logo
Letters: Nigel Farage's biggest weakness

Letters: Nigel Farage's biggest weakness

Spectator2 days ago
Bad friend
Sir: Tim Shipman's examination of Reform's success in attracting female voters contains an important warning for Nigel Farage ('March of the mums', 9 August). He cites Luke Tryl of More in Common, who points out that Farage's main Achilles' heel when it comes to support among women is his closeness to Donald Trump. The US President has undermined Nato and western security, fawned over our enemy Vladimir Putin, damaged the world economy with his tariffs and promoted dangerous conspiracy theories, not least by appointing a vaccine-denying health secretary. Unless Farage can distance himself decisively from this arrogant and ignorant narcissist, it is not only women who will turn against Reform.
John Hicks
Manchester
Douglas's triumph
Sir: What a joy to read about the trial involving Mohammed Hijab and Douglas Murray ('My victory over Mohammed Hijab', 9 August), and of the triumph of common sense over absurdity. Douglas was vilified because he put his head above the parapet, like so many of The Spectator's journalists and writers do. (Rod Liddle also springs to mind.) Those of us who question and 'call out' wrongs look to them as inspirational. Thank you.
Linda King
Harefield
Following the syllabub
Sir: Philip Womack bemoans the dumbing-down of language in modern children's literature ('Book smart', 9 August) as a result of publishing trends in America, and recalls the rich vocabulary of Ursula Moray Williams's Gobbolino (1942), one of the first books he read. In a speech 30 years later, Williams spoke fondly of her own childhood reading, of books by Twain, Scott and Stevenson, and of 'the joy of discovering a new word like syllabub', while deploring American books with 'spectacular illustrations but shallow story lines'. Was it ever thus?
Colin Davison
Winchcombe, Gloucestershire
Kentish kingdom
Sir: Toby Young's advocacy of Kentish independence raises issues other than migration (No sacred cows, 9 August). The early medieval Kingdom of Kent, which lasted 400 years, was England's first and foremost, so a restored Kentish monarchy would be only natural. As a sovereign power accustomed to fending off foreign adventurers, Kentland would seek to reverse London's unrelenting incursions. King Nigel – a true Kentishman – would doubtless demand the return of territories, from Deptford outwards, colonised by Westminster in 1889 and 1965, along with reparations. Kent nationalists might additionally pursue the return to Kentish suzerainty of a major Cantiaci city recorded by the great geographer Ptolemy, namely Londinium. Inevitably David Lammy would be denied further access to Chevening, but Maidstone would magnanimously welcome as UK ambassador that born-and-bred Kentish maid, Rachel Reeves.
John Bunyard
Egerton, Kent
Test of time
Sir: It was splendid to read Henry Blofeld in your pages, and especially his defence of Test cricket as the highest form of the game (Cricket notebook, 9 August). Comparisons with the one-day versions of the sport are unnecessary: we still speak of 2005, of Botham's Ashes in 1981, and other great matches and series from decades ago. Who now remembers the result of a Hundred game from one year to the next?
Tom Stubbs
Surbiton, Surrey
In praise of PMQs
Sir: I disagree with Amol Rajan (Diary, 9 August) that a monthly interrogation by the liaison committee would be preferable to having PMQs each Wednesday. After the bombing of the House of Commons in May 1941, Churchill argued for the rebuilt chamber to be deliberately adversarial. The UK parliament website reminds us of his thoughts on the rebuilding: 'He referred mainly to the debating chamber which he suggested should remain the confrontational assembly it had been before the fire… that its shape should be oblong and not semi-circular; that members should not have their own seat and desk, and that a small chamber space would create the sense of urgency and intimacy that lifted the affairs of the House into a 'human sphere'.' It's thanks to Churchill, who couldn't have foreseen the televising of PMQs, that we are now able to watch it with all its 'urgency and intimacy'.
Jeremy White
Buxton, Derbyshire
Wrong winner
Sir: Barometer (9 August) says that Franz Beckenbauer played half an hour of extra time in the World Cup semi-final in 1970 against Italy with his arm in a sling. It then states: 'His German team beat Italy 4-3.' But the Germans actually lost 4-3 and Italy went on to lose 4-1 to Brazil in the final.
Alan Haile
London SW6
Horatio's Garden
Sir: Charles Moore described the restorative properties of a Horatio's Garden (Notes, 2 August). My brother is currently in St George's Hospital in Tooting and benefits from the garden there. There are shady and sunny spots, a variety of tactile and sweet-smelling plants and a pond full of goldfish. It has the added advantage of giving some privacy, not always available on a busy ward, for family discussions in its various nooks and crannies.
Mary Moore
Croydon, London
Write to us
The Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London SW1H 9HP;
letters@spectator.co.uk
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump-Putin peace summit leaves five unanswered questions as ceasefire in doubt
Trump-Putin peace summit leaves five unanswered questions as ceasefire in doubt

Daily Mirror

time18 minutes ago

  • Daily Mirror

Trump-Putin peace summit leaves five unanswered questions as ceasefire in doubt

The prospect of a ceasefire in Ukraine seems more distant than ever as several hours of negotiations in Anchorage, Alaska, between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin ended without agreement Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin have concluded their highly anticipated peace summit without any notable outcome, as the two world leaders failed to broker an agreement - leaving a host of unanswered questions in their wake. ‌ The two met in Anchorage, Alaska, today for what was projected to be several hours worth of closed-door negotiations between senior teams in a bid to hammer out a Ukraine ceasefire. But they both left empty-handed after just under three hours, with the summit closing abruptly following a joint press statement and both men boarding their respective planes bound for home. ‌ Mr Trump, who conceded there was "no deal" in his own statement, has left more questions than answers after delivering vague remarks to gathered journalists. ‌ What was the ' significant point' that couldn't be agreed on? Mr Trump gave the most substantive answer to what happened behind closed doors when he addressed diplomats and members of the press, but still revealed very little as to what was said. He notably revealed that "many points were agreed to" in the closed-door meeting, adding that "one is the most significant". He said: "We had an extremely productive meeting and many points were agreed to, there are very few that are left. Some are not that significant, one is probably the most significant but we have a very good chance of getting there." While he spoke for a little longer, he never did elaborate on that point, with members of the public none the wiser as to what he meant after he and Putin split off without answering journalists' questions. Will Trump go to Moscow? Today's joint address concluded with a brief quip from Putin, who appeared to suggest another meeting in the future - this time on his home turf. Speaking after Mr Trump suggested they could meet again, he said: "Next time in Moscow." ‌ The US President seemed discomforted by the suggestion, however, and was very non-commital in his response, telling his Russian counterpart the suggestion was an "interesting one". He said: "That's an interesting one. I'll get a little heat on that one, but I could see it possibly happening." Neither Washington nor the Kremlin has committed to another meeting, with Mr Trump suggesting in an interview on Fox News that the ball is now in Ukraine and NATO's court. ‌ Why did Trump not take questions? Mr Trump famously enjoys speaking with members of the press, whether from the Oval Office or in conferences after major meetings conducted behind closed doors. But today was notably different, with the US and Russian Presidents notably departing the stage abruptly and without taking a single question. The leaders had a taste of the kind of questions that would have been asked, with Putin quizzed as to whether he would "keep killing civilians" in Ukraine. He appeared to antagonise members of the press at several points by holding his hand to his hear and shrugging, before cracking a smile. He may have wanted to avoid answering these lines of inquiry on stage and ruled out taking questions - but neither Kremlin nor Washington officials have said why they left before doing so. ‌ How will NATO respond? One question to which we will eventually get an answer is how NATO will respond to the meeting, with Mr Trump saying during today's conference that he planned to speak with representatives of the military pact after the summit. He said: "I'm going to start making a few phone calls and will tell them what happened." World leaders typically release statements following conversations with Mr Trump, with Sir Keir Starmer, Emmanuel Macron and NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte among the key figures likely to do so. ‌ But we've already got an early taste of how the summit was received by former NATO officials, with the US' former ambassador to the organisation saying Mr Trump achieved "zero". Douglas Lute told the BBC Putin ultimately won, having come away "with the end of international isolation". Why was the luncheon cancelled? Among the billed features of the summit mentioned ahead of time was a luncheon between senior negotiators, which appears to have been ultimately ditched at the last second. These lunches are typically vital opportunities for strengthening diplomatic ties, and have been skipped in the past when frictions develop between officials. A highly-anticipated lunch between Mr Trump and Ukrainian premier Volodymyr Zelensky was notably skipped earlier this year after their Oval Office meeting descended into a shouting match. While the Anchorage summit was more publicly convivial, the lunch between US and Russian officials was skipped. Representatives from either party are yet to confirm as to why this was the case.

British personnel ready to arrive in Ukraine once fighting on hold
British personnel ready to arrive in Ukraine once fighting on hold

South Wales Guardian

timean hour ago

  • South Wales Guardian

British personnel ready to arrive in Ukraine once fighting on hold

Russian President Vladimir Putin has met his US counterpart Donald Trump in Anchorage, Alaska, where they discussed the conflict after more than three years of fighting in eastern Europe but failed to strike a deal. After talking for nearly three hours, they refused to answer questions from reporters, but both made statements, with Mr Trump saying 'some great progress' was made with 'many points' agreed to, and 'very few' remaining. The UK Government earlier this summer backed international efforts to set up a 'Multinational Force Ukraine', a military plan to bolster Ukraine's defences once the conflict eases, in a bid to ward off future Russian aggression. 'Planning has continued on an enduring basis to ensure that a force can deploy in the days following the cessation of hostilities,' an MoD spokesperson said. According to the Government, 'along with securing Ukraine's skies and supporting safer seas, the force is expected to regenerate land forces by providing logistics, armaments, and training expertise'. It 'will strengthen Ukraine's path to peace and stability by supporting the regeneration of Ukraine's own forces', the spokesperson added. Early designs for the Multinational Force Ukraine were originally drafted last month, after military chiefs met in Paris to agree a strategy and co-ordinate plans with the EU, Nato, the US and more than 200 planners. Russian forces invaded Ukraine in February 2022. On the day of negotiations, the Russians are killing as well. And that speaks volumes. Recently, weʼve discussed with the U.S. and Europeans what can truly work. Everyone needs a just end to the war. Ukraine is ready to work as productively as possible to bring the war to an end,… — Volodymyr Zelenskyy / Володимир Зеленський (@ZelenskyyUa) August 15, 2025 Moments before Mr Trump touched down in Anchorage, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky wrote on X that Saturday 'will start early for everyone in Europe' as leaders react to the Alaska summit. 'We continue co-ordinating with our partners in Europe,' Mr Zelensky said, and added: 'Russia must end the war that it itself started and has been dragging out for years. 'The killings must stop. A meeting of leaders is needed – at the very least, Ukraine, America, and the Russian side – and it is precisely in such a format that effective decisions are possible.' When he addressed the press, Mr Putin said he greeted Mr Trump on the tarmac as 'dear neighbour' and added: 'Our countries, though separated by the oceans, are close neighbours.' According to a translation carried by broadcasters, he claimed the 'situation in Ukraine has to do with fundamental threats to our security'. Stood next to Mr Putin in front of the words 'Pursuing Peace', Mr Trump said: 'We haven't quite got there but we've made some headway.' He stressed 'there's no deal until there's a deal' and added: 'I will call up Nato in a little while. 'I will call up the various people that I think are appropriate, and I'll of course call up President Zelensky and tell him about today's meeting.' Concluding their exchange, the US president said: 'We'll speak to you very soon and probably see you again very soon. 'Thank you very much, Vladimir.' Mr Putin replied: 'Next time, in Moscow.' Mr Trump said: 'That's an interesting one. I'll get a little heat for that one. 'I could see it possibly happening.' Speaking to Fox News before boarding Air Force One to leave Alaska, Mr Trump said 'a lot of points were negotiated' in what he described as 'a very warm meeting'. He said European nations would have some involvement in any deal, but said the emphasis was on Mr Zelensky 'to get it done'. Mr Trump said he expected the Russian and Ukrainian leaders to meet, possibly with him involved. The Kremlin has previously said the two men would only meet when an agreement is ready to be signed. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov described the talks as 'very positive', according to Russian state news agency RIA Novosti. He said no questions were taken from journalists because Mr Putin and Mr Trump had made 'comprehensive statements'.

Donald Trump's gift to Vladimir Putin
Donald Trump's gift to Vladimir Putin

Economist

timean hour ago

  • Economist

Donald Trump's gift to Vladimir Putin

FROM THE moment he stepped off his plane onto the red-carpeted tarmac, the summit in Alaska was a triumph for Vladimir Putin. He was greeted with applause from his host, Donald Trump. The two men may have had nothing to announce after hours of talks—the first meeting between a Russian and American president since the invasion of Ukraine—but the encounter at the Elmendorf-Richardson military base in Anchorage transformed Mr Putin from a pariah of the West into an honoured guest on American soil.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store