
Who gains most from Trump's retirement fund reforms?
Setting aside for a moment the fact that Trump or members of his family have
vested interests in some of these asset classes, Trump's apparent contempt for prudential regulation threatens to put trillions of dollars of pension fund assets at risk just at a time when they are badly needed for more responsible forms of investment.
Already, pension funds are invested in arguably overvalued tech stocks, which dominate US and other stock markets. Such investments have the power to topple markets. Adding further risk to this shaky structure at a time when underfunded areas such as the
fight against global warming , inadequate infrastructure and health services are crying out for investment seems irresponsible, to say the least.
In the US, 401(k) plans are portable schemes where contributions, instead of benefits, are defined in advance. In theory, investors have the right to assume their savings are being deployed wisely and safely.
A 401(k) is a deferred arrangement. Employees can elect to defer receiving a portion of their salary, which is instead contributed on their behalf, before taxes, to their 401(k) plan. Sometimes employers match these contributions.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


South China Morning Post
14 minutes ago
- South China Morning Post
At Trump's request, West Virginia sending National Guard troops to Washington
West Virginia Governor Patrick Morrisey is deploying 300 to 400 National Guard troops to the District of Columbia at the request of the Trump administration, the governor's office said on Saturday. The deployment is 'a show of commitment to public safety and regional cooperation' and will include providing equipment and specialised training alongside the 'approximately 300 to 400 skilled personnel as directed', Morrisey's office said in a statement. Drew Galang, a spokesman for Morrisey, said the state's National Guard received the order to send equipment and personnel to Washington late on Friday and was working to organise the deployment. Earlier this week, US President Donald Trump said he was deploying hundreds of National Guard troops to Washington and temporarily taking over the city's police department to curb what he depicted as a crime and homelessness emergency in the nation's capital. A White House official said on Saturday that more National Guard troops would be called in to Washington to 'protect federal assets, create a safe environment for law enforcement officials to carry out their duties when required, and provide a visible presence to deter crime'. A US official, speaking on the condition of anonymity, said a formal order was expected to go out that would authorise National Guard troops in Washington to carry firearms. The official said this order would affect mostly military police officers with side arms.


South China Morning Post
5 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
US stops all visitor visas for people from Gaza
The US State Department on Saturday said it was halting all visitor visas for individuals from Gaza while it conducts 'a full and thorough' review. The department said 'a small number' of temporary medical-humanitarian visas had been issued in recent days but did not provide a figure. The US issued more than 3,800 B1/B2 visitor visas, which permit foreigners to seek medical treatment in the United States, to holders of the Palestinian Authority travel document, according to an analysis of monthly figures provided on the department's website. That figure includes 640 visas issued in May. The State Department's move to stop visitor visas for people from Gaza comes after Laura Loomer, a far-right activist and an ally of US President Donald Trump, said on social media on Friday that the Palestinian 'refugees' had entered the country this month. Play Loomer's statement sparked outrage among some Republicans, with congressman Chip Roy, of Texas, saying he would inquire about the matter and congressman Randy Fine, of Florida, describing it as a 'national security risk'.


South China Morning Post
7 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Trump-Putin summit: was it a win for Russia or the US?
The highly anticipated US-Russia presidential summit in Alaska had raised hopes for progress on ending the Ukraine war, but instead left more questions than answers Advertisement Still, observers viewed Vladimir Putin's diplomatic return to US soil – his first in a decade – as a symbolic win for Moscow. The nearly three-hour talks, which both Putin and Donald Trump described as 'productive', signalled a potential thaw in the fraught US-Russia relationship despite concluding without a ceasefire agreement, they said. Meanwhile, as China offered a cautious endorsement of the summit, Chinese and Russian analysts warned that Beijing could face a strategic dilemma , wary of how the limited détente might reshape the US-China-Russia power triangle. With Ukraine and Europe notably absent from the discussions, Trump's post-summit remarks about territorial swaps and US security guarantees sparked confusion over whether he had tacitly accepted Russia's retention of occupied territories amid the prolonged war. Advertisement There was a joint press appearance after the meeting, but neither Trump nor Putin announced concrete outcomes or details on what they had agreed on. They also did not take any questions from reporters. Putin, who was the first to speak, described the US and Russia as 'close neighbours'. He said he hoped 'the agreement that we've reached together' would be seen 'constructively' by Kyiv and European capitals and 'they won't throw a wrench in the works'.