1st images from the Vera C Rubin Observatory will drop on June 23. Here's why that's such a big deal
On Monday (June 23), the public and the wider science community will get their first look at images from the Vera C. Rubin Observatory. This will arguably mark the biggest moment in astronomy since the first images from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) were revealed in the summer of 2022.Rubin was built by the National Science Foundation and the U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Science on the mountain Cerro Pachón, high in the dry atmosphere of northern Chile. When its operational, the observatory will construct what Director of Rubin Observatory's construction, Željko Ivezić, described as the "greatest movie of all time and the most informative map of the night sky ever assembled."
The 8.4-meter telescope, equipped with the largest digital camera ever, will conduct the decade-long Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST), capturing the entire southern sky over Earth every 3 nights.
To get you properly prepped for the first images from Rubin, Space.com spoke to an array of scientists who will work with the observatory, as well as others who are just excited to see what images and data this groundbreaking instrument is set to reveal. However, be warned: they're tight-lipped about just what images we will see."Until the images are revealed next week, all I can say is that people are going to be amazed at what we're able to see already," Andrés Alejandro Plazas Malagón, a researcher at Stanford University and part of the Rubin Observatory's Community Science Team, told Space.com. "I am excited about using the largest digital camera in the world for astronomy — the LSSTCam, with 3.2 gigapixels — to survey the entire sky visible from its location in Chile over a 10-year period. This is something that has never been done before. "We will be able to gather more data than any galaxy survey to date to help answer fundamental open questions in astronomy."
Mireia Montes is a Ramón y Cajal Fellow at the Institute of Space Sciences (ICE-CSIC) who will use Rubin to track stars drifting between galaxies via the faint "intracluster light" they emit."Rubin is exciting because it is going to be huge! Surveys are normally limited by how much area they cover or how deep they go, following a method called the 'wedding cake strategy'," Montes said."This means they cover a large area but are not very detailed, or small areas in great detail. Large areas are good for having lots of galaxies, but depth is better for seeing faint things like the details of galaxies or very distant galaxies. You usually choose whether to go for depth or area. Rubin is going to provide both depth and area! This will help us to see things that are not usually very clear.
"The general public will see that the night sky is not as dark as we see it. In fact, when you look at deep images, you can see that there are objects (like stars and galaxies) everywhere you look. I think people are going to be amazed by the number of objects in this image, just as we were by the Hubble Deep Field ... but on a very different scale, as Rubin's camera is huge.
Rubin is going to show us the universe in a totally new way!"
The wide-field view of Rubin will see the LSST gather data that could finally solve lingering mysteries surrounding dark energy, the force that accounts for around 68% of our universe's matter-energy content and causes the expansion of the cosmos to accelerate. It is somewhat startling to consider that despite all of humanity's advances in science, we still only know what around 5% of the universe's contents are. All stars, planets, moons, animals, plants, and inanimate objects, everything we see is "baryonic matter" composed of atoms, but there is a lot more to the universe than this. The rest of the matter-energy content is known as the "dark universe."
Rubin has the right stuff to shine a light on the dark universe, which is divided into dark energy and dark matter, both of which account for about 17% of the universe's matter and energy but remains invisible because it doesn't interact with light.
"Studies of dark energy and dark matter are highly complementary with the Rubin Observatory and its LSST," Plazas Malagón said. "For dark energy, the LSST will measure the shapes and properties of billions of galaxies — an order of magnitude more than current photometric galaxy surveys — across cosmic time. "This will allow Rubin to probe the growth of the large-scale structure of the universe, namely the cosmic web, which is dominated by dark matter, and the expansion history of the universe."
Plazas Malagón explained that the LSST will revolutionize the study of dark matter by mapping the sky with unprecedented depth and precision. This will enable the detection of the smallest dark matter halos that surround small satellite dwarf galaxies and wrap around stellar streams. The observatory will also use a phenomenon first predicted in 1916 by Einstein called "gravitational lensing" to investigate the distribution of dark matter through large galaxies."It will test dark matter properties such as self-interactions, warm or ultra-light masses, and the presence of compact objects like primordial black holes," Plazas Malagón continued. "The LSST will also constrain exotic dark matter models — including axion-like particles — through stellar population measurements, and provide high-resolution maps of large-scale structure to explore how dark matter and dark energy interact. "Combined with other experiments, LSST will offer powerful, complementary tests of dark matter's fundamental nature."
Among the most curious dark energy findings since its discovery in 1998 are hints from the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) that this mysterious force is weakening over time. The wide-field view of Rubin could help confirm this, which would prompt revisions to the standard model of cosmology, or Lambda Cold Dark Matter (LCDM), a model built on a constant dark energy strength.
"The LSST will collect vastly more data, which will help determine whether this is a real effect or just a fluctuation," Plazas Malagón explained. "In addition to studying dark energy, LSST will allow us to test the standard model of cosmology in other ways—examining the cold dark matter and dark energy hypotheses in the context of alternative models, including modified theories of gravity."
Luz Ángela García Peñaloza is a cosmologist in Bogotá, Colombia, specializing in dark energy. She explained why she is so excited about Rubin, its first images, and its ongoing mission.
"Rubin's first image release is an incredible milestone for the astronomical community. This observatory will cover the largest patch of the sky ever, capturing the light of approximately 20 billion galaxies. Rubin (or LSST) is not only an impressive telescope that will complement the cosmic cartography we are doing with other galaxy surveys, but also a fantastic piece of engineering that will be online for the next 10 years. We don't know yet what kind of images they will release on Monday, but I'm looking forward to seeing a deep field with tens of thousands of galaxies and stars. Remarkably, Vera Rubin is going to observe many, many galaxies in one night; thus, I expect to see beautiful images of the sky. Rubin will help us constrain the Large Scale Structure of the universe and, along the same lines, the nature and dynamics of dark energy."
While Rubin will excel at studying galaxies en masse, some scientists will be interested in using its detailed view to look at what lies between those galaxies, namely, faint intracuster light.
"These processes are linked to the formation of clusters of galaxies, which are the largest structures bound by gravity in the universe," Mireia Montes is a Ramón y Cajal Fellow at the Institute of Space Sciences (ICE-CSIC), told Space.com. "Our understanding of the processes that form intracluster light is limited by small datasets. With Rubin, however, we will finally have the depth and numbers required to understand this light much better."
Montes added that the filters employed by Rubin will enable astronomers to determine the type of stars between galaxies that give rise to intracluster light. That should then lead to the revelation of the origins of these "orphan" stars and how they came to drift between galaxies.
Rubin may also excel in spotting another type of faint stellar outcast, so-called "failed stars" or brown dwarfs. These are bodies that form like stars from a collapsing cloud of gas and dust, but fail to gather enough mass to trigger the nuclear fusion of hydrogen to helium in their cores, the process that defines what a main sequence star is.The infrared vision of Rubin's Simonyi Survey Telescope combined with its wide field of view and ability to see deep into space, will make it the perfect instrument for discovering faint, infrared-emitting objects like brown dwarfs.
In fact, researchers have predicted that Rubin could detect thousands of brown dwarfs in the Milky Way, increasing our catalog of these "failed stars" by 20 times.
That could help us better understand the mass limit at which a star "succeeds" and becomes a star rather than a brown dwarf, and thus how our galaxy took shape.
Giuseppe Donatiello is an amateur astronomer from Italy who, thus far, has discovered a staggering 11 new dwarf galaxies in the local neighborhood of the Milky Way."Thanks to deep surveys, important discoveries have come in the Local Group, in particular, bizarre and decidedly unconventional objects have emerged. Rubin will certainly bring other similar discoveries, pushing their detection further," Donatiello said."The ability to go very deep will allow us to better define the timing in cosmic evolution, from the first stars to the current galaxies. Having such an instrument at our disposal does not limit the possibilities of observation, and we must have an open mind to anything new."Nature is more imaginative than we are!"
This cursory list above is far from the extent of the phenomena that will be investigated by Rubin as it conducts the LSST.
"There will be major improvements in almost every area of astronomy," Montes said. "Understanding better our own Milky Way, the evolution of galaxies, finding more low-mass galaxies that will allow us to understand better how galaxy formation occurs at those masses, mapping the mass of our universe, and therefore understanding better our universe."
Plazas Malagón added that some of the other key questions the groundbreaking observatory could answer include: Are there undiscovered planets in the outer solar system (e.g., Planet Nine or Planet X)? What explosive and transient events occur in the universe? How do stars evolve and die? What are the electromagnetic counterparts to gravitational wave and neutrino events? What is the structure of the Milky Way's halo, disk, and bulge? What is the local galactic neighborhood like? Are there hazardous asteroids or comets that could impact Earth?
Phew! Little wonder scientists (and Space.com) are excited!
Related Stories:
— How the Rubin observatory could detect thousands of 'failed stars'
— World's largest digital camera to help new Vera Rubin Observatory make a 'time-lapse record of the universe' (video)
— Rubin Observatory aces 1st image tests, gets ready to use world's largest digital camera
"I'm thrilled to see what the scientific community will do with this data," Alejandro Plazas concluded. "I'm especially excited about the new questions that will emerge — questions we haven't even imagined yet. We've built a discovery machine, and that's incredibly exciting to me.
"One of the most exciting aspects is the unexpected discoveries that lie ahead!"
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Light pollution is encroaching on observatories around the globe – making it harder for astronomers to study the cosmos
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. This article was originally published at The Conversation. The publication contributed the article to Expert Voices: Op-Ed & Insights. Outdoor lighting for buildings, roads and advertising can help people see in the dark of night, but many astronomers are growing increasingly concerned that these lights could be blinding us to the rest of the universe. An estimate from 2023 showed that the rate of human-produced light is increasing in the night sky by as much as 10% per year. I'm an astronomer who has chaired a standing commission on astronomical site protection for the International Astronomical Union-sponsored working groups studying ground-based light pollution. My work with these groups has centered around the idea that lights from human activities are now affecting astronomical observatories on what used to be distant mountaintops. Hot science in the cold, dark night While orbiting telescopes like the Hubble Space Telescope or the James Webb Space Telescope give researchers a unique view of the cosmos – particularly because they can see light blocked by the Earth's atmosphere – ground-based telescopes also continue to drive cutting-edge discovery. Telescopes on the ground capture light with gigantic and precise focusing mirrors that can be 20 to 35 feet (6 to 10 meters) wide. Moving all astronomical observations to space to escape light pollution would not be possible, because space missions have a much greater cost and so many large ground-based telescopes are already in operation or under construction. Around the world, there are 17 ground-based telescopes with primary mirrors as big or bigger than Webb's 20-foot (6-meter) mirror, and three more under construction with mirrors planned to span 80 to 130 feet (24 to 40 meters). The newest telescope starting its scientific mission right now, the Vera Rubin Observatory in Chile, has a mirror with a 28-foot diameter and a 3-gigapixel camera. One of its missions is to map the distribution of dark matter in the universe. To do that, it will collect a sample of 2.6 billion galaxies. The typical galaxy in that sample is 100 times fainter than the natural glow in the nighttime air in the Earth's atmosphere, so this Rubin Observatory program depends on near-total natural darkness. Any light scattered at night – road lighting, building illumination, billboards – would add glare and noise to the scene, greatly reducing the number of galaxies Rubin can reliably measure in the same time, or greatly increasing the total exposure time required to get the same result. The LED revolution Astronomers care specifically about artificial light in the blue-green range of the electromagnetic spectrum, as that used to be the darkest part of the night sky. A decade ago, the most common outdoor lighting was from sodium vapor discharge lamps. They produced an orange-pink glow, which meant that they put out very little blue and green light. Even observatories relatively close to growing urban areas had skies that were naturally dark in the blue and green part of the spectrum, enabling all kinds of new observations. Then came the solid-state LED lighting revolution. Those lights put out a broad rainbow of color with very high efficiency – meaning they produce lots of light per watt of electricity. The earliest versions of LEDs put out a large fraction of their energy in the blue and green, but advancing technology now gets the same efficiency with "warmer" lights that have much less blue and green. Nevertheless, the formerly pristine darkness of the night sky now has much more light, particularly in the blue and green, from LEDs in cities and towns, lighting roads, public spaces and advertising. The broad output of color from LEDs affects the whole spectrum, from ultraviolet through deep red. The U.S. Department of Energy commissioned a study in 2019 which predicted that the higher energy efficiency of LEDs would mean that the amount of power used for lights at night would go down, with the amount of light emitted staying roughly the same. But satellites looking down at the Earth reveal that just isn't the case. The amount of light is going steadily up, meaning that cities and businesses were willing to keep their electricity bills about the same as energy efficiency improved, and just get more light. Natural darkness in retreat As human activity spreads out over time, many of the remote areas that host observatories are becoming less remote. Light domes from large urban areas slightly brighten the dark sky at mountaintop observatories up to 200 miles (320 kilometers) away. When these urban areas are adjacent to an observatory, the addition to the skyglow is much stronger, making detection of the faintest galaxies and stars that much harder. When the Mt. Wilson Observatory was constructed in the Angeles National Forest near Pasadena, California, in the early 1900s, it was a very dark site, considerably far from the 500,000 people living in Greater Los Angeles. Today, 18.6 million people live in the LA area, and urban sprawl has brought civilization much closer to Mt. Wilson. When Kitt Peak National Observatory was first under construction in the late 1950s, it was far from metro Tucson, Arizona, with its population of 230,000. Today, that area houses 1 million people, and Kitt Peak faces much more light pollution. Even telescopes in darker, more secluded regions – like northern Chile or western Texas – experience light pollution from industrial activities like open-pit mining or oil and gas facilities. The case of the European Southern Observatory An interesting modern challenge is facing the European Southern Observatory, which operates four of the world's largest optical telescopes. Their site in northern Chile is very remote, and it is nominally covered by strict national regulations protecting the dark sky. AES Chile, an energy provider with strong U.S. investor backing, announced a plan in December 2024 for the development of a large industrial plant and transport hub close to the observatory. The plant would produce liquid hydrogen and ammonia for green energy. Even though formally compliant with the national lighting norm, the fully built operation could scatter enough artificial light into the night sky to turn the current observatory's pristine darkness into a state similar to some of the legacy observatories now near large urban areas. This light pollution could mean the facility won't have the same ability to detect and measure the faintest galaxies and stars. RELATED STORIES — Light pollution poses serious threat to astronomy, skywatching and more, study says — Best light pollution filters for astrophotography 2025 — World's largest telescope threatened by light pollution from renewable energy project Light pollution doesn't only affect observatories. Today, around 80% of the world's population cannot see the Milky Way at night. Some Asian cities are so bright that the eyes of people walking outdoors cannot become visually dark-adapted. In 2009, the International Astronomical Union declared that there is a universal right to starlight. The dark night sky belongs to all people – its awe-inspiring beauty is something that you don't have to be an astronomer to appreciate. This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
Yahoo
13 hours ago
- Yahoo
What would Mars look like under an Earth-like blue sky? NASA's Perseverance rover just showed us
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. NASA's Perseverance Mars rover continues to beam home incredible sights from the Red Planet surface. This week, NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) released an enhanced-color mosaic of 96 separate images taken by Perseverance on May 26, 2025 that together create an 360-degree panorama of a location on Mars called "Falbreen." This area contains some of the oldest terrain Perseverance has ever explored on the Red Planet, according to JPL. The image was taken on a day when the skies above NASA's Perseverance rover were clear, enabling the robotic explore to capture "one of the sharpest panoramas of its mission so far," according to a JPL statement. The panorama was taken with Perseverance's Mastcam-Z instrument and depicts a rippling surface nearby as well as hills in the distance some 40 miles (65 kilometers) away from the rover. One of the most striking elements of the image is the blue skies overhead — but don't be fooled. The Mars' skies never appear blue like Earth's, and only appear to be blue in the panorama due to processing. "The relatively dust-free skies provide a clear view of the surrounding terrain,' Jim Bell, Mastcam-Z's principal investigator at Arizona State University, said in JPL's statement. "And in this particular mosaic, we have enhanced the color contrast, which accentuates the differences in the terrain and sky." Aside from the blue sky, there is another element in this image that Perseverance's science team is excited about. A large rock visible to the right of the center of the mosaic is an example of what geologists refer to as a "float rock," in reference to a rock that was transported to its current location by water, wind, or even a landslide. This particular float rock sits atop a crescent-shaped ripple of sand, but the Perseverance science team "suspects it got here before the sand ripple formed," according to the statement. Also visible in the image is an abrasion patch, a 2-inch (5-centimeter) area of the Martian surface into which Perseverance drilled with its diamond-dust tipped grinder known as the Rock Abrasion Tool (RAT), capable of spinning at 3,000 revolutions per minute. A raw, more close-up image taken by Perseverance's Mastcam-Z instrument on the same day shows the abraded patch of the Martian surface in greater detail, revealing multiple cracks in the Red Planet's weathered surface. Perseverance landed on Mars on Feb. 18, 2021 in a multi-stage sequence that included an atmospheric entry capsule. The capsule had opened to deploy a landing vehicle featuring a "sky crane" that lowered the rover safely to the Martian surface before flying away and crashing at a safe distance to avoid damaging the rover. The roughly car-sized 2,260-lb (1,025-kilogram) Perseverance landed in a region of Mars known as Jezero Crater. Since then, it has been scouring the area for interesting geological features and collecting samples that NASA hopes to one day return to Earth. However, the fate of that Mars Sample Return program hangs in the balance due to widespread budget cuts at NASA. Private companies have offered to step in, but whether or not we will ever see Perseverance's samples brought home remains unknown. Solve the daily Crossword


Scientific American
16 hours ago
- Scientific American
Rogue Worlds May Not Be So Lonely After All, Europa Clipper Completes Key Test, and RFK, Jr., Pulls $500 Million in mRNA Vaccine Funding
Rachel Feltman: Happy Monday, listeners! For Scientific American 's Science Quickly, I'm Rachel Feltman. Let's kick off the week with our usual science news roundup. Let's start with some space news. Have you ever heard of rogue planets? They sound pretty cool, and they are: the term refers to exoplanets that roam free instead of orbiting a star. Some of them may be objects that formed like stars, coalescing in the wake of a giant gas cloud's collapse but never gaining enough mass to actually start the process of nuclear fusion. Others may get their start in the usual planetary way—forming from the gas and dust around a star—before getting ejected out into open space for some reason or another. According to a preprint study made available last month, the life of a rogue planet might not always be as lonely as it sounds. Some of them may be able to form little planetary systems of their own. On supporting science journalism If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today. The researchers behind the new study, which still has to go through peer review, used instruments on the James Webb Space Telescope to gather information about eight different rogue planets, each with a mass around five to 10 times greater than Jupiter's. Based on infrared observations, the scientists say, six of the objects seem to have warm dust around them, indicating the presence of the kinds of disks where planets form. The researchers also saw silicate grains in the disks—evidence that the dust is growing and crystallizing. That's typically a disk's signature move when it's gearing up to make some baby planets. This study didn't actually find any hints of fully grown planets orbiting those giant rogue worlds, but it suggests that such a phenomenon might be possible. As wild as it is to imagine a lonely world roaming space without a star to orbit, it's even more intriguing to picture a whole system of planets spinning in the dark. Speaking of space, NASA's Europa Clipper, which is expected to arrive at the Jupiter system in 2030 so it can study the gas giant's icy moon, has completed an important test. Back in March 2025 the Europa Clipper flew past Mars and conducted a test of its REASON instrument. That's short for Radar for Europa Assessment and Sounding: Ocean to Near-surface. This radar is a crucial component of the clipper's mission because it's designed to peek beneath the icy shell of Europa's surface, perhaps even glimpsing the ocean beneath it. The radar will also help NASA scientists study the ice itself, along with the topography of Europa's surface. The clipper features a huge pair of solar arrays that carry the slender antennas REASON needs to do its work. The antennas span a distance of about 58 feet, while the arrays collectively stretch the length of a basketball court, which is necessary for them to gather enough light—Europa gets just around 1/25th as much sunlight as we do on Earth. The sheer size of all those components made it impossible to fully test REASON on Earth because once the flight hardware was finished, the clipper had to be kept inside a clean room. NASA simply didn't have a sterile chamber big enough to properly assess the radar. When Europa flew by Mars on March 1, REASON sent and received radio waves for about 40 minutes, collecting 60 gigabytes of data. Earlier this month NASA announced that scientists had completed their analysis of the data and deemed the REASON instrument ready for prime time. Let's move on to some public health news—first, vaccines. Last Tuesday, the Guardian reported that COVID cases in the U.S. are on the rise, as has been the case each summer since the start of the pandemic. Though this current surge has seen case numbers growing more slowly than in previous years, experts who spoke to the Guardian voiced concerns about what the coming months could bring. In May, U.S. Food and Drug Administration officials wrote that, come fall, COVID boosters may be limited to older people and individuals at higher risk of getting severely ill. Even if this move doesn't outright prevent people from vaccinating themselves and their kids, public health experts are concerned that confusion around availability and insurance coverage could lead to a worrisome dip in booster administration. Meanwhile, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services head Robert F. Kennedy Jr. announced last Tuesday that his department is canceling almost $500 million in funding for the development of mRNA vaccines. While experts say mRNA vaccines are safe, have the potential to curb future pandemics, and have already saved millions of lives, Kennedy has come out against the technology. Mike Osterholm, a University of Minnesota expert on infectious diseases and pandemic preparedness, told the Associated Press that he didn't think he'd witnessed 'a more dangerous decision in public health' in his 50 years in the field. We're hoping to focus on explaining mRNA technology in an upcoming episode, so let us know if you have any questions we can answer. You can send those to ScienceQuickly@ In other public health news, a group of scientists say bird flu could be airborne on some dairy farms. In a preprint paper recently posted online, researchers report finding H5N1 influenza virus in both large and small aerosol particles in air sampled from California farms. The scientists also found viral particles in milk, on milking equipment and in wastewater. While H5N1 isn't currently thought to pose a major health risk to humans, its continued circulation in mammals leaves us open to potentially dangerous mutations of the virus. We'll end this week's roundup with a fun little story about how terrifying humans are. Earlier this month the Wall Street Journal reported that U.S. Department of Agriculture workers are blasting human music and voices from speaker-touting drones to scare wolves away from livestock. Apparently the audio selections for these so-called wolf-hazing attempts include the sounds of fireworks, AC/DC's song 'Thunderstruck' and, perhaps most delightfully, that scene from the movie Marriage Story where Scarlett Johansson and Adam Driver scream at each other. Apparently Driver and ScarJo are doing the trick: the Wall Street Journal reported that noisemaking drones were deployed in southern Oregon after wolves killed 11 cows in the area over the span of 20 days. Once the drones were in hazing mode, there were reportedly just two fatal wolf attacks on cattle in an 85-day period. There's no word yet on how the wolves feel about Laura Dern. That's all for this week's science news roundup. We'll be back on Wednesday to talk about the latest advances in male contraception. Science Quickly is produced by me, Rachel Feltman, along with Fonda Mwangi, Kelso Harper and Jeff DelViscio. This episode was edited by Alex Sugiura. Shayna Posses and Aaron Shattuck fact-check our show. Our theme music was composed by Dominic Smith. Subscribe to Scientific American for more up-to-date and in-depth science news. For Scientific American, this is Rachel Feltman. Have a great week!