China Threatens Trump's Panama Canal Deal: Report
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
China has warned that it may block the sale of Hong Kong-based CK Hutchison's international ports, including one on either end of the Panama Canal, to a United States-linked consortium unless China's state-owned shipping giant, COSCO, is included in the agreement.
The development has raised questions about the high-profile $22.8 billion deal, which U.S. President Donald Trump lauded as a foreign policy victory that would reduce Chinese influence over strategic global shipping lanes.
Why It Matters
CK Hutchison agreed in March to sell its 80 percent stake in 43 container ports across 23 countries to a consortium led by BlackRock and the Geneva-based Mediterranean Shipping Company.
The deal, which still requires approval from Beijing, comes after Trump claimed, without offering evidence, that China controls the Panama Canal. China and Panama have rejected this, stressing that the canal remains under Panamanian management.
Newsweek reached out to BlackRock and CK Hutchison via email for comment.
Container ship COSCO Development is seen at the Agua Clara Locks in Colon, 56 miles from Panama City, on May 2, 2017.
Container ship COSCO Development is seen at the Agua Clara Locks in Colon, 56 miles from Panama City, on May 2, 2017.
Rodrigo Arangua/AFP via Getty Images
What To Know
Negotiations over the purchase between BlackRock, Mediterranean Shipping Company (MSC), and CK Hutchison are facing mounting pressure as Chinese officials insist that COSCO, a major state-owned Chinese shipping company, be included in the agreement as an equal partner and shareholder.
Otherwise, Beijing is prepared to block the transaction, according to people familiar with the talks cited by The Wall Street Journal.
Chinese state media has criticized the deal, labeling it a "hegemonic act" by the United States designed to limit China's national interests under the pretense of trade.
Chinese authorities launched an antitrust investigation into the sale and ordered state-owned enterprises to pause any new business dealings linked to CK Hutchison founder Li Ka-shing and his family.
Officials in Panama confirmed an audit of Hutchison's concessions was ongoing.
What People Are Saying
Trade expert Henry Gao, a professor at Singapore Management University, told Newsweek of China's reported ultimatum: "I think it's primarily driven by political and strategic considerations.
"It won't sit well with the Trump administration, which has been trying to push China out of Latin America, long seen by the U.S. as its own backyard. That said, if bilateral trade negotiations make good progress, the U.S. might be willing to resolve the issue in a more amicable way."
Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Lin Jian told reporters Friday: "Regarding the sale of overseas port assets by Changhe, China's State Administration for Market Regulation has stated that it will conduct a review in accordance with the law to protect fair competition in the market and safeguard the public interest.
"I would like to stress once again that China has always firmly opposed the use of economic coercion, hegemony and bullying to infringe upon the legitimate rights and interests of other countries."
What Happens Next
The sources say a final agreement is unlikely before July 27, the previously agreed-upon deadline for negotiations between the three companies.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US Fed independence under threat, say economists, but no one expects a July rate cut- Reuters poll
By Indradip Ghosh BENGALURU -The U.S. Federal Reserve's independence is under threat from mounting political interference, according to a clear majority of economists polled by Reuters, although no one expects a July interest rate cut despite a recent divergence in views among policymakers. President Donald Trump has made it almost a daily routine to personally attack Fed Chair Jerome Powell over the central bank's stance of holding rates due to tariff-related risks of higher inflation. A recent jump in inflation suggests businesses are now passing some of the tariffs onto consumers. Most Federal Market Open Committee members favor holding rates steady, but a few, including Governor Chris Waller and Trump appointee Fed Vice Chair for Supervision Michelle Bowman, have recently advocated a reduction as soon as July 30. Powell's term is set to expire in May 2026. Waller last week said he would accept the job as the bank's head if he was offered it by Trump. An over 70% majority of economists in the July 17-23 Reuters poll who answered an additional question, 36 of 50, said they were worried about the Fed's independence from political influence, including 10 who said they were very concerned. The remaining 14 said they were not. "I am more worried about the Fed's independence than I was a few months ago, and the main reason for that is the recent behaviour of Governors Bowman and Waller. It's very notable they are diverging from the consensus," said Philip Marey, senior U.S. strategist at Rabobank. "This year is still Powell's Fed. The current Fed is very cautious and wants to wait for the data and go only when they're sure ... It is kind of a policy paralysis at the moment and I don't think that will change as long as Powell has some grip on the FOMC," he added. All 105 economists said the Fed, which last cut its key interest rate to 4.25%-4.50% in December, will hold rates again at the conclusion of its July 29-30 meeting. Most respondents maintained their rate outlook or expected fewer reductions compared with a poll taken last month. A slight 53% majority of economists, 56 of 105, forecast a cut in September, in line with market pricing. But with less than half the year remaining, a clear consensus on where rates would be by end-2025 remains elusive. Economists are waiting for clarity on trade policies as a deadline for Trump's so-called "reciprocal" tariffs first announced in April approaches. That deadline of August 1 is itself an extension from a previous July 9 deadline. "Tariffs could affect things both in terms of higher inflation (and) it could slow the economy. The Fed doesn't know exactly what that mix is going to be and that's reason enough to wait," said Jonathan Millar, senior U.S. economist at Barclays. Just under two-thirds of forecasters expect one or two rate cuts this year, with nearly a fifth expecting no cuts at all. Interest rate futures are pricing in two reductions. The Fed will cut twice next year, poll medians showed. "We've had a very substantial easing of policy over the last few months just from the fact the dollar has weakened and improvements in equity markets. It's not as if things are really screaming out for a rate cut," Millar said. Inflation forecasts were broadly unchanged from last month, with economists forecasting it will average above the Fed's 2% target through at least 2027. The recent passage of Trump's signature spending bill, expected to add $3.4 trillion to an already enormous $36.2 trillion debt pile, poses a further risk of reigniting price pressures. The economy, which contracted 0.5% last quarter, is forecast to grow just 1.5% this year, a sharp slowdown from 2.8% in 2024. Next year, it was expected to expand 1.6%, a view that has remained steady since May. (Other stories from the Reuters global economic poll) Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
3 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The More Deals Trump Gets, The More Confidence Markets Gain
(Bloomberg) -- The world's investors are enjoying a confidence boost after months of uncertainty as President Donald Trump finally starts signing trade deals. Trump Awards $1.26 Billion Contract to Build Biggest Immigrant Detention Center in US Why the Federal Reserve's Building Renovation Costs $2.5 Billion Salt Lake City Turns Winter Olympic Bid Into Statewide Bond Boom Milan Corruption Probe Casts Shadow Over Property Boom How San Jose's Mayor Is Working to Build an AI Capital Global stocks extended a record, risk-sensitive currencies strengthened and bonds fell after a trade agreement with Japan contained lower tariffs than Trump had threatened earlier this month. The big picture takeaway seems to be a light at the end of a negotiating tunnel that will further fuel investor optimism that the worst of their fears on trade are behind them. As a major trading partner, the Japan deal is potentially a big step forward toward the conclusion of tariff-related uncertainties, according to Jane Foley, head of FX strategy at Rabobank. Subscribe to the Bloomberg Daybreak Podcast on Apple, Spotify and other Podcast Platforms. 'Overall the deal will justify the market's rolling back of the fears related to US recession and inflation seen earlier in the year and should help support risk appetite,' she said. 'It raises pressure on the European trade negotiators, though at the same time it will also raise hope that they can still pull something out of the bag ahead of the deadline.' The deal with Japan sets tariffs on the nation's imports at 15%, including for autos — by far the biggest component of the trade deficit between the two countries. A separate agreement with the Philippines set a 19% rate, the same level as Indonesia agreed and a percentage point below Vietnam's 20% baseline level, signaling that the bulk of Southeast Asia is likely to get a similar rate. After the deals, effective tariff rates still remain much higher than at the beginning of the year, but below the more punitive rates suggested previously. Japan's Topix Index rallied more than 3% to hit a one-year high, with Toyota Motor Corp. surging as much as 16%, the most since 1987. Hopes that the deal could pave the way for an agreement in Europe also boosted shares in the region, with Europe's Stoxx 600 gauge rising 1.2%, the most in a month, led by automakers such as Porsche, Volkswagen and Stellantis, each up more than 6%. Shares in other sectors such as pharma and construction — which have a big exposure to the US market — also rallied on Wednesday, while the yield on US 10-year Treasuries rose three basis points to 4.38%, halting five days of losses. Trump Deals Bring Some Clarity for World's Manufacturing Base Earlier this year, Trump's rapidly-shifting tariff policies sent global markets spiraling amid recession fears and worries about the outlook for US equities, bonds and even the status of the dollar as the world's reserve currency. But risk assets have rebounded as investors saw signs of progress in negotiations and the greenback has steadied. 'Since this news counters the 'Sell America' trade that was exhibited in the first 5 months of the year, if should help support short-covering in the dollar,' Rabobank's Foley said. Japan's deal might be setting a precedent for trade negotiations happening with Europe, according to Fabien Yip, a market analyst at IG in Australia. That will provide some optimism for global markets in their expectations for what will eventually happen with Europe and China, she said. 'It looks like Trump has been making a few concessions with several key trading partners, including Vietnam, Indonesia, and now Japan,' Yip said. 'So the deal today will be quite meaningful for the global rally.' After Stock Market's Torrid Run, Earnings Misses Face Punishment With a deal with Beijing still a key factor for the global economy, US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent will meet his Chinese counterparts in Stockholm for their third round of trade talks aimed at extending a tariff truce and widening the discussions. European Union and US negotiators are still in intensive talks, as they seek to clinch a trade deal by Aug. 1. 'Collectively, this more positive trade news has really helped to ease investor fears that tariffs are about to snap back higher on August 1,' wrote Deutsche Bank AG's Jim Reid in a note to clients. 'But of course, the threat of much higher tariffs still remains for several large economies, including the 30% on the EU, 35% on Canada and 50% on Brazil.' Mohit Kumar, the chief European strategist at Jefferies International sees trade agreements signed in the near term with the rest of the US's key trading partners. 'While a negative from a macro point of view, the world can live with 15% or so tariffs,' he said. --With assistance from Blaise Robinson and Michael Msika. (Updates market pricing from second paragraph.) Elon Musk's Empire Is Creaking Under the Strain of Elon Musk Burning Man Is Burning Through Cash A Rebel Army Is Building a Rare-Earth Empire on China's Border Thailand's Changing Cannabis Rules Leave Farmers in a Tough Spot How Starbucks' CEO Plans to Tame the Rush-Hour Free-for-All ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
San Francisco Chronicle
5 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Trump's racist name games are straight out of a totalitarian playbook
At the beginning of any totalitarian regime, alteration of the past is a top priority, and President Donald Trump's first six months in office seem to be no exception. This week, Trump called for the team names of the Washington Commanders and the Cleveland Guardians to be restored to the Redskins and the Indians, complete with the resurrection of the old Indians' mascot/logo Chief Wahoo, a thoroughly racist caricature. 'The Washington 'Whatever's' should IMMEDIATELY change their name back to the Washington Redskins Football Team,' Trump wrote in a social media post that seemed designed to distract America's attention away from Jeffrey Epstein, adding, 'Our great Indian people, in massive numbers, want this to happen. Their heritage and prestige is systematically being taken away from them. Times are different now than they were three or four years ago. We are a Country of passion and common sense. OWNERS, GET IT DONE!!!' The owners, of course, won't get it done. They know how that would play out after their multimillion-dollar rebranding efforts. As for Native Americans clamoring for going back in time, I'd like to see the polling on that assertion. Oh, wait, a 2020 poll of Native Americans by UC Berkeley and University of Michigan researchers found that half believed the name 'Redskins' offensive, while 65% said they found the 'tomahawk chop' stadium gesture at odds with, you know, not being a racist. No doubt Trump has conducted his own poll because he went further, vowing to block the Commanders from building a new stadium in the nation's capital if the team's owner refuses to make their racist name great again. That threat to billionaire Commanders owner Josh Harris — who also has a stake in the NBA's Philadelphia 76ers and the NHL's New Jersey Devils — comes as his football team is scheduled to move back to the District of Columbia and a new stadium in 2030. But after a decades-long pressure campaign that resulted in the 2021 name change, reverting to the old one will likely prove more difficult than repainting an end-zone logo. Trump is also very offended that the name of Cleveland's baseball team no longer offends so many people and is pressuring the owners of the team formerly known as the Indians to re-offend. So far, that doesn't seem likely. 'Not something I'm tracking or have been paying a lot of attention to, but I would say generally I understand that there are very different perspectives on the decision we made a few years ago,' Guardians President of Baseball Operations Chris Antonetti said. 'But obviously it's a decision we've made and we've gotten the opportunity to build the brand as the Guardians over the past four years and are excited about the future.' Trump's pressing the issue of sports team names is part of a larger rebranding offensive designed to take the country back to the bad old days. When Trump isn't threatening the NFL, MLB and network late-night talk show hosts, he's been busy erasing U.S. Army base names and renaming U.S. Navy ship names he doesn't like. After the George Floyd murder in 2020, Congress voted to change seven Army bases named after Confederate generals, most prominently Fort Bragg in North Carolina and Fort Benning in Georgia. Braxton Bragg was regarded as one of the most incompetent rebel generals, but he happened to be from North Carolina, and Henry Louis Benning was a leading white supremacist who once said, 'If things are allowed to go on as they are … we will have black governors, black legislatures, black juries, black everything. Is it supposed that the white race will stand for that?' Our terribly clever secretary of defense, Pete Hegseth, used a fascinatingly cute gambit to restore the base names: He found soldiers who had a connection to the bases while sharing their old names. Goodbye, Braxton Bragg, hello Roland Bragg, a World War II paratrooper. Sen. Angus King, the Independent from Maine, told Hegseth the bases were named for 'people who took up arms against their country on behalf of slavery,' which didn't seem to faze the former Fox News weekend analyst. 'There is a legacy, a connection' for older U.S. Army veterans, Hegseth countered, to which King responded that his answer and actions were 'an insult to the people of the United States.' Throw in the recent decision by Trump and Hegseth to change U.S. Navy ship names, most prominently those named after the late San Francisco Supervisor Harvey Milk and the late civil rights icon, Rep. John Lewis, and the at-best thinly disguised pattern is laid bare. Want more? The Pentagon's pogrom/purge of alleged DEI promotion in its online presence and libraries initially wiped out any mention of Navajo Code talkers or the Tuskegee Airmen, a far greater affront than any sports franchise name. All of this adds up to more than a diversion from the Epstein case. If they do, we're history.
