logo
Erased In Silence: How Intelligentsia Ignores Hindu Persecution

Erased In Silence: How Intelligentsia Ignores Hindu Persecution

News1821 hours ago
Last Updated:
The world must wake up to the reality that Hindus in Pakistan and Bangladesh are not just second-class citizens, they are targeted and oppressed minorities
For generations, the liberal intelligentsia in India and the West have platformed themselves as the flagbearers of a conscience-driven society and champions of the oppressed and voiceless. Yet, their silence on the relentless persecution of Hindus in Pakistan and Bangladesh exposes the absolute hollowness of this claim.
These are states whose very foundations were laid on the idea of Islamic othering. The non-Muslim, particularly the Hindu, exists as an unwanted relic of a rejected hangover of 1947. As a consequence, the persecution they suffer isn't just societal but institutional, legal and sustained via the State's policy mechanisms.
It is often forgotten that over 90% of Indian Muslims of undivided British India, who voted in the 1946 elections, supported the Muslim League's call for Pakistan. Yet after Partition, more than 70% of them who voted, chose to stay back in India and not embrace the Pakistan they helped create. Some, like Khaliquzzaman, who were patrons of the Muslim League and Gazwa-E-Hind project (literal translation Holy War against Hind), even stayed on to help shape India's Constitution sitting in the constituent assembly before eventually departing for Pakistan they had politically birthed.
This unacknowledged historical truth is uncomfortable for the intelligentsia, which continues to present Muslims of the Indian subcontinent as mere victims of Hindu majoritarianism, while refusing to scrutinise the ideological forces and often deflecting it on the Hindu Mahasabha or Savarkar that led to Partition and its consequences.
Despite the global blindspot and gaslighting of facts, it is undeniable that in Pakistan and Bangladesh, Hindus are being quietly erased. Their temples are frequently desecrated, their daughters abducted, raped and converted under State patronage, their lands snatched, and their identities crushed. This is not anecdotal but rather state-enabled.
In Bangladesh, a pivotal study conducted by Professor Abdul Barakat of Dhaka University revealed that between 1964 and 2013, an estimated 11.3 million Hindus were forced to flee the country due to religious persecution and systematic dispossession. Laws like the Enemies Property Act (Pakistan) and the Vested Property Act (Bangladesh) were designed to dispossess Hindus under the guise of nationalism or land reform. These draconian policies have been used for decades to legally plunder Hindu-owned properties, with millions of families rendered homeless and stateless without recourse or redress.
And yet, the global liberal elite, so quick to decry 'Islamophobia" in India, continues to demonstrate a deafening silence when it comes to this religious apartheid.
False Equivalences and Intellectual Gaslighting
What we instead hear are shrill claims of Muslim oppression in India, based not on institutional disenfranchisement, but often on isolated incidents inflated into sweeping narratives. Meanwhile, the systemic dispossession of Hindus in Islamic states is explained away, or worse, ignored.
Consider this – in India, Muslims benefit from exclusive educational scholarships, religious reservations, personal law privileges, and vast land holdings under Waqf Boards, unchecked by Parliament or courts. Bodies like the All India Muslim Personal Law Board act as parallel legal systems, undermining efforts like the Uniform Civil Code in the garb of minority rights.
And yet, any mention of these imbalances is branded 'Islamophobic." Meanwhile, no such label exists for ignoring the actual, ongoing erasure of Hindus in neighbouring Islamic republics.
The Islamo-Leftist Nexus
What explains this hypocrisy? It is the alliance between Islamist politics and leftist intellectual elites, a mutually beneficial arrangement. The Left provides cover for Islamists under the garb of anti-majoritarianism; the Islamists, in turn, help perpetuate the victimhood narrative that fuels leftist politics in democratic setups like India.
This axis has succeeded in portraying India's Muslims as oppressed, while remaining eerily silent about the crimes against Hindus committed in the name of Islam just across the border. The result? A distorted moral compass that condemns imagined majoritarianism while enabling real, ongoing theocratic oppression.
The Nehruvian Lie
India, too, carries historical baggage. For decades, Nehruvian historians like Irfan Habib, Romila Thapar, D N Jha etc (today known as distorians) gave us a whitewashed version of the past, airbrushing centuries of trauma under the guise of 'composite culture" and 'secular harmony." The brutalities of Islamic invasions, the forced conversions, the destruction, desecration and loot of temples, none of it found meaningful space in our textbooks or discourse.
This wilful historical amnesia was meant to foster social cohesion, but instead bred historical dishonesty, crippling India's ability to have an honest conversation about religious and historical fault lines.
The Case for Intellectual Honesty
If human rights are to mean anything, they cannot be filtered through ideological convenience. The world must wake up to the reality that Hindus in Pakistan and Bangladesh are not just second-class citizens, they are targeted and oppressed minorities whose lives, property, and dignity are under a constant assault.
And in India, we must stop pretending that the Muslim minority is uniformly oppressed while Hindu refugees from Pakistan and Bangladesh continue to live in squalor and fear, denied the sympathy freely offered to others.
It is time to dismantle the false equivalences and hold all states, not just politically convenient ones, accountable for their treatment of minorities.
Justice cannot be selective. Nor can memory.
Adit Kothari is a Calcuttan residing in London as a Pravasi Bharatiya, working to dismantle the plethora of false narratives and misinformation against India and Hindutva. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely that of the author. They do not necessarily reflect News18's views.
view comments
Location :
New Delhi, India, India
First Published:
July 22, 2025, 19:11 IST
News opinion Opinion | Erased In Silence: How Intelligentsia Ignores Hindu Persecution
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

AIADMK's Palaniswami Sparks Controversy With Temple Land Ownership Promise For Delta Residents
AIADMK's Palaniswami Sparks Controversy With Temple Land Ownership Promise For Delta Residents

Hans India

time6 minutes ago

  • Hans India

AIADMK's Palaniswami Sparks Controversy With Temple Land Ownership Promise For Delta Residents

Tamil Nadu's opposition leader Edappadi K Palaniswami has ignited a fresh political controversy by pledging to grant formal land ownership rights to families residing on temple properties across the state's delta region, should his AIADMK party regain power. The promise has drawn sharp criticism from political commentators and sparked renewed debate over temple land management. Palaniswami defended his proposal by highlighting the long-term residence of numerous families on temple-owned land, arguing that his previous administration had initiated steps toward regularizing their occupancy. During his tenure as Chief Minister, he had announced a comprehensive scheme whereby the government would conduct land assessments, compensate temples appropriately, and subsequently issue ownership documents to current residents. The former Chief Minister acknowledged that legal challenges had previously derailed the initiative, with court interventions resulting in stay orders that prevented implementation. He expressed confidence that a future AIADMK government would successfully navigate these legal obstacles and complete the ownership transfer process for affected families. However, the proposal has faced immediate pushback from political analysts who question both its legality and appropriateness. Sumanth Raman, a prominent political commentator, strongly condemned the plan through social media, emphasizing that temple lands remain outside government ownership and cannot be arbitrarily redistributed. He characterized Palaniswami's promise as fundamentally flawed and politically irresponsible. The controversy extends beyond land ownership issues to broader questions about temple administration and fund utilization. During his ongoing statewide campaign, Palaniswami has consistently attacked the ruling DMK government's approach to temple management, accusing them of misappropriating religious institution funds for secular purposes. Palaniswami has specifically criticized the DMK's practice of using temple revenues to establish educational institutions, arguing that such expenditures represent improper diversion of religious funds. He contends that the state government should finance educational infrastructure through its own budget rather than utilizing temple resources designated for religious purposes. The DMK leadership has responded forcefully to these accusations, citing existing legal frameworks that explicitly permit such fund utilization. The HR&CE Act provides clear authorization for temple institutions to allocate surplus funds toward educational and charitable activities, making Palaniswami's criticism legally questionable. Chief Minister MK Stalin has characterized Palaniswami's position as reflecting BJP ideological influence rather than traditional AIADMK policies. This accusation suggests that the opposition leader has shifted toward more religiously conservative positions that align with national BJP narratives about temple autonomy and Hindu religious rights. Deputy Chief Minister Udhayanidhi Stalin escalated the political rhetoric by labeling Palaniswami a "Sanghi," implying ideological alignment with RSS-BJP thinking rather than authentic AIADMK principles. This characterization represents an attempt to portray the opposition leader as abandoning his party's historical positions in favor of external ideological influences. The temple land ownership promise reflects broader political calculations about rural constituency appeals and religious sentiment mobilization. Palaniswami's strategy appears designed to attract support from families currently residing on temple properties while simultaneously positioning his party as protective of religious institutions against alleged DMK mismanagement.

Akhilesh Yadav's mosque visit sparks BJP outrage over political meeting and Dimple Yadav's attire
Akhilesh Yadav's mosque visit sparks BJP outrage over political meeting and Dimple Yadav's attire

Time of India

time6 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Akhilesh Yadav's mosque visit sparks BJP outrage over political meeting and Dimple Yadav's attire

Akhilesh Yadav recently visited a mosque near Delhi's Parliament accompanied by his wife Dimple Yadav and other SP MPs, including Imam-MP Mohibullah Nadvi. The BJP has strongly condemned the visit, alleging that it disguised a political meeting and even calling the mosque an unofficial Samajwadi Party office. BJP leader Jamal Siddiqui also criticised Dimple Yadav's attire, claiming it violated religious norms and hurt Islamic sentiments globally. The BJP has threatened an FIR over the incident. In response, the Samajwadi Party denied all allegations, accusing the BJP of orchestrating a distraction from pressing national issues. Show more Show less

Chander and Jyotsna Mohan's ‘Pratap: A Defiant Newspaper' emboldens patriotic legacy
Chander and Jyotsna Mohan's ‘Pratap: A Defiant Newspaper' emboldens patriotic legacy

The Hindu

time36 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

Chander and Jyotsna Mohan's ‘Pratap: A Defiant Newspaper' emboldens patriotic legacy

In 1983, Punjab was teetering on the precipice of a communal conflict between Sikhs and Hindus. Amidst this tension, an innocuous parcel was sent to Pratap Bhavan in Jalandhar, headquarters of the revolutionary Urdu Pratap and Hindi Vir Pratap newspapers. Soon after delivery, an explosion shook the office — the parcel contained a bomb that had injured one and killed two. This haunting incident was neither the first nor the last Pratap faced until its closure in 2017. Now, four decades after the parcel bomb, journalist and author Jyotsna Mohan and her father Chander Mohan revisit their family's fiery past in their latest book, Pratap: A Defiant Newspaper (published by Harper Collins). Jyotsna paused her book tour at Odyssey bookstore in Adyar, Chennai, for a meaningful conversation about the story, behind this story. At the center of Pratap: A Defiant Newspaper lies family history — persevering through remembrance — from the recollection of various events surrounding the newspaper, to the personal experiences of Chander's father Virendra, who was Bhagat Singh's jailmate before the latter's unjust hanging. But the book is by no means simply a personal tale — it is an account of a newspaper held together by a belief that truth is, simply put, non-negotiable. Interspersed with personal accounts and news reporting, the book is a look into a generation of principled journalists dedicated to truth and not to playing sides. Jyotsna's great-grandfather Mahashay Krishan, the founder of Pratap, reportedly said: 'News editors and journalists are not vendors. We are not here to sell the news. We have one duty and that is to be upright and to speak truth to power.' The father-and-daughter duo certainly remains uncompromising in this belief throughout their book. Jyotsna has seen the evolution of journalism through her 30-year stint in both newsrooms and newspapers. When asked about the importance of legacy and defiance in the arena of journalism, she says, 'Defiance to me is the act of speaking up. Not necessarily being anti-establishment, but about flagging the uncomfortable and speaking about what is wrong.' She says defiance is a rare quality in journalism today, since it almost always comes with a personal cost. Her own family's experiences and Pratap's unfortunate closure are a living, burning example of this. This story was one kept buried for years within her family, and Chander questioned whether anyone would even want to read it. But Jyotsna believes otherwise, that the book plugs a gap in the collective memory of Punjab's troubled past, reaching further back than most mainstream accounts. 'It's not just a North Indian story,' she says. 'It's a story anyone, anywhere, can connect with.' In its defiant telling, Pratap: A Defiant Newspaper becomes more than just a chronicle of one family's legacy — it becomes a meditation on what journalism once stood for, and what it can still be. As the media navigates increasingly difficult terrain, this book reminds us that the act of bearing witness is not always loud, but it is always vital.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store