Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg settles lawsuit over Cambridge Analytica scandal
A trial over the long-running case had just begun on Wednesday, with defendants accused of overpaying the U.S. government in 2019 when they engineered a $5 billion settlement for alleged privacy violations in the scandal.
Sources familiar with the matter confirmed the settlement to AFP, without providing details.
The settlement comes the same day that Marc Andreessen, one of Silicon Valley's most influential venture capitalists and a board member of the company now known as Meta, was to take the stand.
Mr. Zuckerberg himself was expected in the Wilmington, Delaware courtroom on Monday.
Silicon Valley investor Peter Thiel and former Meta top executive Sheryl Sandberg were also expected to face questioning in the court.
Cambridge Analytica was a political consulting firm that was found to have improperly harvested personal data from millions of Facebook users for targeted political advertising, particularly during the 2016 U.S. election and Brexit referendum.
The scandal thrust Facebook and Mr. Zuckerberg in particular into a political firestorm, leading to major regulatory changes and public scrutiny of tech companies' data practices.
The shareholders in the lawsuit alleged that the board members conspired to pay more to the U.S. government in exchange for ensuring that Mr. Zuckerberg would not be named personally for wrongdoing in the settlement.
Longtime observers of the company were hoping that the trial would expose inside details of how Mr. Zuckerberg and the Facebook executives handled the scandal.
Mr. Zuckerberg was under huge pressure at the time from U.S. and European lawmakers amid widespread allegations that Russia and other bad actors were weaponising Facebook to sow chaos around major elections in the West.
The multi-faceted case also alleged insider trading at the time of the events, with board members to be questioned about the timing of their share sales before the scandal was made public.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
24 minutes ago
- The Hindu
AIAMA to adopt BIS certification for agarbathi industry to benchmark quality
The All-India Agarbathi Manufacturing Association (AIAMA) on Friday said it would adopt the Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) certification to maintain a quality benchmark for the ₹8,000-crore agarbathi industry in India. Ambica Ramanjaneyulu, president of the AIAMA, told The Hindu that the apex body was focusing on value addition, premiumisation, innovation, and quality. 'Through this initiative, we aim to instil pride and deepen the sense of belonging among all stakeholders in the agarbathi ecosystem,' said Mr. Ramanjaneyulu, who is also the director of Ambica Agarbathies Aroma & Industries based in Hyderabad. Addressing the media, Arjun Ranga, immediate past president of AIAMA and MD of Cycle Pure Agarbatti, said, 'Over the years, the global demand for agarbathis has witnessed a significant rise. Our vision is to bring the entire agarbathi fraternity up to speed with the evolving business landscape and more exciting opportunities.' According to him, India currently produces between 16,000 tonnes and 20,000 tonnes of incense sticks a month, and over two lakh women are employed in the industry. The country exports ₹1,000 crore worth of agarbathis to 120 countries, while 80% of the production is sold in domestic markets. The AIAMA directly and indirectly represents over 800 and 3,000 agarbathi manufacturers, respectively, across the country. Cumulatively, the industry has over 5,000 different agarbathi products. As a step towards building a holistic ecosystem, the AIAMA will organise a three-day expo and conference scheduled from November 6 to 8 in Bengaluru, which will feature discussions on various issues including policies, employment opportunities, sourcing raw materials, trends around consumer behavior, and new products, packaging innovations and technology upgradation. 'The showcase will feature rare agarbathi samples, iconic photographs, prestigious awards, and other significant memorabilia. It is designed not only to honour the journey of the industry but also to inspire future generations of agarbathi entrepreneurs,' said Mr. Ranga, who is also the chairperson, AIAMA EXPO. To be spread across 1,20,000 sq. ft, the expo will feature curated seminars that would cover various aspects of the agarbathi industry, including job creation, sourcing of raw materials, research on new fragrances, packaging developments, women empowerment, export opportunities and new-age marketing. The expo would be held in support of the Fragrance and Flavours Association of India (FAFAI), Mumbai; the Fragrance and Flavour Development Centre (FFDC), Kannauj; and the Essential Oils Association of India (EOAI). Over 5,000 delegates and exhibitors from India, Vietnam, Indonesia, and a few European countries are expected to participate. Commenting on growth, Mr. Ramanjaneyulu said the industry was witnessing an emergence of newer products like yoga, meditation, and non-prayer niches. The demand for prayer products, especially agarbathis, has seen a sharp increase in the last five years in India and across the globe, found a study done by the AIAMA.
India Today
24 minutes ago
- India Today
India won't be lectured by a West that still funds Putin
There's an unwritten rule in geopolitics: do as the West says—not as it does. When Europe buys Russian gas, it's painted as a 'strategic necessity.' When India purchases Russian oil, it's condemned as a 'moral failure.' When NATO nations quietly maintain trade links with Moscow even as they publicly criticise others, they call it leadership. But for many observers in the Global South, this looks less like principle—and more like Since the outbreak of the war in Ukraine, India has faced sustained pressure from Western capitals to align with their sanctions regime against Russia. The messaging from Washington, Brussels, and London has been consistent—cut ties with Moscow, reduce dependency, and don't undermine the collective response to Russian aggression. Yet for all the rhetoric of unity, the reality tells a different story. India Under PressureIn the wake of Russia's invasion in February 2022, Western nations imposed sweeping sanctions targeting Russian banks, energy exports, technology transfers, and key individuals. The stated aim was clear: isolate Russia economically and diplomatically. Yet, two and a half years later, it is evident that not all nations are being held to the same has become a focal point of Western concern. Senior U.S. and European officials have repeatedly urged New Delhi to reconsider its burgeoning trade with Moscow—especially its purchase of discounted Russian crude. The message is implicit but firm: buying from Russia risks undermining the West's sanctions what many in India ask is simple: why is India being singled out when many Western countries themselves have continued or quietly resumed trade with Russia?The Numbers Tell a Different StorySince 2022, India has ramped up its imports of Russian crude to over a million barrels per day—up from almost zero prior to the war. The purchases are made at discounted rates, often paid in rupees or dirhams. India argues that this is about securing affordable energy for its 1.4 billion citizens. Western critics argue that it's helping finance Putin's India is not alone in this energy calculus. Despite loudly proclaiming support for sanctions, European Union countries continue to import Russian liquefied natural gas (LNG) at near-record levels. Spain and Belgium, in particular, have become top buyers of Russian LNG. Meanwhile, Germany, after cutting off pipeline gas, has quietly increased LNG imports from Russia via port too, despite its vocal condemnation of Moscow, continues to receive Russian oil products through third-party channels. Even the United States, leading the charge on sanctions, still imports critical Russian commodities such as uranium, essential for powering its nuclear energy infrastructure.A Tale of Double StandardsThe disparity is striking. When India buys Russian oil, it's accused of complicity. When Europe purchases Russian gas, it's considered necessity. When India uses alternative currencies, it's accused of evading sanctions. When Europe employs financial loopholes, it's called pragmatic this: in 2022 alone, the EU paid over $120 billion to Russia for fossil fuels. India's total was less than half that—around $50 billion. And yet, India finds itself at the receiving end of Western External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar has been blunt: Europe must not assume that its problems are the world's problems. Nor should it expect developing nations to prioritise Eurocentric moral binaries over their own developmental Ties and Strategic NecessityBeyond oil, India's longstanding defence partnership with Russia is also under scrutiny. Roughly 60–70% of India's military hardware is of Russian origin. From fighter jets and submarines to missile systems and spare parts, the Indian Armed Forces remain heavily reliant on Russian argues that severing defence ties abruptly would be strategically reckless. NATO, on the other hand, labels continued cooperation as here, too, the hypocrisy is hard to ignore. Turkey, a NATO member, bought the Russian S-400 missile system in 2019—triggering U.S. sanctions under the CAATSA law. But Turkey remains firmly within NATO. More tellingly, Ankara today maintains a dual posture—arming Ukraine with drones while trading grain and gas with Russia. And Washington turns a blind Sanctions TrapIn March 2024, U.S. lawmakers revived the threat of secondary sanctions on countries facilitating Russian trade. Though India wasn't directly named, the intention was unmistakable. Reports emerged that Indian refineries processing Russian crude and exporting it to Europe were being closely irony? Europe continues to import refined Russian-origin fuel through Indian intermediaries—and then warns India for buying the crude in the first paradox underlines a broader issue: are sanctions truly about isolating Russia—or are they about preserving Western strategic comfort? And if the West isn't prepared to apply sanctions uniformly, why should others bear the brunt?Multipolarity and Sovereign ChoiceIndia has remained clear-eyed. It condemns the war. It supports diplomacy. But it refuses to play along with what it sees as a selective and self-serving sanctions Delhi's position finds support across the Global South. Nations in Asia, Africa, and Latin America view India's choices not as betrayal—but as realism. Like India, many rely on Russian energy, fertilisers, grain, and arms. And they, too, have rejected the binary of 'with us or against us.'advertisementAt the BRICS Summit, India joined other member states in calling for a more balanced global financial architecture—less beholden to the U.S. dollar, and less exposed to Western sanctions. The sentiment was clear: the rules of global trade cannot change based on who is writing Brazilian President Lula da Silva put it, 'We don't want an emperor. Our countries are sovereign.' His remarks, interpreted as a response to former U.S. President Donald Trump's threats of retaliatory tariffs, encapsulate a growing frustration with Western economic West's Credibility CrisisSince the war began, over 500 Western companies have pulled out of Russia. But hundreds of others remain—protected by waivers, exemptions, or discreet arrangements. From pharmaceuticals to chemicals to machinery, the West's economic ties to Russia have not been severed—they've merely been firms, however, receive little such leeway. When they request flexibility, they're met with inconsistency chips away at the West's credibility. If sanctions are to be moral instruments, they must be applied universally. Otherwise, they become little more than geopolitical many in New Delhi believe the West's real discomfort is not with oil—or even with Moscow—but with India's growing strategic autonomy. Once a junior partner, India is now asserting its independent course—one that does not always align with Western PartnershipsIn response, India has begun diversifying its global partnerships. It is strengthening ties with the Gulf, deepening trade with Africa and Latin America, and intensifying economic engagement across Southeast Asia. The West remains a key partner—but no longer the only is walking with the West—but not behind Western powers escalate their sanctions rhetoric, they risk pushing India further into alternative economic systems—such as BRICS-led financial structures or bilateral arrangements with China and Russia. That would be a strategic misstep for Washington and Not PressureIndia is not seeking conflict. It has sent humanitarian aid to Ukraine. It has engaged diplomatically with both President Zelensky and President Putin. But New Delhi has made it clear: distant wars will not dictate domestic policy. Especially not when the countries demanding restraint refuse to show it the heart of this debate lies a fundamental truth. Sanctions, to be effective, require consistency. Moral authority, to command respect, must be selectively targeting India while tolerating its own contradictions, the West risks not only weakening its case—but undermining the very principles it claims to the end, this debate isn't just about Russian oil. It's about the shape of the emerging global order. It's about whether leadership is rooted in fairness—or in double in today's world, leadership can no longer be demanded. It must be earned.- EndsMust Watch
India Today
24 minutes ago
- India Today
No double standards: India slams EU sanctions targeting Gujarat refinery
India on Friday strongly criticised the European Union's latest sanctions package against Russia, which includes measures targeting an Indian-based Rosneft-linked oil refinery in Gujarat. The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) rejected the EU's unilateral move, reaffirming that India does not recognise sanctions imposed outside the United Nations EU's 14th sanctions package, aimed at further restricting Russia's revenues amid its war in Ukraine, includes tighter banking rules, measures on shadow fleet shipping, a lower oil price cap, and, for the first time, sanctions affecting infrastructure located in India. advertisementSpecifically, the sanctions target Nayara Energy's 20-million-tonne-per-year refinery in Gujarat's Vadinar, where Russian energy firm Rosneft holds a 49.13 per cent stake. 'We have noted the latest sanctions announced by the European Union. India does not subscribe to any unilateral sanction measures. We are a responsible actor and remain fully committed to our legal obligations,' said MEA Spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal in a 'unilateral sanctions' by the EU could block Nayara from exporting refined products such as diesel and petrol to European nations. Responding to this, India underscored its right to energy access and reiterated its long-standing position on energy sovereignty.'The Government of India considers the provision of energy security a responsibility of paramount importance to meet the basic needs of its citizens. We would stress that there should be no double standards, especially when it comes to energy trade,' Jaiswal EU sanctions also lower the crude oil price cap, currently at USD 60 per barrel, which may unintentionally allow India, the world's second-largest buyer of Russian oil, to access Russian crude at even lower prices.- EndsMust Watch
