logo
Opinion - Blaming Cambodia, hiding the truth: Thailand's dangerous game of cybercrime deflection

Opinion - Blaming Cambodia, hiding the truth: Thailand's dangerous game of cybercrime deflection

The Star10-07-2025
PHNOM PENH: While pointing fingers at its neighbour, Thailand quietly shelters the very crimes it accuses others of.
In a recent statement reported by The Nation Thailand, a spokesperson for the Thai government attempted to frame Cambodia as the epicentre of Southeast Asia's cybercrime crisis. The accusation was neither new nor surprising — but it was profoundly hypocritical.
For years, Thailand has sought to portray itself as a victim of transnational crime while deflecting attention from the fact that it is, in reality, a regional hub for cybercrime, drug smuggling and human trafficking.
Rather than promoting honest regional cooperation, Thailand has chosen a path of political distraction — one that not only damages bilateral relations but also undermines genuine efforts to tackle organised crime across Southeast Asia.
A convenient scapegoat
Thailand's claims that Cambodia is the source of scam networks are a tired and convenient narrative, crafted to distract from the deep-seated criminal infrastructure operating within its own borders.
Thai government officials continue to emphasise arrests of their nationals abroad, yet turn a blind eye to domestic trafficking networks, recruitment hubs and cyber-scam training centres operating under their own jurisdiction.
Several international investigations have documented how Thai border provinces, such as Sa Kaeo, Tak, Chiang Rai and Mae Sot, serve as launchpads for scam syndicates.
These criminal groups recruit, transport and traffic both Thai and foreign nationals into scam compounds in Laos, Myanmar and, occasionally, Cambodia.
Victims — often young people desperate for jobs — are funnelled through Thailand by well-organised networks that Thai authorities have failed, or refused to dismantle.
When Thai police do act, it's typically after pressure from international partners — not from any consistent domestic policy.
In early 2024, Thai and Chinese police cooperated in Chiang Mai to investigate scam recruitment rings, yet similar networks continue to flourish elsewhere in the country.
Why? Because for every arrest, many more are protected, hidden, or ignored by local officials.
Drugs, human trafficking, and complicity
Thailand's involvement in transnational crime extends beyond cyber scams.
It remains a key player in the Golden Triangle's narcotics trade, one of the largest drug-producing and smuggling regions in the world.
Methamphetamine and ketamine, smuggled in staggering quantities, often pass through Thai territory on their way to global markets.
Worse still is Thailand's role in human trafficking. According to reports from Amnesty International and others institutions, Thailand has become both a source and a transit country for trafficking victims — especially those lured into scam centres in neighbouring countries.
Thai nationals, foreign workers and even minors have been recruited via Thai-based agencies, smuggled across borders and forced into online scam operations.
Yet instead of addressing its own complicity, the Thai government has adopted the strategy of deflection — targeting Cambodia with vague accusations while avoiding accountability at home.
Dangers of political deflection
Blaming Cambodia serves a political purpose. It helps Thai leaders avoid uncomfortable questions from the international community and the Thai public.
It also allows them to project an image of law and order, even as corruption, weak enforcement and deliberate inaction allow criminal operations to flourish within Thailand itself.
This approach is not only irresponsible — it is dangerous. It undermines regional trust, weakens cross-border collaboration and fuels unnecessary diplomatic tensions.
Rather than building joint frameworks to combat transnational crime, Thailand has chosen to use Cambodia as a scapegoat. But the truth is harder to bury than officials may think.
Cambodia's constructive approach
Unlike Thailand's pattern of blame and evasion, Cambodia has publicly acknowledged the presence of scam operations on its territory and taken direct action.
The Cambodian government has launched multiple raids, cooperated with foreign embassies, deported thousands of foreign suspects and strengthened its cybercrime laws.
Cambodia has also welcomed multilateral cooperation, including working with UN agencies and neighbouring states.
If Thailand is sincere about combating cybercrime, it should match Cambodia's transparency and willingness to cooperate — instead of waging a media campaign based on distortion and denial.
Thailand's cybercrime problem is not Cambodia's creation — it is of Thailand's own making.
From its porous borders and complicit officials to its role in trafficking and drug smuggling, Thailand has more to fix at home than to criticise abroad.
If the Thai government truly wants to solve the regional crime crisis, it should begin by confronting the networks, enablers and institutions within its own territory.
Otherwise, its repeated finger-pointing at Cambodia will be seen not as leadership — but as cowardice disguised as diplomacy.
[Roth Santepheap is a geopolitical analyst based in Phnom Penh. The views and opinions expressed are his own.]
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

What we reported 60 years ago
What we reported 60 years ago

Daily Express

time15 minutes ago

  • Daily Express

What we reported 60 years ago

Published on: Sunday, August 10, 2025 Published on: Sun, Aug 10, 2025 By: Patrick J Killen Text Size: Daily Express front page on Aug. 10, 1965. Kuala Lumpur: Singapore today seceded from the two-year old Federation of Malaysia and announced it would like to settle any differences with Indonesia if the agreement would 'not endanger us' (In Jakarta, Indonesian leaders hailed the breakup of the Federation as a victory for Indonesia's campaign against Malaysia. Foreign Minister Subandrio said Indonesia probably would recognise Singapore and continue to seek the complete destruction of Malaysia.) Advertisement Singapore Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew said after announcing his government's secession: 'We want to be friends with Indonesia. We would like to settle any differences with Indonesia, but we must survive. 'We must be sure that we cannot be overrun or invaded by an army or rockets or missiles. It is important that we want to be friends in spite of all that had happened.' A few hours after Lee announced secession, Kuala Lumpur's Federal Parliament passed a constitutional amendment making Singapore independent as of today. Advertisement It was announced that Bri-tain's important military bases on Singapore would remain intact, as would those of Malaysia, pending a new agreement among the three governments. Malaysia reserved the right to take action if Singapore engaged in activities which threatened Malaysia. Malaysian Prime Minister Tunku Abdul. Rahman stressed that potential racial trouble was the major reason for Singapore's separation during his speech to Parliament and a news conference seven hours later. He said there were two courses open: Singapore's withdrawal or 'repressive measures' against Singapore leaders. In the end, he said, repressive measures might not solve the problem and Malaysia's thousands of students abroad would be 'fed with all kinds of propaganda against the Central Government.' He said he had decided on severing relations with the 'State Government that has ceased to give even measure of loyalty to Malaysia.' Prime Minister Tunku Abdul Rahman, acting on the permission of the King, signed the amendment into law, making the separation of Singapore legal and complete. Singapore and Malaysian leaders agreed on the surprise moves on Saturday, after a series of secret meetings. Under the pact, Malaysia and Singapore agreed to co-operate in External. Defence, Trade and Commerce. Although Singapore was free, it agreed not to under-take foreign treaties to the detriment of Malaysia. Tunku Abdul Rahman made clear at a news conference Malaysia reserved the right to take action if Singapore engaged in activities which threatened Malaysia. This included establishing relations with Communist China and Indonesia. The Tunku said he had decided to seek Singapore's withdrawal because he feared the continuing differences might lead to Malay-Chinese racial trouble. He said he hoped for the 'closest co-operation' bet-ween an independent Singapore and Malaysia. He said Malaysia would sponsor Singapore's admittance to the United Nations and the Commonwealth. The Prime Minister was anxious after the press con-ference this evening to know about the people's reaction to the separation. He asked newsmen how the people had received the news and whether there had been any violent demonstrations. On being told there has been no incidents he said, 'Well I am happy to hear had to do this.' Alliance and some opposition members of the Parliament said in the lobby this had to be done. However, members of the Sarawak and Sabah Alliance Party on being approached for comment on the matter said, 'no comment. We will make a statement later perhaps.' However they voted for the motion. The Tunku's relaxed mood and ready smile at the news conference was in sharp contrast to that of Singapore's Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew. At a Singapore news conference, Lee broke down and wept while speaking of the breakup. Lee said he met the Tunku last Saturday and was unconvinced Singapore's withdrawal from Malaysia was necessary. 'I believed there were still other ways to reduce communal tensions in Malaysia. After what he told me I realized there was no other way. We had to leave Malaysia.' 'I knew from what he said that we would all be in. for communal trouble if we insisted on remaining in Malaysia.' Describing it as a 'moment of anguish,' the 42-year-old Prime Minister told, newsmen: 'The whole of my adult life I have believed in merger and unity of these two countries.' Under the new arrangement Malaysia would continue as a Federation of 13 states including the Borneo Territories of Sabah and Sarawak. Singapore, Sabah and Sarawak—all British dependencies—merged with the Federation of Malaya on Sept. 16, 1963 to form Malaysia. Singapore as an independent island state 26 miles long and14 miles wide has a population of 1.7 million. Malaysia's population was reduced to about 8.5 million. Addressing parliament earlier today, the Tunku said the situation had reached a point where it was no longer worth having Singapore in the Federation. At his news conference, he said when Malaysia was formed he had hoped to prevent Singapore from becoming a 'second Cuba,' a communist island Just south of the Malay Peninsula. But, he said, the Singapore leaders were too involved in. politics to co-operate and work for a successful Malaysia. The Tunku said the foreign nations closest to Malaysia—Britain, Australia and New Zealand—had shown 'great disappointment' in the move. 'But,' he said, 'we have got to think what's best for the country and not what's best for our friends.' The Tunku said he had considered the problems of Malaysia while recovering from an attack of shingles or herpes in London last month. He said during this time Deputy Prime Minister Tun Abdul Razak and Lee met in Kuala Lumpur but were unable to agree on any points. The Tunku returned to Malaysia after a 54-day absence on Thursday. He said he got a thorough briefing of the situation at that time. The matter was discussed at an emergency cabinet meeting on Friday. On Saturday, the Tunku reached his decision that Singapore must go and conveyed his thoughts to Lee. After some reluctance, the Singapore leader and his nine cabinet ministers all signed the agreement. Five Federal cabinet ministers signed for Malaysia. The decision was kept secret until today when it was to be released at 10 a.m. local time (0230 GMT). The Tunku said, however, Lee broke the news of Singapore's independence three hours earlier. Singapore's new status took most of Malaysia's 10.2 million people by complete surprise. Reaction was slow because of the shock effect. Singapore was reported quiet with troops patrolling predominant Malay areas where race riots broke out last year. The Tunku called on the people to remain calm. He said those persons who wanted to come to Malaysia would be provided land in Johore State, just to the north of Singapore. The Minister of Sarawak Affairs, Dato Temmenggong Jugah told Parliament Sarawak would never withdraw from Malaysia. There was no immediate reaction from Sabah. Although the Singapore and Central Governments had many differences, neither had directly called for a break-up of Malaysia. Both the Tunku and Lee were regarded as the fathers of Malaysia and pushed for its inception. * Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel and Telegram for breaking news alerts and key updates! * Do you have access to the Daily Express e-paper and online exclusive news? Check out subscription plans available. Stay up-to-date by following Daily Express's Telegram channel. Daily Express Malaysia

Third landmine incident injures soldiers
Third landmine incident injures soldiers

The Star

time2 hours ago

  • The Star

Third landmine incident injures soldiers

Three Thai soldiers were injured by a landmine while patrolling the border with Cambodia, the Thai army said in a statement yesterday, days after the two neighbours agreed to a detailed ceasefire following a violent five-day conflict last month. One soldier lost a foot and two others were injured after one of them stepped on a landmine as they patrolled an area between Thailand's Sisaket and Cambodia's Preah Vihear provinces yesterday morning, the Thai army said. The soldiers are being treated at a hospital, the army said. Cambodia's defence ministry did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The incident is the third time in a few weeks that Thai soldiers have been injured by mines while patrolling along the border. Two previous similar incidents led to the downgrading of diplomatic relations and triggered five days of violent clashes. A fragile ceasefire has been holding since both countries agreed on Thursday to allow Asean observers to inspect disputed border areas to ensure hostilities do not resume. — Reuters

Crash victims' families want flight recorders released
Crash victims' families want flight recorders released

The Star

time2 hours ago

  • The Star

Crash victims' families want flight recorders released

Seeking answers: Relatives of those killed at a funeral service are demanding the release of flight recorders, which they believe hold the truth behind the June plane crash (below) in Ahmedabad. — AFP Families of the victims of June's deadly Air India crash demanded the immediate release of the aircraft's two flight recorders, saying delays were eroding their trust in the investigation. A total of 241 people on board the London-bound Boeing 787 Dreamliner were killed when the plane crashed shortly after take-off from Ahmedabad in western India on June 12. Another 19 people were killed on the ground. A preliminary investigation report by India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau said fuel to the jet's engines was cut off moments before impact. The report did not offer any conclusions or apportion blame for the disaster, but indicated, based on the cockpit voice recording, that one pilot asked the other why he cut off fuel. The second pilot responded that he had not. 'We are formally demanding the immediate release of the Cockpit Voice Recorder and Flight Data Recorder – the black box,' said Imtiaz Ali Sayed, a family member of several victims. 'These devices contain vital information that can reveal the truth behind this horrific tragedy,' he said in a media statement. Sayed, whose younger brother, his wife and their two children were killed in the crash, said he was speaking on behalf of 60 families 'who share the same pain and unanswered questions'. 'Every day without answers deepens the pain of our loss and erodes public trust in aviation safety,' he said. Some of the families are exploring legal action against Air India and Boeing, the plane's US manufacturer, their lawyer said. Mike Andrews of the US-based Beasley Allen Law Firm, representing 65 families from India and Britain, met relatives in Vadodara city, south of Ahmedabad, on Friday after visiting the crash site. 'Suppose the flight data recorder and cockpit voice recorder indicate that there is a defect with the aircraft... in that case, the options are to bring a defective product or a product liability claim in the United States for those claims,' he told reporters. — AFP

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store