USAID marks last day with Obama, Bush criticizing Trump's gutting of agency
Obama called the Trump administration's dismantling of USAID 'a colossal mistake.'
Monday was the last day as an independent agency for the six-decade-old humanitarian and development organization, created by President John F. Kennedy as a peaceful way of promoting U.S. national security by boosting goodwill and prosperity abroad.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio has ordered USAID absorbed into the State Department as of Tuesday.
The former presidents and Bono spoke with thousands in the USAID community in a videoconference, which was billed as a closed-press event to allow political leaders and others privacy for sometimes angry and often teary remarks. Parts of the video were shared with The Associated Press.
Story continues below advertisement
They expressed their appreciation for the thousands of USAID staffers who have lost their jobs and life's work. Their agency was one of the first and most fiercely targeted for government-cutting by President Donald Trump and his billionaire ally Elon Musk, with staffers abruptly locked out of systems and offices and terminated by mass emailing.
Trump claimed the agency was run by 'radical left lunatics' and rife with 'tremendous fraud.' Musk called it 'a criminal organization.'
1:35
USAID cuts face growing backlash
Obama, speaking in a recorded statement, offered assurances to the aid and development workers, some listening from overseas.
Get breaking National news
For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy
'Your work has mattered and will matter for generations to come,' he told them.
Obama has largely kept a low public profile during Trump's second term and refrained from criticizing the monumental changes that Trump has made to U.S. programs and priorities at home and abroad.
Story continues below advertisement
'Gutting USAID is a travesty, and it's a tragedy. Because it's some of the most important work happening anywhere in the world,' Obama said. He credited USAID with not only saving lives, but being a main factor in global economic growth that has turned some aid-receiving countries into U.S. markets and trade partners.
The former Democratic president predicted that 'sooner or later, leaders on both sides of the aisle will realize how much you are needed.'
Asked for comment, the State Department said it would be introducing the department's foreign assistance successor to USAID, to be called America First, this week.
'The new process will ensure there is proper oversight and that every tax dollar spent will help advance our national interests,' the department said.
USAID oversaw programs around the world, providing water and life-saving food to millions uprooted by conflict in Sudan, Syria, Gaza and elsewhere, sponsoring the 'Green Revolution' that revolutionized modern agriculture and curbed starvation and famine, preventing disease outbreaks, promoting democracy, and providing financing and development that allowed countries and people to climb out of poverty.
Bush, who also spoke in a recorded message, went straight to the cuts in a landmark AIDS and HIV program started by his Republican administration and credited with saving 25 million lives around the world.
2:38
Risk of 2,000 new HIV infections daily after US aid freeze, UN AIDS agency estimates
Bipartisan blowback from Congress to cutting the popular President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief, known as PEPFAR, helped save significant funding for the program. But cuts and rule changes have reduced the number getting the life-saving care.
Story continues below advertisement
'You've showed the great strength of America through your work — and that is your good heart,'' Bush told USAID staffers. 'Is it in our national interests that 25 million people who would have died now live? I think it is, and so do you,' he said.
Former Liberian President Ellen Johnson-Sirleaf, former Colombian President Juan Manual Santos and former U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Linda Thomas-Greenfield also spoke to the staffers.
So did humanitarian workers, including one who spoke of the welcome appearance of USAID staffers with food when she was a frightened 8-year-old child in a Liberian refugee camp. A World Food Program official vowed through sobs that the U.S. aid mission would be back someday.
Bono, a longtime humanitarian advocate in Africa and elsewhere, was announced as the 'surprise guest,' in shades and a cap.
He jokingly hailed the USAID staffers as 'secret agents of international development' in acknowledgment of the down-low nature of Monday's unofficial gathering of the USAID community.
Bono held back tears at times as he recited a poem he had written to the agency and its gutting. He spoke of children dying of malnutrition, a reference to millions of people who Boston University researchers and other analysts say will die because of the U.S. cuts to funding for health and other programs abroad.
Story continues below advertisement
'They called you crooks. When you were the best of us,' Bono said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Toronto Sun
31 minutes ago
- Toronto Sun
GUNTER: Canada looks weak to U.S. by backpedalling on digital services tax
Canada's Finance Minister Francois-Philippe Champagne, left, and Bank of Canada Governor Tiff Macklem arrive to greet fellow G7 finance ministers and central bank governors at the Rimrock Resort Hotel in Banff on Wednesday May 21, 2025. Photo by Gavin Young / Postmedia There are so many things wrong about the Liberals' climbdown from the digital services tax (DST) announced late last Sunday evening. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account For one, they look like they played chicken with U.S. President Donald Trump and lost. They swerved first. That makes them (and the whole country) look weak. Trump will now be back again and again with new demands because he knows he can threaten to cut off trade talks or jack up tariffs and our tough-guy, elbows-up prime minister will fold. Next it is likely to be supply-managed agriculture, mostly in dairy, poultry and eggs, which Trump has railed against since his first term in office. (It would be good to be rid of supply management, but that's another discussion.) The Liberal government looked foolish and dishonest. On the evening of June 29, when Finance Minister François-Philippe Champagne announced the government was cancelling the DST on billions of dollars of goods and services sold online, he insisted the Liberals had been contemplating cancelling the tax all along. Your noon-hour look at what's happening in Toronto and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. That is such a lie. There's no gentler way to put it. Hundreds of large Canadian and foreign providers of online goods and services had already filed DST returns and paid tens of millions of dollars in new taxes. The deadline for initial DST payments was June 30. And companies had had to comb back through their books to 2022 to calculate how much they owed. This is as much a foul-up on the Liberals' part as their colossally messed-up attempt to raise the capital gains tax by nearly one-third in 2024. On that occasion, companies and professionals spent millions (perhaps as much as a quarter-billion dollars) paying accountants' fees to realize capital gains in their businesses and retirement plans prior to the June 25, 2024, deadline for the tax to go up. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. But the Liberals never passed the tax increase. It was never put in place. Canadians wasted hundreds of millions of their own money trying to comply with the Liberals' wishes. Pulling the plug on the DST last week was similar. Hundreds of companies and their accounts toiled for weeks to get their first DST returns and initial payments ready. Many had already paid. Yet when Champagne announced the tax's demise, he didn't also announce when the paying companies could expect full refunds. He hinted there would be further details on how to apply for their money back, but the Liberals already know who paid and how. Refunds should be as straightforward as the government putting the money back where it came from. With interest. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. If you are late paying your taxes, the Canada Revenue Agency will charge you interest. You might even be liable for penalties. Stiff ones. But the reverse isn't true, even though it should be. Businesses that complied with the DST, that obeyed the rules (even though they may have disagreed with the tax), should not only get their money back — pronto — but should be compensated with interest for the time their money was in Ottawa's grubby hands. In short, going back on the DST at the last second, under pressure from the bully Trump, makes Canada — and specifically Prime Minister Mark Carney — look feeble. But it was the right thing to do. It would have been far better if the Liberals had never introduced the DST. It was one of those fashionable, punitive, anti-business taxes that global 'progressives' think is justified to rob from the 'rich' to give to … well, mostly to give to the internationalist 'progressives,' their governments and pet causes. Not only were the Liberals justified in getting rid of the DST to restart trade talks with the Trump White House, they were smart to get rid of it to preserve Canadian production by online streaming services and sellers, too. It was a good thing. But the Liberals have to stop stepping in cowflops of their own making. lgunter@ Sports Money News MLB Toronto Maple Leafs Editorial Cartoons
Winnipeg Free Press
an hour ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Military veteran gets a life sentence for plotting an FBI attack after his Jan. 6 arrest
WASHINGTON (AP) — A military veteran was sentenced Wednesday to life in prison for plotting to attack an FBI office and assassinate law enforcement officers in retaliation for his arrest on charges that he was part of the mob that stormed the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, court records show. Edward Kelley was one of the first rioters to breach the Capitol. Nearly two years later, Kelley made plans with another man to attack the FBI office in Knoxville, Tennessee, using improvised explosive devices attached to vehicles and drones, according to prosecutors. Last November, a jury convicted Kelley of conspiring to murder federal employees, solicitation to commit a crime of violence and influencing federal officials by threat. Kelley received a pardon from President Donald Trump for his Jan. 6 convictions, but a judge agreed with prosecutors that Trump's action did not extend to Kelley's Tennessee case. That makes Kelley, who is from Maryvale, Tennessee, one of only a few Capitol riot defendants remaining in prison after the Republican president's sweeping act of clemency. U.S. District Judge Thomas Varlan handed down Kelley's life sentence during a hearing in Knoxville, according to court records. The judge denied a request for Kelley to be released pending the outcome of an appeal. Prosecutors had recommended a life sentence for Kelley, saying he was remorseless and incapable of rehabilitation. 'On the contrary, Kelley not only believes the actions for which he was convicted were justified but that his duty as a self-styled 'patriot' compelled him to target East Tennessee law enforcement for assassination,' they wrote. Kelley served in the Marine Corps for eight years. He was deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan before his 2015 discharge from the military. On Jan. 6, 2021, Kelley was captured on video helping two other rioters throw a Capitol Police officer onto the ground and using a piece of wood to damage a window, according to the FBI. He was the fourth person to enter the Capitol through a broken window, the FBI said. After a trial without a jury, a federal judge in Washington convicted Kelley last November of 11 counts stemming from the riot. Before Kelley could be sentenced, Trump pardoned him and hundreds of other convicted Capitol rioters. Kelley argued that his pardon was broad enough to cover his conduct in the Tennessee case, but the judge disagreed. Varlan said Kelley's crimes in the Tennessee case were separated from Kelley's conduct on Jan. 6 'by years and miles.' Prosecutors reached the same conclusion. In other Jan. 6 cases, however, Trump's Justice Department has argued that the pardons apply to separate convictions. For instance, prosecutors concluded that a Kentucky man's pardon for storming the Capitol also covered his conviction for illegally possessing guns when FBI agents searched his home for the Jan. 6 investigation. Kelley has been jailed since December 2022. His lawyer, Mark Brown, said Kelley did not hurt anybody or directly threaten anybody with violence. Brown urged the judge to reject prosecutors' request to apply a 'terrorism enhancement' in calculating his client's sentence. 'Kelley does not deserve the same sentence as an actual 'terrorist' who injured or killed hundreds or thousands of America citizens,' Brown wrote. Kelley's co-defendant, Austin Carter, pleaded guilty to a conspiracy charge in January 2024. He is scheduled to be sentenced on Aug. 4. Kelley created a list of 36 law-enforcement officers to target for assassination and shared it with Carter, calling it their first 'mission,' according to prosecutors. All the officers were involved in Kelley's May 2022 arrest on Capitol riot charges and the FBI's search of his home. 'The proof at trial established that Kelley targeted law enforcement because of their anticipated role in the civil war that Kelley hoped to initiate and because of his animus towards those who participated in his May 2022 arrest and search of his home,' prosecutors wrote. Kelley, Carter and a third man used an encrypted messaging platform to discuss plans, prosecutors said. Carter testified that he met with Kelley to conduct military-style training in November 2022. 'Carter's testimony was unequivocal — he had no doubts that, had he and Kelley not been arrested, the law enforcement personnel included on Kelley's list would have been murdered,' prosecutors wrote. Kelley's attorney said the case involved 'little to no planning.' 'Discussions did not lead to action,' Brown wrote. 'And while people may not like what Mr. Kelley had to say, he stands behind his position that he has a First Amendment right to free speech.'
Winnipeg Free Press
an hour ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
With public ban on band Bob Vylan, Trump appears to ease visa privacy rules to make a point
WASHINGTON (AP) — When the United States revokes someone's visa, it is typically confidential, with few exceptions. But with British punk-rap duo Bob Vylan and others, the Trump administration appears to have eased privacy restrictions to make a public point when it deems a case particularly egregious. The State Department's number two diplomat made headlines when he posted a social media message this week saying visas for the band for an upcoming U.S. tour had been revoked. British police are investigating whether a crime was committed when the duo's frontman led the audience in chants of 'Death to the IDF' — the Israel Defense Forces — at a music festival in the U.K. Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau posted that their visas had been revoked 'in light of their hateful tirade at Glastonbury, including leading the crowd in death chants.' The band rejected claims of antisemitism and said in a statement that it was being 'targeted for speaking up' about the war in Gaza. Under the Immigration and Nationality Act and certain statutes related to the privacy of government documents, the State Department has for years resisted or refused to discuss specific cases in which visas may have been denied or revoked. Certain exemptions apply, such as when foreign officials and their immediate family members are found to ineligible for entry into the United States for violating anti-corruption or human rights regulations. However, as the Trump administration pursues a nationwide crackdown targeted at visa holders it believes have engaged in antisemitic or pro-militant behavior, the standard for releasing once-privileged information seems to have been relaxed. 'Foreigners who glorify violence and hatred are not welcome visitors to our country,' State Department spokeswoman Tammy Bruce said when asked about the public announcement. She said one reason for announcing the revocations was to make clear that the administration is serious about the standards it will apply to visa holders and applicants. 'We've been public about that standard, and this was a very public event that violated that very basic standard about the nature of who we want to let into the country,' Bruce said. Other recent cases have been less clear-cut, although some have ended up in public court cases. Earlier this year, as part of an initiative to expel foreign students who are accused by the Trump administration of engaging in pro-Hamas, anti-Israel or antisemitic activity, Secretary of State Marco Rubio said he had rescinded at least 300 visas and expected that number to rise. Many of those cases were not publicized individually. One that was: Rumeysa Ozturk, who was detained by immigration authorities in Massachusetts for authoring an opinion piece criticizing Tufts University for not taking a tougher line on alleged Israeli atrocities in Gaza. U.S. officials said at the time that her visa had been revoked because of adverse foreign policy consequences if she remained in the United States. Other high-profile and public cases of visa revocations for political reasons date back decades, including actor Charlie Chaplin in 1952 during the Truman administration and an ultimately unsuccessful deportation attempt against Beatles singer John Lennon in the 1970s. 'The practice of ideological exclusion has a long history in the United States, having been used for decades as a political tool to keep U.S. audiences from being exposed to dissident viewpoints,' the human rights group Amnesty International said in a 2020 report. 'During the Cold War, in particular, the U.S. government denied visas to some of the world's leading intellectuals, writers and artists who, the government thought, might promote Communism or other 'subversive' views,' it said.
