logo
Israel-Iran war could set oil markets in fire, Goldman Sachs sees $10 per barrel spike

Israel-Iran war could set oil markets in fire, Goldman Sachs sees $10 per barrel spike

First Post20-06-2025
Goldman Sachs recently revised its assessment of geopolitical risk in oil markets, suggesting that Brent crude prices could climb by approximately $10 per barrel due to conflict in West Asia read more
The escalation of hostilities between Israel and Iran has rattled global oil markets, with major financial institutions such as Goldman Sachs forecasting a significant spike in oil prices. According to analysts, the uncertainty surrounding regional stability, especially with the potential involvement of the United States, is poised to inject volatility into oil pricing, which had recently settled into relative calm.
Geopolitical unrest alters price projections
Goldman Sachs recently revised its assessment of geopolitical risk in oil markets, suggesting that Brent crude prices could climb by approximately $10 per barrel due to conflict in West Asia. This would place Brent above the $85 per barrel mark, rising from levels in the mid-$70s, as reported by Oilprice.com's Irina Slav. The bank noted that if Iranian oil supply were disrupted more severely prices could surge even further, possibly exceeding $90 per barrel.
In particular, Goldman highlighted vulnerabilities in oil transport through strategic chokepoints such as the Bab el-Mandeb Strait, previously targeted by Yemen's Houthi rebels. These flashpoints illustrate the broader risks to oil infrastructure in a highly combustible region.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Threat of US involvement intensifies market jitters
Adding to market unease is the potential for the United States to enter the conflict. President Donald Trump has publicly flirted with the idea of US intervention, stating ambiguously, 'I may do it. I may not do it.'
Though Trump has acknowledged internal political resistance to renewed military engagement in West Asia citing criticism from Republican figures like Steve Bannon, he also emphasised the threat of a nuclear Iran as a possible justification for action.
As a result, traders are adopting a cautious stance. Oil prices initially dipped slightly amid the uncertainty with Brent crude settling at $76.56 per barrel and West Texas Intermediate (WTI) at $75.22, awaiting clearer US policy signals.
War escalation sends prices climbing
Events quickly shifted on the ground. Oil prices surged nearly 3 per cent as of June 19 following Israel's direct strikes on Iranian nuclear sites and Iran's retaliatory missile barrage, which included an attack on an Israeli hospital. Brent crude closed at $78.85 per barrel, its highest since January, while WTI climbed to $77.20.
These strikes marked a dramatic escalation, dispelling any illusions of a short-lived skirmish. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu vowed that Iran's leaders would 'pay the full price,' while Tehran warned against foreign nations—implicitly the US—joining the fray.
Rory Johnston, analyst and founder of Commodity Context, said market consensus is tilting toward US participation in the conflict, which would significantly compound the risks to oil infrastructure and supply routes.
Strategic chokepoints and oil supply at stake
Iran's role as the third-largest oil producer in OPEC places it at the heart of this crisis. With a production output of approximately 3.3 million barrels per day, Iran remains a crucial supplier—particularly to China, which absorbs the majority of its 2 million daily barrels of crude exports.
More critically, the Strait of Hormuz—a narrow passage bordering southern Iran—serves as the gateway for 18 to 21 million barrels of oil and oil products each day. RBC Capital analyst Helima Croft emphasised that this waterway could become a primary target if Iran perceives an existential threat. She warned that attacks on tankers and energy installations would likely follow any US military involvement.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
JP Morgan went further, positing a worst-case scenario in which conflict spreads across the broader region and leads to the closure of the Strait. Under such circumstances, oil prices could spike to between $120 and $130 per barrel.
Risk premiums and market sentiment
Goldman Sachs reiterated its position that a geopolitical risk premium of around $10 per barrel is now reasonable, considering the lower availability of Iranian oil and potential for wider supply disruption. Even in the event of a de-escalation, it believes that Brent prices will not return to the low $60s seen in the recent past.
Similarly, Barclays warned that if half of Iran's oil exports were halted, Brent could hit $85 per barrel. A broader war could push prices past the $100 threshold.
Price Futures Group analyst Phil Flynn noted that the market had been lulled into a 'complacency' that has now been shattered. 'The market has been underplaying geopolitical risk,' he said, arguing that this latest flare-up will keep prices elevated as long as uncertainty remains.
Temporary or sustained price hike?
Despite the price spike, some observers maintain that any surge will likely be short-lived. DBRS Morningstar, in a note released Thursday, cautioned that higher oil prices might hurt the global economy by intensifying tariff-related pressures and suppressing demand. In their view, once the conflict recedes, the war premium would deflate and oil prices could cycle lower.
Nonetheless, the potential for prolonged instability keeps the market on alert. With no clear exit strategy from either Israel or Iran, and Washington's decision on intervention still pending, investors are bracing for further upheaval.
Opec+ response and the global oil balance
In response to the emerging tensions, Russian Deputy Prime Minister Alexander Novak advised the Opec+ alliance not to overreact. Speaking at an economic forum in St Petersburg, Novak recommended that oil producers stick to current plans to increase supply in light of rising summer demand. His comments sought to reassure markets and prevent price volatility from spiralling further.
Yet, whether Opec+ output increases will be enough to stabilise prices amid the shockwaves of a regional war remains to be seen. Market dynamics are now driven more by geopolitical risk than traditional supply and demand fundamentals.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
A market on the edge
The Israel-Iran conflict represents a potential inflection point for global energy markets. Analysts from Goldman Sachs to JP Morgan are now factoring in a war risk premium, with oil prices already trending upward and possibly heading for triple digits if the situation worsens.
The spectre of US military involvement could dramatically shift the balance, not only disrupting Iranian exports but also imperiling vital shipping routes. While some believe any price surge would be short-lived, the combination of strategic vulnerability and political unpredictability suggests that volatility will persist for the foreseeable future.
Whether oil prices stabilise or soar above $100 per barrel may ultimately depend not just on battlefield developments, but on decisions yet to be made in Washington.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

$63 billion in tax relief for America's seniors? Here's when the new changes in Social Security will begin
$63 billion in tax relief for America's seniors? Here's when the new changes in Social Security will begin

Economic Times

timean hour ago

  • Economic Times

$63 billion in tax relief for America's seniors? Here's when the new changes in Social Security will begin

NYT News Service If taxes no longer apply to Social Security earnings, seniors will have more income to cover basic living expenses US President Donald Trump has pledged to end taxes on Social Security as part of the GOP's 'One Big Beautiful Bill' signed into law on July 4. America's seniors will get new tax relief due to to the $6,000 bonus senior deduction included in The One, Big, Beautiful exact wording of the law actually stipulates a $6,000 tax deduction for individuals aged 65 and older, likely raising the number of seniors who won't pay taxes on Social Security to 88 percent. Currently, 64 percent of seniors already don't pay taxes on Social Security benefits. ALSO READ: New Covid variant in US linked to pain chest and trouble staying awake: Check symptoms, treatment and prevention tips No tax on Social Security means almost 90% of seniors will see zero taxation of those benefits and will help more seniors keep the hard-earned Social Security they spent their entire lives working for,' said Ways and Means Committee Chairman Jason Smith (MO-08). 'This tax cut is desperately needed relief for seniors who have struggled to afford basic goods and services under the inflationary policies of Joe Biden and those who were forced to pay taxes on their Social Security benefits for the first time because of the Washington spending spree Democrats undertook.' US seniors who depend on Social Security are at an high risk of poverty. While more than 70 million Americans receive benefits each month, about one in three adults aged 65 and older are living below the poverty level, according to ConsumerAffairs. If taxes no longer apply to Social Security earnings, seniors will have more income to cover basic living expenses such as housing, transportation and health care. ALSO READ: Apple Watch blood oxygen feature returns: Stunning update rolls out with iOS 18.6.1 and watchOS 11.6.1. How can you access it? Trump's sweeping tax and spending package, dubbed the 'One Big Beautiful Bill,' brings sweeping changes across multiple policy fronts. The law not only extends Trump's 2017 tax cuts but also scraps taxes on tips and overtime, while pouring more money into immigration enforcement and defense. To balance those measures, however, the bill slashes nearly $1 trillion from Medicaid and scales back food assistance programs. The law's $6,000 tax deduction for Americans aged 65 and older means couples filing jointly can reduce taxable income by up to $12,000, with the benefit available from 2025 to the threshold for income is $25,000 for individuals and $32,000 for couples before benefits get taxed, OBBBA effectively will raise the percentage of seniors who don't pay taxes on Social Security to 88 percent, according to the White House. ALSO READ: $1,390 stimulus check in your bank account soon? IRS' crucial update for millions of Americans Because low-income retirees have already been tax-exempt, however, the law provides tax relief to middle and upper-middle class seniors. To get the full $6,000 deduction, single filers must have a modified adjusted gross income under $75,000, while married couples must be below $150,000. "This new deduction is not an "above-the-line" deduction, so it does not lower your AGI nor MAGI, and therefore does nothing to reduce the taxable amount of your Social Security benefits. But it still lowers your total taxable income," Drew Powers, the founder of Illinois-based Powers Financial Group, told Newsweek."In practice, seniors will calculate AGI and MAGI just as they always have, and a corresponding percentage, 0 percent to 85 percent, of their Social Security benefits will be added to their taxable income. Then they will subtract standard or itemized deductions, just as they always have, but now will receive an additional $6,000 deduction per taxpayer." ALSO READ: 1,000 foot mega-tsunami could wipe out large parts of America? These US states face maximum threat from monster wave The deduction starts for the tax year 2025, so seniors will be able to claim it when they file next year. "The provisions are retroactive and already in effect for 2025," Kevin Thompson, the CEO of 9i Capital Group and the host of the 9innings podcast, told Newsweek. "Now is the time to work with a financial adviser who understands these rules and can run simulations on how it affects your plan."The White House said in news release on July 21: "The largest tax cut in history for working- and middle-class Americans—including No Tax on Tips, No Tax on Overtime, and No Tax on Social Security—is now the law of the land, along with unprecedented tax relief for small businesses, farmers, workers, and families."Starting in 2026, seniors will gain from the new tax deduction, but experts caution it could worsen Social Security's financial troubles, with the program projected to be unable to pay full benefits by 2033.

Trump tariffs may hit nearly 60% of India's exports: Govt says $48.2 bn of shipped goods vulnerable
Trump tariffs may hit nearly 60% of India's exports: Govt says $48.2 bn of shipped goods vulnerable

First Post

timean hour ago

  • First Post

Trump tariffs may hit nearly 60% of India's exports: Govt says $48.2 bn of shipped goods vulnerable

The Narendra Modi government has told the parliament that around 60% of Indian exports to the United States to the tune of $48.2 billion could be affected by 50% tariffs. The Narendra Modi government has told the parliament that Indian exports to the tune of $48.2 billion could be affected by American tariffs. US President Donald Trump has slapped 50 per cent tariffs on India — 25 per cent on July 31 as part of the rollout of tariffs for over 60 countries and additional 25 per cent on August 6 as a punishment for the purchase of Russian oil. In an answer to Congress MP Adoor Prakash's question, Jitin Prasada, the Union Minister of State for Commerce and Industry, told the Lok Sabha that the government has estimated that around $48.2 billion of Indian exports to the United States, as per the trade value of 2024, will be subjected to tariffs. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD As Indian exports to the United States last were worth around $80 billion, the exposure of $48.2 billion-worth goods would mean that around 60 per cent of all exports would be exposed to tariffs. The government's estimate is therefore in line with independent estimates that had previously been reported. India's approximate exports to the United States for 2024. Previously, Bloomberg Economics had projected that Trump's 50 per cent tariffs could affect 60 per cent of India's US exports and lower the GDP growth for the financial year 2025-26 by 1 per cent. The United States is the largest export destination for Indian goods, accounting for around 17-18 per cent of all Indian exports. India also has a trade surplus with the United States, particularly in pharmaceuticals, textiles, and engineering goods. While Prasada did not answer about retaliatory measures, he said, 'Government is committed to secure and advance country's national interest and protect the welfare of our farmers, workers, entrepreneurs, exporters, MSMEs and all sections of industry and take all necessary steps to help mitigate impact on trade including through appropriate export promotion and trade diversification measures.' Separately, the government has proposed changes to the goods and services tax (GST) regime to make up for the losses from tariffs to some extent and spur consumption-led growth.

Israel approves settlement project that could divide West Bank
Israel approves settlement project that could divide West Bank

The Hindu

timean hour ago

  • The Hindu

Israel approves settlement project that could divide West Bank

Israel gave final approval for a controversial settlement project in the occupied West Bank that would effectively cut the territory in two, and that Palestinians and rights groups say could destroy plans for a future Palestinian state. Settlement development in E1, an open tract of land east of Jerusalem, has been under consideration for more than two decades, but was frozen due to U.S. pressure during previous administrations. On Wednesday (August 20, 2025), the project received final approval from the Planning and Building Committee after the last petitions against it were rejected on Aug. 6. If the process moves quickly, infrastructure work could begin in the next few months and construction of homes could start in around a year. The plan includes around 3,500 apartments to expand the settlement of Maale Adumim, far-right Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich said during a press conference at the site last Thursday. Mr. Smotrich cast the approval as a riposte to western countries that announced their plans to recognize a Palestinian state in recent weeks. 'This reality finally buries the idea of a Palestinian state, because there is nothing to recognize and no one to recognize,' Mr. Smotrich told reporters. 'Anyone in the world who tries today to recognize a Palestinian state will receive an answer from us on the ground.' The location of E1 is significant because it is one of the last geographical links between Ramallah, in the northern West Bank, and Bethlehem in the southern West Bank. The two cities are 22 kilometers (14 miles) apart by air, but Palestinians traveling between them must take a wide detour and pass through multiple Israeli checkpoints, adding hours to the journey. The hope for final status negotiations for a Palestinian state was to have the region eventually serve as a direct link between the cities. Peace Now, an organization that tracks settlement expansion in the West Bank, called the E1 project 'deadly for the future of Israel and for any chance of achieving a peaceful two-state solution' which is 'guaranteeing many more years of bloodshed.' Israel's plans to expand settlements are part of an increasingly difficult reality for Palestinians in the occupied West Bank as the world's attention focuses on the war in Gaza. There have been marked increases in attacks by settlers on Palestinians, evictions from Palestinian towns, and checkpoints that choke freedom of movement, as well as several Palestinian attacks on Israelis. More than 700,000 Israelis now live in the occupied West Bank and east Jerusalem, territories captured by Israel in 1967 and sought by the Palestinians for a future state. The international community overwhelmingly considers Israeli settlement construction in these areas to be illegal and an obstacle to peace. Israel's government is dominated by religious and ultranationalist politicians with close ties to the settlement movement. Mr. Smotrich, previously a firebrand settler leader and now finance minister, has been granted Cabinet-level authority over settlement policies and vowed to double the settler population in the West Bank. Israel has annexed east Jerusalem and claims it as part of its capital, which is not internationally recognized. It says the West Bank is disputed territory whose fate should be determined through negotiations. Israel withdrew from 21 settlements Gaza in 2005.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store