
Since George Floyd's Murder, Police Killings Keep Rising, Not Falling
Yet five years later, despite the largest racial justice protests since the civil rights era of the 1960s and a wave of measures to improve training and hold officers more accountable, the number of people killed by the police continues to rise each year, and Black Americans still die in disproportionate numbers.
Last year, the police killed at least 1,226 people, an 18 percent increase over 2019, the year before Mr. Floyd was killed, according to an analysis by The New York Times drawing on data compiled by The Washington Post and the nonprofit Mapping Police Violence. The vast majority of such cases have been shootings, and the vast majority of the people killed were reported to be armed. But police officers, as in the past, also killed people who had no weapon at all, some in the same manner as Mr. Floyd: pinned down by an officer and yelling, 'I can't breathe.'
Among them was Frank Tyson, an unarmed Black man in Canton, Ohio, who uttered Mr. Floyd's famous words last year before dying when he was wrestled to the ground in a bar by police officers. This happened even though police departments around the country, especially in the aftermath of Mr. Floyd's murder, have known about the dangers of asphyxiation when keeping a suspect in the prone position. (Two officers were charged with homicide in Mr. Tyson's death.)
Derek Chauvin, the officer who knelt on Mr. Floyd's neck for more than nine minutes as he gasped for air, was convicted and sentenced to prison, along with three other officers who were on the scene. But even as the number of police killings has risen in the years since, it has remained exceedingly rare for officers to be charged with crimes for those deaths.
Last year, for example, 16 officers were charged with either murder or manslaughter in a fatal shooting, the same number as in 2020, according to data tracked by Philip M. Stinson, a professor of criminal justice at Bowling Green State University in Ohio.
Mr. Stinson said that given 'all of the promise of five years ago, in terms of the promises of police reform, from where I sit, the reality is that policing hasn't changed.'
Experts say it is difficult to draw definitive answers from the data about why police killings continue to rise without an analysis of the circumstances of each case. But they have plenty of theories about what may have contributed to the problem.
An increasing number of guns in circulation heightens the chances of deadly encounters. A backlash against the police reform movement in conservative states may have empowered the police in those places. And the decline in public trust in the police after Mr. Floyd's murder may have led to more deadly encounters.
'Public perception of policing can matter here,' said Seth Stoughton, a former police officer who is a law professor at the University of South Carolina and frequently testifies about use-of-force policies in criminal trials of officers. 'When police are viewed as more legitimate, folks are more likely to comply. When police are viewed as less legitimate, people are less likely to comply and more likely to resist, and that can increase the rates of violence.'
While answers may be elusive, here are some of the underlying trends that might explain the shifting nature of police violence in the United States.
After Mr. Floyd's killing, many Democratic-run states and cities made more robust changes to policing. And culturally, in more-liberal states, there were much louder calls for the police to be reined in.
This might help explain why there is a growing divide in where people are being killed by the police. In more-liberal states, the rate has stabilized, but in more-conservative ones, the numbers have risen.
If measured over the last 10 years, since the police killing of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Mo., in 2014 sparked wide-scale protests, fatal police shootings in more-Democratic states have declined 15 percent on a population-adjusted basis, with the rate holding relatively steady since Mr. Floyd's death.
But in Republican-leaning states, they have risen 23 percent. And within those redder states, exurbs and rural areas, which tend to be more conservative than cities, have the highest rates of police killings.
Christina Beeler, a senior supervising attorney at the Texas Civil Rights Project, said officials across that state had resisted efforts to make police departments more accountable and transparent.
'The pendulum has swung back and, in some ways, has gone further than where it was before,' she said.
Even as police killings have risen in the years since the killing of Mr. Floyd, killings of unarmed people have become less frequent.
The numbers have fluctuated over the years, but have dropped significantly since 2015, when 152 people killed by the police were unarmed. In 2020, that number was 95, and last year, it dropped to 53. The number of people killed while wielding replica weapons, fake guns that look like the real thing, has also dropped.
Still, experts were split on why the drop may have occurred and how much weight to give the data. They said it was one of several statistics that would benefit from a more comprehensive national database of police use of force.
Some suggested the decrease in the number of unarmed people being killed could be a natural outcome in a country where a large percentage of people own guns. It is difficult to evaluate gun ownership in the United States, but polls have shown that more than 40 percent of adults report having a gun in their household.
'In a world in which we are awash in guns, and getting more awash, that's what's going to happen,' said Barry Friedman, a professor at New York University's law school who specializes in policing.
Others were more skeptical.
Justin Nix, an associate professor at the University of Nebraska, Omaha, said he hoped that the data was a reflection of improvements in policing and training, but that he was hesitant to draw any conclusions. That's in part because of how rare police killings of unarmed people are and the fluctuating number of cases where it is unclear whether the person who was killed had a weapon.
Mr. Nix, whose focus is on criminology and criminal justice, said the difficulty in interpreting the data was indicative of a larger problem, which is that data on police force and killings remains sparse. For example, he noted, there is very little data on police shootings in which a person is not killed. One study estimated that there were roughly 800 of these nonfatal shootings each year.
Despite the rise in the overall number of police killings, legislators across the country have rolled back several attempts to reduce police violence.
In Washington State, lawmakers passed an initiative last year that rolled back a law, passed in 2021, that had imposed limits on when the police could chase suspects in their cars. This year, Alabama enacted a new law seeking to make it harder to prosecute or sue police officers. Oregon in 2022 loosened the standard for when the police could use tear gas after tightening regulations just a year earlier.
The federal government, under the Trump administration, has also pulled back from holding law enforcement agencies accountable.
This week, the Justice Department said it would no longer investigate or oversee nearly two dozen police departments that were accused of civil rights violations, including in Minneapolis and Louisville, Ky. And in April, President Trump signed an executive order aimed at 'unleashing' law enforcement, including by directing the U.S. attorney general to 'provide legal resources' to defend police officers accused of wrongdoing.
Mr. Nix, the criminal justice professor in Nebraska, said the demands of constituents had changed in many places since the immediate aftermath of Mr. Floyd's death.
'The climate is perceived as a little bit more friendly to policing,' he said. 'Things that are perceived as unnecessarily tying the hands of police, you're going to see those get rolled back.'
On the other hand, Mr. Nix said, many changes — including the use of body cameras, transparency measures and training on de-escalation — are focused on a broader range of goals than reducing police killings. Some, for example, train the police in better empathizing with those they encounter.
'In the aggregate, that spells better police-citizen interactions,' he said. But he said any significant reduction in the number of people killed by the police would require doing more than just focusing on department policies and involve a host of 'societal factors that go way beyond the police.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump Wants a Piece of Intel -- And Wall Street Is All Ears
The Trump administration could be gearing up for a bold move: a direct equity stake in Intel (NASDAQ:INTC). According to people familiar with the talks, the potential deal is aimed at reviving Intel's long-delayed factory project in Ohio, once promised to be the largest chipmaking hub in the world. Shares jumped 7.4% to $23.86 on the day of the news and gained as much as another 4% after hours, as the market reacted to the possibility of federal backing. The discussions come just days after President Donald Trump met with Intel's new CEO Lip-Bu Tan, whom he recently criticized for alleged ties to China. While the deal's details are still in fluxand could fall apartany move would signal Tan's job is likely safe for now. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 10 Warning Signs with INTC. This wouldn't be the first time the Trump administration takes a hands-on approach with corporate America. It recently took a 15% cut of certain semiconductor sales to China and secured a golden share in U.S. Steel to help clear a foreign acquisition. Even more surprising? The Pentagon just became the biggest shareholder in MP Materials (NYSE:MP) with a $400 million preferred equity deal. If Intel follows the same playbook, investors could see a blend of equity, guaranteed purchases, and government-led financingsomething the White House sees as a way to crowd in private capital while reassuring markets that the U.S. government has skin in the game. Intel's Ohio site was expected to benefit heavily from the 2022 CHIPS Act, but with funding momentum now uncertain, a direct government stake could change the equation. The factory buildout has already been pushed into the 2030s, and Tan has shifted focus toward stabilizing the company's finances. Earlier this year, one idea floated was to have TSMC (NYSE:TSM) operate Intel's factories under a joint venturebut that plan never advanced. What's unfolding now could become a new chapter in U.S. industrial policy: one where Washington doesn't just regulate or subsidizebut invests, owns, and influences. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Sign in to access your portfolio


CNN
19 minutes ago
- CNN
Man yells for help as apparent ICE agents carry him from LA courthouse into unmarked car, video shows
A man yelled for help as a group of men – one of whom said he was with Immigration and Customs Enforcement – picked him up and pushed him into a car outside a Los Angeles courthouse Wednesday, video shows. The detention has been condemned by the county's top judge and the man's lawyers, who said such operations will deter people from showing up to court. Video obtained by the Los Angeles Times shows the man being carried away with his hands bound behind his back. Those detaining him are in plainclothes, and some are wearing masks. The detained man repeatedly screams, 'Can you help me, please?' as his body flails. The man is then pushed into the back seat of an unmarked car. It's not clear where he was taken. Neither ICE nor the Department of Homeland Security responded to CNN's questions about whether ICE was involved in the detention or why the man was detained. But the incident happened as ICE increasingly make arrests at courthouses under recent guidance from the Trump administration. Los Angeles County Superior Court's presiding judge issued a critical statement in response to questions about Wednesday's incident, saying such operations will have a negative effect on the judicial system. 'While the court is rarely notified of federal immigration enforcement activity occurring outside our courthouse, I am deeply disturbed by such actions,' the presiding judge, Sergio C. Tapia II, said in a release. 'These intimidating and unnecessary displays undermine public trust in the justice system, deter people from seeking justice, and send a dangerous message to immigrant communities that they are not safe to fully and freely participate in the legal process.' In Wednesday's video, an onlooker asks for the name of the man being detained, and he replies, 'Steven Reyes.' Court records show a man named Steven Reyes, who is represented by the Los Angeles County Alternate Public Defender's Office, had an appearance at the county's criminal justice center Wednesday on a state felony charge of having or buying illegal drugs with the intent to sell them. Records show he had pleaded not guilty to the charge on July 31 and was free on his own recognizance. The man detained in the video is represented by the Los Angeles County Alternate Public Defender's Office, spokesperson Jenny Cheng said. She did not confirm if the man detained is the same Steven Reyes with the drug charge. 'These alleged ICE agents, without a warrant or any explanation, clearly deprived our client of his liberty without due process,' Cheng said in an email to CNN. 'It shocks the conscience to see any human violently abducted by a group of mostly masked unidentified individuals. Such aggressive ICE abductions threaten the integrity of the court system and discourage participation.' Wednesday's detention happened outside the Clara Shortridge Foltz Criminal Justice Center, according to the Times and the LA Public Press, which told CNN it obtained the video from a witness and published a shorter, edited clip on social media. In the longer video published by the Times, an onlooker asks one of the men detaining Reyes whether he is from ICE. The man responds, 'yes.' When further questioned by an onlooker, the man quickly flashes a badge twice. While the footage is too blurry to show exactly what the badge says, it resembles a Homeland Security Investigations badge. The person who appears to be taking the video asks if the men have arrest warrants, and the men do not respond to that question. CNN has reached out to ICE for information about the arrest, whether Reyes is in the country illegally, whether he is in ICE custody, where he is being held, and exactly what charges he faces. ICE and the Department of Homeland Security previously operated under guidelines that limited immigration enforcement at or near courthouses, but the Trump administration rescinded those guidelines shortly into the president's second term. Masked law enforcement officers have been showing up at courthouses across the country to arrest migrants. Trump officials have argued the previous guidance hampered the ability of immigration enforcement officers to apprehend people they say are dangerous individuals. 'The ability of law enforcement to make arrests of criminal illegal aliens in courthouses is common sense,' DHS spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin said in a May news release. 'It conserves valuable law enforcement resources because they already know where a target will be. It is also safer for our officers and the community. These illegal aliens have gone through security and been screened to not have any weapons.' Immigrant rights groups have said the increasing number of courthouse arrests by ICE reflect a broader trend of enforcement extending into places once considered out of bounds and no longer confined to border crossings or work sites. The Los Angeles County district attorney's office, which is prosecuting Reyes for the drug charge, said it had no prior knowledge of and played no part in Wednesday's detention outside of court. 'Our ultimate goal is to seek justice for victims and hold criminals accountable,' the district attorney's office wrote in a statement. 'Detaining a defendant before the judicial process has concluded interferes with our ability to prosecute cases and is not to the advantage of the pursuit of justice.' CNN's Holly Yan, Caroll Alvarado and Sara Smart contributed to this report.


Bloomberg
19 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Trump, Putin Talks Continue at Ukraine Summit in Alaska
Discussions between President Donald Trump and Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin extended into a second hour at a summit in Alaska. Meanwhile, the US is reportedly weighing the threat of sanctions against Russian oil companies Rosneft PJSC and Lukoil PJSC as an option to push President Vladimir Putin to accept a ceasefire with Ukraine. Annmarie Hordern reports on Bloomberg Television. (Source: Bloomberg)