I'll be watching Kneecap's 4pm prime time Glastonbury set - they deserve to be t
Like 209,999 other people, I'm at Glastonbury Festival this weekend.
In fact, it's my 20th visit to Worthy Farm.
Among my bucket hats and raincoat – which I'm hoping I won't need – I've packed my Palestine T-shirt and flag.
I'll be proudly wearing and waving them when I go to see Irish rappers Kneecap.
Kneecap are playing the West Holts stage at 4pm today – Saturday June 28, 2025. Their set will last for an hour, ending at 5pm and can be watched live or streamed on the BBC
I will be there, no matter how much it might annoy Keir Starmer and other politicians who think their appearance at the festival is 'not appropriate'.
For those who missed the controversy, it all started when Kneecap made pro-Palestine statements at Coachella in April this year. Critics like Sharon Osbourne decried Kneecap's set as 'promoting terrorist organizations or spreading hate'.
Around the same time, resurfaced footage of a 2024 Kneecap gig in London caused controversy – with band member Liam Óg Ó hAnnaidh currently on bail following a court appearance when he was charged with a terror offence for allegedly displaying a flag in support of Hezbollah.
Keep up to date with Metro's Glastonbury live blog here
So when Keir Starmer was asked recently if he thought Kneecap should still play Glastonbury, he responded: 'I don't think that's appropriate'.
As the band themselves put it on X: 'You know what's 'not appropriate' Keir?! Arming a genocide…'
I couldn't agree more.
So I'll be waving my Palestine flag at most of the gigs that I catch over the weekend, just like I and hundreds of others did at last year's Glastonbury.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
At its heart, Glastonbury is political. For the Prime Minister, who should have enough on his plate, to try to say that any band performing is 'not appropriate', it's laughable.
Every year, festival goers wear T-shirts and wave flags highlighting issues they feel strongly about, including racism, trans rights, climate justice, women's reproductive rights, and safe routes for immigrants.
And this year, I imagine many more, in the crowds and on the stage, will call out the actions of controversial political figures, such as Donald Trump and Elon Musk.
Freedom of speech and discussing social and political issues is a huge part of the festival, which hosts countless talks across the site.
Guest speakers this year include outspoken TV pundit Gary Lineker, Zarah Sultana MP, drag queen and model Bimini Bon Boulash, author and activist Reni Eddo-Lodge, political commentator Danny Price, fast fashion activist Venetia La Manna, political satirist and comedian Munya Chawawa, political journalist Ash Sarkar, and Palestine and Climate direct action group Youth Demand – to name just a few.
In my two decades of attending, I've never felt like the political content was 'not appropriate.'
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
In fact, since 1992, the festival has partnered with Greenpeace and the organisation's message at the festival this year is to highlight the 'democratic right to protest and to call out the big polluters to stop drilling and start paying'.
With politicians trying to dictate which bands should play, that first point in particular seems timely.
Glastonbury and the right to voice your political beliefs go hand in hand – and have done since the festival's inception in 1970, where there was a large 'anti-Vietnam War' crowd, at what was then the Pilton Pop, Blues & Folk Festival.
In 1981, the festival donated profits to the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament (CND). While in 1984, the festival introduced the Green Fields – dedicated to environmental and social issues.
The festival has been part of the 'Make Poverty History' campaign, the 'I Count campaign' – which highlighted the need to address climate change – and also the 'White Ribbon Alliance's Million Mums' campaign – aimed at ending the needless deaths of women in childbirth.
It's a big part of the festival, and a big part of the appeal for me.
In 2016, Blur frontman, Damon Albarn, claimed that 'democracy has failed us' after the Brexit results. He also made a surprise appearance at last year's festival, expressing his support for Palestine and also talking about the upcoming US elections.
On top of that, the main Pyramid stage has seen powerful political speeches and performances from everyone from Jeremy Corbyn to David Attenborough and Stormzy to Kendrick Lamar.
So, for Keir Starmer to be weighing in and saying that it's 'not appropriate' for Kneecap to perform makes no sense at all.
People might wonder why the Prime Minister of this country is even getting involved with who should be on the Glastonbury line-up. I know exactly why – because it's a distraction from the real story: The thousands of people being slaughtered in Gaza. More Trending
A distraction from what I believe is the UK Government's complicity in what is being described by humanitarian groups as a genocide. And a distraction from their refusal to fully ban arms sales to Israel or place serious sanctions on the state.
Instead, Keir Starmer is pointing the finger at a young band who stand firm to their beliefs and are calling out the atrocities that he won't talk about.
So I'll be attending Kneecap's Glastonbury performance to show solidarity with them.
If that makes me 'inappropriate' – so be it.
Do you have a story you'd like to share? Get in touch by emailing Ross.Mccafferty@metro.co.uk.
Share your views in the comments below.
MORE: Glastonbury viewers vent over 'hopeless' The 1975 set as one thing ruins it
MORE: Glastonbury fans are fuming after struggle to stream Other Stage on BBC iPlayer
MORE: The 1975's Glastonbury glory is overshadowed by Matty Healy's problematic past
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
19 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Will I get lost – or liberated? My day at Glastonbury without a phone
For someone who gets lost on the way back from a restaurant bathroom, the 364-hectare (900-acre) sprawl of Glastonbury is a navigational nightmare. I've been to the festival three times, and between the music and the drinking I've always been glued to my phone, risking a rolled ankle as I hurry along, staring at the site map on the app and racing to recorrect my route to the shows. Losing power or losing my phone hasn't ever seemed an option here. Without it, I would cease to function. But perhaps, at the ripe old age of 31, it is time to face my fears. What would happen if I ditched my phone for the day? Would I perish from boredom or find myself liberated, finally embracing the full freedom of the Glastonbury experience? I feel like a frightened puppy at the start of the day, stowing my phone in my bag and attaching myself to colleagues who can show me around instead. I follow my first benevolent handler to the circus fields to watch a talk – so far, so straightforward. But as I head off to find some water, I momentarily lose my bearings on my way back to the group. I have to remind myself to be more attentive once I'm cast off alone to follow the signs (and the many helpful stewards I ask) to the Pyramid stage. Supergrass are playing and as I watch their skittish set I feel my phone start to buzz. I instinctively reach for it, worrying I'm missing out on group chats or work goings-on, and feel strangely bereft when I realise I have to let it vibrate, ignoring it to focus on the stage. I begin to feel a bit bored – something I haven't felt since I first had a smartphone to fill every quiet moment with scrolling. I am considering the state of modern boredom when the Spice Girl Mel C walks past. If I'd been staring at my screen, I never would have noticed her. I head over to ask for a selfie before realising I'd need to take my phone out, settling for an awkward wave instead. As the sun reaches a woozy afternoon peak, I reach into my bag and turn the phone off, free now to wander. I soon spot a group dressed as pirates and ask where they're off to. They hand me a warm bottle of vodka and squash and invite me to tag along. This is their eighth Glastonbury as a group and two of them, Jo and Chris, got engaged here last year. 'It's the most magical place on Earth,' Jo says. 'Nothing bad can happen to you, so have fun!' We spend the next few hours together, stumbling past an Elvis impersonator, the millennial rappers Rizzle Kicks and someone in a morph suit singing Frank Sinatra's My Way on a karaoke machine. As night falls, I find myself alone again, but no longer bored or lonely. Sebastian, a Greenpeace volunteer, spots me scribbling and asks what I'm up to. He tells me he's been coming since the 1980s. 'It's changed a lot and there's more of a corporate atmosphere these days,' he says. 'But you won't find a place with more friendly people in the world.' We try to make our way to the hedonistic south-east corner before losing each other in the crowd. Soon, though, the magic of the festival strikes, as I spot a friend from primary school who I haven't seen in two decades. In a sea of 200,000 people, this meeting feels very unlikely, and as we catch up into the early hours, I realise I would never have found myself here had I followed my phone and had arranged plans. Bleary-eyed, I eventually make the long walk back to the tent. When I wake up and turn on my phone, I realise I missed a meeting with a photographer the day before and an interview for another piece in the afternoon. There are downsides to being uncontactable, but it feels a small price to pay for a revelation: my sense of direction hasn't improved, but I now feel comfortable with getting lost. Perhaps I'll leave my phone at home more often.
Belfast Telegraph
20 minutes ago
- Belfast Telegraph
Mo Chara tells Glastonbury crowd of ‘stress' after court appearance, blasts PM and makes joke for BBC editor at packed stage
Kneecap led the crowd in chants of 'Free Mo Chara and f*** Keir Starmer' during their Glastonbury set, while also thanking the organisers for not bowing to pressure to cancel their performance.
Spectator
27 minutes ago
- Spectator
Starmer changes his tune on peerage rules
Sir Keir Starmer seems to be changing his mind a lot these days. Whether it is welfare cuts or the 'island of strangers' speech, a grooming gangs inquiry or winter fuel, the Prime Minister is struggling to keep consistent line on much at present. So it is perhaps no surprise then that the Labour leader has changed his tune on the rules around peerages too. In a little-noticed statement to parliament, snuck out last Thursday, Starmer provided an update on the 'roles and responsibilities of all parties involved in making nominations to the House of Lords.' He addressed the subject of the House of Lords Appointments Commission (HOLAC), saying that: Advice on propriety is separate to judgements about the suitability of candidates, which are for political parties… The Commission can decline to support a nomination on propriety grounds and will inform the relevant political party if this is the case. It is a matter for the Prime Minister to decide whether to recommend an individual to the Sovereign. In the unlikely event I, as Prime Minister, were to proceed with a nomination against HOLAC's advice on propriety I would write to the Commission and this letter would be published on The Commission may also provide advice on whether there are any presentational risks associated with a nominee. The Commission does not withhold support for a nominee due to presentational risks. Hmm. That is a somewhat different tone to the one struck by Labour in opposition. Flashback to 2020 when Labour criticised Boris Johnson's decision to overrule HOLAC and award businessman Peter Cruddas a peerage. It prompted Starmer's deputy, Angela Rayner, to declare that 'there is one rule for the Conservatives and their chums, another for the rest of the country.' Yet now that Labour is in office, it seems that Starmer is perfectly happy to overrule HOLAC if he deems it necessary… There is an intriguing sub-plot to this latest Starmer statement too. He goes on to refer to the creation of Crossbench peerages: As Prime Minister, I will continue to recommend directly for appointment a limited number of candidates to sit as Crossbench peers, based on their public service, including both distinguished public servants on retirement and individuals with a proven track record of service to the public. These nominations will continue to be vetted for propriety by the House of Lords Appointments Commission. Given Starmer's aforementioned distinction between 'propriety' and 'suitability', it does raise the question of who exactly he has in mind to sit on the Crossbenches in future…
