Joan Didion's ‘Notes to John' may be a gift. And yet, I wish her the privacy she relished
The memoirs Didion published after the deaths of her husband, writer John Gregory Dunne, and their daughter, Quintana — 'The Year of Magical Thinking' (2005) and 'Blue Nights' (2011) — are her most personal, excavating her grief to produce works that are by turns deadpan, wrenching, restrained, operatic. She is excruciatingly introspective but in perfect control of every sentence and emotion — withholding, sparing or repeating words to produce observations that gleam with intelligence and insight but keep their author shadowed.
Didion died in 2021 at 87, and her literary trustees authorized the publication of observations she documented during an especially fraught personal period when she was seeing a psychiatrist to navigate her daughter's alcoholism and possibly suicidal tendencies. Those sessions are capsulized in 'Notes to John,' journal-like entries that were addressed to Didion's husband, who was mostly absent from the appointments.
Didion's therapist — a strict Freudian named Roger MacKinnon — was in regular communication with Quintana's shrink. MacKinnon shared information gleaned about Quintana with Didion, unbeknownst to Quintana. It appears as though MacKinnon never met Quintana, and yet he doesn't hesitate to characterize her codependency, or to interpret certain behaviors as manipulative, or to dismiss Didion's fear that she might take her own life. When Didion expresses guilt that her adopted daughter is in such a 'labile' state, he offers:
'Don't take all the blame on yourself, she's a very difficult person, a very hard case.' 'You feel imprisoned by responsibility for her,' he intones. 'You're allowing her to hold you prisoner.' This serves to reassure Didion. Meeting after meeting, they repeat the theme: Quintana's problems may have been exacerbated by the impenetrability of her parents' bond, or by her mother's tendency to distance. In MacKinnon's words to Didion: 'You rather spectacularly lack the skills for dealing with other people.'
The question haunting this book is whether an author so private that she revealed her breast cancer diagnosis to just two friends — Alice and Calvin Trillin — would have wanted her intimate, unedited reflections to be shared with readers. Close friends and family who have survived her appear split on this issue, with the majority coming down on the side of probably not. The document would have been made public in the archive she bequeathed to the New York Public Library, but if deposited there without the attention a book launch garners, they might have been relegated to obscurity.
Fame is no doubt a rare gift, but also cruel, with every bread crumb counting as an essential clue. I came away from 'Notes to John' feeling discomfited and saddened — though literary scholars may read it as providing context with which to deconstruct a great writer's oeuvre. To Didion's Freudian analyst, the mother-daughter dynamic was everything, and the book suggests that the mother fell short. She professed love for Quintana, about whom she obsessed. But here she is ambivalent both about the maternal role and even, at times, about her daughter. She confesses to MacKinnon, 'It had occurred to me at several points that I didn't like her.' She says, 'All my life I have turned away from people who were trouble to me. Cut them out of my life. I can't have that happen with Quintana.'
From the outside, Didion seemed to be to be inscrutable, glamorous, insanely gifted and invulnerable. But Quintana, these pages reveal, saw her mother as 'fragile,' if intimidating. How did Didion view herself? 'A friend once remarked,' she writes, 'that while most people had very strong, competent exteriors and were a bowl of jelly inside, I was just the opposite.' Her ethereal look masked her interior stoniness and likely facilitated her extraordinary powers of observation and reporting. This volume penetrates that shell to expose a woman entering her elder years as dealing with emergency rooms, hip fractures, vertigo and the necessity to shed the red suede high-heeled shoes and hoop earrings that distinguished her outward style. She continued to share details of her 'late life crisis' until 2012 with MacKinnon if no one else, well after Quintana and John were gone, and 10 years after she stopped documenting their sessions.
Ultimately, 'Notes to John' may be a gift. Didion broke barriers, refusing to feel remorse over valuing her career above all else and forging a language that can only be described as Didionesque. Should her insecurities and parental doubts be in the public domain? Most everything is now. She must have known that, as an icon, her life would be studied from every angle for decades to come. And yet, I wish her the privacy she relished. But these latest revelations only thicken the mystery: Who was Joan Didion?
Haber is a writer, editor and publishing strategist. She was director of Oprah's Book Club and books editor for O, the Oprah Magazine.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Vogue
a day ago
- Vogue
The Beauty Marc Jacobs Found for His Fall 2025 Collection
For his Fall 2025 ready-to-wear collection, Marc Jacobs went in search of beauty. And we saw the fruits of his long-nailed, permed hair labor through the marbled halls of the New York Public Library—with the help of longtime collaborators, makeup artist Pat McGrath and hairstylist Duffy. 'Marc was obsessed with the idea of simple beauty,' McGrath shared backstage just an hour before the show, while her fingertips were still gently dabbing model Alex Consani. 'Pure poetry.' The result felt a bit like early Veruschka von Lehndorff—each of the 19 models had smudgy, cool eyeshadow shades around the eyes, a bright, healthy cheek, and a liner rubbed into the lips to resemble their own lips. The most makeup-y part of the look was a swipe of McGrath's best-selling Skin Fetish Highlighter & Balm Duo at the inner corner of the eyes. 'It's a trick that really gives light to the eyes.' Photographed by Huy Luong For hair, Duffy's biggest tool of the night was creasless clips. Each and every model, from the uber-extensioned Daria to bobbed Wali had their hair held in place by the clips until the moment they stepped onto the runway. 'When it came to creating a look, this was a challenging season because the beauty wasn't prescribed in the beginning,' the hairstylist says. 'Each of these models means something to him, so we treated each of the girls individually.' For a handful of models, flat bows in an array of sizes were fashioned out of felt—and extension Jacob's obsession with doll-like beauty we have seen over the past few seasons. In the show notes, Jacobs described beauty as 'a quality or combination of qualities that gives pleasure to the mind or senses and is often associated with properties such as harmony of form or color, proportion, and authenticity.'


New York Post
5 days ago
- New York Post
‘A Chorus Line' turns 50 — and Broadway is desperate for another hit musical like it
Watching a new Broadway musical early on, you can always tell when one is going to be really big. The standing ovation is physically involuntary — not out of politeness or a ploy to be first in line to the bathroom. The departing audience's euphoric buzz drowns out the din in Times Square — where the air suddenly smells sweet. And your last thought as you leave the theater is the first word of one of the greatest really big musicals of all time: 'Again.' 5 'A Chorus Line' opened 50 years ago on Broadway. Kevin Mazur That's 'A Chorus Line,' Marvin Hamlisch and Edward Kleban's heart-stopper of a show about the inner lives of dancers that had its first performance on Broadway 50 years ago on Friday. The supremely inventive piece — conceived, directed and choreographed by the genius Michael Bennett — revitalized Broadway and New York City in the 1970s with electricity, humanity and modernity during a fallow period. 'A Chorus Line' became a giant unlikely hit and gave us the songs 'What I Did For Love,' 'The Music and the Mirror' and 'One.' Its unitard-clad actors step, kick, kick, leap, kick, touched at the Shubert Theater for 15 years. From the start, everybody knew it was the 'One.' Post theater critic Martin Gottfried reviewed the experimental musical in its first risky days downtown at the Public Theater, well before the non-profit venue got a reputation as an incubator of Broadway musicals. By curtain, he realized he'd just experienced a singular sensation. 5 Donna McKechnie starred in the original production of 'A Chorus Line' on Broadway. Martha Swope/New York Public Library 5 Innovative 'A Chorus Line' tells the story of struggling Broadway dancers trying to get a gig. New York Post 'As 'A Chorus Line' launched into its finale on opening night at the Newman Theater, the audience rose and cheered,' Gottfried wrote. 'Its applause continued throughout the number. I can't recall that happening ever before.' Goosebumps. And a historic moment worth celebrating. For me, however, the mood of 'A Chorus Line''s half-century fete is bittersweet. Because the last time I walked out of a new Broadway musical feeling the thrill of having just watched a really big hit was a decade ago. Not since exiting the doors of Lin-Manuel Miranda's 'Hamilton,' which will party for its own 10th anniversary on August 6th. 5 'Hamilton,' which opened 10 years ago, was Broadway's last truly major hit. AP There have been wonderful, profitable shows post-'Ham,' of course, such as 'Dear Evan Hansen' and 'Come From Away.' But not the sort of musicals your cousin Ann in Oshkosh texts you nonstop for tickets to. Beg, borrow, steal shows. 'Maybe we could sell our French Bulldog' shows. Those flagships' absence is glaring and alarming. During the 40 years from 'A Chorus Line' to 'Hamilton,' Broadway enjoyed a huge smash that got a ton of national press attention just about every five years, more or less. Some of those titans: 'Annie,' 'Evita,' 'Cats,' 'Les Miserables,' 'The Phantom of the Opera,' 'Rent,' 'The Lion King,' 'The Producers,' 'Wicked' and 'The Book of Mormon.' That all-important well has dried up. I was wrecked by 'The Outsiders' last year, but it's not in the major league. I still find myself explaining to casual theater fans what last season's deserving Best Musical Tony Award winner 'Maybe Happy Ending' is. 5 Smaller 'Maybe Happy Ending' was this year's Best Musical Tony Award winner. Getty Images for Tony Awards Productions Solving the problem of the big-hit rut is tricky. Because, like a person whose life has spiraled out of control after a small mistake, the causes have exploded beyond an easy fix. Broadway's 18-month Covid closure forever changed audience habits. Then, costs rose astronomically and investors grew skittish. Movie studios became too involved, and plopped Saltine songs on Hollywood IP. Original musicals turned tiny and niche. I'm also convinced that the current class of producers has terrible taste and minimal skill. It rots from the head. True, the past season came close to 2019 sales numbers. But that was thanks to lousy plays starring celebrities with disgusting ticket prices, a few new musicals performing admirably and Cole Escola's comedy 'Oh, Mary!'. But A-List interventions and a bunch of quirky musicals flopping after a year will not save Broadway in the long run. It's the only-in-New-York, must-see, can't-get-in musical that is Broadway's lifeblood. The ones that, pardon the cliche, raise all boats. The ones that become tentpoles of American culture. The a-five-six-seven-eights. And, despite the odds, I'm holding out for another. I'll take the optimistic advice of 50-year-old 'A Chorus Line.' Kiss today goodbye, and point me toward tomorrow.


Boston Globe
10-07-2025
- Boston Globe
A ‘Back to the Future' that reminds you of the past
Wherever that DeLorean took me, it would surely be a better time and place. But the universe had other plans, so here are a few thoughts: Advertisement 'Back to the Future' is a throwback in more than one sense. It can no longer be assumed that a stage musical drawn from a nonmusical hit movie will be dreck. The 2017 Broadway musical adaptation of 'Groundhog Day' was pretty good. The 2019 Broadway musical adaptation of very good. The musical adaptation of ' But 'Back to the Future: The Musical' reminds you why journeys from screen to stage are often a bad idea, destined to land with a splat: Because they are driven, so to speak, by the imperatives of the box office rather than any kind of artistic inspiration or aspiration. Advertisement The best adaptations have something to say. 'Back to the Future' doesn't have much more to say than: Give us your money. While there are some changes from the movie, a chief problem with this touring production is that That narrows the interpretive range any of the performers can traverse. While the cast is certainly game, their struggles to make something fresh out of something so pre-fabricated, such an industrial product, are evident. Lucas Hallauer, who physically resembles the younger Fox, plays restless teenager Marty McFly. Marty is rightly embarrassed by his parents, the ultra-wimpy George (Mike Bindeman, seemingly trying to out-geek Crispin Glover) and slovenly Lorraine (Zan Berube). It's 1985, fully three decades after high school, but George is still being pushed around by Biff (Nathaniel Hackmann), the hulking, none-too-bright fellow who bullied George back then and still has designs on Lorraine. Within that stifling environment, Marty is understandably eager for adventure. An opportunity for that presents itself when nuclear physicist/mad scientist Doc Brown (David Josefberg) enlists him to help in an attempt to travel through time in the aforementioned DeLorean. ( But when Doc experiences radiation poisoning while handling plutonium, Marty tries to go for help in the DeLorean, then accidentally stomps on the accelerator too hard and ends up back in 1955. There he encounters his father, George, and his mother, Lorraine, both of them teenagers. George is the same hapless nerd, but Lorraine is … different. Advertisement She always told Marty and his siblings that she was prim and proper when she was in high school. Marty discovers that she was neither. Soon he is experiencing the Freudian nightmare of being hit on by his mom. For reasons that have to do with the space-time continuum, Marty's very existence hinges on whether he can get George and Lorraine to fall in love. For Marty to be returned to 1985 – to go back to the future — he and the 1955 version of Doc Brown need to harness the power of a lightning strike on town's clocktower. The nonstop musical and video bombardment in 'Back to the Future' seems designed to pummel the audience into submission and persuade them that their money was well spent. But it comes across as a sign of desperation in the effort to create a live simulacrum of a beloved movie. A joke in which 1955 George is perplexed by Marty's use of the word 'heavy,' which is not funny the first time, is for some reason brought back a second time. There is some Boston-based pandering: a Tom Brady reference, a throwaway line about the 'Green Monstah.' One number features the chorus in top hats and tails, for some reason. It should be noted, however, that the chorus is first-rate, the best thing about this 'Back to the Future.' It's far from the first time that has been true in a production that's arrived in Boston from Broadway. Advertisement In the number that opens Act Two, Doc Brown sings 'I can't wait to be/In the 21st century!' You might want to reconsider that, Doc. BACK TO THE FUTURE: THE MUSICAL Book by Bob Gale. Music and lyrics by Alan Silvestri and Glen Ballard. Directed by John Rando. Choreography, Chris Bailey. Presented by Broadway In Boston. At Citizens Opera House, Boston. Through July 20. Tickets from $40. Don Aucoin can be reached at