
Remember the heroes of St Valery-en-caux on this day
READ MORE: Air India flight bound for Gatwick crashes with 244 people on board
This was all kept hidden so that the morale-boosting 'miracle' of Dunkirk would not be undercut by the disaster of the 51st Division's sacrifice only 10 days later. Relatives did not get news for years, some not till the war ended; the lives of many of the survivors were shortened; and the men whose actions had made Dunkirk possible were ignored. Every Highland village lost men, and yet little was made of St Valery – apart from those immediately connected – for the next 80 years.
During their long imprisonment the 51st Division, with many pipers, produced much music, including the Reel of the 51st Division and later The Heroes of St Valery, written by Pipe Major Donal MacLean (who died in 1964 aged only 56). Three Scottish Armed Forces charities organised a tribute, and pipers (and others players) all over the world – suitably distanced because of Covid – brought the memory of these men, mostly long dead, to mind.
Every year since 1940 much attention is rightly given to the courage of those involved in the Dunkirk rescue, including many who perished on the 'little' boats. Such commemoration should also be paid, every year, perhaps by playing 'their tune', to the men who fought on, to guaranteed disaster, with no rescue, in order that so many could be saved at Dunkirk – the heroes of St Valery-en-caux.
Remember the heroes of St Valery-en-caux: The 51st Highland Division, June 12 1940.
Susan FG Forde
Scotlandwell
IN a recent letter regarding the result of the latest by-election loss in Hamilton, in another publication, a pro-Reform UK writer used the Latin term 'ad hominem' to defend his preferred political party – Ukip, Leave, Brexit or now Reform UK plc, Mr Farage's vehicle – by alleging that opponents of his choice are, to use a common football analogy, 'playing the man rather than the ball'.
The normal protocol for political discourse advises that we should all stick to''the policy', being supportive or otherwise, rather than attacking or idolising the person espousing the policy.
However, I don't want to be a 'they did it first' person but they did, didn't they?
READ MORE: Scottish Tories see fresh defection to Nigel Farage's Reform UK
First, it was the EU was ripping us off, Johnny Foreigner telling us what to and not to do. The European Research Group (ERG) political grouping within the Conservative party frequently squeezed their party to speak from the ERG script to get a better, less restrictive deal from the EU. The rest, we know, was Brexit.
Next, illegal immigrants became the focus of their ire. These poor people running from various threats to life, and yes, some making the move for a better way of life; let's be clear, 'a life'.
There is not one person in the UK that would not do the same if circumstances were different here. History reminds us of our forebears of the 1700s, who were forced to leave for sheep.
A more recent incident revealed that they (Reform UK) are back on their claims of stopping the dilution of British (English) values with the anti-Islam rhetoric, where banning the burqa was proposed and then subsequently reversed when chairman stood down then reappointed in a newer role, 'flip-flopping' somewhat.
The leader of the Ukip hasn't changed his spots since he has morphed his party from Ukip to Reform UK plc. There have been successive outbursts from the Clacton MP through the ages, about the EU and 'loss of control' of the UK borders and ridiculous legislation on food and regulations.
If Farage gets into Number 10 or into a position where he can pull the chain of the government, he will force the UK from the European Convention on Human Rights, which the UK co-founded, and we would join Russia and Belarus as they are the only other two European not bound by ECHR rules.
Is that a club we wish to join? That's a 'no thanks' from me.
It is clear 'playing the man' can sometimes be unhelpful, but when a snake-oil salesman gets hold of the reigns of government, we must look into to his history to decide if his product is worth touching or should be shunned.
Alistair Ballantyne
Angus
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Powys County Times
a day ago
- Powys County Times
Top A-level grades may remain higher this year than pre-pandemic levels
The proportion of A-level entries scoring top grades this summer is likely to be higher than pre-Covid years, it has been suggested. An education expert has predicted that a higher percentage of UK A-level entries awarded an A or A* grade – compared to before the Covid-19 pandemic – may be the 'new normal'. Professor Alan Smithers, director of the Centre for Education and Employment Research (CEER) at the University of Buckingham, has raised concerns that grade inflation 'may be creeping back in again'. Last year, more than a quarter (27.8%) of UK A-level entries were awarded an A or A* grade, up from 27.2% in 2023. In a report, published ahead of A-level results day, Prof Smithers said he believes this year's results 'are likely to be close to what they were in 2024'. It was the highest proportion of entries scoring top grades outside the pandemic-affected years of 2020-22. In 2019 – the last year that summer exams were taken before the pandemic – 25.4% of entries were awarded A or A* grades. The Covid-19 pandemic led to an increase in top A-level and GCSE grades in 2020 and 2021, with results based on teacher assessments instead of exams. Ahead of A-level results day on Thursday next week, Prof Smithers said the grade pattern in 2024 'could be the start of a new normal'. He added that the proportion of UK A-level entries awarded A or A* grades – of between 27% and 28% – could be the 'new norm' for results. Figures covering A-level entries from students in England, Wales and Northern Ireland will be published by the Joint Council for Qualifications on Thursday. Ofqual brought A-level grading standards back in line with pre-Covid levels in England in 2023, and exam regulators in Wales and Northern Ireland aimed to return to pre-pandemic grading last summer. Prof Smithers said A-level grades should have been 'back to normal' last year, but he added that they rose to a level higher than pre-Covid years. He added: 'There has to be the suspicion that the inflation which bedevilled A-level grades in the days before the regulator, Ofqual, may be creeping back in again.' In his report, Prof Smithers also suggested that 'girls will do better than boys' once again at the top A-level grades. Last year, the proportion of girls' A-level entries awarded A or higher was 28.0%, which was 0.4 percentage points higher than the equivalent figure for boys' entries (27.6%). But the proportion of boys' entries awarded A* was 9.5% – which was 0.4 percentage points higher than girls (9.1%). Prof Smithers has suggested that the success for boys at A* will 'continue to be overshadowed in 2025 by the longstanding superior results of girls overall'. He said: 'Sadly, the under-performance of boys is no more likely than in previous years to receive the attention it deserves. 'They and the country would benefit considerably if ways could be found of ensuring that the potential of many boys is not wasted.' Reflecting on provisional exam entries data for England, Prof Smithers said a decline in the social sciences this summer 'could be an early sign that they have been rumbled' in promising more than they deliver. A-level entries for psychology and sociology are down, but entries for mathematics, physics and chemistry are up, according to provisional figures from Ofqual in June. Prof Smithers said: 'The swing towards maths and the physical sciences could be a response to the former government's promotion of them.' He added: 'I wonder if there is growing recognition that these social sciences promise more than they deliver, whereas the quantitative may be hard but they are meaningful.' A Department for Education spokesperson said: 'These claims are completely false. 'It is vital that qualifications are rigorous, and we are confident in Ofqual's work, as the independent regulator, to manage the risk of grade inflation and ensure this is not impacting standards. 'This suggestion demonstrates a lack of understanding of Ofqual's role and the work they do every year to ensure fairness, with this year being no different.'


South Wales Guardian
a day ago
- South Wales Guardian
Top A-level grades may remain higher this year than pre-pandemic levels
An education expert has predicted that a higher percentage of UK A-level entries awarded an A or A* grade – compared to before the Covid-19 pandemic – may be the 'new normal'. Professor Alan Smithers, director of the Centre for Education and Employment Research (CEER) at the University of Buckingham, has raised concerns that grade inflation 'may be creeping back in again'. Last year, more than a quarter (27.8%) of UK A-level entries were awarded an A or A* grade, up from 27.2% in 2023. In a report, published ahead of A-level results day, Prof Smithers said he believes this year's results 'are likely to be close to what they were in 2024'. It was the highest proportion of entries scoring top grades outside the pandemic-affected years of 2020-22. In 2019 – the last year that summer exams were taken before the pandemic – 25.4% of entries were awarded A or A* grades. The Covid-19 pandemic led to an increase in top A-level and GCSE grades in 2020 and 2021, with results based on teacher assessments instead of exams. Ahead of A-level results day on Thursday next week, Prof Smithers said the grade pattern in 2024 'could be the start of a new normal'. He added that the proportion of UK A-level entries awarded A or A* grades – of between 27% and 28% – could be the 'new norm' for results. Figures covering A-level entries from students in England, Wales and Northern Ireland will be published by the Joint Council for Qualifications on Thursday. Ofqual brought A-level grading standards back in line with pre-Covid levels in England in 2023, and exam regulators in Wales and Northern Ireland aimed to return to pre-pandemic grading last summer. Prof Smithers said A-level grades should have been 'back to normal' last year, but he added that they rose to a level higher than pre-Covid years. He added: 'There has to be the suspicion that the inflation which bedevilled A-level grades in the days before the regulator, Ofqual, may be creeping back in again.' In his report, Prof Smithers also suggested that 'girls will do better than boys' once again at the top A-level grades. Last year, the proportion of girls' A-level entries awarded A or higher was 28.0%, which was 0.4 percentage points higher than the equivalent figure for boys' entries (27.6%). But the proportion of boys' entries awarded A* was 9.5% – which was 0.4 percentage points higher than girls (9.1%). Prof Smithers has suggested that the success for boys at A* will 'continue to be overshadowed in 2025 by the longstanding superior results of girls overall'. He said: 'Sadly, the under-performance of boys is no more likely than in previous years to receive the attention it deserves. 'They and the country would benefit considerably if ways could be found of ensuring that the potential of many boys is not wasted.' Reflecting on provisional exam entries data for England, Prof Smithers said a decline in the social sciences this summer 'could be an early sign that they have been rumbled' in promising more than they deliver. A-level entries for psychology and sociology are down, but entries for mathematics, physics and chemistry are up, according to provisional figures from Ofqual in June. Prof Smithers said: 'The swing towards maths and the physical sciences could be a response to the former government's promotion of them.' He added: 'I wonder if there is growing recognition that these social sciences promise more than they deliver, whereas the quantitative may be hard but they are meaningful.' A Department for Education spokesperson said: 'These claims are completely false. 'It is vital that qualifications are rigorous, and we are confident in Ofqual's work, as the independent regulator, to manage the risk of grade inflation and ensure this is not impacting standards. 'This suggestion demonstrates a lack of understanding of Ofqual's role and the work they do every year to ensure fairness, with this year being no different.'

Rhyl Journal
a day ago
- Rhyl Journal
Top A-level grades may remain higher this year than pre-pandemic levels
An education expert has predicted that a higher percentage of UK A-level entries awarded an A or A* grade – compared to before the Covid-19 pandemic – may be the 'new normal'. Professor Alan Smithers, director of the Centre for Education and Employment Research (CEER) at the University of Buckingham, has raised concerns that grade inflation 'may be creeping back in again'. Last year, more than a quarter (27.8%) of UK A-level entries were awarded an A or A* grade, up from 27.2% in 2023. In a report, published ahead of A-level results day, Prof Smithers said he believes this year's results 'are likely to be close to what they were in 2024'. It was the highest proportion of entries scoring top grades outside the pandemic-affected years of 2020-22. In 2019 – the last year that summer exams were taken before the pandemic – 25.4% of entries were awarded A or A* grades. The Covid-19 pandemic led to an increase in top A-level and GCSE grades in 2020 and 2021, with results based on teacher assessments instead of exams. Ahead of A-level results day on Thursday next week, Prof Smithers said the grade pattern in 2024 'could be the start of a new normal'. He added that the proportion of UK A-level entries awarded A or A* grades – of between 27% and 28% – could be the 'new norm' for results. Figures covering A-level entries from students in England, Wales and Northern Ireland will be published by the Joint Council for Qualifications on Thursday. Ofqual brought A-level grading standards back in line with pre-Covid levels in England in 2023, and exam regulators in Wales and Northern Ireland aimed to return to pre-pandemic grading last summer. Prof Smithers said A-level grades should have been 'back to normal' last year, but he added that they rose to a level higher than pre-Covid years. He added: 'There has to be the suspicion that the inflation which bedevilled A-level grades in the days before the regulator, Ofqual, may be creeping back in again.' In his report, Prof Smithers also suggested that 'girls will do better than boys' once again at the top A-level grades. Last year, the proportion of girls' A-level entries awarded A or higher was 28.0%, which was 0.4 percentage points higher than the equivalent figure for boys' entries (27.6%). But the proportion of boys' entries awarded A* was 9.5% – which was 0.4 percentage points higher than girls (9.1%). Prof Smithers has suggested that the success for boys at A* will 'continue to be overshadowed in 2025 by the longstanding superior results of girls overall'. He said: 'Sadly, the under-performance of boys is no more likely than in previous years to receive the attention it deserves. 'They and the country would benefit considerably if ways could be found of ensuring that the potential of many boys is not wasted.' Reflecting on provisional exam entries data for England, Prof Smithers said a decline in the social sciences this summer 'could be an early sign that they have been rumbled' in promising more than they deliver. A-level entries for psychology and sociology are down, but entries for mathematics, physics and chemistry are up, according to provisional figures from Ofqual in June. Prof Smithers said: 'The swing towards maths and the physical sciences could be a response to the former government's promotion of them.' He added: 'I wonder if there is growing recognition that these social sciences promise more than they deliver, whereas the quantitative may be hard but they are meaningful.' A Department for Education spokesperson said: 'These claims are completely false. 'It is vital that qualifications are rigorous, and we are confident in Ofqual's work, as the independent regulator, to manage the risk of grade inflation and ensure this is not impacting standards. 'This suggestion demonstrates a lack of understanding of Ofqual's role and the work they do every year to ensure fairness, with this year being no different.'