
Justin Timberlake, Lyme disease and the doctors that don't think it exists
This week, the 44-year-old singer revealed the reason why: he has been diagnosed with Lyme disease. Sharing the news on Instagram, Timberlake admitted he was 'shocked' by the diagnosis – but it finally made sense of the symptoms that had been haunting him on tour.
'If you've experienced this disease or know someone who has — then you're aware: living with this can be relentlessly debilitating, both mentally and physically,' Timberlake added.
His announcement follows a growing number of celebrities speaking openly about their own experiences with the tick-borne illness, helping to shine a light on a condition that is still steeped in mystery, misinformation and medical controversy.
Last October, comedian Miranda Hart revealed she, too, had been living with Lyme disease – though it took decades to get a diagnosis.
In a deeply personal interview, she described being 'bed-bound and housebound' with a 'fatigue-based chronic illness that takes a long time to be diagnosed '. Her ordeal and subsequent vulnerability – a bedfellow of long-term sickness – left her 'waiting in darkness' and with the realisation that she 'didn't want to be alone'.
Hart's eventual diagnosis came 33 years after she believes she was bitten by a tick as a teenager.
The infection, caused by the Borrelia bacterium, can trigger a range of symptoms – from joint pain and headaches to fever and profound exhaustion – which in some cases persist long after treatment. It usually (but not always) first presents as a 'bullseye' rash – circle or oval-shaped markings around a tick bite – in the few weeks after being bitten, before flu-like symptoms appear.
A course of strong antibiotics prescribed in the early stages usually works. But some patients say their symptoms persist long after, often for years and years. It's debilitating, says Hart.
It's also controversial.
For decades, even the very existence of Lyme disease has been debated, with naysayers arguing that it's a US-born phenomenon that's become a catch-all sticking-plaster term, used inaccurately over sprawling, vague symptoms.
Some doctors believe that patients with chronic fatigue syndrome are being misdiagnosed with Lyme, others are more direct – they say that Lyme disease is simply a lucrative racket led by private American quacks. Patients, long-term sufferers like Hart, of course, disagree.
'All anyone wants is to be heard, accepted, loved and seen… and when you're not – particularly in a medical situation – it's the worst,' Hart told Radio 4's Today programme. For a long time, she says, her condition was mistaken for agoraphobia (an anxiety disorder in which a person deems their environment unsafe), and then diagnosed 'under the banner of myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME)'.
She explained that she was bitten by a tick as a teenager, aged 14 or 15, which is when her symptoms started. Ongoing symptoms can vary, but 'flare-ups' are largely thought to be affected by triggers like emotional stress, of which Hart has had her fair share.
Back in 2017, she wrote ardently about losing her best friend, Bella (real name Joanna Duggen), to breast cancer and secondary liver cancer. 'Her death blindsided me,' she said at the time, describing the grief that ensued as 'heavy and unrelenting'.
Over the years she's also divulged her issues with depression and 'acute anxiety', wherein she's found herself 'wading through treacle'. 'On bad days getting to the end of the street to post a letter was hard, such was the extreme level of fear in my body,' she wrote in Miranda's Daily Dose of Such Fun, her last book.
Her diagnosis, 33 years after she was first bitten – the culmination of 'Zoom calls with two experts who confirmed, after a delightful smorgasbord of blood tests, that I had been living with reactivated Lyme disease', she writes in her memoir – was a 'relief'. 'I mean, being misunderstood and misjudged is one of the hardest things about these kinds of conditions. For sure.'
At the time of infection, two blood tests are usually able to detect Lyme disease by identifying the antibodies fighting it off. However, the NHS warns that these tests can be unreliable in the early stages. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines say that anyone presenting with the rash can be treated with up to two rounds of antibiotics, but there's currently no medical guidance for treating the long-term 'chronic' side of the illness.
Usually it's treated similarly to ME or chronic fatigue syndrome, fibromyalgia – with 'energy management', lifestyle changes and cognitive behavioural therapy.
According to some studies, an estimated 14.5 per cent of the world's population have had Lyme disease and researchers believe that it has become more common due to a warming climate which has enabled ticks to spread to new regions, increasing the opportunity for them to pass on pathogens.
In more recent years, it's also gained celebrity status as the likes of Bella Hadid, Justin Bieber, Shania Twain and Avril Lavigne speak out about their experiences; as a result, huge online communities have become prolific on social media.
According to a BMC study, patients with Lyme disease are more likely to be white, female and living in affluent areas. The research found that 'nearly two-thirds of patients were women or girls and, for patients whose ethnicity was recorded, 96 per cent were white'.
Yet, many health authorities do not recognise chronic Lyme disease as a condition in its own right. One paper found that around 5 per cent of patients experience long-lasting fatigue, pain and muscle aches after a course of antibiotics, known as 'post-treatment Lyme disease' (PTLD) – a term that is rejected by large parts of the Lyme community for its connotations that the illness has passed. Rather, they argue, a person can have recurrent, consistent re-infection.
This is where the controversial part comes into play. Increasingly, the standard treatment for Lyme disease in the US is long-term use of antibiotics, with some people taking the drugs for years on end.
The practice of overusing antibiotics is considered notoriously harmful – antibiotic resistance puts millions at risk each year by changing bacteria so much that antibiotics don't work against them.
The practice is so contentious that, both in the US and the UK, patients seeking long-term antibiotics – which are only available through private practice and not sanctioned by the NHS – are often forced to sign non-disclosure agreements with their doctor in order to obtain a prescription.
Doctors prescribing are risking their licences to treat it, says Natasha Metcalf, founder and co-chair of volunteer-led charity Lyme Disease UK. Many, like her, travel from the UK to the US to find treatment.
There's a question of whether it exists, and we don't actually have a test for cure – it's not one of those illnesses where you can test to see if it's gone away. So we're kind of at the stalemate
Natasha Metcalf
'I was labelled with ME and fibromyalgia,' Metcalf says. Like Hart, she was bitten by a tick as a teenager and continued to suffer symptoms periodically throughout her twenties. Her symptoms included fatigue, headaches – but the symptoms are 'constantly on the move', she explains.
'So you feel like a real hypochondriac. One day your knee hurts, then it's your shoulders… One of the worst things for me was my brain – I couldn't remember my birth date or fill out a basic form.'
Metcalf also claims to have been diagnosed with bipolar and schizophrenia during her search for a Lyme disease diagnosis, despite never having symptoms of mania or loss of reality.
Until she went to the US, she was 'having seizures; I was really, really sick,' she explains. 'I was also showing symptoms of various co-infections that are all tick-borne, so you're not even limited to Lyme disease with what that tick is carrying. It's obviously frowned upon, but it wasn't until I got long-term antibiotics that I got better. It saved my life.'
Metcalf's symptoms rendered her unable to function. Like Hart, who said there would 'be times where I'd look at a glass of water and think, I don't know how to pick that up', Metcalf 'basically spent 12 years in a darkened bedroom', unable to work.
Now aged 40, and on a 'programme' of antibiotics, which she takes a combination of for a certain amount of days per month, she's back to working full-time, and running a charity in her spare time.
The trouble is, she explains, despite the reported high numbers of people who may have the disease, there's a grave lack of research into the condition, perhaps due to the decades that the condition has been downplayed by the medical community.
'There's a question of whether it exists,' Metcalf says, 'and we don't actually have a test for cure – it's not one of those illnesses where you can test to see if it's gone away. So we're kind of at the stalemate where people will say, 'well there's no proof it exists', but there's also no proof it resolves itself. If the immune system is compromised, the chances are it's not just going to.
'There's kind of a denial about it, which is very difficult. This is why more research is desperately needed, because right now we can only share our experiences – that thousands and thousands of people around the world who had a tick bite got sick.'
Since the emergence of long Covid, research in the area is picking up – in the US, at-home tests, urine tests and better antibody tests are all being investigated – just very slowly. In the meantime, for Metcalf, raising awareness of the disease is a priority, which is why she's glad to see that Miranda Hart has been vocal about her ailments. The key, she says, is to get treatment early. 'But in a case like Miranda's and mine, where it's left for decades, that's where it gets complicated.'
Hart's admission of her battle appears to be similar. Back in 2021, when the scale of long Covid was slowly revealing itself, Hart tweeted her empathy for those suffering 'housebound chronic illnesses'.
'I hope the pandemic has raised some awareness of what it is like living with an illness that keeps you in lockdown for years,' she said, 'and the ensuing isolation, difficulty in being understood, grief and much more. Much love to all.'
Perhaps now, years on, her message will shed a bit more light on a disease that takes the spotlight but remains somewhat of a mystery.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
4 hours ago
- Daily Mail
The unlikely group 'destined' to be struck by Alzheimer's disease as early as 40
Alzheimer's disease is largely seen as one of old age. The most common form of memory-robbing dementia, Alzheimer's affects nearly 7 million Americans, most of whom are over the age of 65. Your browser does not support iframes. Your browser does not support iframes. Your browser does not support iframes.


The Guardian
5 hours ago
- The Guardian
Using Generative AI for therapy might feel like a lifeline – but there's danger in seeking certainty in a chatbot
Tran* sat across from me, phone in hand, scrolling. 'I just wanted to make sure I didn't say the wrong thing,' he explained, referring to a recent disagreement with his partner. 'So I asked ChatGPT what I should say.' He read the chatbot-generated message aloud. It was articulate, logical and composed – almost too composed. It didn't sound like Tran. And it definitely didn't sound like someone in the middle of a complex, emotional conversation about the future of a long-term relationship. It also did not mention anywhere some of Tran's contributing behaviours to the relationship strain that Tran and I had been discussing. Like many others I've seen in therapy recently, Tran had turned to AI in a moment of crisis. Under immense pressure at work and facing uncertainty in his relationship, he'd downloaded ChatGPT on his phone 'just to try it out'. What began as a curiosity soon became a daily habit, asking questions, drafting texts, and even seeking reassurance about his own feelings. The more Tran used it, the more he began to second-guess himself in social situations, turning to the model for guidance before responding to colleagues or loved ones. He felt strangely comforted, like 'no one knew me better'. His partner, on the other hand, began to feel like she was talking to someone else entirely. ChatGPT and other generative AI models present a tempting accessory, or even alternative, to traditional therapy. They're often free, available 24/7 and can offer customised, detailed responses in real time. When you're overwhelmed, sleepless and desperate to make sense of a messy situation, typing a few sentences into a chatbot and getting back what feels like sage advice can be very appealing. But as a psychologist, I'm growing increasingly concerned about what I'm seeing in the clinic; a silent shift in how people are processing distress and a growing reliance on artificial intelligence in place of human connection and therapeutic support. AI might feel like a lifeline when services are overstretched – and make no mistake, services are overstretched. Globally, in 2019 one in eight people were living with a mental illness and we face a dire shortage of trained mental health professionals. In Australia, there has been a growing mental health workforce shortage that is impacting access to trained professionals. Clinician time is one of the scarcest resources in healthcare. It's understandable (even expected) that people are looking for alternatives. Turning to a chatbot for emotional support isn't without risk however, especially when the lines between advice, reassurance and emotional dependence become blurred. Many psychologists, myself included, now encourage clients to build boundaries around their use of ChatGPT and similar tools. Its seductive 'always-on' availability and friendly tone can unintentionally reinforce unhelpful behaviours, especially for people with anxiety, OCD or trauma-related issues. Reassurance-seeking, for example, is a key feature in OCD and ChatGPT, by design, provides reassurance in abundance. It never asks why you're asking again. It never challenges avoidance. It never says, 'let's sit with this feeling for a moment, and practice the skills we have been working on'. Tran often reworded prompts until the model gave him an answer that 'felt right'. But this constant tailoring meant he wasn't just seeking clarity; he was outsourcing emotional processing. Instead of learning to tolerate distress or explore nuance, he sought AI-generated certainty. Over time, that made it harder for him to trust his own instincts. Beyond psychological concerns, there are real ethical issues. Information shared with ChatGPT isn't protected by the same confidentiality standards as registered Ahpra professionals. Although OpenAI states that data from users is not used to train its models unless permission is given, the sheer volume of fine print in user agreements often goes unread. Users may not realise how their inputs can be stored, analysed and potentially reused. There's also the risk of harmful or false information. These large language models are autoregressive; they predict the next word based on previous patterns. This probabilistic process can lead to 'hallucinations', confident, polished answers that are completely untrue. AI also reflects the biases embedded in its training data. Research shows that generative models can perpetuate and even amplify gender, racial and disability-based stereotypes – not intentionally, but unavoidably. Human therapists also possess clinical skills; we notice when a client's voice trembles, or when their silence might say more than words. This isn't to say AI can't have a place. Like many technological advancements before it, generative AI is here to stay. It may offer useful summaries, psycho-educational content or even support in regions where access to mental health professionals is severely limited. But it must be used carefully, and never as a replacement for relational, regulated care. Tran wasn't wrong to seek help. His instincts to make sense of distress and to communicate more thoughtfully were logical. However, leaning so heavily on to AI meant that his skill development suffered. His partner began noticing a strange detachment in his messages. 'It just didn't sound like you', she later told him. It turned out: it wasn't. She also became frustrated about the lack of accountability in his correspondence to her and this caused more relational friction and communication issues between them. As Tran and I worked together in therapy, we explored what led him to seek certainty in a chatbot. We unpacked his fears of disappointing others, his discomfort with emotional conflict and his belief that perfect words might prevent pain. Over time, he began writing his own responses, sometimes messy, sometimes unsure, but authentically his. Good therapy is relational. It thrives on imperfection, nuance and slow discovery. It involves pattern recognition, accountability and the kind of discomfort that leads to lasting change. A therapist doesn't just answer; they ask and they challenge. They hold space, offer reflection and walk with you, while also offering up an uncomfortable mirror. For Tran, the shift wasn't just about limiting his use of ChatGPT; it was about reclaiming his own voice. In the end, he didn't need a perfect response. He needed to believe that he could navigate life's messiness with curiosity, courage and care – not perfect scripts. Name and identifying details changed to protect client confidentiality Carly Dober is a psychologist living and working in Naarm/Melbourne In Australia, support is available at Beyond Blue on 1300 22 4636, Lifeline on 13 11 14, and at MensLine on 1300 789 978. In the UK, the charity Mind is available on 0300 123 3393 and Childline on 0800 1111. In the US, call or text Mental Health America at 988 or chat


Daily Mail
6 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Harvard study casts new light on why some couples conceive all girls or boys
Harvard study casts new light on why some couples conceive all girls or boys A Harvard study has revealed a link between a woman's age and the likelihood of giving birth to multiple children of the same sex. Siwen Wang, a PhD student in nutritional epidemiology at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, began researching the topic after noticing a trend in her own family. Her mother was one of three sisters and a younger brother, while her father had two brothers and no sisters. 'I was wondering whether it's just pure chance or if there was some special biology underlying this phenomenon,' she told the Boston Globe. Her questions led to a study published July 18 in Science Advances by her and seven others. The researchers analyzed 146,064 pregnancies from 58,000 US nurses across nearly six decades and discovered that in some families the odds are not so random. The NIH-funded Nurses' Health Study studied the subjects between 1956 and 2015 and found that some families were more likely to have children of the same sex. Researchers found that maternal age played a key role in the sex of the baby. A Harvard study has revealed a link between a woman's age and the likelihood of giving birth to children of the same sex Siwen Wang (pictured), a PhD student at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, began researching the topic after noticing a trend in her own family. Her mother was one of three sisters and a younger brother, while her father had two brothers and no sisters The research found that women who had their first child at age 29 or older were significantly more likely to have multiple children of the same sex. 'It's like moving the needle from 50 to 60 percent,' Dr. Bernard Rosner, a co-author of the study told the outlet. 'I don't think you could use any of this information to definitively predict whether a specific person will have a male or female offspring, but ... it's not necessarily random probability.' The findings also showed that women who already had three children of the same sex were more likely to have a fourth of the same gender. The study showed a 61 percent likelihood for boys and 58 percent for girls. 'If you've had two girls or three girls and you're trying for a boy, you should know your odds are not 50-50,' Jorge Chavarro, professor of nutrition and epidemiology and author of the study, told the Washington Post. The research found that women who had their first child at age 29 or older were significantly more likely to have multiple children of the same sex 'You're more likely than not to have another girl.' 'We don't know why these genes would be associated with sex at birth, but they are, and that opens up new questions,' Chavarro added. Paternal influences on the child's sex were not entirely explored in the study. Researchers did not include detailed data on fathers so they couldn't analyze how paternal factors might influence the sex of children. Despite, the lack of research on the paternal side, Wang did mention that older maternal age is most highly correlated with older paternal age.