logo
US weekly jobless claims fall; job growth appears steady in July

US weekly jobless claims fall; job growth appears steady in July

Business Times17-07-2025
[WASHINGTON] The number of Americans filing new applications for jobless benefits fell last week, pointing to steady job growth in July, though some laid off workers are experiencing long spells of unemployment because of a moderation in hiring.
Initial claims for state unemployment benefits dropped 7,000 to a seasonally adjusted 221,000 for the week ended July 12, the Labor Department said on Thursday (Jul 17). Economists polled by Reuters had forecast 235,000 claims for the latest week.
Motor vehicle assembly plant closures for reasons including maintenance and annual retooling for new models could be influencing the data. Auto manufacturers typically idle assembly lines in summer, though the timing often varies, which could throw off the model that the government uses to strip out seasonal fluctuations from the data.
Layoffs have remained generally low, though economic uncertainty stemming from trade policy has left companies hesitant to increase hiring. President Donald Trump last week announced higher duties would come into effect on August 1 for imports from a range of countries, including Mexico, Japan, Canada and Brazil, and the European Union.
Trump in April slapped a 10 per cent duty on nearly all imports, while giving nations a 90-day period to negotiate trade deals.
The Federal Reserve's Beige Book report on Wednesday described hiring as having 'remained generally cautious' in early July, attributed by many of the US central bank's contacts to 'ongoing economic and policy uncertainty.'
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
The Fed said while reports of layoffs were limited in all industries, they were 'somewhat more common among manufacturers.' It noted that 'many contacts expected to postpone major hiring and layoff decisions until uncertainty diminished.'
The claims report covered the period during which the government surveyed employers for the nonfarm payrolls component of July's employment report. Nonfarm payrolls increased by 147,000 jobs in June, though nearly half of the positions were in the government sector, mostly state education.
Tepid hiring is underscored by the growing number of people collecting unemployment checks. The number of people receiving benefits after an initial week of aid, a proxy for hiring, increased 2,000 to a seasonally adjusted 1.956 million during the week ending July 5. The start of a new quarter could have influenced the current level of the so-called continuing claims.
'Eligibility for benefits can be affected by calendar-quarter considerations, leading to large swings in the underlying data,' said Lou Crandall, chief economist at Wrightson ICAP.
Next week's continuing claims data could offer more clarity on the health of the labour market in July. Economists said the elevated continuing claims reading suggested an increase in the unemployment rate. While the jobless rate fell to 4.1 per cent in June after holding at 4.2 per cent for three straight months, that was mostly because people dropped out of the labour force. REUTERS
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Big Tech earnings strength is bright light in murky stock market
Big Tech earnings strength is bright light in murky stock market

Straits Times

time2 hours ago

  • Straits Times

Big Tech earnings strength is bright light in murky stock market

The Nasdaq 100 index remains up more than 30 per cent off its low from early April. NEW YORK – Wall Street had a lot riding on whether this week's big-tech earnings would meet increasingly high expectations. By and large, the companies delivered. The stock market finished the week on a down note with the selloff on Aug 1, which was in part sparked by mixed results from after the market closed on July 31, as well as a weak jobs report and fears about the economic impact of President Donald Trump's sweeping global tariffs. But for the most part, investors looking for strength from technology companies to justify their market leadership found plenty of it in their reports. 'The sector is proving itself to have something like Teflon status, as fundamentals look strong, revenue growth has come in quite significantly higher than expected, and margins remain relatively healthy,' said Kevin Gordon, senior investment strategist at Charles Schwab & Co. 'While things aren't perfect, and valuations are nearing a level that has acted as a ceiling in the past, we still have a high degree of optimism, especially as we go up the market-cap spectrum.' Alphabet started the season off by reporting strong sales, lifted by artificial intelligence. Last week, Apple posted its strongest revenue growth in more than three years, while Meta Platforms spiked to a record as it beat expectations and outlined aggressive spending on AI. Microsoft Corp. reported robust strength in its cloud business on the back of AI demand, enough to temporarily lift it to a US$4 trillion market capitalisation, only the second company ever to do so. The stock has risen for 10 straight weeks, its longest streak since 2023. Amazon was the exception, offering a tepid forecast due to relatively slow growth in its cloud-computing division and heavy investments into AI. From here, investors will turn to chip behemoth Nvidia, which reports at the end of the month. The Nasdaq 100 Index finished the week down 2.2 per cent, with much of the drop coming on Aug 1. However, the Nasdaq 100 remains up more than 30 per cent off its low from early April, while the Mag Seven Index is up more than 40 per cent. Those gains are raising questions among some Wall Street pros about whether the rally in tech has become overly stretched. The Nasdaq 100 is trading at nearly 27 times estimated earnings, well above its 10-year average of 22. Overall, however, none of the companies that have reported are showing dramatically weakening fundamentals, which is particularly important as uncertainty continues to swirl around the impact of trade policy and tariffs. More than 96 per cent of tech firms in the S&P 500 Index have topped expectations for profits, while roughly 93 per cent have for revenue, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. For the index overall, the beat rates stand at 82 per cent for earnings and 68 per cent for revenue. While Wall Street has long been broadly positive on big tech, last week's results reinforced it's continuing potential. The Magnificent Seven are expected to see earnings growth of 24.2 per cent this year, a dramatic increase from the 21.4 per cent pace that was predicted just a month ago, according to Bloomberg Intelligence data. Revenues are anticipated to rise 13.4 per cent, up from the 11.5 per cent pace seen in early July. Of course, that level of growth would represent a deceleration from last year, when the Mag Seven's net income rose 36 per cent and revenue gained 14 per cent. But the group continues to outgrow the broader market, which is expected to see earnings expand by 8.9 per cent in 2025 on revenue growth of 5.5 per cent. 'This slowing is understandable given how quickly these names were growing, and for how long,' said Mr Michael Nell, a senior investment analyst and portfolio manager at UBS Asset Management. 'We're not seeing the kind of dramatic deceleration that would be a cause for concern, just a reflection that these large companies can't grow to the sky forever.' Now investors are waiting on Nvidia, the chipmaker at the heart of the AI boom and the world's biggest company, which is scheduled to release its earnings on Aug 27. Advanced Micro Devices, its much-smaller rival in AI processors, reports on Aug 5. The bottom line for both is that big tech reaffirmed their intention to continue spending on AI, as Meta, Microsoft, Alphabet and Amazon all increased their plans for capital expenditures. That represents a cluster of encouraging data points for Nvidia, which derives more than 40 per cent of its revenue from those four companies, according to supply chain data compiled by Bloomberg. 'Use cases for AI are emerging and some companies are already seeing a payoff, meaning this isn't speculative anymore,' Mr Nell said. 'That doesn't mean big tech can't get ahead of themselves and pull back, but tech is on an inexorable march to be a larger and larger part of the market. That's been the trend my whole career, and I don't know why it would stop now.' BLOOMBERG

How Pakistan shot down India's cutting-edge fighter using Chinese gear, Asia News
How Pakistan shot down India's cutting-edge fighter using Chinese gear, Asia News

AsiaOne

time2 hours ago

  • AsiaOne

How Pakistan shot down India's cutting-edge fighter using Chinese gear, Asia News

ISLAMABAD/NEW DELHI — Just after midnight on May 7, the screen in the Pakistan Air Force's operations room lit up in red with the positions of dozens of active enemy planes across the border in India. Air Chief Mshl. Zaheer Sidhu had been sleeping on a mattress just off that room for days in anticipation of an Indian assault. New Delhi had blamed Islamabad for backing militants who carried out an attack the previous month in Indian Kashmir, which killed 26 civilians. Despite Islamabad denying any involvement, India had vowed a response, which came in the early hours of May 7 with air strikes on Pakistan. Sidhu ordered Pakistan's prized Chinese-made J-10C jets to scramble. A senior Pakistani Air Force (PAF) official, who was present in the operations room, said Sidhu instructed his staff to target Rafales, a French-made fighter that is the jewel of India's fleet and had never been downed in battle. "He wanted Rafales," said the official. The hour-long fight, which took place in darkness, involved some 110 aircraft, experts estimate, making it the world's largest air battle in decades. The J-10s shot down at least one Rafale, Reuters reported in May, citing US officials. Its downing surprised many in the military community and raised questions about the effectiveness of Western military hardware against untested Chinese alternatives. Shares of Dassault, which makes the Rafale, dipped after reports the fighter had been shot down. Indonesia, which has outstanding Rafale orders, has said it is now considering purchasing J-10s — a major boost to China's efforts to sell the aircraft overseas. But Reuters interviews with two Indian officials and three of their Pakistani counterparts found that the performance of the Rafale wasn't the key problem: Central to its downing was an Indian intelligence failure concerning the range of the China-made PL-15 missile fired by the J-10 fighter. China and Pakistan are the only countries to operate both J-10s, known as Vigorous Dragons, and PL-15s. The faulty intelligence gave the Rafale pilots a false sense of confidence they were out of Pakistani firing distance, which they believed was only around 150km, the Indian officials said, referring to the widely cited range of PL-15's export variant. "We ambushed them," the PAF official said, adding that Islamabad conducted an electronic warfare assault on Delhi's systems in an attempt to confuse Indian pilots. Indian officials dispute the effectiveness of those efforts. "The Indians were not expecting to be shot at," said Justin Bronk, air warfare expert at London's Royal United Services Institute (RUSI) think-tank. "And the PL-15 is clearly very capable at long range." The PL-15 that hit the Rafale was fired from around 200km away, according to Pakistani officials, and even farther according to Indian officials. That would make it among the longest-range air-to-air strikes recorded. India's defence and foreign ministries did not return requests for comment about the intelligence mistakes. Delhi hasn't acknowledged a Rafale being shot down, but France's air chief told reporters in June that he had seen evidence of the loss of that fighter and two other aircraft flown by India, including a Russian-made Sukhoi. A top Dassault executive also told French lawmakers that month that India had lost a Rafale in operations, though he didn't have specific details. Pakistan's military referred to past comments by a spokesperson who said that its professional preparedness and resolve was more important than the weaponry it had deployed. China's defence ministry did not respond to Reuters' questions. Dassault and UAC, the manufacturer of the Sukhoi, also did not return requests for comment. 'Situational awareness' Reuters spoke to eight Pakistani and two Indian officials to piece together an account of the aerial battle, which marked the start of four days of fighting between the two nuclear-armed neighbours that caused alarm in Washington. The officials all spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss national security matters. Not only did Islamabad have the element of surprise with its missiles' range, the Pakistani and Indian officials said, but it managed to more efficiently connect its military hardware to surveillance on the ground and in the air, providing it with a clearer picture of the battlefield. Such networks, known as "kill chains", have become a crucial element of modern warfare. Four Pakistani officials said they created a "kill chain", or a multi-domain operation, by linking air, land and space sensors. The network included a Pakistani-developed system, Data Link 17, which connected Chinese military hardware with other equipment, including a Swedish-made surveillance plane, two Pakistani officials said. The system allowed the J-10s flying closer to India to obtain radar feeds from the surveillance plane cruising further away, meaning the Chinese-made fighters could turn their radars off and fly undetected, according to experts. Pakistan's military did not respond to requests for comment on this point. Delhi is trying to set up a similar network, the Indian officials said, adding that their process was more complicated because the country sourced aircraft from a wide range of exporters. Retired UK Air Mshl. Greg Bagwell, now a fellow at RUSI, said the episode didn't conclusively prove the superiority of either Chinese or Western air assets but it showed the importance of having the right information and using it. "The winner in this was the side that had the best situational awareness," said Bagwell. [[nid:720388]] Change in tactics After India in the early hours of May 7 struck targets in Pakistan that it called terrorist infrastructure, Sidhu ordered his squadrons to switch from defence to attack. Five PAF officials said India had deployed some 70 planes, which was more than they had expected and provided Islamabad's PL-15s with a target-rich environment. India has not said how many planes were used. The May 7 battle marked the first big air contest of the modern era in which weaponry is used to strike targets beyond visual range, said Bagwell, noting both India and Pakistan's planes remained well within their airspaces across the duration of the fight. Five Pakistani officials said an electronic assault on Indian sensors and communications systems reduced the situational awareness of the Rafale's pilots. The two Indian officials said the Rafales were not blinded during the skirmishes and that Indian satellites were not jammed. But they acknowledged that Pakistan appeared to have disrupted the Sukhoi, whose systems Delhi is now upgrading. Other Indian security officials have deflected questions away from the Rafale, a centerpiece of India's military modernisation, to the orders given to the air force. India's defence attache in Jakarta told a university seminar that Delhi had lost some aircraft "only because of the constraint given by the political leadership to not attack [Pakistan's] military establishments and their air defences". India's chief of defence staff Gen. Anil Chauhan previously told Reuters that Delhi quickly "rectified tactics" after the initial losses. After the May 7 air battle, India began targeting Pakistani military infrastructure and asserting its strength in the skies. Its Indian-made BrahMos supersonic cruise missile repeatedly sliced through Pakistan's air defences, according to officials on both sides. On May 10, India said it struck at least nine air bases and radar sites in Pakistan. It also hit a surveillance plane parked in a hangar in southern Pakistan, according to Indian and Pakistani officials. A ceasefire was agreed later that day, after US officials held talks with both sides. 'Live inputs' In the aftermath of the episode, India's deputy army chief Lt. Gen. Rahul Singh accused Pakistan of receiving "live inputs" from China during the battles, implying radar and satellite feeds. He did not provide evidence and Islamabad denies the allegation. When asked at a July briefing about Beijing's military partnership with Pakistan, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Mao Ning told reporters the work was "part of the normal co-operation between the two countries and does not target any third party." Beijing's air chief Lt. Gen. Wang Gang visited Pakistan in July to discuss how Islamabad had used Chinese equipment to put together the "kill chain" for the Rafale, two PAF officials said. China did not respond when asked about that interaction. The Pakistani military said in a statement in July that Wang had expressed "keen interest in learning from PAF's battle-proven experience in Multi Domain Operations". ALSO READ: Defence minister denies India bowed to pressure to end fighting with Pakistan

After a lag, US consumers begin to feel the pinch of tariffs
After a lag, US consumers begin to feel the pinch of tariffs

Straits Times

time2 hours ago

  • Straits Times

After a lag, US consumers begin to feel the pinch of tariffs

Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Government data showed prices rose in June on items heavily exposed to tariffs, such as home furnishings, toys and appliances. Companies are starting to shift more tariff-related costs onto consumers. Many businesses chose to absorb the additional tax during the early days of President Donald Trump's trade war . But evidence is emerging that they are running out of options to keep prices stable in the face of deteriorating profit margins, suggesting that the tariffs could have a more pronounced effect on prices in the months ahead. Government data shows that prices rose in June on items heavily exposed to tariffs, such as home furnishings, toys and appliances. And in recent days – before Mr Trump announced tariffs for much of the world on the night of July 31 – Adidas, Procter & Gamble, Stanley Black & Decker and other large corporations told investors that they either had increased prices or planned to do so soon to offset the tariff costs. Companies like Walmart and toy makers Hasbro and Mattel had already warned that tariffs would lead to higher prices. 'We have no interest in running a lower-margin business, particularly due to tariffs,' Mr Richard Westenberger, the chief financial officer of Carter's, a children's apparel maker, said on a call with analysts July 25. 'And if this is something that's going to be a permanent increase to our cost structure, we have to find a way to cover it.' Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Despite bag checks and warnings, young partygoers continue to vape in clubs in Singapore Singapore Ong Beng Seng to plead guilty on Aug 4, more than 2 years after trip to Qatar with Iswaran Singapore LTA, Singapore bus operators reviewing Malaysia's request to start services from JB at 4am Singapore NDP 2025: Veteran Red Lion says each leap 'feels like 5km run' Business Decoupling to save on tax? You may lose right to property if ties go awry Singapore Lessons learnt from Singapore's love-hate relationship with e-scooters Opinion At UN's Wipo, Singaporean Daren Tang strives to create an equal music for haves and have-nots Asia Mass grave with over 100 skeletons in Sri Lanka brings up old wounds Economists have been watching for signs of tariff-related price increases since Mr Trump rolled out his trade policy in the spring. But inflation remained relatively muted, defying expectations and prompting the White House to declare that those who predicted the tariffs would elevate prices were mistaken. Even some forecasters are acknowledging that the tariffs have taken longer to work their way through to consumer prices than initially anticipated. Mr Jerome Powell, chair of the Federal Reserve, said on July 30 that the process might be 'slower than expected at the beginning'. 'We think we have a long way to go to really understand exactly how it will be,' he said. Ms Sarah House, an economist at Wells Fargo, said the next three to six months would be 'crunch time,' as more tariff rates solidified. 'Businesses are grappling with the fact that tariffs are here to stay, and as there's more certainty around a higher tariff environment, they are going to be more willing and able to adjust their prices,' she said. 'We're getting to a point where you're going to start to see those feed through.' NYTIMES

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store