Digital clones of real models are revolutionising fashion advertising
Driven by advances in artificial intelligence (AI) and metaverse technologies, digital clones are transforming fast-fashion marketing. Always available, ageless and adaptable to any setting, these virtual figures enable brands to create immersive, cost-effective campaigns that resonate with today's digital-first consumers.
Virtual influencers -- digitally created personas used to provide entertainment, generate content and endorse brands -- are becoming increasingly influential, especially among Gen Z and digital-first audiences.
These virtual figures vary in form: some, like Lil Miquela and Shudu, are entirely computer-generated, while others, such as Hatsune Miku, incorporate human elements like voice or motion.
Hybrid influencers blend real and virtual components, allowing for brand-specific customisation. These virtual influencers boost brand visibility, drive engagement and influence market performance.
Real persons, virtual personas
The estimate for global influencer market size for 2024 was valued at over USD 24 billion and is projected to grow to over USD 32 billion in 2025. The rise of virtual influencers is particularly prominent in Asia.
This trend is also reshaping the USD 2.5 trillion modelling industry, according to The Business of Fashion. AI-generated avatars and digital clones enable brands to cut production costs and accelerate campaign development. As a result, companies such as Levi Strauss and Co. are partnering with AI modelling firms to integrate these virtual personas into their marketing strategies.
Digital twins
Digital twins -- virtual replicas of real people -- are gaining traction in marketing to enhance personalisation, streamline content creation and deepen customer engagement.
In the fashion world, they provide a means to maintain a sense of human connection while using AI for precision and volume purposes. Fast-fashion retailer H&M recently introduced AI-generated digital twins of real-life models for advertising and social media content. Positioned as a creative and operational aid rather than a replacement for human talent, the initiative has ignited industry-wide debate.
While the brand highlights the advantages -- lower production costs and faster catalogue development -- some critics have raised ethical concerns regarding representation and transparency.
These digital twins fall into the category of "front-of-camera" tools: static avatars used in visual content without independent personas or social media presence. Unlike virtual influencers, they do not interact with audiences or build followings. Instead, they function strictly as visual stand-ins for traditional models, who are compensated for the use of their likenesses, similar to conventional campaigns.
As these avatars do not speak, endorse or engage directly with consumers, they remain subject to traditional advertising regulations -- not influencer marketing laws.
Digital models are used for operational efficiency: testing and refining creative strategies before rollout, reducing costs and potentially offering immersive digital experiences to enhance customer connection and brand loyalty.
Authenticity and other challenges
In July 2024, fast-fashion retailer Mango launched its first advertising campaign featuring AI-generated avatars to promote a limited-edition collection for teenaged girls.
These
AI-generated influencers
and digital twins introduce numerous ethical and legal challenges. These innovations raise difficult questions about the displacement of human talent -- including models, make-up artists, hairstylists and photographers -- and broader implications for creative industries.
Key concerns centre on consent and compensation. The unauthorised use of an individual's likeness, even in digital form, poses a risk of exploitation and underscores the importance of clear standards and protections. The legal landscape regarding image rights and intellectual property is still evolving, which makes compliance both essential and complex.
As the lines between reality and digital fabrication blur, brands risk eroding consumer trust. The authenticity that audiences value can be undermined if AI-generated content seems deceptive or inauthentic.
Companies must tread carefully, balancing innovation with transparency.
Diversity is another critical issue. While AI offers customisation, it can also perpetuate biases or create an illusion of inclusivity without genuine representation.
As the use of AI proliferates, ensuring that digital models support, rather than hinder, meaningful advancement in representation will be essential.
Ultimately, brands must implement ethical frameworks to ensure that AI enhances creativity while maintaining integrity, inclusivity and legal accountability.
Strategic considerations
Digital clones provide fast-fashion brands with a powerful tool to create personalised shopping experiences and enable greater representation of diverse body types and style preferences. This degree of customisation can significantly enhance customer satisfaction and brand loyalty.
To ensure ethical integration, transparency is crucial. Brands must clearly disclose when digital models appear in campaigns. These digital representations should encompass a wide variety of demographics to genuinely promote inclusivity and engage with a broader audience.
Establishing ethical and legal safeguards is equally important. Creating digital clones requires explicit consent and careful attention to intellectual property rights. Without clear guidelines and permissions, brands risk violating privacy, misusing likenesses and facing legal repercussions. (The Conversation) KRS KRS
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
41 minutes ago
- India Today
Why Gen Z and Millennials are betting on holiday home rentals for passive income
There's no denying that we live in an unpredictable world, and the uncertainty goes beyond just our lives and relationships; even our jobs aren't spared. Which is why having a passive source of income is no longer just a dream, but a strategy that needs to be part of everyone's game Gen Z and Millennials are at the forefront of this passive income movement. These young (and not-so-young) investors are increasingly turning to rental real estate to build long-term wealth and financial generational shift is rewriting the rules of property ownership. No longer is real estate only a legacy asset handed down across decades. Today, it's a cash-flowing tool for freedom, lifestyle, and even content new-age income stack 'Gen Z and Millennials aren't just living off one paycheck anymore. They're stacking incomes,' says Arpit Bansal, CEO and founder of Sea Breeze Group. 'Rental income, especially in lifestyle markets like Goa, gives them the security and freedom to operate outside the 9-to-5 norm.'That shift is driven by multiple forces: job instability, rising inflation, a desire for autonomy, and exposure to global digital tools. According to Manjunath V., Managing Partner at Aakruthi Properties, 'They're finance-oriented, assessing ROI and rental yield using tech. Real estate isn't just a home—it's an asset that works for them.'From stability to utilityIf you go by the older idea of home or property ownership, it was mostly about stability, or it was something passed down by ancestors. The idea of functional ownership did exist, but the penetration wasn't nearly as widespread. Today, however, young investors are opting for Airbnb-style stays, co-living models, and content-friendly homes that generate income from Day One.'Young investors aren't waiting for long-term capital gains; they're activating properties now,' Bansal explains. 'Think pool villas, studio flats, or designer homes that are both income assets and lifestyle spaces.'Sarika Shetty, co-founder and CEO of RentenPe, echoes that: 'They're choosing properties with optionality. Not just for living, but for leasing, monetising, and reselling when needed. Ownership today is dynamic.'Gen Z, Millennials are making it look coolSiliguri's Shiwangi Chettri was stuck in her 9-5 job until she and her friends took that trip to Goa, which was life-changing, at least for her. During a conversation with a full-time Airbnb host who was also travelling the world while doing so, she realised that it could be her chance to try something new and break free from the burnout. A few months later, she became an Airbnb host herself.'I met someone who was running Airbnbs full-time while travelling the world, and doing it well. That moment gave me the social proof I didn't even know I needed,' she India, there might be people doing this full-time, but there aren't many creators or influencers openly sharing that journey. So I thought, maybe I could be that person. I quit my job, started from scratch, and poured my heart (and savings) into building something of my own,' she how Shiwangi's Airbnb business started. Now, in the process of figuring out how to do the business herself, she is also sharing her learnings with her followers on Instagram. View this post on Instagram A post shared by Shiwangi | Airbnb Host | Siliguri (@shiwangi_chhetri)Meanwhile, Sushmita Pramanick, a 25-year-old from Krishnanagar, West Bengal, started her homestay business from scratch in Manali. Today, she is not just managing the space she acquired in the beautiful Himalayas, but she is also diversifying her travel business step by step. The founder of 'Off The Cuff' community has been sharing her experiences of building everything from zero in her daily vlogs on Instagram. View this post on Instagram A post shared by Susmita Pramanick (@_rastaqueen_)advertisementSo, what can we conclude from their story?Pandemic push and the rise of holiday homesThe remote work boom during the pandemic didn't just trigger a migration, it changed how people view geography and homeownership.'Goa and Manali saw a surge of digital nomads. "Surprisingly, that trend hasn't reversed,' says Bansal. 'Young investors realised they could work from anywhere, so they invested where they'd want to live, or earn from.'Shetty adds, 'Second-tier cities and vacation destinations offer emotional yield in addition to financial returns. Homes now double as retreats and rentals.'The locationWhile metro cities still attract traditional investors, yields there are thinning. 'Most metros offer only 2–3 per cent annual rental returns,' says Bansal. 'But Goa and other lifestyle hubs are clocking 5–8 per cent, especially with short-stay models.'While the Tier 1 cities stand as the playground for seasoned real estate moguls, for first-timers or the ones willing to invest a small sum, touristy Tier 2 or 3 cities and offbeat locations are where they are of caution and adviceThe glamorisation of real estate on social media has played a double-edged role. It's inspired many, but also misled.'Social media has made property investing look like the coolest side hustle,' says Shetty. 'But it often skips the hard parts, upkeep, regulation, tenant issues, and local licensing.'All three experts agree: don't confuse aesthetics with ROI. 'Not every sea-facing home is profitable,' says Bansal. 'It takes careful acquisition, compliance, and local partnerships to make the model work.'Shetty advises first-time investors to 'start small and smart. Focus on consistent demand, legal clarity, and manageable properties. Use tech tools to streamline rent collection, screen tenants, and track costs. This is a business, treat it like one.'Manjunath recommends thinking long-term: 'Don't chase short-term hype. Look for areas with appreciation potential and steady tenant demand. Your first property should anchor your portfolio.'Bansal agrees. 'Passive income from rentals is passive only if professionally managed. Otherwise, it's a part-time job. Hidden costs like furnishing upgrades, taxes, and commissions often catch first-time investors off guard.'TakeawayIn an economy marked by volatility and fluidity, rental real estate is emerging as a rare constant: a flexible, functional asset that earns while you sleep, and works even harder if you do it right.- EndsMust Watch
India Today
41 minutes ago
- India Today
Tesla's brand loyalty took a hit after Musk backed Trump as US President: Report
Tesla for years had more repeat US customers than any other major automotive brand, but its loyalty has plunged since CEO Elon Musk endorsed President Donald Trump last summer, according to data from research firm S&P Global Mobility shared exclusively with data, which has not been previously reported, shows Tesla's customer loyalty peaked in June 2024, when 73% of Tesla-owning households in the market for a new car bought another Tesla, according to an S&P analysis of vehicle-registration data in all 50 industry-leading brand loyalty rate started to nosedive in July, that data showed, when Musk endorsed Trump following an assassination attempt in Pennsylvania on the Republican nominee. The rate bottomed out at 49.9% last March, just below the industry average, after Musk launched Trump's budget-slashing Department of Government Efficiency in January and started firing thousands of government US loyalty rate has since ticked back up to 57.4% in May, the most recent month the S&P data is available, putting it back above the industry average and about the same as Toyota but behind Chevrolet and Ford.S&P analyst Tom Libby called it "unprecedented" to see the runaway leader in customer loyalty fall so quickly to industry-average levels. "I've never seen this rapid of a decline in such a short period of time," he and Musk did not respond to requests for Monday, Tesla granted Musk 96 million shares worth about USD 29 billion, a move aimed at keeping the billionaire entrepreneur at the helm as he fights a court ruling that voided his original pay deal for being unfair to timing of Tesla's plunging brand loyalty suggests the CEO's involvement in politics turned off customers in the EV pioneer's eco-conscious customer base, some analysts said. "If they have Democratic leanings, then perhaps they consider other brands in addition to Tesla," said Seth Goldstein, an analyst at ageing model lineup also faces stiffer competition from an array of EVs from legacy automakers including General Motors, Hyundai and BMW. The only new model Tesla has released since 2020, its triangular Cybertruck, has proved a flop despite Musk's prediction of hundreds of thousands of annual an April earnings call, Tesla CFO Vaibhav Taneja singled out "the negative impact of vandalism and unwarranted hostility towards our brand and people," but also said there were "several weeks of lost production" when the company retooled factories to produce a refreshed version of its top-selling Model on the April call said that "absent macro issues, we don't see any reduction in demand".advertisementTesla vehicle sales overall are falling globally and have declined 8% in the United States the first five months of 2025, according to S&P. Sales fell 33% over the first six months of the year in Europe, where public backlash to Musk's politicking has been particularly increased political activism was "very bad timing" for Tesla, said Garrett Nelson, an analyst who tracks the EV maker at CFRA Research, because it came exactly as the company faced heightened competition from Chinese EV makers and other traditional automakers. He said his top concerns for Tesla are its loss of market share and "what can be done to repair the brand damage".LOYALTY NOSEDIVETesla remains the US electric-vehicle sales leader but has seen its dominance erode as Musk last year delved into politics and focused Tesla more on developing self-driving technology than on new affordable models for human loyalty is a closely watched auto-industry metric because it is "much more expensive" to take new customers from competitors than to retain existing ones, said S&P's Libby.S&P offers some of the most detailed industry data on automotive purchases because it analyses vehicle registration data from all 50 states on a household-by-household basis. Unlike survey data, it follows actual vehicle transactions to track how consumers migrate among brands and the fourth quarter of 2021 through the third quarter of last year, more than 60% of Tesla-owning households bought another one for their next car purchase, the data show. Only one other brand – Ford – posted a quarterly loyalty rate exceeding 60% during the period, and only DEFECTIONSS&P's data also examines another aspect of the automotive market: Which brands and models are taking customers away from others, and which ones are losing them?Until recently, Tesla was in a different stratosphere than other automotive brands on this metric. For the four years prior to July 2024, Tesla, on average, acquired nearly five new households for every one it lost to another other brand from a major automaker was even close: Hyundai's luxury Genesis brand was the next best, acquiring on average 2.8 households for every one it lost, followed by Kia and Hyundai, which acquired on average 1.5 and 1.4 households, respectively, for every one they lost. Ford, Toyota and Honda lost more households on average than they gained during that average inflow of customers started to decline in July 2024, along with its loyalty rate. Since February, Tesla has been gaining fewer than two households for every one it loses to the rest of the industry, its lowest level ever, according to the data."The data shows clearly that the net migration to Tesla is slowing," Libby that now attract more Tesla customers than they lose to Tesla include Rivian, Polestar, Porsche and Cadillac, the data Mulberry, client portfolio manager at Tesla investor Zacks Investment Management, said he isn't concerned about Tesla's long-term earnings because he expects enormous profits from its plans to operate robotaxis and licence self-driving technology to other launched a small test of robotaxis in Austin in June, giving rides to hand-picked fans and Internet personalities but the service isn't available to the general public. If Tesla succeeds in expanding the technology, Mulberry said, "there's a case to be made that Tesla doesn't need to sell cars and trucks anymore".- EndsTune InMust Watch
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
After Mumbai, Tesla to open showroom in Delhi's Aerocity on August 11
After Mumbai, Elon Musk's Tesla will be opening its second showroom in India on August 11. The showroom will be opened at Worldmark 3 in Aerocity for customers. Like the Mumbai showroom, this showroom is also expected to serve as a display and customer experience centre, offering visitors a chance to view the vehicles up close and understand Tesla's vehicle maker Tesla marked its entry into the Indian market with the launch of its first showroom in Bandra Kurla complex in Mumbai on July to Tesla's website, the company will begin its India journey with the Model Y SUV. The Model Y rear-wheel drive is priced at Rs 60 lakh (around USD 69,765) for customers paying in cash. The long-range rear-wheel drive variant comes in at a higher price of Rs 68 prices are higher than Tesla's base pricing in other markets. In the US, the Model Y starts at USD 44,990, while in China it is priced at 263,500 yuan, and in Germany at 45,970 higher price in India is mainly due to import duties, as the Model Y will be sold as a completely built unit (CBU).Tesla's Model Y units are expected to be imported from the company's Gigafactory in Shanghai. The Shanghai facility is currently the production hub for many of Tesla's international markets. For India, Tesla has so far imported six units of the Model Y SUV, which are expected to be used for display and test drives at the Mumbai with the vehicles, Tesla has also brought in supercharger equipment and accessories worth nearly USD 1 million to India.- EndsTune InMust Watch
