Ex-CJI Sanjiv Khanna declares: No post-retirement roles for me
Former Chief Justice of India Sanjiv Khanna has said he would not accept any post-retirement official assignments and that he would continue his innings in law.
Justice Khanna was appointed as the CJI on November 11, 2024 and retired on 13 May, after a six-month tenure. Justice Khanna will be replaced by Justice BR Gavai, who takes oath as 52nd CJI today.
After the conclusion of the ceremonial bench proceedings on Tuesday, the CJI met journalists in the apex court premises and said, 'I will not accept any post-retirement post ... .perhaps will do something with law.'
Many former apex court judges begin their innings in arbitration post judgeship. 'I will have a third innings and will do something related to law,' the CJI said.
Justice Sanjiv Khanna was elevated to the Supreme Court of India on January 18, 2019.
Justice Khanna has also been the Chairman, Supreme Court Legal Services Committee (SCLSC) from 17th June, 2023 till 25th December, 2023 and Executive Chairman, NALSA from 26th December, 2023 till 10 November, 2024.
After having initially practised in the District Courts of Delhi, he started practice primarily in the High Court of Delhi. As an amicus curiae, he assisted the High Court of Delhi in several criminal cases and cases involving issues of public importance.
On June 24, 2005, Justice Khanna was elevated as an Additional Judge of the High Court of Delhi and was made a Permanent Judge on 20th February, 2006.
Justice Sanjiv Khanna was part of 2024 Supreme Court judgement pertaining to the interim bail of former chief minister Arvind Kejriwal while the latter was embroiled in a case under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA).
Justice Khanna was also part of a five-judge bench that declared the controversial electoral bonds scheme unconstitutional due to concerns around transparency of donors and potential for corrupt practices.
Responding to a query related to the cash discovery controversy involving high court judge Justice Yashwant Varma, he said, 'Judicial thinking has to be decisive and adjudicatory.'
He added, 'We see plus and minus points and decide the issue, then rationally we weigh various factors that help us to make a right decision.'
The CJI dealt with the cash row controversy following a news report, prompting him to take several steps, including a preliminary inquiry by Delhi High Court Chief Justice DK Upadhyaya, judicial work being taken away from Justice Varma in the Delhi High Court, and later his transfer to the Allahabad High Court sans judicial work.
I will not accept any post-retirement post ... perhaps will do something with law.
After the in-house inquiry panel indicted the judge, the CJI nudged him to resign and later wrote to President Droupadi Murmu and Prime Minister Narendra Modi after Justice Varma refused to tender resignation.
On May 10, CJI-designate Justice B R Gavai also said no to any post-retirement assignments.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
3 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Democracy without dissent a contradiction: Justice Surya Kant
Democracy without dissent is a contradiction and that silence in the face of injustice is not neutrality, but complicity, Supreme Court judge justice Surya Kant has asserted as he invoked India's constitutional ethos and the top court's role in defending civil liberties. Justice Kant, who is in line to take over as the Chief Justice of India (CJI) in November this year, was speaking at the Washington Supreme Court as part of an international judicial exchange. In his address earlier this week that underscored the shared constitutional commitments of India and the United States, the judge said: 'Democracy without dissent is a contradiction, and that silence in the face of injustice is not neutrality, but complicity…These are not merely legal precedents; they are constitutional declarations.' Justice Kant highlighted that the right to free speech, protected under Article 19(1)(a) of the Indian Constitution and the First Amendment in the US, has been 'zealously defended' by courts on both sides of the Atlantic. Drawing parallels with the US Supreme Court's protection of student protest in Tinker Vs Des Moines (1969), he recalled how India's top court, much earlier, had established the primacy of expression in Romesh Thappar and Brij Bhushan cases in 1950, ruling against pre-censorship and vague notions of public order. 'In both countries, the judiciary has consistently pushed back against the temptation to suppress dissent under misguided and deceptive notions that the executive may hold,' he noted. Reaffirming the foundational nature of constitutional supremacy in both democracies, Justice Kant highlighted that the basic structure doctrine in India that asserts Parliament cannot amend away core constitutional values mirrors the American principle that 'even the majoritarian will must bow' before foundational ideals like liberty, federalism, and equality. 'These doctrines reflect a shared understanding that tampering with these principles would cause a rift so immense that it would threaten the very heart of our existence,' he warned. ALSO READ | Free speech, democracy, and the epidemic of hurt feelings Justice Kant also spotlighted India's global leadership in using public interest litigation (PIL) as a judicial tool to redress collective harm. Citing the Vishaka judgment (1997) where the Indian Supreme Court laid down workplace sexual harassment guidelines in the absence of legislation, he said: 'Though structurally distinct, both approaches reflect a shared judicial philosophy: that justice must not be confined to individual litigants but must be responsive to collective harm and systemic failure.' In contrast, he acknowledged the role of class action lawsuits in the US, such as Lois Jenson Vs Eveleth Taconite Co (1993), where female workers collectively challenged workplace abuse. Addressing the evolution of due process jurisprudence, Justice Kant recalled how the Indian Constitution initially adopted 'procedure established by law' over the American-style 'due process,' but eventually evolved the latter through judicial interpretation. 'In the seminal Maneka Gandhi case (1978), the Indian Supreme Court read into the phrase the requirements of justice, fairness, and reasonableness -- effectively harmonizing our doctrine with the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution,' he added. Justice Kant concluded his address on a note of judicial kinship, stating: 'It is my firm belief that our countries, and our legal systems, share a kindred spirit rooted in the pursuit of justice, liberty, and the rule of law… The law must be a shield for the weak, not a sword for the powerful.'
India Today
12 hours ago
- India Today
BJP will form government in Bengal, Tamil Nadu: Amit Shah's power play in Madurai
Union Home Minister Amit Shah on Sunday launched a scathing attack on Tamil Nadu Chief Minister MK Stalin's party DMK, saying it crossed all limits of corruption in the last four years of its tenure. Addressing a rally in Madurai on Sunday, Shah also vowed that the BJP is going to form a government in West Bengal and Tamil Nadu in DMK government in Tamil Nadu has crossed all limits of corruption. They committed a huge scam by handing over the Rs 450 crore nutrition kits provided by the Central government to a private company, and deprived the poor of food," Shah alleged while addressing party also claimed that the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) government also committed a sand mining scam to the tune of Rs 4,600 crore, causing poor people of the state to buy sand at inflated prices just to help the ruling party to mint money. The home minister also raked up the alleged Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation (Tasmac) scam, claiming it cost the state exchequer Rs 39,000 crore, which could otherwise be used to build two extra rooms in every school in Tamil last month, the Supreme Court halted Enforcement Directorate proceedings into the case under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, after hearing a plea by the Tamil Nadu government, who said it was an overreach of the central agency's powers and a violation of the Constitution."I have a long list of scams committed by the MK Stalin government, but I don't want to waste time elaborating on each one of them," Shah Shah also attacked the DMK government over last year's Kallakurichi hooch tragedy, which claimed the lives of over 60 people, alleging that their corruption resulted in the TO FORM GOVERNMENT IN TAMIL NADU, BENGALRiding high on confidence on the back of the BJP's recent election wins in Odisha, Haryana, Maharashtra and Delhi, Amit Shah vowed the saffron party will also be successful in defeating their rivals in Tamil Nadu and West Bengal next year, and form a government."The NDA alliance of the BJP and the AIADMK is going to form a government in Tamil Nadu next year. I understand the pulse of the people and can say that the people of Tamil Nadu will dethrone the DMK in the next elections," Shah exuded former BJP president also attacked the Stalin government, accusing it of not having fulfilled 60 per cent of their poll promises. "Mr Stalin, I dare you to tell people how many promises you made in your poll manifesto in the last elections you have fulfilled".Heaping praise on Prime Minister Narendra Modi's leadership and political will, Amit Shah spoke about the recent Operation Sindoor precision strikes carried out to dismantle Pakistani terror recalled the 2016 Uri attack, the 2019 Pulwama attack and the Pahalgam attack in April, saying that it was PM Modi who did not refrain from hitting deep inside enemy territory in retaliation to these terrorist between the BJP and certain opposition parties, has heated up with regard to Operation Sindoor. While the BJP claims the precision strikes became possible because of PM Modi's strong leadership, the opposition accuses the Modi government of claiming undue credit for the strikes carried out by the armed Watch IN THIS STORY#Tamil Nadu#Amit Shah
Hans India
13 hours ago
- Hans India
No demolition threat to slums in Delhi: CM Rekha Gupta
Countering rumours of impending demolition of many slums in the national capital, Delhi Chief Minister Rekha Gupta on Sunday hit out at the previous Aam Aadmi Party and Congress governments for treating residents of these colonies as vote banks and depriving them of basic amenities. Speaking after inaugurating a toilet block in a slum in Haiderpur, CM Gupta assured that no slum will be demolished without first providing permanent housing to its residents. She said that FIRs will be filed and strict action will be taken against those spreading false information about demolitions. She clarified that most anti-encroachment actions are being carried out in compliance with court orders and are targeting illegal occupations that are obstructing traffic or hindering public movement. Talking about slum demolition near Jangpura, she said the action was ordered by the Delhi High Court. "Wherever there are orders of the Court, neither the government nor the administration can do anything. Today, the reality of Madrasi Colony is that it is settled on the banks of the Barapullah drain, and the Court has repeated almost four times that these jhuggis (informal settlements) must be removed so that machines can reach there and cleaning can be done. Otherwise, there are chances of floods in Delhi like in 2023..." she added. The Chief Minister said the previous Arvind Kejriwal government and Sheila Dikshit government did not do any development for residents of slum clusters in Delhi. "The BJP government in Delhi is spending Rs 700 crore on various projects," she added. The Chief Minister emphasised that every slum resident deserves to live with dignity. "It is our responsibility to ensure that they enjoy the same facilities as other citizens of the city," she said. The government's goal is not just redevelopment but also improvement in the standard of living of slum dwellers, she added. On Sunday, she also inaugurated and inspected various development projects in Nehru Camp in Haiderpur, Ekta Camp in Pitampura, and the area near U and V Blocks of JJ Cluster in the Shalimar Bagh Assembly constituency. The Chief Minister also reviewed key works such as laying of pipelines and construction of new roads in these areas. She also announced that a clean and safe parks with swings will be developed especially for the children of slum areas in the city. CM Gupta reiterated her government's commitment to ensuring that every resident of Delhi's slums has access to basic amenities such as clean water, proper roads, public toilets, and parks, so that no citizen is left behind in the journey of development. On this occasion, the Chief Minister inaugurated the construction work of a 24-seater Jan Suvidha Kendra (public convenience centre) at JJ Cluster, Outer Ring Road, No. 26, Nehru Camp in Haiderpur. She said that this Jan Suvidha Kendra will address the long-standing issue of toilet shortage in the area and will particularly benefit women, senior citizens, and children by providing clean and safe facilities.
