logo
‘I have never been an activist': Meet the pensioners risking prison to support Palestine Action

‘I have never been an activist': Meet the pensioners risking prison to support Palestine Action

Independent3 days ago
In an interrogation room just after 1am, 68-year-old grandmother-of-seven Marji Mansfield was sat across from counter terrorism officers after being arrested at a pro-Palestine protest in central London.
She had suffered days of poor sleep in anticipation of this eventuality. Now, an 'aggressive' man was asking her repeatedly if she sympathised with a terrorist organisation, leading her through an extensive list of questions about her politics and who she knew in Gaza.
A few hours earlier, on the afternoon of 5 July, half a dozen officers had handcuffed the pensioner and hauled her off the ground and into a police van, alongside her 73-year-old husband.
The couple who once described themselves as small 'c' Conservatives had travelled to the capital up from near Chichester for the protest, declining to tell their children what they were about to do.
It was only a day later that their son realised what had happened after he saw her in the news, suspended and flanked by the large group of officers.
She had been following the conflict in the Middle East since the Israeli invasion of Gaza in 2014, but only became an active protester after former home secretary Suella Braverman branded peaceful protesters as 'hate marchers' in November 2023.
'I have never been political or an activist. I was just an ordinary, middle-England person,' she says. 'But then I became outraged.'
She said she was 'shocked' by the events of 7 October, when Hamas militants broke into Israel and killed around 1,200 people, taking 251 more hostage. 'But the actions that subsequently followed, where entire families are being wiped out, I had to join those urging for a ceasefire now,' she adds.
More than 60,000 Palestinians are believed to have been killed since Israel launched its retaliatory aerial and ground offensive in Gaza. Humanitarian organisations have warned that, with not nearly enough aid entering the enclave, the 2.3 million residents of Gaza are now being effectively starved.
Sir Keir Starmer this week warned that Britain would recognise the Palestinian state if Israel did not end its 'appalling' war in Gaza. He urged Israel to work towards a ceasefire and a two-state solution.
Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu accused Sir Keir of 'rewarding Hamas's monstrous terrorism'. Ms Mansfield dismissed Sir Keir's move as 'performative rather than substantial'.
Fighting her own battle for Gaza, the pensioner was arrested under Section 12 and 13 of the Terrorism Act 2000 for holding up a placard that said: 'I oppose genocide, I support Palestine Action'. The charges carry a possible maximum sentence of 14 years in prison.
The protest group Palestine Action had just been proscribed as a terrorist organisation, after they claimed responsibility for activists spraying red paint on fighter jets at RAF Brize Norton, making it illegal to support them. It put the group in the same legal ranks as Isis, Al-Qaeda and Hamas, leading critics to accuse the government of heavy-handedness.
Ms Mansfield had known it was a possibility she would get arrested, but had no idea how the police would actually react when she and dozens of others held up placards in support of Palestine Action outside the Houses of Parliament. It was the first of what would be weekly protests, all of which resulted in arrests.
As the police interview with an exhausted Ms Mansfield drew to a close around 2am, after more than 60 questions had been asked, the counter terrorism officer made one final remark.
'Look, even if you get hundreds of people, thousands of people, we're 30,000 strong,' Ms Mansfield recounts him saying. 'We'll put all our resources, and not just police forces, into arresting and interrogating you.'
Then he let the 'traumatised' pensioner go free, hundreds of miles from home. She was not charged with a crime.
A total of 385 MPs voted in favour of the unprecedented move to criminalise Palestine Action. Only 26 dissented.
Announcing the vote, home secretary Yvette Cooper said that while the right to protest and to free speech form 'the cornerstone of our democracy', Palestine Action was guilty of 'violence and serious criminal damage' that does not constitute 'legitimate protest'.
As a result, Palestine Action was proscribed alongside a white supremacist, neo-Nazi organisation called Maniacs Murder Cult and a pro-Kremlin ethno-nationalist organisation which seeks to create a new Russian Imperial State.
Critics and human rights activists quickly accused the government of infringing upon people's right to protest after the proscription.
In a letter to Ms Cooper, the Network for Police Monitoring said: 'Misusing terrorism legislation in this way against a protest group sets a dangerous precedent, threatens our democratic freedoms, and would be a terrifying blow to our civil liberties.'
Several United Nations human rights experts, meanwhile, said criminal damage that does not endanger life was not 'sufficiently serious to qualify as terrorism'.
On Wednesday, a judge ruled that Palestine Action would be allowed to challenge the Home Office in court over its proscription, but it could be months until a result.
The outrage over the move has increased as more protesters are arrested.
Private Eye editor Ian Hislop branded the arrest in Leeds on 19 July of 67-year-old Jon Farley, for holding up a printout of the magazine's front page that questioned the proscription, as 'mind-boggling'. Mr Farley has not been charged.
The case was cited by Mr Justice Chamberlain on Wednesday as a reason to allow Palestine Action to fight the proscription. He said it was evidence of the 'chilling effect' the proscription was having 'on those wishing to express legitimate political views'.
In total, more than 200 people have been detained since the ban. Not a single person in England and Wales has been charged.
The large majority are over 60, according to Tim Crosland, a former government lawyer who now campaigns for Defend Our Juries, an organisation supporting many of the detainees. He says some of the protesters are 'well into their 80s'.
The police are aware of these optics. Ms Mansfield claims her male counter terrorism interrogator even asked her at one stage: 'Was this a conspiracy to make the police look bad?'
The reality, she says, is simpler: the seriousness of terrorism charges is a significant disincentive to younger protesters at the start of their careers; for pensioners determined to take a stance, it is the perfect opportunity to step up.
Robert Lee, 61, another protester arrested on 5 July but not charged, who later went to support demonstrators in Bristol, says he remembers one 83-year-old woman gleefully telling him that police were too afraid to arrest her 'because they are terrified I might die in custody'.
But the crowds of pensioner protesters are nonetheless peppered with younger demonstrators, a reality they say nods to the broad spectrum of opposition to the proscription of Palestine Action.
For Zara Ali, 18, among the youngest people to have been arrested, her involvement felt especially high stakes. She was already on bail for conspiracy to cause public nuisance after blocking a road in March. She has not been charged.
'I was told to prepare myself for prison,' she says, admitting that she was very 'anxious' when she arrived in Parliament Square for her 19 July protest.
'But at the end of the day, I had it in my mind that this is not about me but about Palestine, and about every single political prisoner who is being held.'
The Independent spoke to half a dozen protesters for this piece, all of whom mentioned their 'disgust' with Israel's war on Gaza as the primary motivation for their involvement. Claims that the proscription pointed to a 'dystopian' future in Britain were also commonly cited as key motivation.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'The most devastating images': Home secretary reacts to ITV News' aerial footage of Gaza
'The most devastating images': Home secretary reacts to ITV News' aerial footage of Gaza

ITV News

time12 minutes ago

  • ITV News

'The most devastating images': Home secretary reacts to ITV News' aerial footage of Gaza

Speaking to ITV News, the Home Secretary described the images taken by ITV News over Gaza as "the most devastating" Home Secretary Yvette Cooper has described newly released aerial images of Gaza as 'devastating,' saying they underscore the urgent need for a ceasefire, humanitarian aid, and a comprehensive plan to address the deepening crisis in the Middle East. Her comments come after ITV News aired the first independent aerial footage from over Gaza in months, showing the sheer scale of destruction caused by nearly two years of war. Filmed by International Editor Emma Murphy on board a plane delivering aid, the footage captures vast swathes of Gaza reduced to dust, entire neighbourhoods flattened and turned to rubble. Speaking to ITV News on Tuesday, Cooper said: 'Well, those are the most devastating images and to see that scale of destruction across Gaza. "Of course, we have also seen the terrible images of malnutrition among children, and we've seen the really disturbing images of some of the hostages still being held. "So it shows really why it is so urgent that we get the ceasefire, the humanitarian assistance and also a proper plan going forward, as the prime minister has set out, including not just the pathway around recognition, but also a whole series of much wider steps in terms of tackling this crisis in the Middle East.' The aerials show areas like Al-Zahraa City virtually levelled, with one of the only buildings still standing - the Al Wafa Centre for Elderly Care - surrounded by ruins. The centre, which provides free care for elderly Palestinians without families, was hit in November 2023, according to local reports, killing its director, Dr Medhat Muheisen. In March, an Israeli strike demolished the only cancer hospital in Gaza. The Israeli army said it was being used by Hamas operatives, providing no evidence to support the claim. The ariels also depicted a primary and secondary school, surrounded by ruins. There is no public information about what happened to the lives of those who once lived in the area, nor that of the pupils who once filtered through the halls of the school. Since October 7, 2023 - when 1,200 Israelis were killed in Hamas-led attacks - Israel has launched a prolonged military campaign across the Gaza Strip. More than 60,000 Palestinians have been killed since then, according to the territory's health ministry. Alongside the physical devastation, a humanitarian catastrophe continues to unfold. Gaza's Health Ministry claims 87 adults have died from malnutrition since late June, with at least 93 children having died from hunger-related causes since the war began. Israel denies that famine is occurring, but UN experts have warned the territory is facing a 'worst-case scenario.' Israeli broadcaster Channel 12 has reported that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is set to convene a high-level security meeting on Tuesday. It's understood that the goal of the session is to finalise strategic options for Gaza, ahead of a broader cabinet meeting later this week. The pressure on Netanyahu's government to reach a ceasefire is growing, especially following the recent release of videos showing visibly emaciated Israeli hostages still held in Gaza. A previous round of negotiations collapsed in July, after US envoy Steve Witkoff accused Hamas of showing 'a lack of desire' to reach a deal. As destruction deepens and the humanitarian crisis worsens, Cooper's remarks reflect increasing international calls for both immediate relief and a viable long-term political solution.

National living wage likely to rise to £12.71 next year, advisory body estimates
National living wage likely to rise to £12.71 next year, advisory body estimates

The Independent

time12 minutes ago

  • The Independent

National living wage likely to rise to £12.71 next year, advisory body estimates

The national living wage could rise by as much as 65p an hour next year, an advisory body has estimated, as the terms of its annual review of wage rates were published. Ministers are determined to deliver 'a genuine living wage', according to the Low Pay Commission's (LPC) latest remit for increasing the so-called national living wage – the UK minimum wage for workers aged 21 and older. At the moment, the national living wage is £12.21 an hour. The LPC estimates that this will need to increase to £12.71 in 2026 to not fall below two-thirds of median earnings: the threshold which the Government expects it to stay above. But the LPC acknowledged the national living wage could rise to as much as £12.86 an hour, or as little as £12.55 an hour, depending on changing economic conditions. Founded in 1997, the advisory body provides recommendations to ministers each autumn regarding how it believes the minimum wage should be changed. The Government ultimately sets minimum wage rates for the following April after this advice. A letter from Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner and Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds said the committee must take into account the cost of living as it reviews the national living wage. The two senior ministers insisted the Government was 'committed to ensuring that the minimum wage is a genuine living wage'. They added: 'We continue to recognise that our ambition should be backed by evidence, and that the minimum wage rate should be consistent with delivering inclusive growth for working people and businesses alike. 'We are therefore asking the LPC to recommend a national living wage rate that is at least two-thirds of UK median earnings for workers aged 21 and over, to apply from next April, which takes into account the cost of living, effects on employment and developments in the wider economy.' Elsewhere, the Government is pushing forward with plans to end 'discriminatory' age banding for the minimum wage, and has extended the LPC's remit to examine this. It said the LPC will consult with employers, trade unions and workers on narrowing the gap between the national living wage and the minimum wage rate for 18 to 20-year-olds, which is currently £10. There is also a minimum wage for those aged under 18, and apprentices, of £7.55. The LPC will report back in October with advice to the Government on how much the minimum wage should rise by in 2026. The Resolution Foundation, a think tank which works to improve living standards, suggested the Government was using 'ambitious language' on increasing the minimum wage, but in reality was adopting a cautious approach. Nye Cominetti, principal economist at the think tank, said: 'Despite the Government's ambitious language around 'delivering a genuine living wage', the new remit for the Low Pay Commission represents a steady-as-she-goes approach to the adult rate, after faster increases in the years preceding 2024. 'This caution is warranted given worrying labour market data, which is thanks in part to the Government's increase in employer national insurance contributions in April.'

What are the rules around police giving out a suspect's nationality?
What are the rules around police giving out a suspect's nationality?

BBC News

time12 minutes ago

  • BBC News

What are the rules around police giving out a suspect's nationality?

Ministers have said police should be more transparent about the nationalities of people who are charged. But what exactly are the rules?When a police force in England and Wales arrests or charges a suspect and they are thinking of giving information to the media, they need to have two things in mind: the laws about contempt of court which are designed to make sure suspects have a fair trial, and the College of Policing guidance on media of court laws are quite simple in this context. No-one should make public any information that might make a future trial unfair, for example giving out details of the evidence that police officers have collected. In most cases publishing the nationality of the person charged is unlikely to make the trial unfair, so the contempt of court laws are not often College of Policing guidance is more complicated. Before 2012 police forces made decisions on what information to give to the media on a purely case by case basis. These decisions were often nuanced, but were based on how much that information was considered relevant, and were sometimes simply dependent on the force's relationship with an individual journalist. But after Lord Leveson published his report into the ethics of the press in 2012 police forces became much more cautious abut what information they culminated in the College of Policing guidance on media relations which says that if someone is arrested (but not yet charged) police should only give the suspect's gender and age. The guidance does not say anything about nationality or asylum status at this stage. Once a suspect has been charged the guidance says police can give out information such as the name, the date of birth and the address of the nationality and asylum status are not mentioned, but the guidance says: "The media are aware of automatic reporting restrictions and it is their responsibility to follow them. Any information permitted under such restrictions should be released upon charge, including the following: name, date of birth, address, details of charge, and date of court appearance. "The person's occupation can be released if it is relevant to the crime - for example, a teacher charged with the assault of a pupil at the school where they work."So there is nothing in the guidance that prevents police giving information about that nationality, asylum status or even ethnicity of someone who has been charged. But there is nothing that specifically mentions them Warwickshire Police charged two men in connection with the rape of a 12-year-old girl, the force would not say whether the men were asylum seekers. The force said: "Once someone is charged with an offence, we follow national guidance. This guidance does not include sharing ethnicity or immigration status." While this last sentence is true, the guidance does not actually make suggestions one way or another on ethnicity and immigration UK leader Nigel Farage accused the police of a response, Home Secretary Yvette Cooper told BBC Radio 4's Today programme on Tuesday: "We do think there should be greater transparency. We do think more information should be provided, including on issues around nationality including on some of those asylum issues."The prime minister's official spokesman had earlier said: "Our position is that authorities, whether it is the police or whether central government, should be as transparent as possible on these issues."In truth, what information should be released to the media is largely at the discretion of the police force. As events in Liverpool in May showed, when forces think it is in the public interest they will release information about a suspect's ethnicity even before they have been charged. When a car ploughed into crowds celebrating Liverpool FC's winning of the Premiership title, Merseyside Police quickly said the man arrested was white and British, in order to quash rumours of a terrorist College of Policing said: "Police forces make challenging and complex decisions on a case-by-case basis and transparency is essential to prevent misinformation and reassure the public."It said that its guidance was "already under review" and that police forces were considering how to balance their legal obligations with "their responsibility to prevent disorder".The issue of what information police can release about a suspect came sharply into focus last summer when Axel Rudakubana was arrested for murdering three young girls, Alice Aguiar, nine, Bebe King, six, and Elsie Dot Stancombe, seven, in first Merseyside Police did not release any information about him or his religion, which allowed false information that he was a Muslim asylum seeker to spread. Such disinformation was at least partly responsible for last summer's riots. At the time Merseyside Police said it was not giving out more information because of the contempt of court Law Commission has also been looking at contempt of court laws, with a review due to report next month.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store