
Budget Day: Government looks to make its promises add up

Budget Day: Government looks to make its promises add up

RNZ News21-05-2025
The Budget will reveal just how much money will be cut from various services and where the money will go instead.
Photo:
RNZ
"It feels like a kid robbing his mum to pay for his mates" says library assistant Alex Cass, as she prepares for the government to reveal Budget 2025.
New Zealanders will find out on Thursday just how much money will be cut from various services, as the government looks to make its promises add up.
Just how much is saved from the pay equity law changes - and where that money will be going instead - will also be revealed.
Cass was part of a pay equity claim scrapped due to the government's last-minute law change.
"It's unbelievably underhanded the way this process has been done. It was done lightning fast, with no chance for any of us to object. It's incredibly cruel, and it's a legacy of cruelty."
Cass felt like the government was saying to those who are fighting for their work to be taken seriously, "you don't deserve better".
She said she would be on Parliament's lawn on Thursday afternoon to react to the budget - money she said the government got from people who were "already massively underpaid".
But Nicola Willis said New Zealanders were "realistic", because the new scheme would still deliver a scheme protecting women against sex-based discrimination.
Finance Minister Nicola Willis is primed to unveil her "no BS" budget.
Photo:
RNZ
She said "every single cent" reprioritised from money reallocated from those claims would go into "priorities for New Zealand".
"I've had it with opposition politicians who keep promising they can 'do it all', that somehow they're gonna stick to the debt levels, they're not gonna have deficits but also they're not gonna make savings and they're gonna spend on everything - that doesn't add up," said Willis.
"Our approach is different" she said.
"It's about prioritising your taxpayer money carefully and ensuring that we're actually nourishing the growth that ultimately delivers the jobs and living standards we all depend on."
For this budget, the government's given itself only $1.3 billion of new money to use on day-to-day spending.
Already $2.5b is needed for yearly cost increases and more than $3b has been allocated in pre-budget announcements for health, defence, social investment, state abuse survivor redress and the screen production rebate.
"It's not a budget filled with rainbows and unicorns," Willis said, "It's a reality budget that will deliver genuine hope for the future."
She also called it a "no BS" budget, but would not specify what that stood for.
Labour leader Chris Hipkins said "paying women properly" should not be described as "rainbows and unicorns".
"Making sure women who have been underpaid are paid what they're worth is something that a responsible government should prioritise - this government isn't."
Greens co-leader Chlöe Swarbrick says it does look like a "BS" budget.
Photo:
RNZ / Samuel Rillstone
Greens co-leader Chlöe Swarbrick said it did look like a "BS" budget.
"The government has decided it is going to be cutting public services to the bone in order to pay for its landlord and tobacco tax cuts of the last budget."
Council of Trade Unions economist Craig Renney, who is also on the Labour Party's policy council, said the government did not have much to work with given it would not borrow more money.
"We're cutting government services at a time when we know there's increasing demand on those services," he said.
"We have an increasingly elderly population. We have increasingly higher needs in terms of health and education."
Now is the time, he said, to invest in the economy and inject some confidence into the economy.
Renney said despite the government saying it would not cut frontline services, New Zealanders were finding it harder to access those frontline services.
"It's not that there's a direct cut, but because these services aren't being properly funded for change, they're having to work harder and harder to deliver the same services with less real cash available to them."
In the budget, he will be looking out for how the government has chosen to use the savings from stopping the pay equity claims. He will also be looking at Treasury's estimates for what is happening to unemployment, wages and the cost of living.
"We've actually seen wages rising far less quickly than in the past, and we've seen two years of cuts to the minimum wage in real terms, and we've seen rising unemployment.
"If those trends continue, that will suggest that the medicine and the pain of economic change is really being borne by workers, in particular, low-paid workforces, rather than by others in the economy who might have broader shoulders."
He also will be looking to see if the government changes KiwiSaver settings, or begins means-testing for the winter energy payment or BestStart.
"If it tries to do all of those to balance the books, we'll be asking why is it that these workers are having to pay the price for the fact that the government hasn't been able to deliver its fiscal plan to date."
New Zealand Initiative chief economist Dr Eric Crampton said the government should focus on getting spending back down to pre-Covid levels.
New Zealand Initiative chief economist Dr Eric Crampton.
Photo:
Supplied
He wanted to know where the government was planning on reducing expenditure to deal with its deficit.
"If it's simply tighter spending allowances over the next few years, you start wondering how credible it is as a path to get out of structural deficit.
"Pulling the government out of the provision of some services, or explicitly cutting the amount that's provided, would signal a more serious approach."
Crampton was interested to see Treasury's projections of future paths for government spending, and for productivity and GDP growth, as well as government spending priorities.
"I'm watching for the tweaks the government might make to align the budget with the economic growth agenda.
"There has been talk of changes in depreciation schedules to encourage private investment."
He also pointed to a coalition agreement promise between National and ACT to provide housing incentive payments to councils, asking if it would show up in the budget "at least as a forecast for next year".
"The government would need to make fiscal room for it. But it is important if the government wants councils to welcome urban growth."
The Finance Minister has confirmed she will not be making any changes to superannuation.
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Christopher Luxon shrugs off polls showing tight electoral race
Christopher Luxon shrugs off polls showing tight electoral race

RNZ News

time43 minutes ago

  • RNZ News

Christopher Luxon shrugs off polls showing tight electoral race

Prime Minister Christopher Luxon has shrugged off two polls showing a tight electoral race , promising to stay the course with the coalition's plan to fix the economy. The Taxpayers' Union-Curia poll on Monday showed Labour overtaking National as the most popular party and no clear path to power for either side. TVNZ's 1News-Verian poll was more forgiving to the coalition parties, returning them to government. But it also saw Luxon sink to just 20 percent as preferred prime minister, a two-year low. On his way into a morning caucus meeting on Tuesday, Luxon told reporters the polls would not be a topic of conversation in the meeting, nor should they be. "No, no, not at all," he said. "I'm not focused on polls or talking about myself. What I'm focused on is New Zealanders and making sure we've got the right long term economic plan in place." Prime Minister Christopher Luxon said the polls would not be a topic at Tuesday's caucus meeting. (File photo) Photo: RNZ / Mark Papalii Luxon said his MPs continued to be provided internal polling through "a regular process" and discussed them "from time to time" in line with "normal practice". Asked whether he was meeting his own high standards, Luxon said the government was dealing with a challenging international environment. "We've inherited a really difficult recession," he said. "It's a very difficult time, but we are very, very clear minded and very, very focused on fixing the economy." Luxon said global confidence had been knocked by the United States' tariff regime but New Zealand had to "power through that". The faltering economy and cost-of-living crisis featured in both polls as key concerns for voters. Recently, the Auckland Chamber of Commerce has advocated a cut to the corporate tax rate, while the Taxpayers' Union is calling for an emergency mid-year Budget. Luxon previously dismissed such calls, and on Tuesday, he maintained the coalition's current focus on manufacturing and construction was the right approach. "We are doing everything we can. If you think about $6 billion worth of infrastructure projects starting before Christmas, that is a lot of jobs, it's a lot of tradies." He also pointed to relief on the horizon with the Reserve Bank expected to deliver further interest rate cuts this year. Speaking on Tuesday morning, Labour leader Chris Hipkins said the polls demonstrated New Zealanders were losing faith in National's ability to deliver on its promises. Labour leader Chris Hipkins. (File photo) Photo: RNZ / Mark Papalii He accepted, however, that Labour had more work to do, given neither poll had returned the party to the Beehive. Asked whether the party's support was helped or hindered by Labour's lack of policy, Hipkins said the government "would desperately love more things to attack". "We'll put further policy out there, but my focus right at the moment is holding the government accountable for their promises." Any comprehensive fiscal plan would have to wait till after next year's Budget, he said, but Labour's tax policy would be released this year. Hipkins said a final decision on tax had yet to be resolved but: "consensus is emerging." He repeatedly refused to give any details, including whether the proposal would be revenue neutral or possible parameters. "I've always said that I don't think the family home should be taxed, but I'm not announcing a policy that we haven't announced." National's campaign chairperson Chris Bishop said it was very easy for Labour to insist life should better when they had no policy solutions to offer themselves. National's campaign chairperson Chris Bishop said the government had to make tough decisions. (File photo) Photo: NZME / LDR "Life's easy when you're able to throw rocks from the side. Actually, we're the ones... in the arena, making the tough decisions across planning, across education, across infrastructure, across red tape, across fiscal policy to get this economy back on track." Bishop said the poll numbers reflected a "tough winter" but stressed that the election was not until next year: "People want the economy to be fixed. And I get that. But there is no silver bullet." He said any talk of replacing Luxon as leader was "just silly". Luxon declined to say whether the caucus would discuss the question of Palestinian statehood on Tuesday, but acknowledged there would be "nuances and differences" within the team. Luxon and Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese discussed Palestine during a meeting in Queenstown over the weekend. Photo: RNZ/Katie Todd Foreign Minister Winston Peters on Monday confirmed Cabinet would come to a formal decision in September over whether to recognise a state of Palestine at an upcoming United Nations summit. All three opposition parties have castigated the government for failing to make a decision, pointing out that New Zealand is now out-of-step with its like-minded partners: Australia, Canada, the United Kingdom and France. But Luxon said the complex question needed careful consideration. "It's not a race," Luxon said. "It deserves a serious weighing up of our position, and that's exactly what we're going to do." Luxon declined to say whether he would be comfortable with either coalition partner opting to "agree-to-disagree" on the decision. "I'm not going to get into hypotheticals... It's all very easy to jump to a bumper-sticker outcome or decision and not think through the consequences." Pressed on what conditions could be attached, Luxon said he would not presuppose a position but made clear Hamas would have to release hostages and disarm: "There is absolutely no role in any future Palestinian state for a terrorist organization like Hamas." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store