logo
Congress Finally Took On AI Policy. It's Just Getting Started

Congress Finally Took On AI Policy. It's Just Getting Started

Newsweek14-05-2025

Advocates for ideas and draws conclusions based on the interpretation of facts and data.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Congress' recent passage of the TAKE IT DOWN Act marks a pivotal breakthrough. The bill, which helps stop the spread of non-consensual intimate images and deepfakes online, is the first major internet content legislation since 2018, and arguably the first law ever to address harms from generative AI.
Finally, we have proof that Washington can act on AI and digital harms. Now, we need to keep the momentum going.
The U.S. Capitol building is seen at sunset.
The U.S. Capitol building is seen at sunset.For years, Congress stalled on technology policy. This wasn't for lack of warning signs. In 2021, Facebook whistleblower Frances Haugen went public with internal research showing that Instagram was toxic for many teens. Two years later, another whistleblower, Arturo Béjar, came forward with allegations that Meta ignored growing evidence of harm to young Facebook users.
Meta wasn't alone. A wealth of research over the last five years has found evidence of platforms including TikTok, Snapchat, and YouTube recommending harmful content to teens. Polling from my organization, Americans for Responsible Innovation, shows that 79 percent of Americans are now concerned about AI's impact on younger generations.
These warning signs and increased public awareness created an environment where public policy mitigating online harms became increasingly possible. Still, Congress stalled for years.
One of the prime suspects behind this legislative paralysis was Big Tech's lobbying clout. The industry spent an estimated $250 million to stop regulatory bills in the 117th Congress. Hyper-partisan divides didn't make legislative movement on tech policy any easier.
In the era of AI, past failures to act on social media cast a long shadow. Would Washington wait until AI harms were rampant and entrenched before responding? Many in tech policy braced for another round of inaction. Thankfully, two important things changed.
First, the tech industry's stance toward regulation shifted. For years, major platforms treated any new regulation as a mortal threat, deploying lobbyists to kill even modest proposals. Now, we're seeing a more strategic approach. In the case of the TAKE IT DOWN Act, Big Tech did something almost unheard of: it didn't fight the bill. In fact, several Silicon Valley giants, including Meta, Snapchat, Google, and X, actively backed it. Even hardline industry groups backed off.
The change of heart may partly be due to a shifting regulatory environment. In the absence of federal laws, states started advancing their own digital rules, creating a patchwork that was even harder for industry to swallow than federal regulation.
The second change is within Congress itself. Burned by years of inaction on social media, lawmakers in both parties want to get ahead of the curve on AI. Over the past year, instead of waiting for the next whistleblower crisis, Congress did something novel: it educated itself and built bipartisan consensus early.
The Senate convened a series of AI insight forums that brought in experts from all sides. Bipartisan working groups in the House and Senate built out roadmaps on AI policy priorities. This process treated AI policy as a shared challenge requiring knowledge and nuance. It's a heartening contrast to the spectacle of social media hearings from the 2010s.
The TAKE IT DOWN Act itself is a step forward that offers a template for future political success. It zeroes in on a specific, clearly harmful phenomenon (non-consensual intimate images), and provides a remedy: a federal mandate that such images be swiftly taken down at victims' request. As some lawmakers in Congress have noted, the TAKE IT DOWN Act's passage shows Congress is getting serious about addressing the harms posed by new technologies.
And when it comes to bipartisan opportunities to pass tech legislation through Congress, there are plenty of bills to choose from. There's the NO FAKES Act, which would outlaw unauthorized AI deepfakes of real people's likenesses, the CREATE AI Act, which would expand access to AI resources for students and researchers, and the TEST AI Act to set up sandbox environments to evaluate new AI models.
As happened with the TAKE IT DOWN Act, tech industry leaders are starting to come to the table rather than trying to block progress.
The key going forward will be to keep this spirit alive. Now is the time for Congress to schedule hearings and markups to move additional bipartisan bills through the pipeline, building a suite of smart guardrails for AI and online platforms. These measures can protect consumers and society from the worst harms while encouraging innovation.
A year ago, many would have laughed at the idea of Congress leading on issues like novel harms from generative AI. But lessons have been learned. The combination of public pressure, shifting industry attitudes, and lawmakers doing their homework has created an opening. Now it's up to us to widen it.
Brad Carson is president of Americans for Responsible Innovation (ARI). Carson is a former congressman representing Oklahoma's 2nd District and served as acting undersecretary of Defense.
The views expressed in this article are the writer's own.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

U.S. ambassador says Canadians facing device searches, detainment ‘not a pattern'
U.S. ambassador says Canadians facing device searches, detainment ‘not a pattern'

Hamilton Spectator

time18 minutes ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

U.S. ambassador says Canadians facing device searches, detainment ‘not a pattern'

OTTAWA - The American ambassador to Canada is pushing back on Ottawa's travel advice, saying his country doesn't search phones at the border and arguing some Americans travelling here are having a tough time. 'We welcome Canadians to come in and invest, to spend their hard-earned Canadian dollars at U.S. businesses,' U.S. Ambassador Pete Hoekstra told The Canadian Press in an interview Friday. 'If a Canadian has had a disappointing experience coming into the United States, I'm not denying that it happened, but I'm saying it's an isolated event and it is not a pattern.' In April, Ottawa updated its advice to Canadians travelling to the United States to warn them about the possibility they might be detained if denied entry. 'Expect scrutiny at ports of entry, including of electronic devices,' reads the new guidance. There have been reports of Canadians facing intensified scrutiny at the border, having phones searched and, in some cases, being detained. Hoekstra insisted concerns about device searches are not grounded in reality. 'Coming to the U.S., that's a decision for the Canadians to make. Searching devices and all of that is not a well-founded fear. We don't do that. America is a welcoming place,' he said. He said some Americans have expressed similar concerns about Canada. 'I've heard that from Americans coming into Canada as well, OK? Saying, 'You know, we've not received a warm reception when we've gotten to Canadian customs,'' he said. When asked if these reports from American travellers involve arbitrary phone searches and lengthy detainment, Hoekstra said there are consular cases of Americans complaining to the embassy about the Canada Border Services Agency. 'We've said, 'OK this may have been an isolated event. There may have been a Canadian border person who was having a bad day, and thought they'd take it out on, you know, somebody across the border,'' he said. In a statement, the CBSA said its officers follow a code of conduct and the federal ethics code that both require them to treat everyone equally, and the agency investigates any complaints of mistreatment. 'Employees are expected to conduct themselves in a way that upholds the values of integrity, respect and professionalism at all times,' wrote spokeswoman Karine Martel. 'Treating people with respect, dignity and fairness is fundamental to our border services officers' relationship with the public and a key part of this is serving all travellers in a non-discriminatory way.' Hoekstra said travel to the U.S. is up to individuals. 'If you decide that you're not going to come down or whatever, that's your decision and you're missing an opportunity. There are great things to see in America,' Hoekstra said. He also noted the case of CNN journalist Christiane Amanpour, who recently said she prepared to visit the U.S. last month as if she was 'going to North Korea' — with a 'burner phone' that didn't carry any personal information — only to experience a warm welcome. 'It's like, (let's) get past the rhetoric and let's look at the real experiences that people are having here,' Hoekstra said. Airlines have been cutting flights between Canada and the U.S. due to a slump in demand, and Flight Centre Travel Group Canada reported a nearly 40 per cent drop in flights between the two countries year-over-year in February. A survey in early May conducted by Leger Marketing for the Association for Canadian Studies found 52 per cent of respondents feel that 'it is no longer safe for all Canadians travelling to the United States,' with 29 per cent disagreeing and 19 per cent saying they were unsure. Roughly the same proportion said they personally feel unwelcome in the U.S. LGBTQ+ groups have opted against attending World Pride events in Washington and United Nations events in New York, citing scrutiny at the border as the Trump administration scales back protections for transgender and nonbinary people. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 7, 2025.

Klarna CEO warns AI may cause a recession as the technology comes for white-collar jobs
Klarna CEO warns AI may cause a recession as the technology comes for white-collar jobs

Yahoo

time28 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Klarna CEO warns AI may cause a recession as the technology comes for white-collar jobs

The CEO of payments company Klarna has warned that AI could lead to job cuts and a recession. Sebastian Siemiatkowski said he believed AI would increasingly replace white-collar jobs. Klarna previously said its AI assistant was doing the work of 700 full-time customer service agents. The CEO of the Swedish payments company Klarna says that the rise of artificial intelligence could lead to a recession as the technology replaces white-collar jobs. Speaking on The Times Tech podcast, Sebastian Siemiatkowski said there would be "an implication for white-collar jobs," which he said "usually leads to at least a recession in the short term." "Unfortunately, I don't see how we could avoid that, with what's happening from a technology perspective," he continued. Siemiatkowski, who has long been candid about his belief that AI will come for human jobs, added that AI had played a key role in "efficiency gains" at Klarna and that the firm's workforce had shrunk from about 5,500 to 3,000 people in the last two years as a result. It's not the first time the exec and Klarna have made headlines along these lines. In February 2024, Klarna boasted that its OpenAI-powered AI assistant was doing the work of 700 full-time customer service agents. The company, most famous for its "buy now, pay later" service, was one of the first firms to partner with Sam Altman's company. Later that year, Siemiatkowski told Bloomberg TV that he believed AI was already capable of doing "all of the jobs" that humans do and that Klarna had enacted a hiring freeze since 2023 as it looked to slim down and focus on adopting the technology. However, Siemiatkowski has since dialed back his all-in stance on AI, telling an audience at the firm's Stockholm headquarters in May that his AI-driven customer service cost-cutting efforts had gone too far and that Klarna was planning to now recruit, according to Bloomberg. "From a brand perspective, a company perspective, I just think it's so critical that you are clear to your customer that there will be always a human if you want," he said. In the interview with The Times, Siemiatkowski said he felt that many people in the tech industry, particularly CEOs, tended to "downplay the consequences of AI on jobs, white-collar jobs in particular." "I don't want to be one of them," he said. "I want to be honest, I want to be fair, and I want to tell what I see so that society can start taking preparations." Some of the top leaders in AI, however, have been ringing the alarm lately, too. Anthropic's leadership has been particularly outspoken about the threat AI poses to the human labor market. The company's CEO, Dario Amodei, recently said that AI may eliminate 50% of entry-level white-collar jobs within the next five years. "We, as the producers of this technology, have a duty and an obligation to be honest about what is coming," Amodei said. "I don't think this is on people's radar." Similarly, his colleague, Mike Krieger, Anthropic's chief product officer, said he is hesitant to hire entry-level software engineers over more experienced ones who can also leverage AI tools. The silver lining is that AI also brings the promise of better and more fulfilling work, Krieger said. Humans, he said, should focus on "coming up with the right ideas, doing the right user interaction design, figuring out how to delegate work correctly, and then figuring out how to review things at scale — and that's probably some combination of maybe a comeback of some static analysis or maybe AI-driven analysis tools of what was actually produced." Read the original article on Business Insider Sign in to access your portfolio

Gavin Newsom Demands Trump Remove National Guard From LA Immigration Protests: ‘Breach of State Sovereignty'
Gavin Newsom Demands Trump Remove National Guard From LA Immigration Protests: ‘Breach of State Sovereignty'

Yahoo

time30 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Gavin Newsom Demands Trump Remove National Guard From LA Immigration Protests: ‘Breach of State Sovereignty'

Gov. Gavin Newsom has formally requested that Donald Trump recall the National Guard from Los Angeles and other areas where Californians are protesting the ongoing immigration raids, calling the federal deployment 'a serious breach of state sovereignty.' Newsom shared his official letter to Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth on Sunday afternoon in an Instagram post, saying, 'I have formally requested the Trump Administration rescind their unlawful deployment of troops in Los Angeles County and return them to my command. We didn't have a problem until Trump got involved. This is a serious breach of state sovereignty — inflaming tensions while pulling resources from where they're actually needed. Rescind the Order. Return order to California.' I have formally requested the Trump Administration rescind their unlawful deployment of troops in Los Angeles county and return them to my command. We didn't have a problem until Trump got involved. This is a serious breach of state sovereignty — inflaming tensions while… — Gavin Newsom (@GavinNewsom) June 8, 2025 In a Saturday night memorandum, Trump ordered the deployment of 2,000 National Guard troops to aid federal law enforcement officers battling growing unrest in downtown L.A. and surrounding areas. More to come … The post Gavin Newsom Demands Trump Remove National Guard From LA Immigration Protests: 'Breach of State Sovereignty' appeared first on TheWrap.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store