JioStar backs India's vision for a creative-tech future with IICT launch at WAVES 2025
'At JioStar also, we believe in the power of connectivity combining with the forces of creativity to unlock infinite possibilities. We are proud to support this mission to build a global centre of excellence in Mumbai to drive media innovation,' Gupta said, as per a statement by WAVES 2025.
Mumbai (Maharashtra) [India], May 4 (ANI): Indian Institute of Creative Technology's (IICT) launch at WAVES 2025 marked a progressive step towards making India a global creative powerhouse — since quality talent is the most fundamental building block of an innovative economy, Sanjog Gupta, CEO – Sports and Live Experiences, JioStar, said.
'The convergence of talent, technology, and policy will not only redefine the future of consumer immersion, connections and experiences but also cultivate the next generation of high-quality talent ready to lead on the world stage,' Gupta added.
In a major step towards empowering India's animation, visual effects, gaming, comics, and extended reality (AVGC-XR) ecosystem, the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, in collaboration with FICCI and CII, has unveiled the Indian Institute of Creative Technology (IICT)–a National Centre of Excellence dedicated exclusively to the AVGC-XR sector.
IICT is on track to evolve into a premier institution in its field, much like how IITs and IIMs have become benchmarks in technology and management education.
The announcement was made at the inaugural edition of the World Audio Visual and Entertainment Summit (WAVES 2025).
The IICT aims to serve as a hub for nurturing talent at the intersection of creativity, technology and innovation, creating pathways for young Indians to thrive in the global digital and content economy.
Underscoring the growing industry-government collaboration in this space, seven global technology leaders–JioStar, Google, Adobe, Meta, Apple, NVIDIA and Microsoft–formally exchanged Letters of Intent with IICT, signalling their commitment to building a strong foundation for the institute and co-developing future-ready skills, tools and platforms, WAVES said in the statement.
IICT is envisioned as a platform that will equip them with the right ecosystem to innovate, create and lead. (ANI)
This report is auto-generated from ANI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Donald Trump doubles down on claim of stopping India-Pakistan war from going nuclear
US President Donald Trump on Saturday doubled down on claiming credit for brokering a ceasefire between India and Pakistan, adding that he had used trade to negotiate with the two countries to halt military action, reported news agency ANI. Trump told reporters on Air Force One, 'You know, I did something that people don't talk about, and I don't talk about very much, but we solved a big problem, a nuclear problem potentially with India and with Pakistan. I spoke to Pakistan, I spoke to India, they have really great leaders, but they were going at it, and they could have gone at it nuclear." Also Read: Shehbaz Sharif seeks Donald Trump's mediation as India's delegation corners Pakistan in US He also praised the leaders of both nations for agreeing to a pause on military action and said, "Both nuclear countries, strong nuclear countries, and I talked about trade and said, 'We're not doing trade if you guys are going to be throwing bombs at each other.' They both stopped, and I stopped that war immediately. It was going much further, and hopefully, it would not go to nuclear, but it might have gone to nuclear. In fact, it might have gone to nuclear in the next round, but we stopped it, and I'd like to commend the leaders of both countries, Pakistan and India." Also Read: Donald Trump now says he's not interested in talking to Elon Musk: 'Lost his mind' The US President has repeatedly claimed credit for mediating the ceasefire, although India has denied the involvement of any external actors in the decision. Also Read: Elon Musk challenges Trump to terminate his govt contracts after US prez threatens him, 'Go ahead, make my day…' India had conducted Operation Sindoor early on May 7 and hit terror infrastructure in Pakistan and PoK in response to the Pahalgam terror attack. Later, the DGMOs of both countries agree to stop firing based on a bilateral understanding. Earlier, Congress MP Shashi Tharoor said, as part of an all-party-delegation, that they had met vice president JD Vance and clarified claims of any outside mediation. "The meeting with Vice President Vance was outstanding, very good, very clear. I think we made our position amply clear on this question of mediation, and Vice President Vance fully understood our points," he said.
Indian Express
2 hours ago
- Indian Express
Knowing when to sell a stock: Key signals investors shouldn't ignore (Part 2)
Among investment decisions, knowing when to sell a stock is often the most challenging. If you've read Part 1 of this story, you already know that selling isn't just about booking profits, rather, it's about protecting capital. We previously discussed what to do when a stock becomes too expensive, when business momentum slows, and when governance red flags begin to emerge. But sometimes, the risk lies outside the company. Sometimes, even the best-run businesses can become bad bets if their industry is in decline or if you hold on too long without re-evaluating. In this second part, we look beyond the balance sheet and ask: Is the company still playing a winnable game? And if not, is it time to let go? 1. When the industry changes: Don't let a good business turn into a bad investment Sometimes, the problem isn't with the company. The business might be well-run and the balance sheet clean, but if the entire industry is heading in the wrong direction, even great businesses can lose relevance. Think of this as the 'Blockbuster vs Netflix' problem. Only in our case, it's Kodak vs smartphones, or Hindustan Motors vs Maruti. Let's look at how this plays out in India. Dish TV and the Fall of DTH In the 2000s, Dish TV was a disruptor. Millions of Indians were moving from cable to satellite TV. The stock multiplied between 2007 and 2010, riding the wave of digital adoption. But by 2015, another wave was quietly building that was streaming. YouTube, Hotstar, Netflix, Amazon Prime; all started eating into traditional DTH. Dish TV didn't pivot. Revenues flattened, subscribers dropped, and the company turned loss-making by FY20. The stock fell from Rs 110 in 2010 to around Rs 15 by 2023. A long, painful fade, not a sudden crash. Another example is Hero MotoCorp. India's undisputed two-wheeler king: strong brand, rural reach, bulletproof finances. But while competitors like Ather, Ola Electric, and TVS moved aggressively into electric scooters, Hero remained slow and cautious. Hero's legacy ICE models (Splendor, Passion) still sell, but the long-term question remains: can Hero lead the EV transition? The market has noticed: Infrastructure and power companies in the post-2008 era Remember GVK Power, GMR Infra, or Lanco Infratech? They were darlings of the infrastructure boom from 2005 to 2009. But post-global financial crisis, the debt cycle turned vicious. Regulatory hurdles, stuck projects, and land acquisition delays choked growth. By the time promoters tried to pivot or restructure, it was too late. Today, many of these companies are either penny stocks or delisted. Investors who didn't exit early kept holding out in the hope and lost everything. So how do you identify a dying or disrupted sector? Low innovation and flat revenue across top players: If the entire sector isn't growing, there's no tide to lift any boats. New entrants grabbing market share with better tech or models: Think of fintechs eating into NBFCs, or startups challenging legacy media. Heavy government regulation or policy shocks: Sectors like telecom and infra are especially vulnerable. One spectrum pricing policy or land bill can derail years of planning. Global trends moving in a different direction: For example, the shift away from fossil fuels is affecting traditional oil refiners and coal-based utilities. The mindset shift? Markets evolve. Technology leapfrogs. Policies change. Consumer habits shift. If you're holding a stock in a sector that's going downhill, ask yourself: Is the company fighting the tide or riding it? 2. The 'hold forever' myth: Even great companies can lose their edge We've all heard it: 'Buy good companies and hold forever.' Sounds elegant. Feels wise. But here's the truth: in real-world investing, 'forever' is a dangerous word. Because businesses evolve. So do industries, leadership, regulations, and consumer behavior. And if you don't reassess your holdings regularly, time can erode even the strongest fundamentals. Let's go back a few decades. Hindustan Motors: From market leader to market exit At one point, Hindustan Motors was India's largest carmaker. The Ambassador was a symbol of power, comfort, and status used by government officials, bureaucrats, and taxi fleets. But then Maruti Suzuki entered the market. It brought Japanese reliability, fuel efficiency, and aggressive pricing. Hindustan Motors didn't adapt, and by 2014, it shut down its Uttarpara plant. From a position of dominance, it disappeared. Investors who bought in the 1990s and held out of nostalgia or blind belief watched their capital evaporate. Original Sensex members: Only 7 out of 30 survived When the BSE Sensex was launched in 1986, it had 30 companies. Today, only 7 of those 30 remain in the index. Companies like Ballarpur Industries, Premier Automobiles, Mukand Iron, and Scindia Steamships — all were once blue-chip. Now? Either defunct, delisted, or barely trading. If you had invested Rs 10,000 in the 'wrong half' of that original Sensex and held on blindly, you'd be left with scraps or nothing. Global example: IBM, Xerox, Kodak Zooming out, the same lesson applies globally: The problem wasn't incompetence. It was inertia and the inability to change fast enough. So, what should retail investors learn? Don't confuse a good company with a permanent investment. Even industry leaders lose steam if they don't innovate or adapt. Always watch for product stagnation, competitive pressure, or market shifts. Review your holdings at least once a year. Ask yourself: 'If I didn't already own this stock, would I buy it today?' If the answer is no, maybe it's time to sell. Cut emotional attachment. Just because a stock made you money in the past doesn't mean it owes you more in the future. Track management, strategy, and capital allocation. A change in leadership or reckless expansion can erode years of compounding in just a few quarters. The bottom line? Yes, long-term investing works. But blind holding doesn't. Holding forever only works for businesses that earn the right to be held year after year. Conclusion: The quiet skill that builds long-term wealth Selling is rarely as satisfying as buying. There's no celebration when you book profits. No praise for cutting a loss early. But the truth is that's where the real discipline lies. Because wealth isn't just built by riding winners. It's built by avoiding traps, exiting when the story changes, and not letting loyalty get in the way of logic. You don't need to get every stock right. But when you do see the signs, have the courage to exit. Because in investing, the ability to let go is just as powerful as the ability to hold on. Note: This article relies on data from the annual report and industry reports. We have used our assumptions for forecasting. Parth Parikh has over a decade of experience in finance and research and currently heads the growth and content vertical at Finsire. He holds an FRM Charter along with an MBA in Finance from Narsee Monjee Institute of Management Studies. Disclosure: The writer and his dependents do not hold the stocks discussed in this article. The website managers, its employee(s), and contributors/writers/authors of articles have or may have an outstanding buy or sell position or holding in the securities, options on securities or other related investments of issuers and/or companies discussed therein. The content of the articles and the interpretation of data are solely the personal views of the contributors/ writers/authors. Investors must make their own investment decisions based on their specific objectives, resources and only after consulting such independent advisors as may be necessary.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
3 hours ago
- Business Standard
Tighter H-1B rules, tech layoffs push Indians to alternate US visas
As scrutiny around H-1B work visa applications intensifies and tech layoffs continue to rattle the US job market, Indian professionals and their employers are increasingly exploring alternative visa routes to live and work in the US, reported The Economic Times. Among the most sought-after options now are the L-1 and O-1 non-immigrant visas. Simultaneously, there's a significant uptick in interest for the EB-5 immigrant investor visa programme. 'These trends aren't entirely new, but we've seen a sharp rise in the number of people reaching out over the past few months,' Gnanamookan Senthurjothi, a US immigration attorney, told The Economic Times. The shift comes as the US, under the Donald Trump administration, has ramped up its scrutiny of H-1B visa applications since the start of the year. According to recent data from the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), H-1B visa approvals this year dropped by 27 per cent Year-on-Year—marking the lowest since the pandemic-hit FY21. Each year, the US allots 85,000 H-1B visas to foreign professionals, with Indians accounting for nearly 70 per cent of the total. However, a wave of layoffs across major tech firms including Microsoft, Google, and Intel has deepened uncertainty among Indian workers in the US. 'Our clients have become more fearful and anxious, particularly regarding international travel and visa 'stamping' at consular posts abroad,' said Joel Yanovich, attorney at the Murthy Law Firm. 'I don't think a day goes by where I don't have a client or two asking me whether it's safe to travel.' Rise in L-1 and O-1 applications In response to growing apprehensions around the H-1B process, more applicants are turning to L-1 and O-1 visas—both of which do not have annual numerical limits. The L-1 visa facilitates intracompany transfers, while the O-1 visa is designed for individuals with extraordinary ability in fields such as science, arts, or business. 'Part of this [spike in demand] is seasonal, based on people not being selected for the H-1B lottery,' Yanovich said. 'But part of it appears to stem from employers and individuals hoping to avoid the heightened scrutiny they fear the H-1B program may face.' Canada as a staging ground Adding to the shift, companies are also considering temporary assignments outside the US as a strategic move to qualify employees for other visa categories. 'What we are also seeing is that some companies are transferring their employees to countries like Canada or elsewhere outside the US for a short time so that they will qualify for the L-1 visa,' Sukanya Raman, country head – India & GCC practice team at Davies & Associates LLC, was quoted as saying by The Economic Times. This tactic typically applies to professionals in managerial roles who may later transition to the EB-1C visa, which can lead to a green card, she said. There's also rising interest in the EB-2 NIW (National Interest Waiver)—a green card category for individuals with advanced degrees whose work is deemed to benefit the US on a national level. EB-5 investor visa sees surge The EB-5 immigrant investor visa has also seen a notable 50 per cent increase in demand since January 2025, according to Raman. 'These are in current status for Indian nationals, which means that visas are available and applicants can receive their authorisation and travel documents in just 3-6 months,' she noted. 'This allows them to stay in the US legally.'
