logo
Road Warriors: Golden State makes NBA playoffs history without injured Stephen Curry

Road Warriors: Golden State makes NBA playoffs history without injured Stephen Curry

USA Today07-05-2025

Road Warriors: Golden State makes NBA playoffs history without injured Stephen Curry
Show Caption
Hide Caption
Previewing the Warriors and Timberwolves matchup in the NBA playoffs
USA TODAY's Lorenzo Reyes breaks down his thoughts on Steph Curry and the aging Warriors team going up against Anthony Edwards and the Timberwolves.
Sports Pulse
Buddy Hield came to the rescue for the Golden State Warriors once again.
For the second consecutive game, the Warriors needed scoring and Hield delivered – this time with Steph Curry sidelined due to a left hamstring strain.
Hield scored 16 of his team-high 24 points in the third quarter as the Warriors defeated the Minnesota Timberwolves 99-88 Tuesday in Game 1 of the Western Conference semifinals series.
MORE: Steph Curry out of Game 1 with hamstring injury
MORE: Wardrobe malfunction: Warriors guard has wrong shorts on to start Game 1
Curry had 13 points before leaving the game with 8:19 remaining in the second quarter and did not return. Hield, Draymond Green (18 points, eight rebounds, six assists, two steals) and Jimmy Butler (20 points, 11 rebounds, eight assists, two steals ) carried the offense in Curry's absence, and the Warriors took advantage of a putrid Timberwolves offense (39.5% from the field).
Anthony Edwards led the Timberwolves with an inefficient 23 points and 14 rebounds.
The road team is now 5-0 in the conference semifinals, and Golden State's victory marked the first time in NBA history that the road team won all four Game 1s in the second round.
Coach Steve Kerr said after the win that Curry was day-to-day and would have an MRI on Wednesday.
"I talked to him at halftime,' the Warriors coach said. 'He's obviously crushed, but the guys picked him up and played a great game. Obviously we're all concerned about Steph. …
"Our guys did a great job of moving on and getting a great win 48 hours after a Game 7 road win. It's an amazing group of guys. These guys — they compete, they're together. We've been the best defense in the league since the Jimmy trade, and that's what's keeping us afloat right now.'
Game 2 is Thursday (8:30 p.m. ET, TNT) in Minneapolis.
Warriors-Timberwolves Game 1 winners
Buddy Hield
Hield made nine 3-pointers against Houston, tying a Game 7 record, and he made five threes in Game 1 against Minnesota. It's the first time this season that Hield has made more than 10 3s in consecutive games. The Warriors have received necessary shooting from Hield, who is one of the league's best shooters and won the 3-Point Contest at All-Star Weekend in 2020.
''We needed every one of his 24 points. With Steph out, we have very few options offensively,' Kerr said.
Hield is now 23-for-50 (46%) on 3s in the eight playoff games. Regardless of Curry's availability the rest of the series, the Warriors need Hield's shooting.
He also needed to make amends for wearing the wrong shorts to start the game, which resulted in a delay of game penalty for the Warriors.
Road teams
As noted, road teams are unbeaten in the conference semifinals. It's not a surprise the Warriors got one on the road. In their past 31 playoff series, they have won a road game in 30 of those series, including Game 7 at Houston on Sunday.
Jimmy Butler's defensive presence
Since acquiring Butler, the Warriors have the best defense in the league. In seven games in the first round, Golden State held Houston to less than 100 points three times and then allowed just 88 from the Timberwolves in Game 1.
With Butler on the court, Minnesota scored just 92.4 points per 100 possessions. That's why Golden State made the move at the trade deadline to acquire Butler who played 41 minutes.
Golden State's 3-point shooting
Hield wasn't the only Warrior making 3s. The Warriors made 18-for-42 (42.9%) and outscored the Timberwolves 54-15 from that distance. Draymond Green made four, Curry made three and Butler and Gary Payton II each made two.
It's not the same 3-point team as when they had Klay Thompson, but the Warriors are still one of the league's best 3-point shooting teams.
Warriors-Timberwolves Game 1 losers
Injuries
It's known that injuries impact the playoffs. 'It's part of the game. Guys get hurt, you move on,' Kerr said.
But the playoffs are better when teams are healthy and stars are on the court. Kerr said Curry will get an MRI on Wednesday to determine the extent of the injury and his availability for the rest of the series. By stealing home court advantage, Golden State has the flexibility to sit Curry in Game 2 and give him extra rest and treatment as long as the injury doesn't rule him out for multiple games.
Anthony Edwards' offense
All-Star Anthony Edwards' 23 points and 14 rebounds look better on paper. He needed 22 shots to get his 23 points, missed his first 10 shots and was just 1-for-5 on 3-pointers.
'You're a leader of the team, and you've got to come out and set the tone in all ways that that happens,' Timberwolves coach Chris Finch said. 'If your shot's not going, like you still have to carry the energy. If I have to talk to guys about having the right energy coming into an opening second-round game, then we're not on the same page.'
Timberwolves' offense
Edwards wasn't the only player who struggled to score for Minnesota. The Timberwolves shot 39.5% from the field and 17.2% on 3-pointers and scored just 31 points in the first half, including 11 in the second quarter.
Mike Conley, Julius Randle and Donte DiVincenzo were a combined 7-for- 27 from the field. After scoring at least 90 points in 82 regular-season games, the Timberwolves have failed to reach 90 twice in six playoff games.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Pacers vs. Thunder: Have the Pacers found a blueprint for success against Shai Gilgeous-Alexander in the NBA Finals?
Pacers vs. Thunder: Have the Pacers found a blueprint for success against Shai Gilgeous-Alexander in the NBA Finals?

Yahoo

time33 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Pacers vs. Thunder: Have the Pacers found a blueprint for success against Shai Gilgeous-Alexander in the NBA Finals?

OKLAHOMA CITY — Rick Carlisle wants to make one thing abundantly clear: The Pacers are not looking for Shai Gilgeous-Alexander to go off. 'We are not looking to get Shai going,' he said Saturday on the eve of Game 2 of the 2025 NBA Finals. 'That doesn't make any sense.' Advertisement That stands to reason! If the other team's best player has the ball a ton, and is doing a lot with it, it's reasonable to assume that it would be a bad thing for your defense. Here's the thing, though: • In the second round of the Eastern Conference playoffs against the Pacers, Donovan Mitchell wound up averaging 34.2 points on 25 field goal attempts per game, finishing a mammoth 41% of the Cavaliers' offensive possessions with a shot attempt, foul drawn or turnover — a usage rate more than 10% higher than it had been against Miami the previous round. (Injuries to Darius Garland, Evan Mobley and De'Andre Hunter played a role there.) In a possibly related story: Only one other Cleveland player (Mobley) averaged more than 15 points per game in the series, and a Cavaliers team whose league-leading offense assaulted the record books all season long scored just 109.6 points per 100 possessions in Mitchell's minutes in the conference semifinals — same as the 25th-ranked Toronto Raptors managed during the regular season. The Pacers drummed Cleveland out of the playoffs in five games. Shai Gilgeous-Alexander scored 38 points in Game 1, but it wasn't enough. (Alonzo Adams-Imagn Images) (IMAGN IMAGES via Reuters Connect / Reuters) • In the Eastern Conference finals against the Pacers, Jalen Brunson went off, averaging 30.7 points on 20.8 field goal attempts per game, finishing 34.4% of the Knicks' offensive possessions with a shot attempt, foul drawn or turnover — a usage rate nearly 5% higher than it had been against Boston the previous round. Advertisement In a possibly related story: Only one other New York player (Karl-Anthony Towns) averaged more than 18 points per game in the series, and a Knicks team that ranked fifth in the NBA in offensive efficiency during the regular season scored just 114.3 points-per-100 in Brunson's minutes in the conference finals — a league-average scoring rate. The Pacers drummed New York out of the playoffs in six. • And hey, sure, given your druthers, you'd certainly prefer that the NBA's reigning Most Valuable Player not score 30-plus points on you — as Gilgeous-Alexander did on Thursday, pouring in 38 to lead the Thunder in Game 1. If he's going to, though, you'd probably like those points to come as inefficiently as possible. Say, on 30 shot attempts — tied for the third-highest total of his career. And probably while soaking up a ton of possessions. Like, for example, a 37.1% usage rate — the third-highest mark of his playoff career. And maybe even while dominating the ball to a greater degree than usual. For instance, a total time of possession of 8.8 minutes — up more than two minutes from the regular season, and more than one minute from the first three rounds. In a possibly related story: Only one other Oklahoma City player (Jalen Williams) scored more than 15 points in Game 1, and a Thunder offense that scored a scorching 122.4 points per 100 possessions with Gilgeous-Alexander on the floor during the regular season, and 116.2 points-per-100 with SGA at the controls through the first three rounds of the postseason, scored just 104.7 points-per-100 in the MVP's minutes in Game 1 — a sub-Wizardian rate of offensive inefficiency that would've ranked dead last in the NBA during the regular season. Advertisement Oh, and the Pacers won the game. How the Pacers played SGA in Game 1 OK, so maybe 'give the best guy on the team as many shots as he can handle' isn't exactly Indiana's double-secret defensive game plan. As blueprints for success go, though, 'force that player to make a ton of tough 2-point shots, keep anyone else from getting off, and when possible, funnel touches and shots to less-threatening options' — like, for example, by having rangy power forwards Pascal Siakam and Obi Toppin cross-match against Thunder guard Luguentz Dort, sag way off of him to play more aggressive help defense, and then live with him taking dare-you 3s when the ball finds him … well, that wouldn't be the worst one ever constructed against a team that relies so heavily on its elite top option. Advertisement The Pacers threw a ton at Gilgeous-Alexander in Game 1. The MVP saw a heavy dose of Canadian national teammate Andrew Nembhard as his primary defender, with Siakam, Aaron Nesmith and Bennedict Mathurin also pulling shifts. Indiana was also aggressive in showing help in the gaps on Gilgeous-Alexander's isolations and drives, and 'next-ing' his pick-and-rolls — having the defender who's nearest to the play switch over onto SGA as he drives, with his initial defender switching back onto SGA's now-uncovered teammate — to try to corral him in the two-man game. 'He's the MVP of our league, so you're not going to shut a guy like that down,' Pacers guard T.J. McConnell said Saturday. 'He's a special talent. It's just about making things as difficult as possible and trying to tire him out and wear him down. Credit to everyone that guarded him. They played a part in trying to do that. Obviously, he had a phenomenal game, but it's a collective effort.' That effort extends to the defensive end of the floor: The Pacers went 7-for-12 in Game 1 on plays where Gilgeous-Alexander was the closest defender, according to NBA Advanced Stats. As they did to Brunson last round, Indiana at times looked to target Gilgeous-Alexander — putting him into action, leveraging size mismatches on switches, attacking him in isolation — to ensure that he wouldn't get the benefit of a breather when he didn't have the ball: 'I think that's what we're trying to do: just make him work on both ends,' McConnell said. 'I mean, he's a great player. And you know, when great players play a lot of minutes, it can kind of get into their legs. Obviously, I'm not sure we saw a lot of that — he had 38 points. But it's a process thing.' Advertisement Indiana will continue trusting that process, betting that the deposits they put in early will pay off with compound interest late. The Game 1 effort already paid some dividends, though, by influencing Gilgeous-Alexander to put the onus largely on himself. He passed out of just two of his 27 drives — emblematic of an outing that saw him call his own number more frequently than usual. 'I always try to be aggressive and I never, like, predetermine it,' Gilgeous-Alexander said Saturday. 'I always just let the game tell me what to do. So I guess last game, I felt more often than not I had a shot or a play that I could attack on more than in the past, and that's just the way it went.' Gilgeous-Alexander averaged 41 passes per game during the regular season and 46 per game through the first three rounds of the playoffs. In Game 1, though? Just 38. SGA wasn't alone in playing less frequently off the pass, though: After averaging 270.7 passes per game in the regular season, and 256.6 during the first three rounds, Oklahoma City threw a shockingly low 207 passes in Game 1, leading to a season-low 13 assists. Advertisement 'The same thing will happen in Game 2,' Gilgeous-Alexander said. 'I will read the defense, and I will play off my feeling and my instincts, and if it's calling for me to shoot or if it's calling me to pass, that's what I will decide to do.' SGA will need help in Game 2 The key for the Thunder? If the game's calling for Gilgeous-Alexander to pass — if, after film study, he recognizes that the crowd that Indiana's showing him means some of his teammates are wide open — then they've got to knock 'em down at a much better clip than they did in Game 1. Non-SGA Thunderers shot just 25-for-68 (36.8%) from the field — including a 5-for-19 mark off of Shai's passes — and 8-for-24 (33.3%) from 3-point land on Thursday. Strip out Dort's 5-for-9 outing from beyond the arc, and the rest of Oklahoma City's rotation went just 2-for-15 from deep — the kind of output that's not exactly going to dissuade the Pacers from making Gilgeous-Alexander's teammates prove they can knock down enough shots to make them pay for their defensive approach. That puts the spotlight squarely on Williams, who needed 19 shots to score 17 points in Game 1, and on Chet Holmgren, who spoke Saturday about needing to improve his finishing after going 2-for-8 in the paint in Game 1 against the length and physicality of Turner on the interior. Advertisement 'I think we had a good offensive process,' Williams said after Game 1. 'We got some good shots towards the end … I repped a lot of the shots that I shot tonight — over and over and over again, consistently, throughout my career, this year, the playoffs. All you can do is shoot them and not get scared to shoot them.' Maintaining that mentality isn't easy, especially when you know the opponent is betting that, if they throw everything they've got at stopping your teammate, you won't be able to make them pay for it. But Williams said Saturday that knowing he's Oklahoma City's failsafe Plan B isn't anything new for him, and doesn't come with additional pressure to score every time the ball swings his way. Sometimes, though, the circumstances will demand Williams and Holmgren finish those possessions with a bucket — pulling a contested 3, finishing over Turner or Siakam at the rim, or just playing through contact to get to the foul line. Heady stuff for a 23- and 24-year-old. '[Holmgren] and Dub, specifically, obviously, they have carved out huge roles on our team,' Thunder head coach Mark Daigneault said. 'They are a huge reason why we're here. They are in an uncommon position for third-year players … and now that they are here, they have to continue to do what they have done all the way through the playoffs, which is go out there, fully compete, learn the lessons, and apply it forward.' Advertisement Williams, for his part, sounds ready to shake off Game 1 and do just that. 'Pressure is a privilege,' Williams said. 'I enjoy being counted on.' The Thunder are counting on him, Holmgren and everyone else to bounce back in a big way. The Pacers are counting on it, too. 'Look, everybody's pattern after a loss is to come more aggressively,' Carlisle said. 'So [Gilgeous-Alexander's] going to be more aggressive. Williams is going to be more aggressive. Chet is going to be more aggressive. Their whole team is going to be even more aggressive defensively. The challenge for us is to be able to match that.' Advertisement If the Pacers can't, they still walk out of Oklahoma City with a split. If they can, though — if they're able to replicate what worked in Game 1 and improve on what didn't — they could find themselves precisely where they've been in every series they've played in this postseason: up 2-0, in complete control, and in position to do something that very few people outside their locker room ever thought could be possible. 'We don't want Shai getting 38 points if we can avoid it,' Carlisle said. 'We don't want him living on the free-throw line. We don't want him getting easy 3s — we don't want him making that 3 at the end of the third quarter. That was a tough shot, but he banged that in. 'We have to make it hard on him.'

Months After Charles Barkley Questioned Inside The NBA's Future On ESPN, The Network's President Weighed In
Months After Charles Barkley Questioned Inside The NBA's Future On ESPN, The Network's President Weighed In

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Months After Charles Barkley Questioned Inside The NBA's Future On ESPN, The Network's President Weighed In

When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Credit: TNT For much of 2024, Inside the NBA's future seemed to be in jeopardy, as TNT's long-running sports talk show was at risk of being cancelled. That was due to parent company Warner Bros. Discovery was unable to renew its broadcast rights to the pro basketball league. However, a historic deal was later struck between TNT Sports and ESPN, which will air the show, starting this fall. Charles Barkley and others have still questioned the series' position on the Disney-owned sports network and, now, its president is speaking out. Advertisement News of Inside the NBA being saved was warmly welcomed by the fans but, internally, there have been some variables to consider. Much of that involves exactly how the series' four co-hosts – Ernie Johnson, Kenny Smith, Shaquille O'Neal and Charles Barkley – will be utilized. There was even a question as to whether the hosting lineup may be shuffled around due to the show being on a new network. While addressing Front Office Sports and more at a press briefing, ESPN Inc. President Jimmy Pitaro apparently soothed concerns: I have not heard any false notes. My understanding is we're keeping the band together. That prospect is sure to come as a comfort to those who want to see all four hosts remain on the show. Over the last several months, reports indicated that deals were being finalized in order to ensure that the talent was signed on for a while. In February, Shaq notably signed a major deal worth $15 million per year, which would ensure that he remains with TNT Sports for the long haul. When it comes to his fellow hall of famer and occasional verbal sparring partner, Charles Barkley, the situation has been a bit more complex. More on Charles Barkley Charles Barkley during an episode of Inside The NBA 'There's A Chill That Goes Through The Halls': One Thing Charles Barkley Does That Apparently Makes TNT Nervous, According To An Inside The NBA Alum Advertisement A lot can change in the course of a year as, around this time in 2024, Charles Barkley announced that he would retire from sports broadcasting at the end of the 2024-2025 NBA season regardless of Inside's fate. However, 'The Round Mound of Rebound' walked back his retirement decision in August of that same year, later explaining that he was doing so to save jobs. Simultaneously, Barkley was critical of his employers for supposedly dropping the ball (no pun intended) when it came to renewing its NBA broadcast rights. Since the show was saved, 'Sir Charles' has been singing a somewhat different tune, even making jokes about having to go back to 'kissing ass.' Nevertheless, Barkley suggested in September 2024 that his future wasn't set in stone, even though he aimed to return to the broadcasting desk. The biggest point of contention in that case was that, at the time, he'd yet to receive a schedule from ESPN, and he declared that he had no intention of working more strenuously than he had at TNT. ESPN and TNT Sports' deal, which was announced in November 2024, allows the latter entity to licence out Inside the NBA to the former. As part of the agreement, the fan-favorite show will continue to be produced independently from its studios in Atlanta. Per the original press release, Inside's four hosts will also be involved with pregame, halftime and postgame coverage along with NBA Finals and Christmas day coverage among other events. So, based on Jimmy Pitaro's comments, the plan is indeed for Charles Barkley and co. to stay together. However, even though Barkley is signed on, his own sentiments suggest that to keep him happy, he'll need a schedule that's iron-clad. The current NBA season has yet to end, so it's possible that some of those details will be ironed out during the offseason, if not sooner.

John Mellencamp Called Out Pat McAfee For Heckling Ben Stiller At NBA Playoff Game, And He Responded
John Mellencamp Called Out Pat McAfee For Heckling Ben Stiller At NBA Playoff Game, And He Responded

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

John Mellencamp Called Out Pat McAfee For Heckling Ben Stiller At NBA Playoff Game, And He Responded

When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Credit: ESPN/Farmer's Aid Pat McAfee already had to hear from Ben Stiller when his rousing speech during the NBA Eastern Conference Finals felt insulting to New York celebrities in attendance, and now he has to hear from a big name from Indiana: John Mellencamp. Despite McAfee hyping up the Indiana Pacers fans as they defeated the New York Knicks in Game 4 of the NBA playoffs, the Hoosier-born singer wasn't a fan of the ESPN commentator's behavior. Advertisement The Indiana Pacers didn't have many celebrity supporters in the building during Game 4, so it's a shame that two of their biggest ones may be at odds. In a statement made two days after McAfee's big speech, Mellencamp released the following on X: The Knicks/Pacers games have been very entertaining for anyone who likes basketball or sports. I attended Game 4 in Indianapolis. 'Hoosier Hospitality' …I was embarrassed when somebody, under whose direction I don't know, called out some of the people who had made the trip from New York to support their team — and in turn, support our team. The audience booed these people. I'd say that was not Hoosier Hospitality. One could only say it's poor, poor sportsmanship. I was not proud to be a Hoosier, and I've lived here my entire life. On behalf of most Hoosiers, I would like to apologize for our poor behavior. I'm sure the Pacers had nothing to do with this smackdown. I'm not sure if I'm reading into it too deeply, but I have to think John Mellencamp using the term "smackdown" had to be a rib at Pat McAfee being a WWE commentator. No doubt, McAfee's wrestling experience led him to give what was reportedly an impromptu speech that was not rehearsed ahead of delivery. It's worth noting that as someone living in Indiana, I've seen many residents collectively confused by the singer's issue with what seemed like a mostly light-hearted diss to Timothée Chalamet and others. Pat McAfee rarely is quiet when it comes to criticism, so it was a given he wasn't going to ignore John Mellencamp's veiled criticism even though it didn't mention him by name. While the ESPN commentator has been known to drop a cryptic message on social media, he wasn't afraid to let people on X know who the singer was talking about in this scathing message: I am 'somebody' Back when there was some talk going back and forth between Pat McAfee and Ben Stiller, I almost suspected it was a subtle build to some future upcoming WWE event we'd see later this year with a Peacock subscription. Now with John Mellencamp in the mix, I'm assuming there were actual hurt feelings about McAfee calling out celebrities at the event. Advertisement More On The NBA Charles Barkley speaks on Inside the NBA Months After Charles Barkley Questioned Inside The NBA's Future On ESPN, The Network's President Weighed In It's just another chapter in the storied rivalry between the Indiana Pacers and the New York Knicks. Both teams have met many times over the years in the playoffs, with plenty of storylines between players and celebrities alike. It's rare two people supporting the same team speak out against each other, though, which is what makes it so bizarre. As the NBA playoffs continue on, be sure to check out the 2025 TV schedule to see what else is coming to television this summer. I know there are some summer shows I can't wait to get into once basketball is over, especially on the streaming side. Starting Five is coming from Netflix and with Tyrese Haliburton from the Pacers on the list of people covered, it should be a great season if they make the NBA finals.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store